Articles | Volume 24, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3163-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3163-2024
Research article
 | 
13 Mar 2024
Research article |  | 13 Mar 2024

A machine learning approach to downscale EMEP4UK: analysis of UK ozone variability and trends

Lily Gouldsbrough, Ryan Hossaini, Emma Eastoe, Paul J. Young, and Massimo Vieno

Related authors

Opinion: The role of AerChemMIP in advancing climate and air quality research
Paul T. Griffiths, Laura J. Wilcox, Robert J. Allen, Vaishali Naik, Fiona M. O'Connor, Michael Prather, Alex Archibald, Florence Brown, Makoto Deushi, William Collins, Stephanie Fiedler, Naga Oshima, Lee T. Murray, Bjørn H. Samset, Chris Smith, Steven Turnock, Duncan Watson-Parris, and Paul J. Young
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8289–8328, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8289-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8289-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluating tropospheric nitrogen dioxide in UKCA using OMI satellite retrievals over south and east Asia
Alok K. Pandey, David S. Stevenson, Alcide Zhao, Richard J. Pope, Ryan Hossaini, Krishan Kumar, and Martyn P. Chipperfield
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4785–4802, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4785-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4785-2025, 2025
Short summary
On the atmospheric budget of 1,2-dichloroethane and its impact on stratospheric chlorine and ozone (2002–2020)
Ryan Hossaini, David Sherry, Zihao Wang, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Wuhu Feng, David E. Oram, Karina E. Adcock, Stephen A. Montzka, Isobel J. Simpson, Andrea Mazzeo, Amber A. Leeson, Elliot Atlas, and Charles C.-K. Chou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13457–13475, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13457-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13457-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation and evaluation of updated photolysis rates in the EMEP MSC-W chemistry-transport model using Cloud-J v7.3e
Willem E. van Caspel, David Simpson, Jan Eiof Jonson, Anna M. K. Benedictow, Yao Ge, Alcide di Sarra, Giandomenico Pace, Massimo Vieno, Hannah L. Walker, and Mathew R. Heal
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7433–7459, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7433-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7433-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simulating impacts on UK air quality from net-zero forest planting scenarios
Gemma Purser, Mathew R. Heal, Edward J. Carnell, Stephen Bathgate, Julia Drewer, James I. L. Morison, and Massimo Vieno
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13713–13733, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13713-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13713-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Machine Learning | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
High-resolution greenhouse gas flux inversions using a machine learning surrogate model for atmospheric transport
Nikhil Dadheech, Tai-Long He, and Alexander J. Turner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5159–5174, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5159-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5159-2025, 2025
Short summary
Implications of VOC Oxidation in Atmospheric Chemistry: Development of a Comprehensive AI Model for Predicting Reaction Rate Constants
Xin Zhang, Jiaqi Luo, Wenxiao Pan, Qiao Xue, Xian Liu, Jianjie Fu, Aiqian Zhang, and Guibin Jiang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1241,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1241, 2025
Short summary
Multi-Machine Learning Approaches to Modeling Small-Scale Source Attribution of Ozone Formation
Zheng Xiao, Yifeng Lu, and Guangli Xiu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-160,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-160, 2025
Short summary
Technical note: Towards atmospheric compound identification in chemical ionization mass spectrometry with pesticide standards and machine learning
Federica Bortolussi, Hilda Sandström, Fariba Partovi, Joona Mikkilä, Patrick Rinke, and Matti Rissanen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 685–704, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-685-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-685-2025, 2025
Short summary
Identifying Drivers of Surface Ozone Bias in Global Chemical Reanalysis with Explainable Machine Learning
Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Yuliya Marchetti, James Montgomery, Steven Lu, and Kevin Bowman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3753,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3753, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Alkuwari, F. A., Guillas, S., and Wang, Y.: Statistical downscaling of an air quality model using Fitted Empirical Orthogonal Functions, Atmos. Environ., 81, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.031, 2013. 
AQEG: Ozone in the UK – Recent Trends and Future Projections, 2021. 
Bergstra, J., Yamins, D., and Cox, D. D.: Making a Science of Model Search: Hyperparameter Optimization in Hundreds of Dimensions for Vision Architectures. Presented at the Proceedings of the 30 th International Conference on Machine Learning, JMLR: W&CP, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, p. 9, 2013. 
Betancourt, C., Stomberg, T. T., Edrich, A.-K., Patnala, A., Schultz, M. G., Roscher, R., Kowalski, J., and Stadtler, S.: Global, high-resolution mapping of tropospheric ozone – explainable machine learning and impact of uncertainties, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4331–4354, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4331-2022, 2022. 
Download
Short summary
High-resolution spatial fields of surface ozone are used to understand spikes in ozone concentration and predict their impact on public health. Such fields are routinely output from complex mathematical models for atmospheric conditions. These outputs are on a coarse spatial resolution and the highest concentrations tend to be biased. Using a novel data-driven machine learning methodology, we show how such output can be corrected to produce fields with both lower bias and higher resolution.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint