Articles | Volume 23, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1103-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1103-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Examination of aerosol indirect effects during cirrus cloud evolution
Flor Vanessa Maciel
Department of Meteorology and Climate Science, San José State
University, San José, 95192, USA
Current address: Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of
California, Los Angeles, 90095, USA
Department of Meteorology and Climate Science, San José State
University, San José, 95192, USA
Ryan Patnaude
Department of Meteorology and Climate Science, San José State
University, San José, 95192, USA
Current address: Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort
Collins, 80521, USA
Related authors
Flor Vanessa Maciel, Minghui Diao, and Ching An Yang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4843–4861, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4843-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4843-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The partition between supercooled liquid water and ice crystals in mixed-phase clouds is investigated using aircraft-based in situ observations over the Southern Ocean. A novel method is developed to define four phases of mixed-phase clouds. Relationships between cloud macrophysical and microphysical properties are quantified. Effects of aerosols and thermodynamic and dynamical conditions on ice nucleation and phase partitioning are examined.
Samuel Ephraim, Paquita Zuidema, Aaron Bansemer, Lintong Cai, Markus Petters, Elise Rosky, Jefferson R. Snider, Zhien Wang, Sarah Woods, Kevin Barry, Theresa Campos, Owen Cruikshank, Sabine Eckhardt, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Romanos Foskinis, Jeffrey R. French, Bart Geerts, Coltin Grasmick, Silvia Henning, Varun Kumar, Andreas Massling, Camille Mavis, Greg M. McFarquhar, Athanasios Nenes, Gunnar Noer, Ryan Patnaude, Russell Perkins, Lise Lotte Sorensen, Henrik Skov, Tyler Tatro, Florian Tornow, and Lu Zhang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2940, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2940, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
The processes that establish how mixed-phase closed-cell clouds transition to more open cellular structures are poorly known. First-of-its kind aircraft observations document such a transition in the presence of anomalously high aerosol concentrations over the Nordic Seas at cloud temperatures < -15 °C. The reduces the drop size, discouraging riming. Eventually, ice precipitation produces surface cold pools that drive the convective transition, despite strong counteracting surface fluxes.
Derek Ngo, Minghui Diao, Ryan J. Patnaude, Sarah Woods, and Glenn Diskin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7007–7036, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7007-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7007-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Key controlling factors of cirrus clouds were individually quantified using machine learning models based on global-scale in situ observations from 12 campaigns at 67° S–87° N. Relative humidity shows much larger effects on cirrus occurrences and ice water content (IWC) fluctuations than vertical velocity. Aerosol–cloud interactions are seen for both large and small aerosols, with higher IWC and ice crystal number concentration under higher aerosol concentrations. Large aerosols are more impactful than small aerosols.
Flor Vanessa Maciel, Minghui Diao, and Ching An Yang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4843–4861, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4843-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4843-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The partition between supercooled liquid water and ice crystals in mixed-phase clouds is investigated using aircraft-based in situ observations over the Southern Ocean. A novel method is developed to define four phases of mixed-phase clouds. Relationships between cloud macrophysical and microphysical properties are quantified. Effects of aerosols and thermodynamic and dynamical conditions on ice nucleation and phase partitioning are examined.
Ryan J. Patnaude, Kathryn A. Moore, Russell J. Perkins, Thomas C. J. Hill, Paul J. DeMott, and Sonia M. Kreidenweis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 911–928, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-911-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-911-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we examined the effect of atmospheric aging on sea spray aerosols (SSAs) to form ice and how newly formed secondary marine aerosols (SMAs) may freeze at cirrus temperatures (< −38 °C). Results show that SSAs freeze at different relative humidities (RHs) depending on the temperature and that the ice-nucleating ability of SSA was not hindered by atmospheric aging. SMAs are shown to freeze at high RHs and are likely inefficient at forming ice at cirrus temperatures.
Rachel Atlas, Johannes Mohrmann, Joseph Finlon, Jeremy Lu, Ian Hsiao, Robert Wood, and Minghui Diao
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7079–7101, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7079-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7079-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Many clouds with temperatures between 0 °C and −40 °C contain both liquid and ice particles, and the ratio of liquid to ice particles influences how the clouds interact with radiation and moderate Earth's climate. We use a machine learning method called random forest to classify images of individual cloud particles as either liquid or ice. We apply our algorithm to images captured by aircraft within clouds overlying the Southern Ocean, and we find that it outperforms two existing algorithms.
Cited articles
Barth, M. C., Cantrell, C. A., Brune, W. H., Rutledge, S. A., Crawford, et
al.: The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign, Bull.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1281–1309,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1, 2015.
Bogenschutz, P. A., Gettelman, A., Morrison, H., Larson, V. E., Craig, C.,
and Schanen, D. P.: Higher-order turbulence closure and its impact on
climate simulations in the community atmosphere model, J. Climate, 26,
9655–9676, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00075.1, 2013.
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh,
S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X.-Y.: IPCC AR5 Clouds and
Aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution
of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M.,
Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., 571–658 pp., 2013.
Bruce, A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science,
245, 1227–1230, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227,
1989.
Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M.
A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the Dominant
Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 340,
1320–1324, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234145, 2013.
Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Beaton, S. P., and Rogers, D.
C.: Evolution of ice crystal regions on the microscale based on in situ
observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3473–3478,
https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50665, 2013.
Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Avallone, L. M., Paige, M. E., Beaton, S. P., Campos, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Cloud-scale ice-supersaturated regions spatially correlate with high water vapor heterogeneities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2639–2656, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2639-2014, 2014a.
Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Heymsfield, A. J., and Beaton, S. P.: Hemispheric
comparison of cirrus cloud evolution using in situ measurements in HIAPER
Pole-to-Pole Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4090–4099,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059873, 2014b.
Eidhammer, T., Morrison, H., Bansemer, A., Gettelman, A., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Comparison of ice cloud properties simulated by the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5) with in-situ observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10103–10118, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10103-2014, 2014.
Fan, J., Wang, Y., Rosenfeld, D., and Liu, X.: Review of Aerosol–Cloud
Interactions: Mechanisms, Significance, and Challenges, J. Atmos. Sci., 73,
4221–4252, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0037.1, 2016.
Fu, Q. and Liou, K.-N.: Parameterization of the Radiative Properties of
Cirrus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2008–2025,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2008:POTRPO>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.:
The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version
2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017.
Gayet, J.-F., Ovarlez, J., Shcherbakov, V., Ström, J., Schumann, U.,
Minikin, A., Auriol, F., Petzold, A., and Monier, M.: Cirrus cloud
microphysical and optical properties at southern and northern midlatitudes
during the INCA experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D20206,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004803, 2004.
Gettelman, A. and Morrison, H.: Advanced two-moment bulk microphysics for
global models. Part I: Off-line tests and comparison with other schemes, J.
Climate, 28, 1268–1287, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00102.1, 2015.
Gettelman, A., Fetzer, E. J., Eldering, A., and Irion, F. W.: The Global
Distribution of Supersaturation in the Upper Troposphere from the
Atmospheric Infrared Sounder, J. Clim., 19, 6089–6103,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3955.1, 2006.
Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., Morrison, H., Park, S., Conley, A. J.,
Klein, S. A., Boyle, J., Mitchell, D. L., and Li, J.-L. F.: Global
simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud
scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18216,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013797, 2010.
Haag, W., Kärcher, B., Ström, J., Minikin, A., Lohmann, U., Ovarlez, J., and Stohl, A.: Freezing thresholds and cirrus cloud formation mechanisms inferred from in situ measurements of relative humidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1791–1806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1791-2003, 2003.
Heymsfield, A. J., Krämer, M., Luebke, A., Brown, P., Cziczo, D. J.,
Franklin, C., Lawson, P., Lohmann, U., McFarquhar, G., Ulanowski, Z., and
Van Tricht, K.: Cirrus Clouds, Meteorol. Monogr., 58, 2.1–2.26,
https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0010.1, 2017.
Kärcher, B.: Cirrus Clouds and Their Response to Anthropogenic
Activities, Curr. Clim. Chang. Reports, 3, 45–57,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0060-3, 2017.
Kärcher, B. and Jensen, E. J.: Microscale characteristics of homogeneous
freezing events in cirrus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2027–2034,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072486, 2017.
Kärcher, B., DeMott, P. J., Jensen, E. J., and Harrington, J. Y.:
Studies on the Competition Between Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Ice
Nucleation in Cirrus Formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035805,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035805, 2022.
Krämer, M., Schiller, C., Afchine, A., Bauer, R., Gensch, I., Mangold, A., Schlicht, S., Spelten, N., Sitnikov, N., Borrmann, S., de Reus, M., and Spichtinger, P.: Ice supersaturations and cirrus cloud crystal numbers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3505–3522, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3505-2009, 2009.
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., and Avallone, L.: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3463–3483, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016, 2016.
Liou, K.-N.: Influence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A
Global Perspective, Mon. Weather Rev., 114, 1167–1199,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<1167:IOCCOW>2.0.CO;2, 1986.
Liou, K.-N.: Radiation and cloud processes in the atmosphere. Theory,
observation, and modeling, New York, NY (United States), Oxford University
Press, United States, ISBN 978-0195049107, 1992.
Liu, X. and Penner, J. E.: Ice nucleation parameterization for global
models, Meteorol. Z., 14, 499–514,
https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0059, 2005.
Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Ghan, S. J., and Wang, M.: Inclusion of Ice
Microphysics in the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model Version 3 (CAM3), J.
Clim., 20, 4526–4547, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4264.1, 2007.
Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005, 2005.
Lynch, D. K., Sassen, K., Starr, D. O., and Stephens, G.: Cirrus, Oxford
University Press, ISBN 978-0195130720, 2002.
Mace, G. G. and Wrenn, F. J.: Evaluation of the Hydrometeor Layers in the
East and West Pacific within ISCCP Cloud-Top Pressure–Optical Depth Bins
Using Merged CloudSat and CALIPSO Data, J. Clim., 26, 9429–9444,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00207.1, 2013.
McGraw, Z., Storelvmo, T., Samset, B. H., and Stjern, C. W.: Global
Radiative Impacts of Black Carbon Acting as Ice Nucleating Particles,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089056,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089056, 2020.
Montgomery, M. T., Davis, C., Dunkerton, T., Wang, Z., Velden, C., Torn, R.,
Majumdar, S. J., Zhang, F., Smith, R. K., Bosart, L., Bell, M. M., Haase, J.
S., Heymsfield, A., Jensen, J., Campos, T., and Boothe, M. A.: The
Pre-Depression Investigation of Cloud-Systems in the Tropics (PREDICT)
Experiment: Scientific Basis, New Analysis Tools, and Some First Results,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 153–172,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00046.1, 2012.
Morrison, H. and Pinto, J. O.: Mesoscale modeling of springtime Arctic
mixed-phase stratiform clouds using a new two-moment bulk microphysics
scheme, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3683–3794, 2005.
Murphy, D. M. and Koop, T.: Review of the vapour pressures of ice and
supercooled water for atmospheric applications, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc.,
131, 1539–1565, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.94, 2005.
NASA ESPO data archive: NASA ATTREX flight campaign data archive, NASA [data set], https://espoarchive.nasa.gov/archive/browse/attrex (last access: 20 December 2022), 2011a.
NASA ESPO data archive: NASA MACPEX flight campaign data archive, NASA [data set], https://espoarchive.nasa.gov/archive/browse/macpex (last access: 20 December 2022), 2011b.
NASA ESPO data archive: NASA POSIDON flight campaign data archive, NASA [data set], https://espoarchive.nasa.gov/archive/browse/posidon (last access: 20 December 2022), 2016.
NASA LaRC Airborne Science Data for Atmospheric Composition: NASA DC3 flight campaign data archive, NASA [data set], https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/dc3 (last access: 20 December 2022), 2012.
NASA LaRC Airborne Science Data for Atmospheric Composition: NASA SEAC4RS flight campaign data archive, NASA [data set], https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/seac4rs (last access: 20 December 2022), 2013.
O'Shea, S. J., Choularton, T. W., Lloyd, G., Crosier, J., Bower, K. N.,
Gallagher, M., Abel, S. J., Cotton, R. J., Brown, P. R. A., Fugal, J. P.,
Schlenczek, O., Borrmann, S., and Pickering, J. C.: Airborne observations of
the microphysical structure of two contrasting cirrus clouds, J. Geophys.
Res. Atmos., 121, 13510–13536,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025278, 2016.
Ovarlez, J., Gayet, J.-F., Gierens, K., Ström, J., Ovarlez, H., Auriol,
F., Busen, R., and Schumann, U.: Water vapour measurements inside cirrus
clouds in Northern and Southern hemispheres during INCA, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 29, 60–64, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014440,
2002.
Pan, L. L., Bowman, K. P., Atlas, E. L., Wofsy, S. C., Zhang, F., Bresch, J.
F., Ridley, B. A., Pittman, J. V, Homeyer, C. R., Romashkin, P., and Cooper,
W. A.: The Stratosphere–Troposphere Analyses of Regional Transport 2008
Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 327–342,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2865.1, 2010.
Pan, L. L., Atlas, E. L., Salawitch, R. J., Honomichl, S. B., Bresch, J. F.,
Randel, W. J., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Weinheimer, A. J., Anderson,
D. C., Andrews, S. J., Baidar, S., Beaton, S. P., Campos, T. L., Carpenter,
L. J., Chen, D., Dix, B., Donets, V., Hall, S. R., Hanisco, T. F., Homeyer,
C. R., Huey, L. G., Jensen, J. B., Kaser, L., Kinnison, D. E., Koenig, T.
K., Lamarque, J.-F., Liu, C., Luo, J., Luo, Z. J., Montzka, D. D., Nicely,
J. M., Pierce, R. B., Riemer, D. D., Robinson, T., Romashkin, P.,
Saiz-Lopez, A., Schauffler, S., Shieh, O., Stell, M. H., Ullmann, K.,
Vaughan, G., Volkamer, R., and Wolfe, G.: The Convective Transport of Active
Species in the Tropics (CONTRAST) Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98,
106–128, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00272.1, 2017.
Park, S. and Bretherton, C. S.: The University of Washington Shallow
Convection and Moist Turbulence Schemes and Their Impact on Climate
Simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Clim., 22, 3449–3469,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2557.1, 2009.
Patnaude, R. and Diao, M.: Aerosol Indirect Effects on Cirrus Clouds Based
on Global Aircraft Observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086550,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086550, 2020.
Patnaude, R., Diao, M., Liu, X., and Chu, S.: Effects of thermodynamics, dynamics and aerosols on cirrus clouds based on in situ observations and NCAR CAM6, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1835–1859, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1835-2021, 2021.
Patnaude, R., Maciel, F. V., and Diao, M.: NSF CAM Simulations, Mendeley Data [code], V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/99hdjty6sb.1, 2023a.
Patnaude, R., Maciel, F. V., and Diao, M.: NASA CAM Simulations, Mendeley Data [code], V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/fjw3zw2p6g.1, 2023b.
Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D.: Microphysics of Clouds and
Precipitation, 2nd ed., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 954 pp.,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48100-0, 2010.
Sassen, K., Wang, Z., and Liu, D.: Global distribution of cirrus clouds from
CloudSat/Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations
(CALIPSO) measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00A12,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009972, 2008.
Shi, X., Liu, X., and Zhang, K.: Effects of pre-existing ice crystals on cirrus clouds and comparison between different ice nucleation parameterizations with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1503–1520, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1503-2015, 2015.
Spichtinger, P. and Gierens, K. M.: Modelling of cirrus clouds – Part 2: Competition of different nucleation mechanisms, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2319–2334, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2319-2009, 2009.
Stephens, B. B., Long, M. C., Keeling, R. F., Kort, E. A., Sweeney, C.,
Apel, E. C., Atlas, E. L., Beaton, S., Bent, J. D., Blake, N. J., Bresch, J.
F., Casey, J., Daube, B. C., Diao, M., Diaz, E., Dierssen, H., Donets, V.,
Gao, B.-C., Gierach, M., Green, R., Haag, J., Hayman, M., Hills, A. J.,
Hoecker-Martínez, M. S., Honomichl, S. B., Hornbrook, R. S., Jensen, J.
B., Li, R.-R., McCubbin, I., McKain, K., Morgan, E. J., Nolte, S., Powers,
J. G., Rainwater, B., Randolph, K., Reeves, M., Schauffler, S. M., Smith,
K., Smith, M., Stith, J., Stossmeister, G., Toohey, D. W., and Watt, A. S.:
The O N2 Ratio and CO2 Airborne Southern Ocean Study, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 99, 381–402, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0206.1, 2018.
Twomey, S.: The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds, J.
Atmos. Sci., 34, 1149–1152,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1149:TIOPOT>2.0.CO;2, 1977.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data (NetCDF), Version 3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6BC3WKB, 2018a.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version 1.2, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6TX3CK0, 2018b.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version 1.1, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D65T3HWR, 2018c.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version 2.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6NZ85Z4, 2019a.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version 5.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6JW8C64, 2019b.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version 5.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6QF8R6R, 2019c.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version 3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6V40SK6, 2019d.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version 3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6CZ35HX, 2019e.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version 2.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D61R6NV5, 2019f.
UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory: Low Rate (LRT – 1 sps) Navigation, State Parameter, and Microphysics Flight-Level Data, Version 3.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6668BHR, 2019g.
Volkamer, R., Baidar, S., Campos, T. L., Coburn, S., DiGangi, J. P., Dix, B., Eloranta, E. W., Koenig, T. K., Morley, B., Ortega, I., Pierce, B. R., Reeves, M., Sinreich, R., Wang, S., Zondlo, M. A., and Romashkin, P. A.: Aircraft measurements of BrO, IO, glyoxal, NO2, H2O, O2–O2 and aerosol extinction profiles in the tropics: comparison with aircraft-/ship-based in situ and lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2121–2148, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2121-2015, 2015.
Wofsy, S. C.: HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO): fine-grained,
global-scale measurements of climatically important atmospheric gases and
aerosols, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 369, 2073–2086,
2011.
Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the
parameterization of cumulus convection in the canadian climate centre
general circulation model, Atmos.-Ocean, 33, 407–446,
https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1995.9649539, 1995.
Zhao, B., Wang, Y., Gu, Y., Liou, K.-N., Jiang, J. H., Fan, J., Liu, X.,
Huang, L., and Yung, Y. L.: Ice nucleation by aerosols from anthropogenic
pollution, Nat. Geosci., 12, 602–607,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0389-4, 2019.
Zondlo, M. A., Paige, M. E., Massick, S. M., and Silver, J. A.: Vertical
cavity laser hygrometer for the National Science Foundation Gulfstream-V
aircraft, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D20309,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014445, 2010.
Short summary
Aerosol indirect effects on cirrus clouds are investigated during cirrus evolution, using global-scale in situ observations and climate model simulations. As cirrus evolves, the mechanisms to form ice crystals also change with time. Both small and large aerosols are found to affect cirrus properties. Southern Hemisphere cirrus appears to be more sensitive to additional aerosols. The climate model underestimates ice crystal mass, likely due to biases of relative humidity and vertical velocity.
Aerosol indirect effects on cirrus clouds are investigated during cirrus evolution, using...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint