Articles | Volume 19, issue 3
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1985–2000, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1985-2019
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1985–2000, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1985-2019
Research article
14 Feb 2019
Research article | 14 Feb 2019

Evaluating solar radiation forecast uncertainty

Minttu Tuononen et al.

Related authors

Boundary-layer height and surface stability at Hyytiälä, Finland, in ERA5 and observations
Victoria Anne Sinclair, Jenna Ritvanen, Gabin Urbancic, Irina Statnaia, Yurii Batrak, Dmitri Moisseev, and Mona Kurppa
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3075–3103, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3075-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3075-2022, 2022
Short summary
Quantifying the coastal urban surface layer structure using distributed temperature sensing in Helsinki, Finland
Sasu Karttunen, Ewan O'Connor, Olli Peltola, and Leena Järvi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2417–2432, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2417-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2417-2022, 2022
Short summary
Atmospheric boundary layer height from ground-based remote sensing: a review of capabilities and limitations
Simone Kotthaus, Juan Antonio Bravo-Aranda, Martine Collaud Coen, Juan Luis Guerrero-Rascado, Maria João Costa, Domenico Cimini, Ewan J. O’Connor, Maxime Hervo, Lucas Alados-Arboledas, María Jiménez-Portaz, Lucia Mona, Dominique Ruffieux, Anthony Illingworth, and Martial Haeffelin
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-14,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-14, 2022
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
Aerosol particle characteristics measured in the United Arab Emirates and their response to mixing in the boundary layer
Jutta Kesti, John Backman, Ewan J. O'Connor, Anne Hirsikko, Eija Asmi, Minna Aurela, Ulla Makkonen, Maria Filioglou, Mika Komppula, Hannele Korhonen, and Heikki Lihavainen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 481–503, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-481-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-481-2022, 2022
Short summary
Evaluation of convective boundary layer height estimates using radars operating at different frequency bands
Anna Franck, Dmitri Moisseev, Ville Vakkari, Matti Leskinen, Janne Lampilahti, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Ewan O'Connor
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7341–7353, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7341-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7341-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Remote Sensing | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Stability-dependent increases in liquid water with droplet number in the Arctic
Rebecca J. Murray-Watson and Edward Gryspeerdt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5743–5756, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5743-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5743-2022, 2022
Short summary
Lightning activity in northern Europe during a stormy winter: disruptions of weather patterns originating in global climate phenomena
Ivana Kolmašová, Ondřej Santolík, and Kateřina Rosická
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3379–3389, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3379-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3379-2022, 2022
Short summary
A climatology of open and closed mesoscale cellular convection over the Southern Ocean derived from Himawari-8 observations
Francisco Lang, Luis Ackermann, Yi Huang, Son C. H. Truong, Steven T. Siems, and Michael J. Manton
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2135–2152, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2135-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2135-2022, 2022
Short summary
New insights on the prevalence of drizzle in marine stratocumulus clouds based on a machine learning algorithm applied to radar Doppler spectra
Zeen Zhu, Pavlos Kollias, Edward Luke, and Fan Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-1102,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-1102, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Methodology to determine the coupling of continental clouds with surface and boundary layer height under cloudy conditions from lidar and meteorological data
Tianning Su, Youtong Zheng, and Zhanqing Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1453–1466, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1453-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1453-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahlgrimm, M. and Forbes, R.: The impact of low clouds on surface shortwave radiation in the ECMWF model, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 3783–3794, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00316.1, 2012. a, b, c, d
Barrett, A. I., Hogan, R. J., and Forbes, R. M.: Why are mixed-phase altocumulus clouds poorly predicted by large-scale models? Part 1. Physical processes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 9903–9926, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026321, 2017. a
Boilley, A. and Wald, L.: Comparison between meteorological re-analyses from ERA-Interim and MERRA and measurements of daily solar irradiation at surface, Renew. Energ., 75, 135–143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.042, 2015. a
Bozzo, A., Remy, S., Benedetti, A., Flemming, J., Bechtold, P., Rodwell, M., and Morcrette, J.-J.: Implementation of a CAMS-based aerosol climatology in the IFS, ECMWF, Technical Memorandum, 801, https://doi.org/10.21957/84ya94mls, 2017. a
Forbes, R. M. and Ahlgrimm, M.: On the representation of high-latitude boundary layer mixed-phase cloud in the ECMWF global model, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 3425–3445, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00325.1, 2014. a, b
Download
Short summary
Many applications require accurate forecasts of the amount of solar radiation reaching the surface, such as solar energy and UV radiation forecasts. This also means that cloud must be correctly forecast. We investigated the skill of these forecasts over Helsinki, Finland, using cloud and solar radiation observations. We found that there were errors in the model radiation forecast even when the clouds were correctly forecast, which we attribute to incorrect representation of the cloud properties.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint