Articles | Volume 16, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9399-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9399-2016
Research article
 | 
28 Jul 2016
Research article |  | 28 Jul 2016

Adjusting particle-size distributions to account for aggregation in tephra-deposit model forecasts

Larry G. Mastin, Alexa R. Van Eaton, and Adam J. Durant

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Cloud water adjustments to aerosol perturbations are buffered by solar heating in non-precipitating marine stratocumuli
Jianhao Zhang, Yao-Sheng Chen, Takanobu Yamaguchi, and Graham Feingold
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10425–10440, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10425-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10425-2024, 2024
Short summary
Glaciation of mixed-phase clouds: insights from bulk model and bin-microphysics large-eddy simulation informed by laboratory experiment
Aaron Wang, Steve Krueger, Sisi Chen, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, Will Cantrell, and Raymond A. Shaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10245–10260, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10245-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10245-2024, 2024
Short summary
Microphysical processes involving the vapour phase dominate in simulated low-level Arctic clouds
Theresa Kiszler, Davide Ori, and Vera Schemann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10039–10053, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10039-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10039-2024, 2024
Short summary
Understanding aerosol–cloud interactions using a single-column model for a cold-air outbreak case during the ACTIVATE campaign
Shuaiqi Tang, Hailong Wang, Xiang-Yu Li, Jingyi Chen, Armin Sorooshian, Xubin Zeng, Ewan Crosbie, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Luke D. Ziemba, and Christiane Voigt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10073–10092, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10073-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10073-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the sensitivity of aerosol–cloud interactions to changes in sea surface temperature in radiative–convective equilibrium
Suf Lorian and Guy Dagan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9323–9338, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9323-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9323-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Armienti, P., Macedonio, G., and Pareschi, M. T.: A numerical model for simulation of tephra transport and deposition: Applications to May 18, 1980, Mount St. Helens eruption, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 6463–6476, 1988.
Barsotti, S., Neri, A., Bertagnini, A., Cioni, R., Mulas, M., and Mundula, F.: Dynamics and tephra dispersal of Violent Strombolian eruptions at Vesuvius: insights from field data, wind reconstruction and numerical simulation of the 1906 event, Bull. Volcanol., 77, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0939-6, 2015.
Biass, S., Scaini, C., Bonadonna, C., Folch, A., Smith, K., and Höskuldsson, A.: A multi-scale risk assessment for tephra fallout and airborne concentration from multiple Icelandic volcanoes – Part 1: Hazard assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2265–2287, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2265-2014, 2014.
Bonadonna, C. and Costa, A.: Estimating the volume of tephra deposits: A new simple strategy, Geology, 40, 415–418, https://doi.org/10.1130/g32769.1, 2012.
Bonadonna, C. and Houghton, B. F.: Total grain-size distribution and volume of tephra-fall deposits, Bull. Volcanol., 67, 441–456, 2005.
Download
Short summary
During volcanic eruptions, fine ash settles out of the atmosphere to form deposits. Particle aggregation makes it difficult for models to calculate where fine ash will fall. In this study we show that the Ash3d dispersion model can accurately predict where fine ash will land if one assumes a Gaussian size distribution of aggregates, ~ 0.18–0.23 mm in diameter and 600 kg m−3 in density. This aggregation scheme has optimally reproduced deposits for four well-documented eruptions.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint