Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-599-2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-599-2011
20 Jan 2011
 | 20 Jan 2011

Attribution of observed changes in stratospheric ozone and temperature

N. P. Gillett, H. Akiyoshi, S. Bekki, P. Braesicke, V. Eyring, R. Garcia, A. Yu. Karpechko, C. A. McLinden, O. Morgenstern, D. A. Plummer, J. A. Pyle, E. Rozanov, J. Scinocca, and K. Shibata

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Driving mechanisms for the El Niño–Southern Oscillation impact on stratospheric ozone
Samuel Benito-Barca, Natalia Calvo, and Marta Abalos
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15729–15745, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15729-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15729-2022, 2022
Short summary
Very Long Period Oscillations in the Atmosphere (0–110 km), Part 2: Latitude/longitude comparisons and trends
Dirk Offermann, Christoph Kalicinsky, Ralf Koppmann, and Johannes Wintel
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-677,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-677, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Exploring the link between austral stratospheric polar vortex anomalies and surface climate in chemistry-climate models
Nora Bergner, Marina Friedel, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Darryn Waugh, and Gabriel Chiodo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13915–13934, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13915-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13915-2022, 2022
Short summary
The impact of improved spatial and temporal resolution of reanalysis data on Lagrangian studies of the tropical tropopause layer
Stephen Bourguet and Marianna Linz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13325–13339, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13325-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13325-2022, 2022
Short summary
Dynamics of ENSO-driven stratosphere-to-troposphere transport of ozone over North America
John R. Albers, Amy H. Butler, Andrew O. Langford, Dillon Elsbury, and Melissa L. Breeden
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13035–13048, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Akiyoshi, H., Zhou, L. B., Yamashita, Y., Sakamoto, K., Yoshiki, M., Nagashima, T., Takahashi, M., Kurokawa, J., Takigawa, M., and Imamura, T.: A CCM simulation of the breakup of the Antarctic polar vortex in the years 1980–2004 under the CCMVal scenarios, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D03103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009261, 2009.
Allen, M. R. and Stott, P. A.: Estimating signal amplitudes in optimal fingerprinting, Part I: Theory, Clim. Dynam., 21, 477–491, 2003.
Allen, M. R. and Tett, S. F. B.: Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting, Clim. Dynam., 15, 419–434, 1999.
Allen, D. R., Bevilacqua, R. M., Nedoluha, G. E., Randall, C. E., and Manney, G. L.: Unusual stratospheric transport and mixing during the 2002 Antarctic winter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1599, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017117, 2003.
Cordero, E. C. and Forster, P. M. de F.: Stratospheric variability and trends in models used for the IPCC AR4, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5369–5380, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5369-2006, 2006.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint