Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2703-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2703-2022
Technical note
 | 
01 Mar 2022
Technical note |  | 01 Mar 2022

Technical note: Dispersion of cooking-generated aerosols from an urban street canyon

Shang Gao, Mona Kurppa, Chak K. Chan, and Keith Ngan

Related authors

Enhanced sulfate formation in mixed biomass burning and sea-salt interactions mediated by photosensitization: effects of chloride, nitrogen-containing compounds, and atmospheric aging
Rongzhi Tang, Jialiang Ma, Ruifeng Zhang, Weizhen Cui, Yuanyuan Qin, Yangxi Chu, Yiming Qin, Alexander L. Vogel, and Chak K. Chan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 425–439, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-425-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-425-2025, 2025
Short summary
Online characterization of primary and secondary emissions of particulate matter and acidic molecules from a modern fleet of city buses
Liyuan Zhou, Qianyun Liu, Christian M. Salvador, Michael Le Breton, Mattias Hallquist, Jian Zhen Yu, Chak K. Chan, and Åsa M. Hallquist
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11045–11061, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11045-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11045-2024, 2024
Short summary
Molecular fingerprints and health risks of smoke from home-use incense burning
Kai Song, Rongzhi Tang, Jingshun Zhang, Zichao Wan, Yuan Zhang, Kun Hu, Yuanzheng Gong, Daqi Lv, Sihua Lu, Yu Tan, Ruifeng Zhang, Ang Li, Shuyuan Yan, Shichao Yan, Baoming Fan, Wenfei Zhu, Chak K. Chan, Maosheng Yao, and Song Guo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13585–13595, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13585-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13585-2023, 2023
Short summary
Distinct photochemistry in glycine particles mixed with different atmospheric nitrate salts
Zhancong Liang, Zhihao Cheng, Ruifeng Zhang, Yiming Qin, and Chak K. Chan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9585–9595, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9585-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9585-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simultaneous formation of sulfate and nitrate via co-uptake of SO2 and NO2 by aqueous NaCl droplets: combined effect of nitrate photolysis and chlorine chemistry
Ruifeng Zhang and Chak Keung Chan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6113–6126, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Gaps in our understanding of ice-nucleating particle sources exposed by global simulation of the UK Earth System Model
Ross J. Herbert, Alberto Sanchez-Marroquin, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Kirsty J. Pringle, Stephen R. Arnold, Benjamin J. Murray, and Kenneth S. Carslaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 291–325, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-291-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-291-2025, 2025
Short summary
The role of interfacial tension in the size-dependent phase separation of atmospheric aerosol particles
Ryan Schmedding and Andreas Zuend
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 327–346, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-327-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-327-2025, 2025
Short summary
Warming effects of reduced sulfur emissions from shipping
Masaru Yoshioka, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Ben B. B. Booth, Colin P. Morice, and Ken S. Carslaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13681–13692, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13681-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13681-2024, 2024
Short summary
The key role of atmospheric absorption in the Asian summer monsoon response to dust emissions in CMIP6 models
Alcide Zhao, Laura J. Wilcox, and Claire L. Ryder
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13385–13402, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13385-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13385-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-model effective radiative forcing of the 2020 sulfur cap for shipping
Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Rachael Byrom, Øivind Hodnebrog, Caroline Jouan, and Gunnar Myhre
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13361–13370, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13361-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13361-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, A. S., Toon, O. B., and Hobbs, P. V.: Numerical modeling of ship tracks produced by injections of cloud condensation nuclei into marine stratiform clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 7121–7133, 1995. a
Baik, J.-J., Kang, Y.-S., and Kim, J.-J.: Modeling reactive pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon, Atmos. Environ., 41, 934–949, 2007. a
Brown, M. J., Lawson, R. E., DeCroix, D. S., and Lee, R.: Comparison of centerline velocity measurements obtained around 2D and 3D building arrays in a wind tunnel, Int. Soc. Environ. Hydraulics, Tempe, AZ, 5, https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc716934/ (last access: 20 February 2022), 2001. a, b
Chang, J. C. and Hanna, S. R.: Air quality model performance evaluation, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 87, 167–196, 2004. a
Cui, Z., Cai, X., and J. Baker, C.: Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in a street canyon, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 1373–1394, 2004. a
Download
Short summary
The contribution of cooking emissions to organic aerosols may exceed that of motor vehicles. However, little is known about how cooking-generated aerosols evolve in the outdoor environment. In this paper, we present a numerical study of the dispersion of cooking emissions. For plausible choices of the emission strength, cooking can yield much higher concentrations than traffic. This has important implications for public health and city planning.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint