Articles | Volume 13, issue 6
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2975–2988, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2975-2013

Special issue: Chemistry, microphysics and dynamics of the polar stratosphere:...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2975–2988, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2975-2013
Research article
15 Mar 2013
Research article | 15 Mar 2013

An assessment of CALIOP polar stratospheric cloud composition classification

M. C. Pitts et al.

Related authors

The CALIPSO version 4.5 stratospheric aerosol subtyping algorithm
Jason L. Tackett, Jayanta Kar, Mark A. Vaughan, Brian J. Getzewich, Man-Hae Kim, Jean-Paul Vernier, Ali H. Omar, Brian E. Magill, Michael C. Pitts, and David M. Winker
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-289,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-289, 2022
Preprint under review for AMT
Short summary
Quasi-coincident observations of polar stratospheric clouds by ground-based lidar and CALIOP at Concordia (Dome C, Antarctica) from 2014 to 2018
Marcel Snels, Francesco Colao, Francesco Cairo, Ilir Shuli, Andrea Scoccione, Mauro De Muro, Michael Pitts, Lamont Poole, and Luca Di Liberto
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2165–2178, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2165-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2165-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluation of polar stratospheric clouds in the global chemistry–climate model SOCOLv3.1 by comparison with CALIPSO spaceborne lidar measurements
Michael Steiner, Beiping Luo, Thomas Peter, Michael C. Pitts, and Andrea Stenke
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 935–959, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-935-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-935-2021, 2021
Short summary
On the best locations for ground-based polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) observations
Matthias Tesche, Peggy Achtert, and Michael C. Pitts
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 505–516, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-505-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-505-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comparison of Antarctic polar stratospheric cloud observations by ground-based and space-borne lidar and relevance for chemistry–climate models
Marcel Snels, Andrea Scoccione, Luca Di Liberto, Francesco Colao, Michael Pitts, Lamont Poole, Terry Deshler, Francesco Cairo, Chiara Cagnazzo, and Federico Fierli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 955–972, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-955-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-955-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Remote Sensing | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Retrieving instantaneous extinction of aerosol undetected by the CALIPSO layer detection algorithm
Feiyue Mao, Ruixing Shi, Daniel Rosenfeld, Zengxin Pan, Lin Zang, Yannian Zhu, and Xin Lu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10589–10602, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10589-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10589-2022, 2022
Short summary
Radiative impacts of the Australian bushfires 2019–2020 – Part 1: Large-scale radiative forcing
Pasquale Sellitto, Redha Belhadji, Corinna Kloss, and Bernard Legras
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9299–9311, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9299-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9299-2022, 2022
Short summary
Australian wildfire smoke in the stratosphere: the decay phase in 2020/2021 and impact on ozone depletion
Kevin Ohneiser, Albert Ansmann, Bernd Kaifler, Alexandra Chudnovsky, Boris Barja, Daniel A. Knopf, Natalie Kaifler, Holger Baars, Patric Seifert, Diego Villanueva, Cristofer Jimenez, Martin Radenz, Ronny Engelmann, Igor Veselovskii, and Félix Zamorano
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7417–7442, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7417-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7417-2022, 2022
Short summary
Five-satellite-sensor study of the rapid decline of wildfire smoke in the stratosphere
Bengt G. Martinsson, Johan Friberg, Oscar S. Sandvik, and Moa K. Sporre
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3967–3984, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3967-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3967-2022, 2022
Short summary
The unexpected smoke layer in the High Arctic winter stratosphere during MOSAiC 2019–2020
Kevin Ohneiser, Albert Ansmann, Alexandra Chudnovsky, Ronny Engelmann, Christoph Ritter, Igor Veselovskii, Holger Baars, Henriette Gebauer, Hannes Griesche, Martin Radenz, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Sandro Dahlke, and Marion Maturilli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15783–15808, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Biele, J., Tsias, A., Luo, B. P., Carslaw, K. S., Neuber, R., Beyerle, G., and Peter, T.: Nonequilibrium coexistence of solid and liquid particles in Arctic stratospheric clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 22991–23007, 2001.
Cairo, F., Di Donfrancesco, G., Adriani, A., Pulvirenti, L., and Fierli, F.: Comparison of various linear depolarization parameters measured by lidar, Appl. Optics, 38, 4425–4432, 1999.
Carslaw, K. S., Luo, B. P., and Peter, T.: An analytic expression for the composition of aqueous HNO3-H2SO4 stratospheric aerosols including gas phase removal of HNO3, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1877–1880, 1995.
Dörnbrack, A., Pitts, M. C., Poole, L. R., Orsolini, Y. J., Nishii, K., and Nakamura, H.: The 2009–2010 Arctic stratospheric winter – general evolution, mountain waves and predictability of an operational weather forecast model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3659–3675, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3659-2012, 2012.
Drdla, K., Gandrud, B. W., Baumgardner, D., Wilson, J. C., Bui, T. P., Hurst, D., Schauffler, S. M., Jost, H., Greenblatt, J. B., and Webster, C. R.: Evidence for the widespread presence of liquid-phase particles during the 1999–2000 Arctic winter, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8318, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001127, 2003.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint