Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article
| 
25 Feb 2022
Review article |
| 25 Feb 2022
| 25 Feb 2022
Long-range prediction and the stratosphere
Adam A. Scaife
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Met Office Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Exeter, UK
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Mark P. Baldwin
Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Amy H. Butler
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory (CSL), Boulder, CO, USA
Andrew J. Charlton-Perez
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, Faculty of Geosciences and Environment, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Chaim I. Garfinkel
Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew
University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Steven C. Hardiman
Met Office Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Exeter, UK
Peter Haynes
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Alexey Yu Karpechko
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Eun-Pa Lim
Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia
Shunsuke Noguchi
Research Center for Environmental Modeling and Application, Japan
Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan
Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency,
Tsukuba, Japan
Judith Perlwitz
NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory (PSL), Boulder, CO, USA
Lorenzo Polvani
Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Jadwiga H. Richter
Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
John Scinocca
Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment and
Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada
Michael Sigmond
Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment and
Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada
Theodore G. Shepherd
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Seok-Woo Son
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National
University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
David W. J. Thompson
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort
Collins, CO, USA
Related authors
Lisa Degenhardt, Gregor C. Leckebusch, and Adam A. Scaife
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 587–607, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-587-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-587-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how dynamical factors that are known to influence cyclone or windstorm development and strengthening also influence the seasonal forecast skill of severe winter windstorms. This study shows which factors are well represented in the seasonal forecast model, the Global Seasonal forecasting system version 5 (GloSea5), and which might need improvement to refine the forecast of severe winter windstorms.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Larissa van der Laan, Anouk Vlug, Adam A. Scaife, Fabien Maussion, and Kristian Förster
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-387, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-387, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Usually, glacier models are supplied with climate information from long (e.g. 100 year) simulations by global climate models. In this paper, we test the feasibility of supplying glacier models with shorter simulations, to get more accurate information on 5–10 year time scales. Reliable information on these time scales is very important, especially for water management experts to know how much meltwater to expect, for rivers, agriculture and drinking water.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Matthew D. K. Priestley, David B. Stephenson, Adam A. Scaife, Daniel Bannister, Christopher J. T. Allen, and David Wilkie
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3845–3861, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3845-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3845-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This research presents a model for estimating extreme gusts associated with European windstorms. Using observed storm footprints we are able to calculate the return level of events at the 200-year return period. The largest gusts are found across NW Europe, and these are larger when the North Atlantic Oscillation is positive. Using theoretical future climate states we find that return levels are likely to increase across NW Europe to levels that are unprecedented compared to historical storms.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philip E. Bett, Adam A. Scaife, Steven C. Hardiman, Hazel E. Thornton, Xiaocen Shen, Lin Wang, and Bo Pang
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 213–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-213-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-213-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Sudden-stratospheric-warming (SSW) events can severely affect the subsequent weather at the surface. We use a large ensemble of climate model hindcasts to investigate features of the climate that make strong impacts more likely through negative NAO conditions. This allows a more robust assessment than using observations alone. Air pressure over the Arctic prior to an SSW and the zonal-mean zonal wind in the lower stratosphere have the strongest relationship with the subsequent NAO response.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Andy Jones, Jim M. Haywood, Adam A. Scaife, Olivier Boucher, Matthew Henry, Ben Kravitz, Thibaut Lurton, Pierre Nabat, Ulrike Niemeier, Roland Séférian, Simone Tilmes, and Daniele Visioni
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2999–3016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Simulations by six Earth-system models of geoengineering by introducing sulfuric acid aerosols into the tropical stratosphere are compared. A robust impact on the northern wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation is found, exacerbating precipitation reduction over parts of southern Europe. In contrast, the models show no consistency with regard to impacts on the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, although results do indicate a risk that the oscillation could become locked into a permanent westerly phase.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Seán Donegan, Conor Murphy, Shaun Harrigan, Ciaran Broderick, Dáire Foran Quinn, Saeed Golian, Jeff Knight, Tom Matthews, Christel Prudhomme, Adam A. Scaife, Nicky Stringer, and Robert L. Wilby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4159–4183, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We benchmarked the skill of ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) for a diverse sample of 46 Irish catchments. We found that ESP is skilful in the majority of catchments up to several months ahead. However, the level of skill was strongly dependent on lead time, initialisation month, and individual catchment location and storage properties. We also conditioned ESP with the winter North Atlantic Oscillation and show that improvements in forecast skill, reliability, and discrimination are possible.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Yunqian Zhu, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Valentina Aquila, Elizabeth Asher, Ewa M. Bednarz, Slimane Bekki, Christoph Brühl, Amy H. Butler, Parker Case, Simon Chabrillat, Gabriel Chiodo, Margot Clyne, Peter R. Colarco, Sandip Dhomse, Lola Falletti, Eric Fleming, Ben Johnson, Andrin Jörimann, Mahesh Kovilakam, Gerbrand Koren, Ales Kuchar, Nicolas Lebas, Qing Liang, Cheng-Cheng Liu, Graham Mann, Michael Manyin, Marion Marchand, Olaf Morgenstern, Paul Newman, Luke D. Oman, Freja F. Østerstrøm, Yifeng Peng, David Plummer, Ilaria Quaglia, William Randel, Samuel Rémy, Takashi Sekiya, Stephen Steenrod, Timofei Sukhodolov, Simone Tilmes, Kostas Tsigaridis, Rei Ueyama, Daniele Visioni, Xinyue Wang, Shingo Watanabe, Yousuke Yamashita, Pengfei Yu, Wandi Yu, Jun Zhang, and Zhihong Zhuo
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 5487–5512, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5487-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5487-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To understand the climate impact of the 2022 Hunga volcanic eruption, we developed a climate model–observation comparison project. The paper describes the protocols and models that participate in the experiments. We designed several experiments to achieve our goals of this activity: (1) to evaluate the climate model performance and (2) to understand the Earth system responses to this eruption.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Annie Y.-Y. Chang, Shaun Harrigan, Maria-Helena Ramos, Massimiliano Zappa, Christian M. Grams, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, and Konrad Bogner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3411, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3411, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a machine learning-aided hybrid forecasting framework to improve early warnings of low flows in the European Alps. It combines weather regime information, streamflow observations, and model simulations (EFAS). Even using only weather regime data improves predictions over climatology, while integrating different data sources yields the best result, emphasizing the value of integrating diverse data sources.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Ying Dai, Peter Hitchcock, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, and William J. M. Seviour
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 841–862, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-841-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-841-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using a new database of subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) forecasts, we find that with a successful forecast of the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW), S2S models can capture the European precipitation signals after the 2018 SSW several weeks in advance. The findings indicate that the stratosphere represents an important source of S2S predictability for precipitation over Europe and call for consideration of stratospheric variability in hydrological prediction at S2S timescales.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Jinbo Xie, Qi Tang, Michael Prather, Jadwiga Richter, and Shixuan Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 9315–9333, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9315-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9315-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Analysis of the interaction between the climate and ozone in the stratosphere is complicated by the inability of climate models to simulate the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) – an important climate mode in the stratosphere. We use a set of model simulations that realistically simulate QBO and a novel ozone diagnostic tool to separate temperature- and circulation-driven QBO impacts. These are important for diagnosing model–model differences in QBO–ozone responses for climate projections.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Peter Hitchcock, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zac D. Lawrence, Wuhan Ning, Philip Rupp, Zheng Wu, Hilla Afargan-Gerstman, Natalia Calvo, Álvaro de la Cámara, Martin Jucker, Gerbrand Koren, Daniel De Maeseneire, Gloria L. Manney, Marisol Osman, Masakazu Taguchi, Cory Barton, Dong-Chang Hong, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Hera Kim, Jeff Knight, Piero Malguzzi, Daniele Mastrangelo, Jiyoung Oh, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Isla R. Simpson, Seok-Woo Son, Damien Specq, and Tim Stockdale
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3611, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3611, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs) are known to follow a sustained wave dissipation in the stratosphere, which depends on both the tropospheric and stratospheric states. However, the relative role of each state is still unclear. Using a new set of subseasonal to seasonal forecasts, we show that the stratospheric state does not drastically affect the precursors of three recent SSWs, but modulates the stratospheric wave activity, with impacts depending on SSW features.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Lou Brett, Christopher J. White, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Bart van den Hurk, Philip Ward, and Jakob Zscheischler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2591–2611, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2591-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2591-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Compound events, where multiple weather or climate hazards occur together, pose significant risks to both society and the environment. These events, like simultaneous wind and rain, can have more severe impacts than single hazards. Our review of compound event research from 2012–2022 reveals a rise in studies, especially on events that occur concurrently, hot and dry events, and compounding flooding. The review also highlights opportunities for research in the coming years.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Bastien François, Khalil Teber, Lou Brett, Richard Leeding, Luis Gimeno-Sotelo, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Laura Suarez-Gutierrez, and Emanuele Bevacqua
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1029–1051, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1029-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1029-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Spatially compounding wind and precipitation (CWP) extremes can lead to severe impacts on society. We find that concurrent climate variability modes favor the occurrence of such wintertime spatially compounding events in the Northern Hemisphere and can even amplify the number of regions and population exposed. Our analysis highlights the importance of considering the interplay between variability modes to improve risk management of such spatially compounding events.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Alexey Yu. Karpechko, Amy H. Butler, and Frederic Vitart
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2556, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2556, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We study how the knowledge of future tropical and stratospheric conditions could improve forecasts in winter remotely, via teleconnections, 3–6 weeks ahead. We find that the tropics improve forecasts of sea level pressure in subtropics, Europe, and North America. The stratosphere improves forecasts in high latitudes and Europe. Improvements are small for temperature and precipitation. Larger forecast ensembles than usually available for research are needed to predict teleconnection signals.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Monika Feldmann, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, and Olivia Martius
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2296, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2296, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Severe thunderstorm outbreaks are a source of major damage across Europe. Using historical data, we analysed the large-scale weather patterns that lead to these outbreaks in eight different regions. Three types of regions emerge: those limited by temperature, limited by moisture and overall favourable for thunderstorms; consistent with their associated weather patterns and the general climate. These findings help explain regional differences and provide a basis for future forecast improvements.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Tyler P. Janoski, Ivan Mitevski, Ryan J. Kramer, Michael Previdi, and Lorenzo M. Polvani
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3065–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3065-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3065-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed ClimKern, a Python package and radiative kernel repository, to simplify calculating radiative feedbacks and make climate sensitivity studies more reproducible. Testing of ClimKern with sample climate model data reveals that radiative kernel choice may be more important than previously thought, especially in polar regions. Our work highlights the need for kernel sensitivity analyses to be included in future studies.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Ewa M. Bednarz, Amy H. Butler, Xinyue Wang, Zhihong Zhuo, Wandi Yu, Georgiy Stenchikov, Matthew Toohey, and Yunqian Zhu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1970, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1970, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Injection of sulfur and water vapour by the Hunga volcanic eruption significantly altered chemical composition and radiative budget of the stratosphere. Yet, whether the eruption could also affect surface climate, especially via indirect pathways, remains poorly understood. Here we investigate these effects using large ensembles of simulations with the CESM2(WACCM6) Earth system model.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Qian Lu, Jian Rao, Chunhua Shi, and Chaim I. Garfinkel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1123, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1123, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric water vapor has been proven to have significant climate effects as a greenhouse gas. Tropical stratospheric water vapor exhibits a clear imprint of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO). This study compares the water vapor variations associated with the QBO between boreal winter and summer, and the seasonal difference in the water vapor QBO signals is revealed.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Wolfgang Wicker, Emmanuele Russo, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1197, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1197, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Heatwaves are becoming more frequent, but the contribution by atmospheric circulation changes is unclear. Experiments with an idealized model that simulates atmospheric dynamics, but excludes clouds, radiation, and moisture, show how a poleward storm track shift increases the eastward phase speed of Rossby waves and reduces mid-latitude heatwave frequency. New evidence suggests that this mechanism is already active in the Southern Hemisphere and may soon emerge in the Northern Hemisphere.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Hiroaki Naoe, Jorge L. Garcia-Franco, Chang-Hyun Park, Mario Rodrigo, Froila M. Palmeiro, Federico Serva, Masakazu Taguchi, Kohei Yoshida, James A. Anstey, Javier Garcia-Serrano, Seok-Woo Son, Yoshio Kawatani, Neal Butchart, Kevin Hamilton, Chih-Chieh Chen, Anne Glanville, Tobias Kerzenmacher, Francois Lott, Clara Orbe, Scott Osprey, Mijeong Park, Jadwiga H. Richter, Stefan Versick, and Shingo Watanabe
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1148, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1148, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines links between the stratospheric Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) and large-scale atmospheric circulations in the tropics, subtropics, and polar regions. The QBO teleconnections and their modulation by the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) are investigated through a series of climate model experiments. While QBO teleconnections are qualitatively reproduced by the multi-model ensemble, they are not consistent due to modelled QBO bias and other systematic model biases.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Cristiana Stan, Saisri Kollapaneni, Andrea Jenney, Jiabao Wang, Zheng Wu, Cheng Zheng, Hyemi Kim, Chaim Garfinkel, and Ayush Singh
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1142, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1142, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The MJO-Teleconnections diagnostics package is an open-source Python software package to be used for evaluation of MJO-Teleconnections predicted by subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) forecast systems.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Tereza Uhlíková, Timo Vihma, Alexey Yu Karpechko, and Petteri Uotila
The Cryosphere, 19, 1031–1046, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1031-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-1031-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand the local, regional, and global impacts of the recent rapid sea-ice decline in the Arctic, one of the key issues is to quantify the effects of sea-ice concentration on the surface radiative fluxes. We analyse these effects utilising four data sets called atmospheric reanalyses, and we evaluate uncertainties in these effects arising from inter-reanalysis differences in the sensitivity of the surface radiative fluxes to sea-ice concentration.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Mari R. Tye, Ming Ge, Jadwiga H. Richter, Ethan D. Gutmann, Allyson Rugg, Cindy L. Bruyère, Sue Ellen Haupt, Flavio Lehner, Rachel McCrary, Andrew J. Newman, and Andy Wood
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 1117–1133, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1117-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1117-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
There is a perceived mismatch between the spatial scales on which global climate models can produce data and those needed for water management decisions. However, poor communication of specific metrics relevant to local decisions is also a problem. We assessed the credibility of a set of water management decision metrics in the Community Earth System Model v2 (CESM2). CESM2 shows potentially greater use of its output in long-range water management decisions.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zachary D. Lawrence, Amy H. Butler, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Gerbrand Koren, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Judah Cohen, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Javier García-Serrano, Neil P. Hindley, Martin Jucker, Hera Kim, Robert W. Lee, Simon H. Lee, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Inna Polichtchouk, Jian Rao, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 171–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Variability in the extratropical stratosphere and troposphere is coupled, and because of the longer timescales characteristic of the stratosphere, this allows for a window of opportunity for surface prediction. This paper assesses whether models used for operational prediction capture these coupling processes accurately. We find that most processes are too weak; however downward coupling from the lower stratosphere to the near surface is too strong.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Fiona Raphaela Spuler, Marlene Kretschmer, Magdalena Alonso Balmaseda, Yevgeniya Kovalchuk, and Theodore G. Shepherd
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4115, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4115, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale atmospheric dynamics modulate the occurrence of extreme events and can be leveraged to improve their predictability. In this paper, we introduce a generative machine learning method to identify dynamical drivers of a relevant impact variable in the form of targeted circulation regimes. Applying the method to study extreme precipitation over Morocco, we show that these regimes are more predictive of the impact while maintaining their own predictability and physical consistency.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Dillon Elsbury, Federico Serva, Julie M. Caron, Seung-Yoon Back, Clara Orbe, Jadwiga H. Richter, James A. Anstey, Neal Butchart, Chih-Chieh Chen, Javier García-Serrano, Anne Glanville, Yoshio Kawatani, Tobias Kerzenmacher, Francois Lott, Hiroaki Naoe, Scott Osprey, Froila M. Palmeiro, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Stefan Versick, Shingo Watanabe, and Kohei Yoshida
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3950, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3950, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO), a major tropical weather pattern, is influenced by persistent El Niño or La Niña sea surface temperature conditions during winter. Using a coordinated set of climate model experiments, we find that El Niño strengthens Kelvin waves, speeding up MJO propagation, while La Niña strengthens Rossby waves, slowing it down. Better understanding these interactions between the MJO and ocean helps us better understand natural climate variability.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Thomas J. Ballinger, Kent Moore, Qinghua Ding, Amy H. Butler, James E. Overland, Richard L. Thoman, Ian Baxter, Zhe Li, and Edward Hanna
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1473–1488, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1473-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1473-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study chronicles the meteorological conditions that led to the anomalous, tandem March 2023 ice melt event in the Labrador and Bering seas. A sudden stratospheric warming event initiated the development of an anticyclonic circulation pattern over the Greenland–Labrador region, while the La Niña background state supported ridging conditions over Alaska, both of which aided northward transport of warm, moist air and drove the concurrent sea ice melt extremes.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Pauline Rivoire, Sonia Dupuis, Antoine Guisan, Pascal Vittoz, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3482, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3482, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study investigates the conditions in temperature, precipitation, humidity, and soil moisture leading to the browning of the European forests in summer. Using a Random Forest model and satellite measurement of vegetation greenness, we identify key conditions that predict forest damage. We conclude that hot and dry conditions in spring and summer are adverse conditions, in particular for broad-leaved trees. The hydro-meteorological conditions during the preceding year can also have an impact.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Rachel W.-Y. Wu, Gabriel Chiodo, Inna Polichtchouk, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12259–12275, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12259-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12259-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Strong variations in the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex can profoundly affect surface weather extremes; therefore, accurately predicting the stratosphere can improve surface weather forecasts. The research reveals how uncertainty in the stratosphere is linked to the troposphere. The findings suggest that refining models to better represent the identified sources and impact regions in the troposphere is likely to improve the prediction of the stratosphere and its surface impacts.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Yoshio Kawatani, Kevin Hamilton, Shingo Watanabe, James A. Anstey, Jadwiga H. Richter, Neal Butchart, Clara Orbe, Scott M. Osprey, Hiroaki Naoe, Dillon Elsbury, Chih-Chieh Chen, Javier García-Serrano, Anne Glanville, Tobias Kerzenmacher, François Lott, Froila M. Palmerio, Mijeong Park, Federico Serva, Masakazu Taguchi, Stefan Versick, and Kohei Yoshioda
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3270, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3270, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) of the tropical stratospheric mean winds has been relatively steady over the 7 decades it has been observed, but there are always cycle-to-cycle variations. This study used several global atmospheric models to investigate systematic modulation of the QBO by the El Niño/La Niña cycle. All models simulated shorter periods during El Niño, in agreement with observations. By contrast, the models disagreed even on the sign of the El Niño effect on QBO amplitude.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Matthew Davison and Peter Haynes
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1153–1185, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1153-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A simple model is used to study the relation between small-scale convection and large-scale variability in the tropics arising from the coupling between moisture and dynamics. In the model, moisture preferentially lies at either moist or dry states, which merge to form large-scale aggregated regions. On an equatorial β plane, these aggregated regions are localised at the Equator and propagate zonally. This forms an intermediate model between past simpler models and general circulation models.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Jacob Perez, Amanda C. Maycock, Stephen D. Griffiths, Steven C. Hardiman, and Christine M. McKenna
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1061–1078, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1061-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1061-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses existing methods for identifying the position and tilt of the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet, proposing a new feature-based approach. The new method overcomes limitations of other methods, offering a more robust characterisation. Contrary to prior findings, the distribution of daily latitudes shows no distinct multi-modal structure, challenging the notion of preferred jet stream latitudes or regimes. This research enhances our understanding of North Atlantic dynamics.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Xavier J. Levine, Ryan S. Williams, Gareth Marshall, Andrew Orr, Lise Seland Graff, Dörthe Handorf, Alexey Karpechko, Raphael Köhler, René R. Wijngaard, Nadine Johnston, Hanna Lee, Lars Nieradzik, and Priscilla A. Mooney
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1161–1177, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1161-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1161-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
While the most recent climate projections agree that the Arctic is warming, differences remain in how much and in other climate variables such as precipitation. This presents a challenge for stakeholders who need to develop mitigation and adaptation strategies. We tackle this problem by using the storyline approach to generate four plausible and actionable realisations of end-of-century climate change for the Arctic, spanning its most likely range of variability.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Sebastian Sippel, Clair Barnes, Camille Cadiou, Erich Fischer, Sarah Kew, Marlene Kretschmer, Sjoukje Philip, Theodore G. Shepherd, Jitendra Singh, Robert Vautard, and Pascal Yiou
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 943–957, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-943-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-943-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Winter temperatures in central Europe have increased. But cold winters can still cause problems for energy systems, infrastructure, or human health. Here we tested whether a record-cold winter, such as the one observed in 1963 over central Europe, could still occur despite climate change. The answer is yes: it is possible, but it is very unlikely. Our results rely on climate model simulations and statistical rare event analysis. In conclusion, society must be prepared for such cold winters.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Michael Schutte, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, and Jacopo Riboldi
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 733–752, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-733-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-733-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The winter circulation in the stratosphere, a layer of the Earth’s atmosphere between 10 and 50 km height, is tightly linked to the circulation in the lower atmosphere determining our daily weather. This interconnection happens in the form of waves propagating in and between these two layers. Here, we use space–time spectral analysis to show that disruptions and enhancements of the stratospheric circulation modify the shape and propagation of waves in both layers.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Luca G. Severino, Chahan M. Kropf, Hilla Afargan-Gerstman, Christopher Fairless, Andries Jan de Vries, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, and David N. Bresch
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1555–1578, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1555-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1555-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We combine climate projections from 30 climate models with a climate risk model to project winter windstorm damages in Europe under climate change. We study the uncertainty and sensitivity factors related to the modelling of hazard, exposure and vulnerability. We emphasize high uncertainties in the damage projections, with climate models primarily driving the uncertainty. We find climate change reshapes future European windstorm risk by altering damage locations and intensity.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Lisa Degenhardt, Gregor C. Leckebusch, and Adam A. Scaife
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 587–607, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-587-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-587-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how dynamical factors that are known to influence cyclone or windstorm development and strengthening also influence the seasonal forecast skill of severe winter windstorms. This study shows which factors are well represented in the seasonal forecast model, the Global Seasonal forecasting system version 5 (GloSea5), and which might need improvement to refine the forecast of severe winter windstorms.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Kasturi Shah and Peter H. Haynes
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 559–585, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-559-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-559-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Long-lived rising bubbles of wildfire smoke or volcanic aerosol contained within strong vortices have been observed in the stratosphere. Heating through absorption of solar radiation has been hypothesised as driving these structures. We present simple models incorporating two-way interaction between dynamics and aerosol combined with insight from vortex dynamics to explain aspects of observed behaviours, including ascent rate and vorticity magnitude, and to suggest criteria for formation.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Wilson C. H. Chan, Nigel W. Arnell, Geoff Darch, Katie Facer-Childs, Theodore G. Shepherd, and Maliko Tanguy
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1065–1078, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1065-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1065-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The most recent drought in the UK was declared in summer 2022. We pooled a large sample of plausible winters from seasonal hindcasts and grouped them into four clusters based on their atmospheric circulation configurations. Drought storylines representative of what the drought could have looked like if winter 2022/23 resembled each winter circulation storyline were created to explore counterfactuals of how bad the 2022 drought could have been over winter 2022/23 and beyond.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Larissa van der Laan, Anouk Vlug, Adam A. Scaife, Fabien Maussion, and Kristian Förster
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-387, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-387, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Usually, glacier models are supplied with climate information from long (e.g. 100 year) simulations by global climate models. In this paper, we test the feasibility of supplying glacier models with shorter simulations, to get more accurate information on 5–10 year time scales. Reliable information on these time scales is very important, especially for water management experts to know how much meltwater to expect, for rivers, agriculture and drinking water.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Romain Pilon and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2247–2264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2247-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2247-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper introduces a new method for detecting atmospheric cloud bands to identify long convective cloud bands that extend from the tropics to the midlatitudes. The algorithm allows for easy use and enables researchers to study the life cycle and climatology of cloud bands and associated rainfall. This method provides insights into the large-scale processes involved in cloud band formation and their connections between different regions, as well as differences across ocean basins.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Tereza Uhlíková, Timo Vihma, Alexey Yu Karpechko, and Petteri Uotila
The Cryosphere, 18, 957–976, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-957-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-957-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A prerequisite for understanding the local, regional, and hemispherical impacts of Arctic sea-ice decline on the atmosphere is to quantify the effects of sea-ice concentration (SIC) on the sensible and latent heat fluxes in the Arctic. We analyse these effects utilising four data sets called atmospheric reanalyses, and we evaluate uncertainties in these effects arising from inter-reanalysis differences in SIC and in the sensitivity of the latent and sensible heat fluxes to SIC.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Hilla Afargan-Gerstman, Dominik Büeler, C. Ole Wulff, Michael Sprenger, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 231–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-231-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-231-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The stratosphere is a layer of Earth's atmosphere found above the weather systems. Changes in the stratosphere can affect the winds and the storm tracks in the North Atlantic region for a relatively long time, lasting for several weeks and even months. We show that the stratosphere can be important for weather forecasts beyond 1 week, but more work is needed to improve the accuracy of these forecasts for 3–4 weeks.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Maria Pyrina, Wolfgang Wicker, Andries Jan de Vries, Georgios Fragkoulidis, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3088, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3088, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the atmospheric dynamics behind heatwaves, specifically of those occurring simultaneously across regions, known as concurrent heatwaves. We find that heatwaves are strongly modulated by Rossby wave packets, being Rossby waves whose amplitude has a local maximum and decays at larger distances. High amplitude Rossby wave packets increase the occurrence probabilities of concurrent and non-concurrent heatwaves by a factor of 15 and 18, respectively, over several regions globally.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Matthew D. K. Priestley, David B. Stephenson, Adam A. Scaife, Daniel Bannister, Christopher J. T. Allen, and David Wilkie
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3845–3861, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3845-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3845-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This research presents a model for estimating extreme gusts associated with European windstorms. Using observed storm footprints we are able to calculate the return level of events at the 200-year return period. The largest gusts are found across NW Europe, and these are larger when the North Atlantic Oscillation is positive. Using theoretical future climate states we find that return levels are likely to increase across NW Europe to levels that are unprecedented compared to historical storms.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
David Martin Straus, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Sarah-Jane Lock, Franco Molteni, and Priyanka Yadav
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 1001–1018, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-1001-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-1001-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The global response to the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is potentially predictable. Yet the diabatic heating is uncertain even within a particular episode of the MJO. Experiments with a global model probe the limitations imposed by this uncertainty. The large-scale tropical heating is predictable for 25 to 45 d, yet the associated Rossby wave source that links the heating to the midlatitude circulation is predictable for 15 to 20 d. This limitation has not been recognized in prior work.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Michael Sigmond, James Anstey, Vivek Arora, Ruth Digby, Nathan Gillett, Viatcheslav Kharin, William Merryfield, Catherine Reader, John Scinocca, Neil Swart, John Virgin, Carsten Abraham, Jason Cole, Nicolas Lambert, Woo-Sung Lee, Yongxiao Liang, Elizaveta Malinina, Landon Rieger, Knut von Salzen, Christian Seiler, Clint Seinen, Andrew Shao, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Libo Wang, and Duo Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6553–6591, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6553-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6553-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new activity which aims to organize the analysis of biases in the Canadian Earth System model (CanESM) in a systematic manner. Results of this “Analysis for Development” (A4D) activity includes a new CanESM version, CanESM5.1, which features substantial improvements regarding the simulation of dust and stratospheric temperatures, a second CanESM5.1 variant with reduced climate sensitivity, and insights into potential avenues to reduce various other model biases.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Ewa M. Bednarz, Amy H. Butler, Daniele Visioni, Yan Zhang, Ben Kravitz, and Douglas G. MacMartin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13665–13684, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We use a state-of-the-art Earth system model and a set of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) strategies to achieve the same level of global mean surface cooling through different combinations of location and/or timing of the injection. We demonstrate that the choice of SAI strategy can lead to contrasting impacts on stratospheric and tropospheric temperatures, circulation, and chemistry (including stratospheric ozone), thereby leading to different impacts on regional surface climate.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Jason Neil Steven Cole, Knut von Salzen, Jiangnan Li, John Scinocca, David Plummer, Vivek Arora, Norman McFarlane, Michael Lazare, Murray MacKay, and Diana Verseghy
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5427–5448, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5 (CanAM5) is used to simulate on a global scale the climate of Earth's atmosphere, land, and lakes. We document changes to the physics in CanAM5 since the last major version of the model (CanAM4) and evaluate the climate simulated relative to observations and CanAM4. The climate simulated by CanAM5 is similar to CanAM4, but there are improvements, including better simulation of temperature and precipitation over the Amazon and better simulation of cloud.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Gabriel Chiodo, Marina Friedel, Svenja Seeber, Daniela Domeisen, Andrea Stenke, Timofei Sukhodolov, and Franziska Zilker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10451–10472, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10451-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10451-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric ozone protects the biosphere from harmful UV radiation. Anthropogenic activity has led to a reduction in the ozone layer in the recent past, but thanks to the implementation of the Montreal Protocol, the ozone layer is projected to recover. In this study, we show that projected future changes in Arctic ozone abundances during springtime will influence stratospheric climate and thereby actively modulate large-scale circulation changes in the Northern Hemisphere.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Kelsey J. Mulder, Louis Williams, Matthew Lickiss, Alison Black, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Rachel McCloy, and Eugene McSorley
Geosci. Commun., 6, 97–110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-97-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-97-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
It is vital that uncertainty in environmental forecasting is graphically presented to enable people to use and interpret it correctly. Using novel eye-tracking methods, we show that where people look and the decisions they make are both strongly influenced by construction of forecast representations common in presentations of environmental data. This suggests that forecasters should construct their presentations carefully so that they help people to extract important information more easily.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Louis Williams, Kelsey J. Mulder, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Matthew Lickiss, Alison Black, Rachel McCloy, Eugene McSorley, and Joe Young
Geosci. Commun., 6, 111–123, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-111-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-6-111-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
When constructing graphical environmental forecasts involving uncertainty, it is important to consider the background and expertise of end-users. Using novel eye-tracking methods, we show that where people look and the decisions they make are both strongly influenced by prior expertise and the graphical construction of forecast representations common in presentations of environmental data. We suggest that forecasters should construct their presentations carefully, bearing these factors in mind.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Jake W. Casselman, Joke F. Lübbecke, Tobias Bayr, Wenjuan Huo, Sebastian Wahl, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 471–487, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-471-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-471-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) has remote effects on the tropical North Atlantic (TNA), but the connections' nonlinearity (strength of response to an increasing ENSO signal) is not always well represented in models. Using the Community Earth System Model version 1 – Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Mode (CESM-WACCM) and the Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure version 1, we find that the TNA responds linearly to extreme El Niño but nonlinearly to extreme La Niña for CESM-WACCM.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Flossie Brown, Lauren Marshall, Peter H. Haynes, Rolando R. Garcia, Thomas Birner, and Anja Schmidt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5335–5353, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5335-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5335-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Large-magnitude volcanic eruptions have the potential to alter large-scale circulation patterns, such as the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). The QBO is an oscillation of the tropical stratospheric zonal winds between easterly and westerly directions. Using a climate model, we show that large-magnitude eruptions can delay the progression of the QBO, with a much longer delay when the shear is easterly than when it is westerly. Such delays may affect weather and transport of atmospheric gases.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Dillon Elsbury, Amy H. Butler, John R. Albers, Melissa L. Breeden, and Andrew O'Neil Langford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5101–5117, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5101-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5101-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
One of the global hotspots where stratosphere-to-troposphere transport (STT) of ozone takes place is over Pacific North America (PNA). However, we do not know how or if STT over PNA will change in response to climate change. Using climate model experiments forced with
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
worst-casescenario Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 climate change, we find that changes in net chemical production and transport of ozone in the lower stratosphere increase STT of ozone over PNA in the future.
Raphaël de Fondeville, Zheng Wu, Enikő Székely, Guillaume Obozinski, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 287–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-287-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-287-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a fully data-driven, interpretable, and computationally scalable framework to characterize sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), extract statistically significant precursors, and produce machine learning (ML) forecasts. By successfully leveraging the long-lasting impact of SSWs, the ML predictions outperform sub-seasonal numerical forecasts for lead times beyond 25 d. Post-processing numerical predictions using their ML counterparts yields a performance increase of up to 20 %.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Khalil Karami, Rolando Garcia, Christoph Jacobi, Jadwiga H. Richter, and Simone Tilmes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3799–3818, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3799-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3799-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Alongside mitigation and adaptation efforts, stratospheric aerosol intervention (SAI) is increasingly considered a third pillar to combat dangerous climate change. We investigate the teleconnection between the quasi-biennial oscillation in the equatorial stratosphere and the Arctic stratospheric polar vortex under a warmer climate and an SAI scenario. We show that the Holton–Tan relationship weakens under both scenarios and discuss the physical mechanisms responsible for such changes.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philip E. Bett, Adam A. Scaife, Steven C. Hardiman, Hazel E. Thornton, Xiaocen Shen, Lin Wang, and Bo Pang
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 213–228, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-213-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-213-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Sudden-stratospheric-warming (SSW) events can severely affect the subsequent weather at the surface. We use a large ensemble of climate model hindcasts to investigate features of the climate that make strong impacts more likely through negative NAO conditions. This allows a more robust assessment than using observations alone. Air pressure over the Arctic prior to an SSW and the zonal-mean zonal wind in the lower stratosphere have the strongest relationship with the subsequent NAO response.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Ewa M. Bednarz, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Andy Jones, James M. Haywood, Jadwiga Richter, Douglas G. MacMartin, and Peter Braesicke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 687–709, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-687-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-687-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Building on Part 1 of this two-part study, we demonstrate the role of biases in climatological circulation and specific aspects of model microphysics in driving the differences in simulated sulfate distributions amongst three Earth system models. We then characterize the simulated changes in stratospheric and free-tropospheric temperatures, ozone, water vapor, and large-scale circulation, elucidating the role of the above aspects in the surface responses discussed in Part 1.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Wolfgang Wicker, Inna Polichtchouk, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 81–93, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-81-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-81-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Sudden stratospheric warmings are extreme weather events where the winter polar stratosphere warms by about 25 K. An improved representation of small-scale gravity waves in sub-seasonal prediction models can reduce forecast errors since their impact on the large-scale circulation is predictable multiple weeks ahead. After a sudden stratospheric warming, vertically propagating gravity waves break at a lower altitude than usual, which strengthens the long-lasting positive temperature anomalies.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philipp Breul, Paulo Ceppi, and Theodore G. Shepherd
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 39–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-39-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-39-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurately predicting the response of the midlatitude jet stream to climate change is very important, but models show a variety of possible scenarios. Previous work identified a relationship between climatological jet latitude and future jet shift in the southern hemispheric winter. We show that the relationship does not hold in separate sectors and propose that zonal asymmetries are the ultimate cause in the zonal mean. This questions the usefulness of the relationship.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
John T. Fasullo and Jadwiga H. Richter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 163–182, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-163-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-163-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The continued high levels of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions increase the likelihood that key climate warming thresholds will be exceeded in the coming decades. Here we examine a recently proposed geoengineering approach using two recently produced climate model experiments. We find the associated latitudinal distribution of aerosol mass to exhibit substantial uncertainty, suggesting the need for significant flexibility in the location and amount of aerosol delivery, if implemented.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Jadwiga H. Richter, Daniele Visioni, Douglas G. MacMartin, David A. Bailey, Nan Rosenbloom, Brian Dobbins, Walker R. Lee, Mari Tye, and Jean-Francois Lamarque
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8221–8243, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8221-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Solar climate intervention using stratospheric aerosol injection is a proposed method of reducing global mean temperatures to reduce the worst consequences of climate change. We present a new modeling protocol aimed at simulating a plausible deployment of stratospheric aerosol injection and reproducibility of simulations using other Earth system models: Assessing Responses and Impacts of Solar climate intervention on the Earth system with stratospheric aerosol injection (ARISE-SAI).
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Marina Friedel, Gabriel Chiodo, Andrea Stenke, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13997–14017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13997-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13997-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In spring, winds the Arctic stratosphere change direction – an event called final stratospheric warming (FSW). Here, we examine whether the interannual variability in Arctic stratospheric ozone impacts the timing of the FSW. We find that Arctic ozone shifts the FSW to earlier and later dates in years with high and low ozone via the absorption of UV light. The modulation of the FSW by ozone has consequences for surface climate in ozone-rich years, which may result in better seasonal predictions.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Nora Bergner, Marina Friedel, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Darryn Waugh, and Gabriel Chiodo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13915–13934, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13915-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13915-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Polar vortex extremes, particularly situations with an unusually weak cyclonic circulation in the stratosphere, can influence the surface climate in the spring–summer time in the Southern Hemisphere. Using chemistry-climate models and observations, we evaluate the robustness of the surface impacts. While models capture the general surface response, they do not show the observed climate patterns in midlatitude regions, which we trace back to biases in the models' circulations.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
John R. Albers, Amy H. Butler, Andrew O. Langford, Dillon Elsbury, and Melissa L. Breeden
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13035–13048, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Ozone transported from the stratosphere contributes to background ozone concentrations in the free troposphere and to surface ozone exceedance events that affect human health. The physical processes whereby the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) modulates North American stratosphere-to-troposphere ozone transport during spring are documented, and the usefulness of ENSO for predicting ozone events that may cause exceedances in surface air quality standards are assessed.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Jake W. Casselman, Bernat Jiménez-Esteve, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1077–1096, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1077-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1077-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using an atmospheric general circulation model, we analyze how the tropical North Atlantic influences the El Niño–Southern Oscillation connection towards the North Atlantic European region. We also focus on the lesser-known boreal spring and summer response following an El Niño–Southern Oscillation event. Our results show that altered tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures may cause different responses over the Caribbean region, consequently influencing the North Atlantic European region.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Stephen G. Yeager, Nan Rosenbloom, Anne A. Glanville, Xian Wu, Isla Simpson, Hui Li, Maria J. Molina, Kristen Krumhardt, Samuel Mogen, Keith Lindsay, Danica Lombardozzi, Will Wieder, Who M. Kim, Jadwiga H. Richter, Matthew Long, Gokhan Danabasoglu, David Bailey, Marika Holland, Nicole Lovenduski, Warren G. Strand, and Teagan King
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6451–6493, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6451-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6451-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Earth system changes over a range of time and space scales, and some of these changes are predictable in advance. Short-term weather forecasts are most familiar, but recent work has shown that it is possible to generate useful predictions several seasons or even a decade in advance. This study focuses on predictions over intermediate timescales (up to 24 months in advance) and shows that there is promising potential to forecast a variety of changes in the natural environment.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Mari R. Tye, Katherine Dagon, Maria J. Molina, Jadwiga H. Richter, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, and Simone Tilmes
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1233–1257, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1233-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1233-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We examined the potential effect of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) on extreme temperature and precipitation. SAI may cause daytime temperatures to cool but nighttime to warm. Daytime cooling may occur in all seasons across the globe, with the largest decreases in summer. In contrast, nighttime warming may be greatest at high latitudes in winter. SAI may reduce the frequency and intensity of extreme rainfall. The combined changes may exacerbate drying over parts of the global south.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irene Erner, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 977–1001, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Forecast models that are used to predict weather often struggle to represent the Earth’s stratosphere. This may impact their ability to predict surface weather weeks in advance, on subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescales. We use data from many S2S forecast systems to characterize and compare the stratospheric biases present in such forecast models. These models have many similar stratospheric biases, but they tend to be worse in systems with low model tops located within the stratosphere.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Rachel Wai-Ying Wu, Zheng Wu, and Daniela I.V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 755–776, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-755-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-755-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate predictions of the stratospheric polar vortex can enhance surface weather predictability. Stratospheric events themselves are less predictable, with strong inter-event differences. We assess the predictability of stratospheric acceleration and deceleration events in a sub-seasonal prediction system, finding that the predictability of events is largely dependent on event magnitude, while extreme drivers of deceleration events are not fully represented in the model.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Kevin DallaSanta and Lorenzo M. Polvani
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8843–8862, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8843-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8843-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Volcanic eruptions cool the earth by reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the surface. Paradoxically, it has been suggested that they may also warm the surface, but the evidence for this is scant. Here, we show that a small warming can be seen in a climate model for large-enough eruptions. However, even for eruptions much larger than those that have occurred in the past two millennia, post-eruption winters over Eurasia are indistinguishable from those occurring without a prior eruption.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Peter Hitchcock, Amy Butler, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Tim Stockdale, James Anstey, Dann Mitchell, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Tongwen Wu, Yixiong Lu, Daniele Mastrangelo, Piero Malguzzi, Hai Lin, Ryan Muncaster, Bill Merryfield, Michael Sigmond, Baoqiang Xiang, Liwei Jia, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Jiyoung Oh, Damien Specq, Isla R. Simpson, Jadwiga H. Richter, Cory Barton, Jeff Knight, Eun-Pa Lim, and Harry Hendon
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5073–5092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes an experimental protocol focused on sudden stratospheric warmings to be carried out by subseasonal forecast modeling centers. These will allow for inter-model comparisons of these major disruptions to the stratospheric polar vortex and their impacts on the near-surface flow. The protocol will lead to new insights into the contribution of the stratosphere to subseasonal forecast skill and new approaches to the dynamical attribution of extreme events.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Chen Schwartz, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Priyanka Yadav, Wen Chen, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 679–692, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-679-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Eleven operational forecast models that run on subseasonal timescales (up to 2 months) are examined to assess errors in their simulated large-scale stationary waves in the Northern Hemisphere winter. We found that models with a more finely resolved stratosphere generally do better in simulating the waves in both the stratosphere (10–50 km) and troposphere below. Moreover, a connection exists between errors in simulated time-mean convection in tropical regions and errors in the simulated waves.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philipp Breul, Paulo Ceppi, and Theodore G. Shepherd
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 645–658, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-645-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-645-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding how the mid-latitude jet stream will respond to a changing climate is highly important. Unfortunately, climate models predict a wide variety of possible responses. Theoretical frameworks can link an internal jet variability timescale to its response. However, we show that stratospheric influence approximately doubles the internal timescale, inflating predicted responses. We demonstrate an approach to account for the stratospheric influence and recover correct response predictions.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Shlomi Ziskin Ziv, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Sean Davis, and Antara Banerjee
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7523–7538, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7523-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7523-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric water vapor is important for Earth's overall greenhouse effect and for ozone chemistry; however the factors governing its variability on interannual timescales are not fully known, and previous modeling studies have indicated that models struggle to capture this interannual variability. We demonstrate that nonlinear interactions are important for determining overall water vapor concentrations and also that models have improved in their ability to capture these connections.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Shima Bahramvash Shams, Von P. Walden, James W. Hannigan, William J. Randel, Irina V. Petropavlovskikh, Amy H. Butler, and Alvaro de la Cámara
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5435–5458, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5435-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5435-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale atmospheric circulation has a strong influence on ozone in the Arctic, and certain anomalous dynamical events, such as sudden stratospheric warmings, cause dramatic alterations of the large-scale circulation. A reanalysis model is evaluated and then used to investigate the impact of sudden stratospheric warmings on mid-atmospheric ozone. Results show that the position of the cold jet stream over the Arctic before these events influences the variability of ozone.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Wilson C. H. Chan, Theodore G. Shepherd, Katie Facer-Childs, Geoff Darch, and Nigel W. Arnell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1755–1777, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1755-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1755-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We select the 2010–2012 UK drought and investigate an alternative unfolding of the drought from changes to its attributes. We created storylines of drier preconditions, alternative seasonal contributions, a third dry winter, and climate change. Storylines of the 2010–2012 drought show alternative situations that could have resulted in worse conditions than observed. Event-based storylines exploring plausible situations are used that may lead to high impacts and help stress test existing systems.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Beatriz M. Monge-Sanz, Alessio Bozzo, Nicholas Byrne, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Michail Diamantakis, Johannes Flemming, Lesley J. Gray, Robin J. Hogan, Luke Jones, Linus Magnusson, Inna Polichtchouk, Theodore G. Shepherd, Nils Wedi, and Antje Weisheimer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4277–4302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4277-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4277-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The stratosphere is emerging as one of the keys to improve tropospheric weather and climate predictions. This study provides evidence of the role the stratospheric ozone layer plays in improving weather predictions at different timescales. Using a new ozone modelling approach suitable for high-resolution global models that provide operational forecasts from days to seasons, we find significant improvements in stratospheric meteorological fields and stratosphere–troposphere coupling.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Seungmok Paik, Seung-Ki Min, Seok-Woo Son, Soon-Il An, Jong-Seong Kug, and Sang-Wook Yeh
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-187, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-187, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates Earth’s surface climate response to volcanic eruptions at different latitudes. By analyzing last millennium ensemble simulations of a coupled climate model, we have identified physical processes associated with the diverse impacts of volcanic eruption latitudes, focusing on the tropical ocean surface warming and the stratospheric polar vortex intensification. Our results provide important global implications for atmospheric responses to future volcanic aerosols.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Andy Jones, Jim M. Haywood, Adam A. Scaife, Olivier Boucher, Matthew Henry, Ben Kravitz, Thibaut Lurton, Pierre Nabat, Ulrike Niemeier, Roland Séférian, Simone Tilmes, and Daniele Visioni
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2999–3016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Simulations by six Earth-system models of geoengineering by introducing sulfuric acid aerosols into the tropical stratosphere are compared. A robust impact on the northern wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation is found, exacerbating precipitation reduction over parts of southern Europe. In contrast, the models show no consistency with regard to impacts on the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, although results do indicate a risk that the oscillation could become locked into a permanent westerly phase.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Daniele Visioni, Simone Tilmes, Charles Bardeen, Michael Mills, Douglas G. MacMartin, Ben Kravitz, and Jadwiga H. Richter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1739–1756, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols are simulated in a simplified way in climate models: in the model analyzed here, they are represented in every grid as described by three simple logarithmic distributions, mixing all different species together. The size can evolve when new particles are formed, particles merge together to create a larger one or particles are deposited to the surface. This approximation normally works fairly well. Here we show however that when large amounts of sulfate are simulated, there are problems.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Juho M. Koskentausta, and Alexey Yu. Karpechko
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 45–58, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-45-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-45-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
El Niño events are known to effect the variability of the wintertime stratospheric polar vortex. The observed relationship differs from what is seen in climate models. Climate models have errors in their average winds and temperature, and in this work we artificially reduce those errors to see how that changes the communication of El Niño events to the polar stratosphere. We find reducing errors improves stratospheric variability, but does not explain the differences with observations.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Nicholas L. Tyrrell and Alexey Yu. Karpechko
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 913–925, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-913-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-913-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures (El Niño) affect the global climate. The Pacific-to-Europe connection relies on interactions of large atmospheric waves with winds and surface pressure. We looked at how mean errors in a climate model affect its ability to simulate the Pacific-to-Europe connection. We found that even large errors in the seasonal winds did not affect the response of the model to an El Niño event, which is good news for seasonal forecasts which rely on these connections.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Marta Abalos, Natalia Calvo, Samuel Benito-Barca, Hella Garny, Steven C. Hardiman, Pu Lin, Martin B. Andrews, Neal Butchart, Rolando Garcia, Clara Orbe, David Saint-Martin, Shingo Watanabe, and Kohei Yoshida
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13571–13591, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13571-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13571-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The stratospheric Brewer–Dobson circulation (BDC), responsible for transporting mass, tracers and heat globally in the stratosphere, is evaluated in a set of state-of-the-art climate models. The acceleration of the BDC in response to increasing greenhouse gases is most robust in the lower stratosphere. At higher levels, the well-known inconsistency between model and observational BDC trends can be partly reconciled by accounting for limited sampling and large uncertainties in the observations.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Zheng Wu, Bernat Jiménez-Esteve, Raphaël de Fondeville, Enikő Székely, Guillaume Obozinski, William T. Ball, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 841–865, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-841-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-841-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We use an advanced statistical approach to investigate the dynamics of the development of sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) events in the winter Northern Hemisphere. We identify distinct signals that are representative of these events and their event type at lead times beyond currently predictable lead times. The results can be viewed as a promising step towards improving the predictability of SSWs in the future by using more advanced statistical methods in operational forecasting systems.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Seán Donegan, Conor Murphy, Shaun Harrigan, Ciaran Broderick, Dáire Foran Quinn, Saeed Golian, Jeff Knight, Tom Matthews, Christel Prudhomme, Adam A. Scaife, Nicky Stringer, and Robert L. Wilby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4159–4183, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4159-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4159-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We benchmarked the skill of ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) for a diverse sample of 46 Irish catchments. We found that ESP is skilful in the majority of catchments up to several months ahead. However, the level of skill was strongly dependent on lead time, initialisation month, and individual catchment location and storage properties. We also conditioned ESP with the winter North Atlantic Oscillation and show that improvements in forecast skill, reliability, and discrimination are possible.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Rachel Furner, Peter Haynes, Dave Munday, Brooks Paige, Daniel C. Jones, and Emily Shuckburgh
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-132, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-132, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Traditional weather & climate models are built from physics-based equations, while data-driven models are built from patterns found in datasets using Machine Learning or statistics. There is growing interest in using data-driven models for weather & climate prediction, but confidence in their use depends on understanding the patterns they're finding. We look at this with a simple regression model of ocean temperature and see the patterns found by the regression model are similar to the physics.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Amy H. Butler and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 453–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-453-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-453-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We classify by wave geometry the stratospheric polar vortex during the final warming that occurs every spring in both hemispheres due to a combination of radiative and dynamical processes. We show that the shape of the vortex, as well as the timing of the seasonal transition, is linked to total column ozone prior to and surface weather following the final warming. These results have implications for prediction and our understanding of stratosphere–troposphere coupling processes in springtime.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Hannah C. Bloomfield, David J. Brayshaw, Paula L. M. Gonzalez, and Andrew Charlton-Perez
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2259–2274, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2259-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2259-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Energy systems are becoming more exposed to weather as more renewable generation is built. This means access to high-quality weather forecasts is becoming more important. This paper showcases past forecasts of electricity demand and wind power and solar power generation across 28 European countries. The timescale of interest is from 5 d out to 1 month ahead. This paper highlights the recent improvements in forecast skill and hopes to promote collaboration in the energy–meteorology community.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
John R. Albers, Amy H. Butler, Melissa L. Breeden, Andrew O. Langford, and George N. Kiladis
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 433–452, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-433-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-433-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Weather variability controls the transport of ozone from the stratosphere to the Earth’s surface and water vapor from oceanic source regions to continental land masses. Forecasting these types of transport has high societal value because of the negative impacts of ozone on human health and the role of water vapor in governing precipitation variability. We use upper-level wind forecasts to assess the potential for predicting ozone and water vapor transport 3–6 weeks ahead of time.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Antara Banerjee, Amy H. Butler, Lorenzo M. Polvani, Alan Robock, Isla R. Simpson, and Lantao Sun
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6985–6997, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6985-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6985-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We find that simulated stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could lead to warmer Eurasian winters alongside a drier Mediterranean and wetting to the north. These effects occur due to the strengthening of the Northern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex, which shifts the North Atlantic Oscillation to a more positive phase. We find the effects in our simulations to be much more significant than the wintertime effects of large tropical volcanic eruptions which inject much less sulfate aerosol.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Philip Rupp and Peter Haynes
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 413–431, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-413-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-413-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We study a range of dynamical aspects of the Asian monsoon anticyclone as the response of a simple numerical model to a steady imposed heating distribution with different background flow configurations. Particular focus is given on interactions between the monsoon anticyclone and active mid-latitude dynamics, which we find to have a zonally localising effect on the time-mean circulation and to be able to qualitatively alter the temporal variability of the bulk anticyclone.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Graeme Marlton, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Giles Harrison, Inna Polichtchouk, Alain Hauchecorne, Philippe Keckhut, Robin Wing, Thierry Leblanc, and Wolfgang Steinbrecht
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6079–6092, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6079-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6079-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A network of Rayleigh lidars have been used to infer the upper-stratosphere temperature bias in ECMWF ERA-5 and ERA-Interim reanalyses during 1990–2017. Results show that ERA-Interim exhibits a cold bias of −3 to −4 K between 10 and 1 hPa. Comparisons with ERA-5 found a smaller bias of 1 K which varies between cold and warm between 10 and 3 hPa, indicating a good thermal representation of the atmosphere to 3 hPa. These biases must be accounted for in stratospheric studies using these reanalyses.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Ohad Harari, Shlomi Ziskin Ziv, Jian Rao, Olaf Morgenstern, Guang Zeng, Simone Tilmes, Douglas Kinnison, Fiona M. O'Connor, Neal Butchart, Makoto Deushi, Patrick Jöckel, Andrea Pozzer, and Sean Davis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3725–3740, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3725-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3725-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Water vapor is the dominant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, and El Niño is the dominant mode of variability in the ocean–atmosphere system. The connection between El Niño and water vapor above ~ 17 km is unclear, with single-model studies reaching a range of conclusions. This study examines this connection in 12 different models. While there are substantial differences among the models, all models appear to capture the fundamental physical processes correctly.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Melissa L. Breeden, Amy H. Butler, John R. Albers, Michael Sprenger, and Andrew O'Neil Langford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2781–2794, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2781-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2781-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Prior research has found a maximum in deep stratosphere-to-troposphere mass/ozone transport over the western United States in boreal spring, which can enhance surface ozone concentrations, reducing air quality. We find that the winter-to-summer evolution of the north Pacific jet increases the frequency of stratospheric intrusions that drive transport, helping explain the observed maximum. The El Niño–Southern Oscillation affects the timing of the spring jet transition and therefore transport.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Linda van Garderen, Frauke Feser, and Theodore G. Shepherd
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 171–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-171-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-171-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The storyline method is used to quantify the effect of climate change on a particular extreme weather event using a global atmospheric model by simulating the event with and without climate change. We present the method and its successful application for the climate change signals of the European 2003 and the Russian 2010 heatwaves.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Joonsuk M. Kang and Seok-Woo Son
Weather Clim. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2020-65, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2020-65, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the development processes of extratropical cyclones in East Asia, particularly when they are passing through the Korean Peninsula. These extratropical cyclones originate from Mongolia and East China and travel towards the Korean Peninsula. The quantitative analyses in the potential vorticity perspective demonstrate that the former is mostly driven dry-dynamically and the latter is influenced significantly by moist processes.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Marlene Kretschmer, Giuseppe Zappa, and Theodore G. Shepherd
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 715–730, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-715-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-715-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The winds in the polar stratosphere affect the weather in the mid-latitudes, making it important to understand potential changes in response to global warming. However, climate model projections disagree on how this so-called polar vortex will change in the future. Here we show that sea ice loss in the Barents and Kara (BK) seas plays a central role in this. The time when the BK seas become ice-free differs between models, which explains some of the disagreement regarding vortex projections.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Rei Chemke, Michael Previdi, Mark R. England, and Lorenzo M. Polvani
The Cryosphere, 14, 4135–4144, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4135-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4135-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The increase in Antarctic surface mass balance (SMB, precipitation vs. evaporation/sublimation) is projected to mitigate sea-level rise. Here we show that nearly half of this increase over the 20th century is attributed to stratospheric ozone depletion and ozone-depleting substance (ODS) emissions. Our results suggest that the phaseout of ODS by the Montreal Protocol, and the recovery of stratospheric ozone, will act to decrease the SMB over the 21st century and the mitigation of sea-level rise.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Lorenzo M. Polvani and Suzana J. Camargo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13687–13700, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13687-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13687-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
On the basis of questionable early studies, it is widely believed that low-latitude volcanic eruptions cause winter warming over Eurasia. However, we here demonstrate that the winter warming over Eurasia following the 1883 Krakatau eruption was unremarkable and, in all likelihood, unrelated to that eruption. Confirming similar findings for the 1991 Pinatubo eruption, the new research demonstrates that no detectable Eurasian winter warming is to be expected after eruptions of similar magnitude.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, and Heikki J. Järvinen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 657–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we investigate the role of the tropospheric forcing in the occurrence of the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) that took place in February 2018, its predictability and teleconnection with the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) by analysing the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble forecast. The purpose of the paper is to present the results of the analysis of the atmospheric circulation before and during the SSW and clarify the driving mechanisms.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Hilla Afargan-Gerstman, Iuliia Polkova, Lukas Papritz, Paolo Ruggieri, Martin P. King, Panos J. Athanasiadis, Johanna Baehr, and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 541–553, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-541-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-541-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the stratospheric influence on marine cold air outbreaks (MCAOs) in the North Atlantic using ERA-Interim reanalysis data. MCAOs are associated with severe Arctic weather, such as polar lows and strong surface winds. Sudden stratospheric events are found to be associated with more frequent MCAOs in the Barents and the Norwegian seas, affected by the anomalous circulation over Greenland and Scandinavia. Identification of MCAO precursors is crucial for improved long-range prediction.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Jessica Oehrlein, Gabriel Chiodo, and Lorenzo M. Polvani
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10531–10544, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10531-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10531-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Winter winds in the stratosphere 10–50 km above the surface impact climate at the surface. Prior studies suggest that this interaction between the stratosphere and the surface is affected by ozone. We compare two ways of including ozone in computer simulations of climate. One method is more realistic but more expensive. We find that the method of including ozone in simulations affects the surface climate when the stratospheric winds are unusually weak but not when they are unusually strong.
This article is included in the Encyclopedia of Geosciences
Cited articles
Abhik, S. and Hendon, H. H.: Influence of the QBO on the MJO during coupled
model multiweek forecasts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 9213–9221,
2019.
Adams, B. J., Mann, M., and Ammann, C.: Proxy evidence for an El Niño-like
response to volcanic forcing, Nature, 426, 274–278, 2003.
Andrews, M., Knight, J., and Gray, L.: A simulated lagged response of the
North Atlantic Oscillation to the solar cycle over the period 1960–2009,
Environ. Res. Lett., 10, L054022, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/5/054022, 2015.
Agnet, J. G., Rozanov, E. V., Muthers, S., Peter, T., Brönnimann, S., Arfeuille, F., Beer, J., Shapiro, A. I., Raible, C. C., Steinhilber, F., and Schmutz, W. K.: Impact of a potential 21st century “grand solar
minimum” on surface temperatures and stratospheric ozone, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 4420–4425, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50806, 2003.
Anstey, J. A. and Shepherd, T. G.: High-latitude influence of the
Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 1–21, 2014.
Anstey, J. A., Simpson, I. R., Richter, J. H., Naoe, H., Taguchi, M., Serva,
F., Gray, L. J., Butchart, N., Hamilton, K., Osprey, S., Bellprat, O., Braesicke, P., Bushell, A. C., Cagnazzo, C., Chen, C.-C., Chun, H.-Y., Garcia, R. R., Holt, L., Kawatani, Y., Kerzenmacher, T., Kim, Y.-H., Lott, F., McLandress, C., Scinocca, J., Stockdale, T. N., Versick, S., Watanabe, S., Yoshida, K., and Yukimoto, S.: Teleconnections of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in a
multi-model ensemble of QBO-resolving models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., Special Section QBO Modelling Intercomparison, 1–26,
2021.
Athanasiadis, P. J., Yeager, S., Kwon, Y. O., Bellucci, A., Smith D. W., and Tibaldi S.: Decadal predictability of North Atlantic blocking and the NAO, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 3, 20, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-0120-6, 2020.
Ayarzagüena, B., Polvani, L. M., Langematz, U., Akiyoshi, H., Bekki, S., Butchart, N., Dameris, M., Deushi, M., Hardiman, S. C., Jöckel, P., Klekociuk, A., Marchand, M., Michou, M., Morgenstern, O., O'Connor, F. M., Oman, L. D., Plummer, D. A., Revell, L., Rozanov, E., Saint-Martin, D., Scinocca, J., Stenke, A., Stone, K., Yamashita, Y., Yoshida, K., and Zeng, G.: No robust evidence of future changes in major stratospheric sudden warmings: a multi-model assessment from CCMI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11277–11287, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11277-2018, 2018a.
Ayarzagüena, B., Barriopedro, D., Garrido-Perez, J. M., Abalos, M., de
la Cámara, A., García-Herrera, R., Calvo, N., and Ordóñez, C.: Stratospheric connection
to the abrupt end of the 2016/2017 Iberian drought, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12639–12646, 2018b.
Ayarzagüena, B. , Charlton-Perez, A. J., Butler, A. H., Hitchcock, P., Simpson, I. R., Polvani, L. M., Butchart, N., Gerber, E. P., Gray, L., Hassler, B., Lin, P., Lott, F., Manzini, E., Mizuta, R., Orbe, C., Osprey, S., Saint-Martin, D., Sigmond, M., Taguchi, M., Volodin, E. M., and Watanabe, S.: Uncertainty in the response of stratospheric sudden
warmings and stratosphere-troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2
concentrations in CMIP6 models, J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2019JD032345,
2020.
Baehr, J., Fröhlich, K., Botzet, M., Domeisen, D. I. V., Kornblueh, L.,
Notz, D., Piontek, R., Pohlmann, H., Tietsche, S., and Müller, W. A.: The prediction of surface temperature in the new seasonal
prediction system based on the MPI-ESM coupled climate model, Clim. Dynam., 44, 2723–2735, 2015.
Baldwin, M. P. and Dunkerton, T. J.: Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation
from the stratosphere to the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 104,
30937–30946, 1999.
Baldwin, M. P. and Dunkerton, T. J.: Stratospheric Harbingers of Anomalous
Weather Regimes, Science, 294, 581–584, 2001.
Baldwin M. P., Stephenson, D. B., Thompson, D. W. J., Dunkerton, T. J., Charlton, A. J., and O'Neill, A.: Stratospheric Memory and
Skill of Extended-Range Weather Forecasts, Science, 301, 636–640, 2003.
Baldwin M. P., Birner, T., Brasseur, G., Burrows, J., Butchart, N., Garcia, R., Geller, M., Gray, L., Hamilton, K., Harnik, N., Hegglin, M. I., Langematz, U., Robock, A., Sato, K., and Scaife, A. A.: 100 Years of Progress in Understanding the
Stratosphere and Mesosphere, Meteor. Mon., 59, 27.1–27.62, 2019.
Baldwin, M. P., Ayarzagüena, B., Birner, T., Butchart, N., Butler, A.
H., Charlton-Perez, A. J., Domeisen, D. I. V., Garfinkel, C. I., Garny, H., Gerber, E. P., Hegglin, M. I., Langematz, U., and Pedatella, N. M.: Sudden stratospheric warmings, Rev. Geophys., 59, e2020RG000708, 2021.
Balmaseda, M. A., Ferranti, L., Molteni, F., and Palmer, T. N.: Impact of 2007
and 2008 Arctic ice anomalies on the atmospheric circulation: Implications
for long-range predictions, Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1655–1664, 2010.
Banerjee, A., Fyfe, J. C., Polvani, L. M., Waugh, D., and Chang, K. L.: A pause in Southern Hemisphere circulation trends due to the Montreal Protocol, Nature, 579, 544–548, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2120-4, 2020.
Barnes, E. A., Barnes, N. W., and Polvani, L. M.: Delayed Southern Hemisphere
climate change induced by stratospheric ozone recovery, as projected by the
CMIP5 models, 27, 852–867, 2014.
Barnes, E. A., Samarasinghe, S. M., Ebert-Uphoff, I., and Furtado, J. C.:
Tropospheric and stratospheric causal pathways between the MJO and NAO,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 9356–9371, 2019.
Beagley, S. R., de Grandpre', J., Koshyk, J. N., McFarlane, N. A., and Shepherd, T. G.: Radiative-dynamical climatology of the first-generation Canadian
middle atmosphere model, Atmos. Ocean, 35, 293–331, 1997.
Bittner, M., Timmreck, C., Schmidt, H., Toohey, M., and Krüger, K.: The
impact of wave-mean flow interaction on the Northern Hemisphere polar vortex
after tropical volcanic eruptions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 5281–5297, 2016.
Blackport, R. and Screen, J. A.: Weakened evidence for mid-latitude impacts of
Arctic warming, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 1065–1666, 2020.
Boer, G. J. and Hamilton, K.: QBO influence on extratropical predictive skill, Clim. Dynam., 31, 987–1000, 2008.
Boville, B. A.: The Influence of the Polar Night Jet on the Tropospheric
Circulation in a GCM, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 1132–1142, 1984.
Butchart, N., Austin, J., Knight, J. R., Scaife, A. A., and Gallani, M. L.:
The Response of the Stratospheric Climate to Projected Changes in the
Concentrations of Well-Mixed Greenhouse Gases from 1992 to 2051, J. Climate, 13, 2142–2159, 2000.
Butler A. H. and Polvani, L. M.: El Niño, La Niña, and stratospheric
sudden warmings: A re-evaluation in light of the observational record,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L13807, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048084, 2011.
Butler, A. H., Polvani, L. M., and Deser, C.: Separating the stratospheric and
tropospheric pathways of El Niño-Southern Oscillation teleconnections,
Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 024014, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024014, 2014.
Butler A. H., Arribas, A., Athanassiadou, M., Baehr, J., Calvo, N., Charlton-Perez, A., Deque, M., Domeisen, D. I. V., Fröhlich, K., Hendon, H.,
Imada, Y., Ishii, M., Iza, M., Karpechko, A. Y., Kumar, A., Maclachlan, C.,
Merryfield, W. J., Muller, W. A., O'Neill, A., Scaife, A. A., Scinocca, J., Sigmond, M., Stockdale, T. N., and Yasuda, T.: The Climate-system Historical Forecast
Project: Do stratosphere-resolving models make better seasonal climate
predictions in boreal winter?, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1413–1427,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2743, 2016.
Butler, A. H., Charlton-Perez, A., Domeisen, D. I. V., Simpson, I. R., and Sjoberg J.: The predictability of Northern Hemisphere final stratospheric
warmings and their surface impacts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10578–10588,
2019a.
Butler, A. H., Charlton-Perez, A., Domeisen, D. I. V., Garfinkel, C., Gerber, E. P.,
Hitchcock, P., Karpechko, A.-Y., Maycock, A. C., Sigmond, M., Simpson, I., and Son, S.-W.: Sub-seasonal Predictability and the Stratosphere, in: Chapter 11, The Gap Between Weather and Climate Forecasting, 223–241, 2019b.
Butler, A. H., Lawrence, Z. D., Lee, S. H., Lillo, S. P., and Long, C. S.:
Differences between the 2018 and 2019 stratospheric polar vortex split
events, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 3503–3521, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3858, 2020.
Byrne, N. J. and Shepherd, T. G.: Seasonal persistence of circulation
anomalies in the Southern Hemisphere stratosphere and its implications for
the troposphere, J. Climate, 31, 3467–3483, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0557.1,
2018.
Byrne, N. J., Shepherd, T. G., Woollings, T., and Plumb, R. A.: Non-stationarity
in Southern Hemisphere climate variability associated with the seasonal
breakdown of the stratospheric polar vortex, J. Climate, 30, 7125–7139, 2017.
Byrne, N. J., Shepherd, T. G., and Polichtchouk, I.: Subseasonal-to-seasonal
predictability of the Southern Hemisphere eddy-driven jet during austral
spring and early summer, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 6841–6855, 2019.
Cagnazzo, C. and Manzini, E.: Impact of the stratosphere on the winter tropospheric teleconnections between ENSO and the North Atlantic and European Region, J. Climate, 22, 1223–1238, 2009.
Cai, M., Yu, Y., Deng, Y., van den Dool, H. M., Ren, R., Saha, S., Wu, X., and Huang, J.: Feeling the pulse of the stratosphere: an emerging opportunity for
predicting continental-scale cold-air outbreaks 1 month in advance, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1475–1489, 2016.
Cassou, C.: Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden–Julian Oscillation
and the North Atlantic Oscillation, Nature, 455, 523–527, 2008.
Ceppi, P. and Shepherd, T. G.: The role of the stratospheric polar vortex for
the austral jet response to greenhouse gas forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46,
6972–6979, 2019.
Charlton, A. J., O'Neill, A., Stephenson, D. B., Lahoz, W. A., and Baldwin,
M. P.: Can knowledge of the state of the stratosphere be used to improve
statistical forecasts of the troposphere?, Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc., 129, 3205–3224, 2003.
Charlton-Perez, A. J., Baldwin, M. P., Birner, T., Black, R. X., Butler, A. H., Calvo, N., Davis, N. A., Gerber, E. P., Gillett, N., Hardiman, S., Kim, J., Krüger, K., Lee, Y.-Y., Manzini, E., McDaniel, B. A., Polvani, L., Reichler, T., Shaw, T. A., Sigmond, M., Son, S.-W., Toohey, M., Wilcox, L., Yoden, S., Christiansen, B., Lott, F., Shindell, D., Yukimoto, S., and Watanabe, S.: On the lack of stratospheric dynamical
variability in low-top versions of the CMIP5 models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2494–2505, 2013.
Charlton-Perez, A. J., Ferranti, L., and Lee, R. W.: The influence of the
stratospheric state on North Atlantic weather regimes, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 1140–1151, 2018.
Charney, J. G. and Drazin, P. G.: Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 83–109, https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i001p00083, 1961.
Chiodo, G., Oehrlein, J., Polvani, L. M., Fyfe, J. C., and Smith, A. K.: Insignificant influence of
the 11-year solar cycle on the North Atlantic Oscillation, Nat. Geosci., 12,
94–99, 2019.
Choi, J. and Son, S.-W.: Stratospheric initial condition for skillful
surface prediction in the ECMWF model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 12556–12564, 2019.
Christiansen B.: Downward propagation and statistical forecast of the
near-surface weather, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 110, D14104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005431, 2005.
Cohen, J. and Entekhabi, D.: Eurasian snow cover variability and northern
hemisphere climate variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 345–348, 1999.
Cohen, J. and Jones, J.: A new index for more accurate winter predictions,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L21701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049626, 2011.
Cohen, J., Furtado, J. C., Jones, J., Barlow, M., Whittleston, D., and Entekhabi, D.: Linking Siberian snow cover to precursors of stratospheric variability, J. Climate, 27, 5422–5432, 2014.
Crutzen, P. J.: Estimates of Possible Variations in Total Ozone Due to Natural
Causes and Human Activities, Ambio, 3, 201–210, 1974.
Dai, A. and Song, M.: Little influence of Arctic amplification on mid-latitude
climate, Nat. Clim. Chang., 10, 231–237, 2020.
Davies, P. A., McCarthy, M., Christidis, N., Dunstone, N., Fereday, D.,
Kendon, M., Knight, J. R., Scaife, A. A., and Sexton, D.: The wet and stormy UK
winter of 2019/2020, Weather, 76, 396–402, https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.3955, 2021.
Domeisen, D. I. V.: Estimating the Frequency of Sudden Stratospheric Warming
Events From Surface Observations of the North Atlantic Oscillation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 3180–3194, 2019.
Domeisen, D. I. V. and Butler, A. H.: Stratospheric drivers of extreme
events at the Earth's surface, Commun. Earth Environ., 59, 1–8, 2020.
Domeisen, D. I. V., Sun, L., and Chen, G.: The role of synoptic eddies in
the tropospheric response to stratospheric variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1–5, 2013.
Domeisen, D. I. V., Badin, G., and Koszalka, I. M.: How Predictable Are the
Arctic and North Atlantic Oscillations? Exploring the Variability and
Predictability of the Northern Hemisphere, J. Climate, 31,
997–1014, 2018.
Domeisen, D. I. V., Garfinkel, C. I., and Butler, A. H.: The Teleconnection
of El Niño Southern Oscillation to the Stratosphere, Rev. Geophys., 57, 5–47, 2019.
Domeisen, D. I. V., Butler, A. H., Charlton-Perez, A. J., Ayarzaguena, B.,
Baldwin, M. P., Dunn-Sigouin, E., Furtado, J. C., Garfinkel, C. I., Hitchcock, P., Karpechko, A. Y., Kim, H., Knight, J., Lang, A. L., Lim, E.-P., Marshall, A., Roff, G., Schwartz, C., Simpson, I. R., Son, S.-W., and Taguchi, M.: The role of
stratosphere-troposphere coupling in sub-seasonal to seasonal prediction. 1.
Predictability in the Stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 125, e2019JD030920, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030923, 2020a.
Domeisen, D. I. V., Butler, A. H., Charlton-Perez, A. J., Ayarzaguena, B.,
Baldwin, M. P., Dunn-Sigouin, E., Furtado, J. C., Garfinkel, C. I., Hitchcock, P., Karpechko, A. Y., Kim, H., Knight, J., Lang, A. L., Lim, E.-P., Marshall, A., Roff, G.,
Schwartz, C., Simpson, I. R., Son, S.-W., and Taguchi, M.: The role of
stratosphere-troposphere coupling in sub-seasonal to seasonal prediction. 2.
Predictability arising from stratosphere-troposphere coupling, J. Geophys.
Res., 125, e2019JD030923, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030923, 2020b.
Douville, H.: Stratospheric polar vortex influence on Northern Hemisphere
winter climate variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L18703, 2009.
Dunstone, N., Smith, D., Scaife, A., Hermanson, L., Eade, R., Robinson, N.,
Andrews, M., and Knight, J.: Skilful predictions of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation one year ahead, Nat. Geosci., 9, 809–814, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2824, 2016.
Eade R., Smith, D., Scaife, A. A., and Wallace, E.: Do seasonal to decadal
climate predictions underestimate the predictability of the real world?,
Geophys. Res. Lett, 41, 5620–5628, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061146, 2014.
Ebdon, R. A.: The quasi-biennial oscillation and its association with tropospheric circulation patterns, Meteor. Mag., 104, 282–297, 1975.
Farman, J., Gardiner, B., and Shanklin, J.: Large losses of total ozone in
Antarctica reveal seasonal
Fels, S. B.: Radiative–Dynamical Interactions in the Middle Atmosphere,
Adv. Geophys., 28, 277–300, 1985.
Fereday, D. R., Maidens, A., Arribas, A., Scaife, A. A., and Knight, J. R.: Seasonal forecasts of northern hemisphere winter
2009/10, Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 034031, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034031, 2012.
Fereday, D. R., Chadwick, R., Knight, J. R., and Scaife, A. A.: Tropical rainfall drives stronger future ENSO-NAO
teleconnection in CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088664, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088664, 2020.
Fletcher, C. G., Hardiman, S. C., Kushner, P. J., and Cohen, J.: The dynamical
response to snow cover perturbations in a large ensemble of atmospheric GCM
integrations, J. Climate, 22, 1208–1222, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2505.1,
2009.
Folland, C. K., Scaife, A. A., Lindesay, J., and Stephenson, D. B.: How potentially predictable is northern European winter climate a season ahead?, Int. J. Climatol., 32, 801–818, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2314, 2012.
Furtado, J. C., Cohen, J. L., Butler, A. H., Riddle, E. E., and Kumar, A.: Eurasian snow cover
variability and links to winter climate in the CMIP5 models, Clim. Dynam., 45, 2591–2605, 2015.
Garfinkel, C. I. and Schwartz, C.: MJO-related tropical convection anomalies
lead to more accurate stratospheric vortex variability in subseasonal
forecast models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 10054–10062, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074470, 2017.
Garfinkel, C. I., Butler, A. H., Waugh, D. W., Hurwitz, M. M., and Polvani, L. M.:
Why might stratospheric sudden warmings occur with similar frequency in El
Nino and La Nina winters?, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 117, D19106,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017777, 2012a.
Garfinkel, C. I., Feldstein, S. B., Waugh, D. W., Yoo, C., and Lee, S.:
Observed connection between stratospheric sudden warmings and the
Madden-Julian Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L18807, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053144, 2012b.
Garfinkel, C. I., Son, S.-W., Song, K., Aquila, V., and Oman, L. D.:
Stratospheric variability contributed to and sustained the recent hiatus in
Eurasian winter warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 374–382, 2017.
Garfinkel, C. I., Schwartz, C., Domeisen, D. I. V., Son, S.-W., Butler, A. H., and
White, I. P.: Extratropical atmospheric predictability from the Quasi-Biennial
Oscillation in subseasonal forecast models, J. Geophys. Res., 123,
7855–7866, 2018.
Garfinkel, C. I., Schwartz, C., Butler, A. H., Domeisen, D. I. V., Son,
S.-W., and White, I. P.: Weakening of the Teleconnection From El
Niño–Southern Oscillation to the Arctic Stratosphere Over the Past Few
Decades: What Can Be Learned From Subseasonal Forecast Models?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 7683–7696, 2019.
Garfinkel, C. I., Schwartz, C., White, I. P., and Rao, J.: Predictability of the early winter Arctic oscillation from autumn Eurasian snowcover in subseasonal forecast models, Clim. Dynam., 55, 961–974, 2020.
Gerber, E. P., Butler, A., Calvo, N., Charlton-Perez, A., Giorgetta, M.,
Manzini, E., Perlwitz, J., Polvani, L. M., Sassi, F., Scaife, A. A., Shaw, T. A.,
Son, S.-W., and Watanabe, S.: Assessing and Understanding the Impact of
Stratospheric Dynamics and Variability on the Earth System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 845–859, 2012.
Givon, Y., Garfinkel, C. I., and White, I.: Transient extratropical response
to solar ultraviolet radiation in the Northern Hemisphere winter, J. Climate, 34, 3367–3383, 2021.
Graversen, R. G. and Christiansen, B.: Downward propagation from the
stratosphere to the troposphere: A comparison of the two hemispheres, J.
Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108, 4780, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004077, 2003.
Gray, L. J., Beer, J., Geller, M., Haigh, J. D., Lockwood, M., Matthes, K., Cubasch, U., Fleitmann, D., Harrison, G., Hood, L., Luterbacher, J., Meehl, G. A., Shindell, D., van Geel, B., and White, W.: Solar influences on climate, Rev. Geophys., 48, RG4001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000282, 2010.
Gray, L. J., Scaife, A. A., Mitchell, D. M., Osprey, S., Ineson, S.,
Hardiman, S., Butchart, N., Knight, J., Sutton, R., and Kodera, K.: A lagged
response to the 11 year solar cycle in observed winter Atlantic/European
weather patterns, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 13405–13420, 2013.
Gray, L. J., Anstey, J. A., Kawatani, Y., Lu, H., Osprey, S., and Schenzinger, V.: Surface impacts of the Quasi Biennial Oscillation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8227–8247, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8227-2018, 2018.
Hall, R. J., Scaife, A. A., Hanna, E., Jones, J. M., and Erdélyi, R.:
Simple statistical probabilistic forecasts of the winter NAO, Weather Forecast., 32, 1585–1601, 2017.
Harari, O., Garfinkel, C. I., Ziskin Ziv, S., Morgenstern, O., Zeng, G., Tilmes, S., Kinnison, D., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Pozzer, A., O'Connor, F. M., and Davis, S.: Influence of Arctic stratospheric ozone on surface climate in CCMI models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9253–9268, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9253-2019, 2019.
Hardiman, S. C., Scaife, A. A., Dunstone, N. J., and Wang, L.:
Subseasonal vacillations in the winter stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
47, e2020GL087766, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087766, 2020a.
Hardiman, S. C., Dunstone, N. J., Scaife, A. A., Smith, D. M., Knight, J.
R., Davies, P., Claus, M., and Greatbatch, R. J.:
Predictability of European winter 2019/20: Indian Ocean dipole impacts on
the NAO, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 2020, e1005, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1005, 2020b.
Hardiman, S. C., Butchart, N., Charlton-Perez, A. J.,
Shaw, T. A., Akiyoshi, H., Baumgaertner, A., Bekki, S.,
Braesicke, P., Chipperfield, M., Dameris, M., Garcia, R. R.,
Michou, M., Pawson, S., Rozanov, E., and Shibata, K.: Improved
predictability of the troposphere using stratospheric final warmings, J.
Geophys. Res., 116, D18113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015914, 2011.
Harnik N.: Observed stratospheric downward reflection and its relation to
upward pulses of wave activity, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D08120, https://doi.org/2008JD010493, 2009.
Harnik, N. and Lindzen, R. S.: The effect of reflecting surfaces on the
vertical structure and variability of stratospheric planetary waves, J.
Atmos. Sci., 58, 2872–2894, 2001.
Haynes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Shepherd, T. G., Marks, C. J., and Shine,
K. P.: On the “Downward Control” of Extratropical Diabatic Circulations by
Eddy-Induced Mean Zonal Forces, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 651–678, 1991.
Haynes, P., Hitchcock, P., Hitchman, M., Yoden, S., Hendon, H., Kiladis, G.,
Kodera, K., and Simpson, I.: The influence of the stratosphere on the tropical
troposphere, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 99, 803–845, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2021-040, 2021.
Henderson, G. R., Peings, Y., Furtado, J. C., and Kushner, P. J.: Snow-atmosphere coupling in
the northern hemisphere, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 954–963, 2018.
Hendon, H. H. and Abhik, S.: Differences in vertical structure of the
Madden-Julian oscillation associated with the quasi-biennial oscillation,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 4419–4428, 2018.
Hendon, H. H., Lim, E.-P., and Abhik, S.: Impact of Interannual Ozone
Variations on the Downward Coupling of the 2002 Southern Hemisphere
Stratospheric Warming, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, 1–16,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032952, 2020.
Hermanson L., Eade, R., Robinson, N. H., Andrews, M. B., Knight, J. R.,
Scaife, A. A., and Smith, D. M.: Forecast cooling of the Atlantic subpolar gyre and
associated impacts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 5167–5174, 2014.
Hitchcock, P. and Simpson, I. R.: The Downward Influence of Stratospheric
Sudden Warmings, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3856–3876, 2014.
Hitchcock, P. and Haynes, P. H.: Stratospheric control of planetary waves,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11884–11892, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071372, 2016.
Hitchcock, P., Shepherd, T.G., Taguchi, M., Yoden, S., and Noguchi, S.:
Lower-stratospheric radiative damping and Polar-night Jet Oscillation
events, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 1391–1408, 2013.
Holton, J. R. and Tan, H.-C.: The influence of the equatorial quasi-biennial
oscillation on the global circulation at 50 mb, J. Atmos. Sci., 37,
2200–2208, 1980.
Honda, M., Inoue, J., and Yamane, S.: Influence of low Arctic sea-ice minima
on anomalously cold Eurasian winters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L08707,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL037079, 2009.
Huebener, H., Cubasch, U., Langematz, U., Spangehl, T., Niehörster, F., Fast, I., and
Kunze, M.: Ensemble climate simulations using a fully coupled
ocean–troposphere–stratosphere general circulation model, Phil. Trans. R.
Soc. A., 365, 2089–2101, 2007.
Hurwitz, M. M., Newman, P. A., and Garfinkel, C. I.: On the influence of
North Pacific sea surface temperature on the Arctic winter climate, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D19110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017819, 2012.
Ineson, S. and Scaife, A. A.: The role of the stratosphere in the European
climate response to El Nino, Nat. Geosci., 2, 32–36, 2009.
Ineson S., Scaife, A. A., Knight, J. R., Manners, J. C., Dunstone, N. J., Gray, L. J.,
and Haigh, J. D.: Solar Forcing of Winter Climate Variability in the Northern
Hemisphere, Nat. Geosci., 4, 753–757, 2011.
Ineson, S., Maycock, A., Gray, L. J., Scaife, A. A., Dunstone, N. J., Harder, J. W., Knight, J. R., Lockwood, M., Manners, J. C., and Wood, R. A.: Regional climate impacts of a possible
future grand solar minimum, Nat. Commun., 6, 7535, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8535, 2015.
Inoue, M., Takahashi, M., and Naoe, H.: Relationship between the stratospheric
quasi-biennial oscillation and tropospheric circulation in northern autumn,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D24115, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016040, 2011.
Jain, S., Scaife, A. A., and Mitra, A. K.: Skill of Indian summer monsoon
rainfall prediction in multiple seasonal prediction systems, Clim. Dynam., 52,
5291–5301, 2019.
Jaiser, R., Dethloff, K., and Handorf, D: Stratospheric response to arctic sea ice
retreat and associated planetary wave propagation changes, Tellus A., 65, 19375, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v65i0.19375, 2013.
Jia, L., Yang, X., Vecchi, G., Gudgel, R., Delworth, T., Fueglistaler, S.,
Lin, P., Scaife, A. A., Underwood, S., and Lin, S.: Seasonal Prediction
Skill of Northern Extratropical Surface Temperature Driven by the
Stratosphere, J. Climate, 30, 4463–4475, 2017.
Johnson, S. J., Stockdale, T. N., Ferranti, L., Balmaseda, M. A., Molteni, F., Magnusson, L., Tietsche, S., Decremer, D., Weisheimer, A., Balsamo, G., Keeley, S. P. E., Mogensen, K., Zuo, H., and Monge-Sanz, B. M.: SEAS5: the new ECMWF seasonal forecast system, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1087–1117, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1087-2019, 2019.
Joshi, M. M., Charlton, A. J., and Scaife, A. A.: On the influence of
stratospheric water vapor changes on the tropospheric circulation, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 33, L09806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025983, 2006.
Jucker, M. and Reichler, T.: Dynamical precursors for statistical
prediction of stratospheric sudden warming events, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13124–13132, 2018.
Jucker, M., Reichler, T., and Waugh, D. W.: How frequent are Antarctic
sudden stratospheric warmings in present and future climate?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2021GL093215, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093215, 2021.
Kang, I. S., Kug, J. S., Lim, M. J., and Choi, D. H.: Impact of transient eddies on
extratropical seasonal-mean predictability in DEMETER models, Clim. Dynam., 37, 509–519, 2011a.
Kang, S. M., Polvani, L. M., Fyfe, J. C., and Sigmond, M.: Impact of Polar Ozone
Depletion on Subtropical Precipitation, Science, 332, 951–954, 2011b.
Karpechko, A. Y.: Predictability of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings in the
ECMWF Extended-Range Forecast System, Mon. Wea. Rev., 146, 1063–1075,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0317.1, 2018.
Karpechko, A. Y. and Manzini, E.: Stratospheric influence on tropospheric
climate change in the Northern Hemisphere, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D05133,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017036, 2012.
Karpechko, A., Gillett, N. P., Marshall, G. J., and Scaife, A. A.: Stratospheric
influence on circulation changes in the Southern Hemisphere troposphere in
coupled climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035354, 2008.
Karpechko, A. Y., Perlwitz, J., and Manzini, E.: A model study of
tropospheric impacts of the Arctic ozone depletion 2011, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 7999–8014, 2014.
Karpechko, A. Y., Hitchcock, P., Peters, D. H. W., and Schneidereit, A.:
Predictability of downward propagation of sudden stratospheric warmings,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 1459–1470, 2017.
Karpechko, A. Y., Charlton-Perez, A., Balmaseda, M., Tyrrell, N., and Vitart, F.:
Predicting sudden stratospheric warming 2018 and its climate impacts with a
multimodel ensemble, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13538–13546, 2018.
Karpechko, A. Y., Tyrrell, N. L., and Rast, S.: Sensitivity of QBO teleconnection to
model circulation biases, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 2147–2159, 2021.
Kautz, L. A., Polichtchouk, I., Birner, T., Garny, H., and Pinto, J. G.:
Enhanced extended-range predictability of the 2018 late-winter Eurasian cold
spell due to the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1040–1055,
2019.
Kidston, J., Scaife, A. A., Hardiman, S. C., Mitchell, D. M., Butchart, N., Baldwin, M.
P., and Gray, L. J.: Stratospheric influence on tropospheric jet
streams, storm tracks and surface weather, Nat. Geosci., 8, 433–440,
2015.
Kim, B. M., Son, S. W., Min, S. K., Jeong, J. H., Kim, S. J., Zhang, X., Shim, T., and Yoon, J. H.: Weakening of the stratospheric polar
vortex by Arctic sea-ice loss, Nat. Comm., 5, 4646, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5646, 2014.
Kim, H., Caron, J. M., Richter, J. H., and Simpson, I. R.: The lack of
QBO-MJO connection in CMIP6 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2020GL087295, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087295, 2020.
King, M. P., Hell, M., and Keenlyside, N.: Investigation of the atmospheric
mechanisms related to the autumn sea ice and winter circulation link in the
Northern Hemisphere, Clim. Dynam., 46, 1185–1195, 2016.
King, A. D., Butler, A. H., Jucker, M., Earl, N. O., and Rudeva, I.: Observed
relationships between sudden stratospheric warmings and European climate
extremes, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 13943–13961, 2019.
Knight, J., Scaife, A., Bett, P. E., Collier, T., Dunstone, N., Gordon, M., Hardiman, S., Hermanson, L., Ineson, S., Kay, G., McLean, P., Pilling, C., Smith, D., Stringer, N., Thornton, H., and Walker B.: Predictability of European winters 2017/2018 and
2018/2019: Contrasting Influences from the Tropics and Stratosphere, Atmos.
Sci. Lett., e1009, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1009, 2020.
Kodera, K.: On the origin and nature of the interannual variability of the
winter stratospheric circulation in the northern hemisphere, J. Geophys.
Res., 100, 14077–14087, 1995.
Kodera, K. and Kuroda, Y.: Dynamical response to the solar cycle, J. Geophys.
Res., 107, 4749, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002224, 2002.
Kodera K. and Mukougawa, H.: Eurasian Cold Surges Triggered by the Nonlinear Reflection of Stratospheric Planetary Waves in December 2012, SOLA, 13, 140–145, https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2017-026, 2017.
Kodera, K., Yamazaki, K., Chiba, M., and Shibata, K.: Downward propagation of
upper stratospheric mean zonal wind perturbation to the troposphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 17, 1263–1266, 1990.
Kodera, K., Mukougawa, H., and Itoh, S.: Tropospheric impact of reflected
planetary waves from the stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L16806,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034575, 2008.
Kolstad, E. W. and Screen, J. A.: Non-stationary relationship between
autumn Arctic sea ice and the winter North Atlantic Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 7583–7591, 2019.
Kretschmer, M., Coumou, D., Donges, J. F., and Runge, J.: Using causal effect
networks to analyze different Arctic drivers of midlatitude winter
circulation, J. Climate, 29, 4069–4081, 2016.
Kretschmer, M., Zappa, G., and Shepherd, T. G.: The role of Barents–Kara sea ice loss in projected polar vortex changes, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 715–730, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-715-2020, 2020.
Kretschmer, M., Adams, S. V., Arribas, A., Prudden, R., Robinson, N.,
Saggioro, E., and Shepherd, T. G.: Quantifying causal pathways of
teleconnections, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E2247–E2263, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0117.1, 2021.
Kuhn, T. S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1970.
Kunz, T. and Greatbatch, R. J.: On the Northern Annular Mode Surface
Signal Associated with Stratospheric Variability, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2103–2118, 2013.
Kuroda, Y.: Role of the stratosphere on the predictability of medium-range
weather forecast: A case study of winter 2003–2004, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L19701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034902, 2008.
Kuroda, Y. and Kodera, K.: Variability of the polar night jet in the northern and southern hemispheres, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 20703–20713, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900226.2001, 2001.
Kushner, P. J. and Polvani, L. M.: Stratosphere-troposphere coupling in a
relatively simple AGCM: The role of eddies, J. Climate, 17, 629–639, 2004.
Kushnir, Y., Scaife, A. A., Arritt, R., Balsamo, G., Boer, G., Doblas-Reyes, F., Hawkins, E., Kimoto, M., Kolli, R. K., Kumar, A., Matei, D., Matthes, K., Müller, W. A., O'Kane, T., Perlwitz, J., Power, S., Raphael, M., Shimpo, A., Smith, D., Tuma, M., and Wu, B.: Towards operational
predictions of the near-term climate, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 94–101, 2019.
Labe, Z., Peings, Y., and Magnusdottir, G.: The effect of QBO phase on the
atmospheric response to projected Arctic sea ice loss in early winter,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 7663–7671, 2019.
Labitzke, K.: On the Mutual Relation between Stratosphere and Troposphere
during Periods of Stratospheric Warmings in Winter, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim.,
4, 91–99, 1965.
Lai, W. K. M., Robson, J. I., Wilcox, L. J., and Dunstone, N.: Mechanisms of
Internal Atlantic Multidecadal Variability in HadGEM3-GC3.1 at Two Different
Resolutions, J. Climate, 35, 1365–1383, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0281.1, 2021.
Lawrence, Z. D., Perlwitz, J., Butler, A. H., Manney, G. L., Newman, P. A.,
Lee, S. H., and Nash, E. R.: The remarkably strong Arctic stratospheric
polar vortex of winter 2020: Links to record-breaking Arctic Oscillation and
ozone loss, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125,
e2020JD033271, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033271, 2020.
Leckebusch, G. C., Ulbrich, U., Fröhlich, L., and Pinto, J. G.: Property
loss potentials for European midlatitude storms in a changing climate,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L05703, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027663, 2007.
Lee, S. H., Charlton-Perez, A. J., Furtado, J. C., Woolnough, S. J.: Representation of
the Scandinavia–Greenland pattern and its relationship with the polar
vortex in S2S forecast models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 4083–4098, 2020a.
Lee, S. H., Lawrence, Z. D., Butler, A. H., and Karpechko, A.: Seasonal forecasts
of the exceptional Northern Hemisphere winter of 2020, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
47, e2020GL090328, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090328, 2020b.
Leung, T. Y., Leutbecher, M., Reich, S., and Shepherd, T. G.: Impact of the
mesoscale range on error growth and the limits to atmospheric
predictability, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 3769–3779, 2020.
L'Heureux, M. L., Levine, A. F. Z., Newman, M., Ganter, C., Luo, J.-J.,
Tippett, M. K., and Stockdale, T. N.: ENSO Prediction, in: El Niño Southern
Oscillation in a Changing Climate, edited by: McPhaden, M. J., Santoso, A., and
Cai, W., AGU Monograph, Wiley, USA, 2020.
Lim, E.-P., Hendon, H. H., and Thompson, D. W. J.: Seasonal evolution of
stratosphere-troposphere coupling in the Southern Hemisphere and
implications for the predictability of surface climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 12002–12016, 2018.
Lim, E.-P., Hendon, H. H., Boschat, G., Hudson, D., Thompson, D. W. J.,
Dowdy, A. J., and Arblaster, J.: Australian hot and dry extremes induced by
weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex, Nat. Geosci., 12, 896–901, 2019a.
Lim, Y., Son, S.-W., Marshall, A. G., Hendon, H. H., and Seo, K.-H.: Influence
of the QBO on MJO prediction skill in the subseasonal-to-seasonal prediction
models, Clim. Dynam., 53, 1681–1695, 2019b.
Lim, E.-P., Hendon, H. H., Butler, A. H., Thompson, D. W. J., Lawrence, Z. D., Scaife, A. A., Shepherd, T. G., Polichtchouk, I., Nakamura, H., Kobayashi, C., Comer, R., Coy, L., Dowdy, A., Garreaud, R. D., Newman, P. A., and Wang, G.: The 2019 Southern Hemisphere polar stratospheric
warming and its impacts, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E1150–E1171, 2021.
Lin, H., Brunet, G., and Derome, J.: An Observed Connection between the
North Atlantic Oscillation and the Madden–Julian Oscillation, J. Climate, 22, 364–380, 2009.
Liu, C., Tian, B., Li, K.-F., Manney, G. L., Livesey, N. J., Yung, Y. L., and Waliser, D. E.: Northern Hemisphere mid-winter
vortex-displacement and vortex-split stratospheric sudden warmings:
influence of the Madden-Julian Oscillation and Quasi-Biennial Oscillation,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 12599–12620, 2014.
Lockwood, M.: Solar change and climate: An update in the light of the
current exceptional solar minimum, Proc. R. Soc. A, 466, 303–329, 2010.
Lorenz, E. N.: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of
motion, Tellus, 21, 289–307, 1969.
MacLachlan, C., Arribas, A., Peterson, K. A., Maidens, A., Fereday, D.,
Scaife, A. A., Gordon, M., Vellinga, M., Williams, A., Comer, R. E., Camp, J.,
Xavier, P., and Madec, G.: Global Seasonal forecast system version 5
(GloSea5): a high-resolution seasonal forecast system, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 1072–1084, 2015.
Mann, M. E., Park, J., and Bradley, R. S.: Global interdecadal and
century-scale climate oscillations during the past 5 centuries, Nature, 378,
266–270, 1995.
Manzini, E., Giorgetta, M. A., Esch, M., Kornblueh, L., and Roeckner, E.:
The Influence of Sea Surface Temperatures on the Northern Winter
Stratosphere: Ensemble Simulations with the MAECHAM5 Model, J. Climate, 19, 3863–3881, 2006.
Manzini, E., Karpechko, A. Y., Anstey, J., Baldwin, M. P., Black, R. X., Cagnazzo, C., Calvo, N., Charlton-Perez, A., Christiansen, B., Davini, P., Gerber, E., Giorgetta, M., Gray, L., Hardiman, S. C., Lee, Y.-Y., Marsh, D. R., McDaniel, B. A., Purich, A., Scaife, A. A., Shindell, D., Son, S.-W., Watanabe, S., and Zappa, G.: Northern winter climate change: Assessment of uncertainty in CMIP5 projections related to stratosphere-troposphere coupling, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 7979–7998, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021403, 2014.
Manzini, E., Karpechko, A. Y., and Kornblueh, L.: Nonlinear Response of the
Stratosphere and the North Atlantic-European Climate to Global Warming,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 4255–4263, 2018.
Mariotti, A., Baggett, C., Barnes, E. A., Becker, E., Butler, A. H.,
Collins, D. C., Dirmeyer, P. A., Ferranti, L., Johnson, N. C., Jones, J., Kirtman, B. P.,
Lang, A. L., Molod, A., Newman, M., Robertson, A. W., Schubert, S., Waliser, D. E.,
and Albers J.: Windows of opportunity for skillful forecasts subseasonal to
seasonal and beyond, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E608–E625, 2020.
Marsh, D. R., Garcia, R. R., Kinnison, D. E., Boville, B. A., Sassi, F.,
Solomon, S. C., and Matthes, K.: Modeling the whole atmosphere response to
solar cycle changes in radiative and geomagnetic forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D23306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008306, 2007.
Marshall, A. and Scaife, A. A.: Improved predictability of stratospheric sudden
warming events in an AGCM with enhanced stratospheric resolution, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D16114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012643, 2010.
Marshall, A. G., Scaife, A. A., and Ineson, S.: Enhanced Seasonal Prediction of European Winter Warming following Volcanic Eruptions, J. Climate, 22, 6168–6180, 2009.
Marshall, A. G., Hendon, H. H., Son, S. W., and Lim, Y.: Impact of the
quasi-biennial oscillation on predictability of the Madden–Julian
oscillation, Clim. Dynam., 49, 1365–1377, 2017.
Martin, Z., Wang, S., Nie, J., and Sobel, A.: The Impact of the QBO on MJO
Convection in Cloud-Resolving Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 669–688, 2019.
Martin, Z., Son, S. W., Butler, A., Hendon, H., Kim, H., Sobel, A., Yoden, S., and Zhang, C.: The influence of the quasi-biennial
oscillation on the Madden–Julian oscillation, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 2,
477–489, 2021.
Matthias, V. and Kretschmer, M.: The Influence of Stratospheric Wave
Reflection on North American Cold Spells, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 1675–1690, 2020.
Maycock, A. C., Ineson, S., Gray, L. J., Scaife, A. A., Anstey, J. A.,
Lockwood, M., Butchart, N., Hardiman, S. C., Mitchell, D. M., and Osprey, S.
M.: Possible impacts of a future grand solar minimum on climate:
Stratospheric and global circulation changes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 9043–9058, 2015.
McKenna, C. M., Bracegirdle, T. J., Shuckburgh, E. F., Haynes, P. H., and Joshi,
M. M.: Arctic sea-ice loss in different regions leads to contrasting Northern
Hemisphere impacts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 945–954, 2018.
McLandress, C. and Shepherd, T. G.: Impact of climate change on stratospheric
sudden warmings as simulated by the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model, J.
Climate, 22, 5449–5463, 2009.
McLandress, C., Shepherd, T. G., Scinocca, J. F., Plummer, D. A., Sigmond, M.,
Jonsson, A. I., and Reader, M. C.: Separating the dynamical effects of climate
change and ozone depletion: Part 2. Southern Hemisphere Troposphere, J.
Climate, 24, 1850–1868, 2011.
Meehl, G. A., Richter, J. H., Teng, H., Capotondi, A., Cobb, K., Doblas-Reyes, F., Donat, M. G., England, M. E., Fyfe, J. C., Han, W., Kim, H., Kirtman, B. P., Kushnir, Y., Lovenduski, N. S., Mann, M. E., Merryfield, W. J., Nieves, V., Pegion, K., Rosenbloom, N., Sanchez, S. C., Scaife, A. A., Smith, D., Subramanian, A. C., Sun, L., Thompson, D., Ummenhofer, C. C., and Xie, S. P. : Initialised Earth System Prediction from Subseasonal to
Decadal Timescales, Nat. Rev. Earth. Environ., 2, 340–357, 2021.
Merryfield, W. J., Lee, W., Boer, G. J., Kharin, V. V., Scinocca, J. F.,
Flato, G. M., Ajayamohan, R. S., Fyfe, J. C., Tang, Y., and Polavarapu, S.:
The Canadian Seasonal to Interannual Prediction System. Part I: Models and
Initialization, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 2910–2945, 2013.
Merryfield, W. J., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Ferranti, L., Jeong, J.-H.,
Orsolini, Y. J., Saurral, R. I., Scaife, A. A., Tolstykh, M. A., and Rixen, M.: Advancing climate forecasting, Eos, 98, 17–21, 2017.
Merryfield, W. J., Baehr, J., Batté, L., Becker, E. J., Butler, A. H., Coelho, C. A. S., Danabasoglu, G., Dirmeyer, P. A., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Domeisen, D. I. V., Ferranti, L., Ilynia, T., Kumar, A., Müller, W. A., Rixen, M., Robertson, A. W., Smith, D. M., Takaya, Y., Tuma, M., Vitart, F., White, C. J., Alvarez, M. S., Ardilouze, C., Attard, H., Baggett, C., Balmaseda, M. A., Beraki, A. F., Bhattacharjee, P. S., Bilbao, R., de Andrade, F. M., DeFlorio, M. J., Díaz, L. B., Ehsan, M. A., Fragkoulidis, G., Grainger, S., Green, B. W., Hell, M. C., Infanti, J. M., Isensee, K., Kataoka, T., Kirtman, B. P., Klingaman, N. P., Lee, J.-Y., Mayer, K., McKay, R., Mecking, J. V., Miller, D. E., Neddermann, N., Ng, C. H. J., Ossó, A., Pankatz, K., Peatman, S., Pegion, K., Perlwitz, J., Recalde-Coronel, G. C., Reintges, A., Renkl, C., Solaraju-Murali, B., Spring, A., Stan, C., Sun, Y. Q., Tozer, C. R., Vigaud, N., Woolnough, S., and Yeager, S.: Current and emerging developments in subseasonal to decadal prediction,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E869–E896, 2020.
Molina, M. and Rowland, F.: Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes:
chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone, Nature, 249, 810–812, 1974.
Monge-Sanz, B. M., Bozzo, A., Byrne, N., Chipperfield, M. P., Diamantakis, M., Flemming, J., Gray, L. J., Hogan, R. J., Jones, L., Magnusson, L., Polichtchouk, I., Shepherd, T. G., Wedi, N., and Weisheimer, A.: A stratospheric prognostic ozone for seamless Earth System Models: performance, impacts and future, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1261, in review, 2021.
Müller, W. A. and Roeckner, E.: ENSO impact on midlatitude circulation
patterns in future climate change projections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33,
L05711, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025032, 2006.
Mukougawa, H., Sakai, H., and Hirooka, T.: High sensitivity to the initial
condition for the prediction of stratospheric sudden warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022909, 2005.
Mukougawa, H., Hirooka, T., and Kuroda, Y.: Influence of stratospheric
circulation on the predictability of the tropospheric Northern Annular Mode,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L08814, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL037127, 2009.
Mukougawa, H., Noguchi, S., Kuroda, Y., Mizuta, R., and Kodera, K.:
Dynamics and predictability of downward-propagating stratospheric planetary
waves observed in March 2007, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 3533–3550, 2017.
Nie, Y., Scaife, A. A., Ren, H. L., Comer, R. E., Andrews, M. B., Davis, P., and Martin, N.: Stratospheric initial conditions provide seasonal
predictability of the North Atlantic and Arctic Oscillations, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 034006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0385, 2019.
Noguchi, S., Mukougawa, H., Kuroda, Y., Mizuta, R., Yabu, S., and
Yoshimura, H.: Predictability of the stratospheric polar vortex breakdown:
An ensemble reforecast experiment for the splitting event in January 2009,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 3388–3404, 2016.
Noguchi, S., Kuroda, Y., Mukougawa, H., Mizuta, R., and Kobayashi, C.:
Impact of satellite observations on forecasting sudden stratospheric
warmings, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086233, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086233, 2020a.
Noguchi, S., Kuroda, Y., Kodera, K., and Watanabe, S.: Robust enhancement
of tropical convective activity by the 2019 Antarctic sudden stratospheric
warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088743, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088743, 2020b.
Norton, W. A.: Sensitivity of northern hemisphere surface climate to simulation of the stratospheric polar vortex, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1627, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL016958, 2003.
Oehrlein, J., Chiodo, G., and Polvani, L. M.: The effect of interactive ozone chemistry on weak and strong stratospheric polar vortex events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10531–10544, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10531-2020, 2020.
Omrani, N. E., Keenlyside, N. S., Bader, J., and Manzini, E.: Stratosphere key for
wintertime atmospheric response to warm Atlantic decadal conditions, Clim. Dynam., 42, 649–663, 2014.
O'Reilly, C. H., Weisheimer, A., Woollings, T., Gray, L. J., and MacLeod, D.: The importance
of stratospheric initial conditions for winter North Atlantic Oscillation
predictability and implications for the signal-to-noise paradox, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 131–146, 2019.
Orsolini, Y. J., Senan, R., Benestad, R. E., and Melsom, A.: Autumn atmospheric response to
the 2007 low Arctic sea ice extent in coupled ocean–atmosphere hindcasts, Clim. Dynam., 38, 2437–2448, 2012.
Owens, M. J., Lockwood, M., Hawkins, E., Usoskin, I., Jones, G. S.,
Barnard, L., Schurer, A., and Fasullo, J.: The Maunder minimum and the Little
Ice Age: an update from recent reconstructions and climate simulations, J.
Space Weather Space Clim., 7, A33, https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017034, 2017.
Pawson, S. and B. Naujokat: The cold winters of the middle 1990s in the
northern lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 14209–14222, 1999.
Pawson, S., Kodera, K., Hamilton, K., Shepherd, T. G., Beagley, S. R.,
Boville, B. A., Farrara, J. D., Fairlie, T. D. A., Kitoh, A., Lahoz, W. A.,
Langematz, U., Manzini, E., Rind, D. H., Scaife, A. A., Shibata, K., Simon,
P., Swinbank, R., Takacs, L., Wilson, R. J., Al-Saadi, J. A., Amodei, M.,
Chiba, M., Coy, L., de Grandpré, J., Eckman, R. S., Fiorino, M., Grose,
W. L., Koide, H., Koshyk, J. N., Li, D., Lerner, J., Mahlman, J. D.,
McFarlane, N. A., Mechoso, C. R., Molod, A., O'Neill, A., Pierce, R. B.,
Randel, W. J., Rood, R. B., and Wu, F.: The GCM-Reality Intercomparison
Project for SPARC (GRIPS): Scientific Issues and Initial Results, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 81, 781–796, 2000.
Peings, Y., Brun, E., Mauvais, V., and Douville, H.: How stationary is the
relationship between Siberian snow and Arctic Oscillation over the 20th
century?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 183–188, 2013.
Perlwitz, J. and Graf, H.: The Statistical Connection between Tropospheric
and Stratospheric Circulation of the Northern Hemisphere in Winter, J. Climate, 8, 2281–2295, 1995.
Perlwitz, J. and Harnik, N.: Observational evidence of a stratospheric
influence on the troposphere by planetary wave reflection, J. Climate, 16,
3011–3026, 2003.
Plumb, R. A. and Semeniuk, K.: Downward migration of extratropical zonal
wind anomalies, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4223, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002773, 2003.
Pohlmann, H., Müller, W. A., Kulkarni, K., Kameswarrao, M., Matei, D., Vamborg, F. S. E., Kadow, C., Illing, S., and Marotzke, J.: Improved forecast skill in the tropics in the new MiKlip decadal climate predictions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5798–5802, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058051, 2013.
Polvani, L. M. and Kushner, P. J.: Tropospheric response to stratospheric
perturbations in a relatively simple general circulation model, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 29, 18-1–18-4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014284, 2002.
Polvani, L. M., Waugh, D. W., Correa, G. J. P., and Son, S.-W.: Stratospheric ozone
depletion: the main driver of 20th Century atmospheric circulation changes
in the Southern Hemisphere, J. Climate, 24, 795–812, 2011.
Polvani, L. M., Sun, L., Butler, A. H., Richter, J. H., and Deser, C.: Distinguishing
stratospheric sudden warmings from ENSO as key drivers of wintertime climate
variability over the North Atlantic and Eurasia, J. Climate, 30, 1959–1969,
2017.
Previdi, M. and Polvani, L. M.: Climate System Response to Stratospheric Ozone
Depletion and Recovery, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 140, 2401–2419, 2014.
Purich, A. and Son, S.-W.: Impact of Antarctic ozone depletion and recovery
on Southern Hemisphere precipitation, evaporation and extreme changes,
J. Climate, 25, 3145–3154, 2012.
Rao, J. and Garfinkel, C. I.: CMIP5/6 Models Project Little Change in the
Statistical Characteristics of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings in the 21st
Century, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 034024, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd4fe, 2020.
Rao, J. and Garfinkel, C. I.: The Strong Stratospheric Polar Vortex in March
2020 in Sub-Seasonal to Seasonal Models: Implications for Empirical
Prediction of the Low Arctic Total Ozone Extreme, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD034190, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034190, 2021.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., and White, I. P.: Predicting the downward and
surface influence of the February 2018 and January 2019 sudden stratospheric
warming events in subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031919, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031919, 2020a.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., White, I. P., and Schwartz, C.: How does the
Quasi-Biennial Oscillation affect the boreal winter tropospheric circulation
in CMIP5/6 models?, J. Climate, 33, 8975–8996, 2020b.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., and White, I. P.: Projected strengthening of the
extratropical surface impacts of the stratospheric Quasi Biennial
Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089149, 2020c.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., White, I. P., and Schwartz, C.: The Southern Hemisphere
Minor Sudden Stratospheric Warming in September 2019 and its predictions in
S2S Models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125,
e2020JD032723, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032723, 2020d.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., and White, I. P.: Development of the
Extratropical Response to the Stratospheric Quasi-Biennial
Oscillation, J. Climate, 34, 7239–7255, 2021.
Reichler, T., Kim, J., Manzini, E., and Kröger, J.: A stratospheric connection to Atlantic climate
variability, Nat. Geosci., 5, 783–787, 2012.
Richter, J. H., Pegion, K., Sun, L., Kim, H., Caron, J. M., Glanville, A.,
LaJoie, E., Yeager, S., Kim, W. M., Tawfik, A., and Collins, D.:
Subseasonal Prediction with and without a Well-Represented Stratosphere in
CESM1, Weather Forecast., 35, 2589–2602, 2020a.
Richter, J. H., Anstey, J. A., Butchart, N., Kawatani, Y., Meehl, G. A.,
Osprey, S., and Simpson, I. R.: Progress in simulating the quasi-biennial
oscillation in CMIP models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125,
e2019JD032362, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032362, 2020b.
Richter, J. H., Butchart, N., Kawatani, Y., Bushell, A. C., Holt, L., Serva, F., Anstey, J., Simpson, I. R., Osprey, S., Hamilton, K., Braesicke, P., Cagnazzo, C., Chen, C. C., Garcia, R. R., Gray, L. J., Kerzenmacher, T., Lott, F., McLandress, C., Naoe, H., Scinocca, J., Stockdale, T. N., Versick, S., Watanabe, S., Yoshida, K., and Yukimoto S.: Response of the
Quasi-Biennial Oscillation to a warming climate in global climate models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., Special Section QBO Modelling Intercomparison, 1–29, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3749, 2020c.
Riddle, E. E., Butler, A. H., Furtado, J. C., Cohen, J. L., and Kumar, A.: CFSv2
ensemble prediction of the wintertime Arctic Oscillation, Clim. Dynam.,
41, 1099–1116, 2013.
Rind, D., Suozzo, R., Balachandran, N. K., Lacis, A., and Russell, G.: The
GISS global climate-middle atmosphere model. Part I: Model structure and
climatology, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 329–370, 1988.
Robock, A. and Mao, J.: Winter warming from large volcanic eruptions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 2405–2408, 1992.
Roff, G., Thompson, D. W. J., and Hendon, H.: Does increasing model
stratospheric resolution improve extended-range forecast skill?, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 38, L05809, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046515, 2011.
Runde, T., Dameris, M., Garny, H., and Kinnison, D. E.: Classification of
stratospheric extreme events according to their downward propagation to the
troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 6665–6672, 2016.
Saito, N., Maeda, S., Nakaegawa, T., Takaya, Y., Imada, Y., and Matsukawa, C.: Seasonal predictability of the North Atlantic Oscillation and zonal mean
fields associated with stratospheric influence in JMA/MRI-CPS2, Scientific
Online Letters on the Atmosphere, 13, 209–213, 2017.
Samarasinghe, S. M., Connolly, C., Barnes, E. A., Ebert-Uphoff, I., and
Sun, L.: Strengthened causal connections between the MJO and the North
Atlantic with climate warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2020GL091168, https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10504546.2, 2021.
Sassi, F., Garcia, R. R., Boville, B. A., and Liu, H.: On temperature
inversions and the mesospheric surf zone, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4380, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001525, 2002.
Scaife, A. A. and Knight, J. R.: Ensemble simulations of the cold European
winter of 2005/6, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 134, 1647–1659, 2008.
Scaife, A. A. and Smith, D.: A signal-to-noise paradox in climate science, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1, 28, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0038-4, 2018.
Scaife, A. A., Butchart, N., Warner, C. D., Stainforth, D., Norton, W. A., and
Austin, J.: Realistic Quasi-Biennial Oscillations in a simulation of the global
climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3481–3484, 2000.
Scaife, A. A., Knight, J. R., Vallis, G. K., Folland, C. K.: A stratospheric
influence on the winter NAO and North Atlantic surface climate, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, L18715, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023226, 2005.
Scaife, A. A., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L., Moberg, A., and Knight, J. R.: European
climate extremes and the North Atlantic Oscillation, J. Climate, 21, 72–83,
2008.
Scaife, A. A., Spangehl, T., Fereday, D., Cubasch, U., Langematz, U., Akiyoshi, H.,
Bekki, S., Braesicke, P., Butchart, N., Chipperfield, M., Gettelman, A.,
Hardiman, S., Michou, M., Rozanov, E., and Shepherd, T. G.: Climate Change and
Stratosphere-Troposphere Interaction, Clim. Dynam., 38, 2089–2097, 2012.
Scaife, A. A., Ineson, S., Knight, J. R., Gray, L., Kodera, K., and Smith, D. M.: A mechanism for lagged North Atlantic climate response to solar variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 434–439, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50099, 2013.
Scaife, A. A., Athanassiadou, M., Andrews, M., Arribas, A., Baldwin, M. P., Dunstone, N., Knight, J., MacLachlan, C., Manzini, E., Müller, W. A., Pohlmann, H., Smith, D., Stockdale, T., and Williams, A.: Predictability of the quasi-biennial oscillation and
its northern winter teleconnection on seasonal to decadal timescales,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1752–1758, 2014a.
Scaife, A. A., Arribas, A., Blockley, E., Brookshaw, A., Clark, R. T., Dunstone, N., Eade, R., Fereday, D., Folland, C. K., Gordon, M., Hermanson, L., Knight, J. R., Lea, D. J., MacLachlan, C., Maidens, A., Martin, M., Peterson, A. K., Smith, D., Vellinga, M., Wallace, E., Waters, J., and Williams, A.: Skillful long-range prediction of European and North
American winters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 2514–2519, 2014b.
Scaife, A. A., Karpechko, A.-Y., Baldwin, M. P., Brookshaw, A., Butler, A. H.,
Eade, R., Gordon, M., MacLachlan, C., Martin, N., Dunstone, N., and Smith, D.:
Seasonal winter forecasts and the stratosphere, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 17, 51–56, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.598, 2016.
Scaife, A. A., Comer, R. E., Dunstone, N. J., Knight, J. R., Smith, D. M., MacLachlan, C., Martin, N., Peterson, K. A., Rowlands, D., Carroll, E. B., Belcher, S., and Slingo, J.: Tropical rainfall, Rossby waves and regional winter climate predictions, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2910, 2017.
Schwartz, C. and Garfinkel, C. I.: Relative Roles of the MJO and Stratospheric
Variability in North Atlantic and European Winter Climate, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 4184–4201, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025829, 2017.
Schwartz, C. and Garfinkel, C. I.: Troposphere-stratosphere coupling in
subseasonal-to-seasonal models and its importance for a realistic
extratropical response to the Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD032043, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032043, 2020.
Screen, J. A. and Blackport, R.: How robust is the atmospheric response to
projected Arctic sea ice loss across climate models?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 11406–11415, 2019.
Screen, J. A., Deser, C., Smith, D. M., Zhang, X., Blackport, R., Kushner, P. J., Oudar, T., McCusker, K. E., and Sun, L.: Consistency and discrepancy in
the atmospheric response to Arctic sea-ice loss across climate models,
Nat. Geosci., 11, 155–163, 2018.
Seviour, W. J. M., Hardiman, S. C., Gray, L. J., Butchart, N., MacLachlan, C.,
and Scaife, A. A.: Skillful seasonal prediction of the Southern Annular Mode
and Antarctic ozone, J. Climate, 27, 7462–7474,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00264.1, 2014.
Shaw, T. A. and Perlwitz, J.: The life cycle of Northern Hemisphere downward
wave coupling between the stratosphere and troposphere, J. Climate, 26 1745–1763, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00251.1, 2013.
Shindell, D. T., Schmidt, G. A., Miller, R. L., and Rind, D.: Northern
hemisphere winter climate response to greenhouse gas, ozone, solar, and
volcanic forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 7193–7210, 2001.
Shukla, J.: Dynamical Predictability of Monthly Means, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2547–2572, 1981.
Sigmond, M. and Scinocca, J. F.: The influence of basic state on the Northern
Hemisphere circulation response to climate change, J. Climate, 23, 1434–1446, 2010.
Sigmond, M., Scinocca, J. F., and Kushner, P. J.: The impact of the
stratosphere on tropospheric climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35,
L12706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033573, 2008.
Sigmond, M., Scinocca, J. F., Kharin, V. V., and Shepherd, T. G.: Enhanced
seasonal forecast skill following stratospheric sudden warmings, Nat. Geosci., 6, 98–102, 2013.
Simpson, I. R., Hitchcock, P., Seager, R., Wu, Y., and Callaghan, P.: The
Downward Influence of Uncertainty in the Northern Hemisphere Stratospheric
Polar Vortex Response to Climate Change, J. Climate, 31,
6371–6391, 2018.
Smith, D. M., Cusack, S., Colman, A. W., Folland, C. K., Harris, G. R., and Murphy, J. M.: Improved surface temperature prediction for the coming decade from a global climate model, Science, 317, 796–799, 2007.
Smith, D. M., Scaife, A. A., Boer, G. J., Caian, M., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Guemas, V., Hawkins, E., Hazeleger, W., Hermanson, L., Ho, C. K., Ishii, M., Kharin, V., Kimoto, M., Kirtman, B., Lean, J., Matei, D., Merryfield, W. J., Müller, W. A., Pohlmann, H., Rosati, A., Wouters, B., and Wyser, K.: Real-time multi-model decadal climate predictions, Clim. Dynam., 41, 2875–2888, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1600-0, 2013.
Smith, D. M., Eade, R., Scaife, A. A., Caron, L.-P., Danabasoglu, G., DelSole, T. M., Delworth, T., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Dunstone, N. J., Hermanson, L., Kharin, V., Kimoto, M., Merryfield, W. J., Mochizuki, T., Müller, W. A., Pohlmann, H., Yeager, S., and Yang, X.: Robust skill of decadal climate predictions, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 2, 13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0071-y, 2019.
Smith, D. M., Dunstone, N. J., Scaife, A. A., Fiedler, E. K., Copsey, D., and Hardiman, S. C.: Atmospheric Response to Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice: The Importance of Ocean–Atmosphere Coupling and the Background State, J. Climate, 30, 4547–4565, 2017.
Smith, D. M., Scaife, A. A., Eade, R., Athanasiadis, P., Bellucci, A., Bethke, I., Bilbao, R., Borchert, L. F., Caron, L.-P., Counillon, F., Danabasoglu, G., Delworth, T., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Dunstone, N. J., Estella-Perez, V., Flavoni, S., Hermanson, L., Keenlyside, N., Kharin, V., Kimoto, M., Merryfield, W. J., Mignot, J., Mochizuki, T., Modali, K., Monerie, P.-A., Müller, W. A., Nicolí, D., Ortega, P., Pankatz, K., Pohlmann, H., Robson, J., Ruggieri, P., Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Swingedouw, D., Wang, Y., Wild, S., Yeager, S., Yang, X., and Zhang, L.: North Atlantic climate far more predictable than models imply, Nature, 583, 796–800, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2525-0, 2020
Smith, D. M., Eade, R., Andrews, M. B., Ayres, H., Clark, A., Chripko, S., Deser, C., Dunstone, N. J., García-Serrano, J., Gastineau, G., Graff, L. S., Hardiman, S. C., He, B., Hermanson, L., Jung, T., Knight, J., Levine, X., Magnusdottir, G., Manzini, E., Matei, D., Mori, M., Msadek, R., Ortega, P., Peings, Y., Scaife, A. A., Screen, J. A., Seabrook, M., Semmler, T., Sigmond, M., Streffing, J., Sun, L., and Walsh, A.: Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss, Nat. Commun., 13, 727, 2022.
Smith, K. L. and Polvani, L. M.: The surface impacts of Arctic stratospheric
ozone anomalies, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 074015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074015, 2014.
Solomon, S., Ivy, D. J., Kinnison, D., Mills, M. J., Neely, R. R., and
Schmidt, A.: Emergence of healing in the Antarctic ozone layer, Science,
353, 269–274, 2016.
Son, S. W., Polvani, L. M., Waugh, D. W., Akiyoshi, H., Garcia, R., Kinnison, D., Pawson, S., Rozanov, E., Shepherd, T. G., and Shibata, K.: The impact of
stratospheric ozone recovery on the Southern Hemisphere westerly jet,
Science, 320, 1486–1489, 2008.
Son, S.-W., Tandon, N. F., Polvani, L. M., and Waugh, D. W.: Ozone hole and Southern Hemisphere climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L15705, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038671, 2009.
Son, S.-W., Purich, A., Hendon, H. H., Kim, B.-M., and Polvani, L. M.:
Improved seasonal forecast using ozone hole variability?, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 40, 6231–6235, 2013.
Son, S.-W., Lim, Y., Yoo, C., Hendon, H. H., and Kim, J.: Stratospheric control
of Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Climate, 30, 1909–1922, 2017.
Son, S.-W., Han, B.-R., Garfinkel, C. I., Kim, S. Y., Park, R., Abraham, N. L., Akiyoshi, H., Archibald, A. T., Butchart, N., Chipperfield, M. P., Dameris, M., Deushi, M., Dhomse, S. S., Hardiman, S. C., Jöckel, P., Kinnison, D., Michou, M., Morgenstern, O., O'Connor, F. M., Oman, L. D., Plummer, D. A., Pozzer, A., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Stone, K., Tilmes, S., Yamashita, Y., and Zeng, G.: Tropospheric jet response
to Antarctic ozone depletion: An update with Chemistry-Climate Model
Initiative (CCMI) models, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 054024, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf21, 2018.
Son, S.-W., Kim, H., Song, K., Kim, S.-W., Martineau, P., Hyun, Y.-K., and
Kim, Y.: Extratropical prediction skill of the subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S)
prediction models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125,
e2019JD031273, 2020.
Song, K. and Son, S.: Revisiting the ENSO–SSW Relationship, J. Climate, 31, 2133–2143, 2018.
Song, Y. and Robinson, W. A.: Dynamical Mechanisms for Stratospheric Influences on the Troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1711–1725, 2004.
Statnaia, I. A., Karpechko, A. Y., and Järvinen, H. J.: Mechanisms and predictability of sudden stratospheric warming in winter 2018, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 657–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020, 2020.
Steil, B., Dameris, M., Brühl, C., Crutzen, P. J., Grewe, V., Ponater, M., and Sausen, R.: Development of a chemistry module for GCMs: first results of a multiannual integration, Ann. Geophys., 16, 205–228, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-998-0205-8, 1998.
Stenchikov, G., Hamilton, K., Stouffer, R. J., Robock, A., Ramaswamy, V.,
Santer, B., and Graf, H.-F.: Arctic Oscillation response to volcanic
eruptions in the IPCC AR4 climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006286,
2006.
Stockdale, T. N., Molteni, F., and Ferranti, L.: Atmospheric initial
conditions and the predictability of the Arctic Oscillation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 1173–1179, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062681, 2015.
Stockdale, T. N., Kim, Y.-H., Anstey, J. A., Palmeiro, F. M., Butchart, N., Scaife, A. A., Andrews, M., Bushell, A. C., Dobrynin. M., Garcia-Serrano, J., Hamilton, K., Kawatani, Y., Lott, F., McLandress, C., Naoe, H., Osprey, S., Pohlmann, H., Scinocca, J., Watanabe, S., Yoshida, K., and Yukimoto, S.: Multi-Model Predictions of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., Special Section QBO Modelling Intercomparison, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3919, 2021.
Sun, L., Deser, C., and Tomas, R. A.: Mechanisms of Stratospheric and
Tropospheric Circulation Response to Projected Arctic Sea Ice Loss, J. Climate, 28, 7824–7845, 2015.
Swinbank, R., Douglas, C. S., Lahoz, W. A., O'Neill, A., and Heaps, A.: Middle
atmosphere variability in the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 124, 1485–1525, 1998.
Swingedouw, D., Ortega, P., Mignot, J., Guilyardi, E.,
Masson-Delmotte, V., Butler, P. G., Khodri., M., and Séférian, R.:
Bidecadal North Atlantic ocean circulation variability controlled by timing
of volcanic eruptions, Nat. Commun., 6, 6545, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7545, 2015.
Taguchi, M.: Predictability of Major Stratospheric Sudden Warmings: Analysis
Results from JMA Operational 1-Month Ensemble Predictions from 2001/02 to
2012/13, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 789–806, 2016.
Taguchi, M.: Seasonal Winter forecasts of the northern stratosphere and
troposphere: Results from JMA seasonal hindcast experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 827–840, 2018.
Takaya, Y., Yasuda, T., Fujii, Y., Matsumoto, S., Soga, T., Mori, H., Hirai, M.,
Ishikawa, I., Sato, H., Shimpo, A., Kamachi, M., and Ose, T.: Japan Meteorological
Agency/Meteorological Research Institute-Coupled Prediction System version 1
(JMA/MRI-CPS1) for operational seasonal forecasting, Clim. Dynam., 1–2,
313–333, 2017.
Thiéblemont, R., Matthes, K., Omrani, N. E., Kodera, K., and Hansen, F.: Solar forcing
synchronizes decadal North Atlantic climate variability, Nat. Commun., 6, 8268, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9268, 2015.
Thompson, D. W. J. and Solomon, S.: Interpretation of Recent Southern
Hemisphere Climate Change, Science, 296, 895–899, 2002.
Thompson, D. W. J., Baldwin, M. P., and Wallace, J. M.: Stratospheric connection
to Northern Hemisphere wintertime weather: Implications for prediction, J.
Climate, 15, 1421–1428, 2002.
Thompson, D. W. J., Baldwin, M. P., and Solomon, S.: Stratosphere–troposphere
coupling in the Southern Hemisphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 708–715, 2005.
Thompson, D., Solomon, S., Kushner, P., England, M. H., Grise, K. M., and Karoly, D. J.: Signatures of the Antarctic
ozone hole in Southern Hemisphere surface climate change, Nat. Geosci., 4,
741–749, 2011.
Tompkins, A. M., Ortiz De Zárate, M. I., Saurral, R. I., Vera, C.,
Saulo, C., Merryfield, W. J., Sigmond, M., Lee, W., Baehr, J., Braun, A.,
Butler, A., Déqué, M., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Gordon, M., Scaife, A.
A., Imada, Y., Ishii, M., Ose, T., Kirtman, B., Kumar, A., Müller, W.
A., Pirani, A., Stockdale, T., Rixen, M., and Yasuda, T.: The
Climate-System Historical Forecast Project: Providing Open Access to
Seasonal Forecast Ensembles from Centers around the Globe, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 2293–2301, 2017.
Tripathi, O. P., Baldwin, M., Charlton-Perez, A., Charron, M., Eckermann, S.,
Gerber, E., Harrison, G., Jackson, D., Kim, B., Kuroda, Y., Lang, A., Lee, C.,
Mahmood, S., Mizuta, R., Roff, G., Sigmond, M., and Son, S.-W.: The predictability of the
extra-tropical stratosphere on monthly timescales and its impact on the
skill of tropospheric forecasts, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 987–1003,
2015a.
Tripathi, O., Charlton-Perez, A., Sigmond, M., and Vitart, F.: Enhanced
long-range forecast skill in boreal winter following stratospheric strong
vortex conditions, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 104007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104007, 2015b.
Tyrrell, N. L., Karpechko, A. Y., and Raisanen, P.: The Influence of Eurasian
Snow Extent on the Northern Extratropical Stratosphere in a QBO Resolving
Model, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 315–328, 2018.
Tyrrell, N. L., Karpechko, A. Y., Uotila, P., and Vihma, T.: Atmospheric circulation
response to anomalous Siberian forcing in October 2016 and its long-range
predictability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 2800–2810, 2019.
Tyrrell, N., Karpechko, A. Y., and Rast, S.: Siberian snow forcing in a
dynamically bias-corrected model, J. Climate, 33, 10455–10467, 2020.
Vitart, F.: Madden–Julian Oscillation prediction and teleconnections in
the S2S database, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 143, 2210–2220, 2017.
Wang, L., Ting, M., and Kushner, P. J.: A robust empirical seasonal
prediction of winter NAO and surface climate, Sci. Rep., 7, 279, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00353-y, 2017.
Wang, L., Hardiman, S. C., Bett, P. E., Comer, R. E., Kent, C., and Scaife, A. A.: What chance of a sudden stratospheric warming in the
southern hemisphere?, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 104038, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba8c1, 2020.
Warner, J. L., Screen, J. A., and Scaife, A. A.: Links between Barents-Kara
sea ice and the extratropical atmospheric circulation explained by internal
variability and tropical forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2019GL085679, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085679, 2020.
White, I., Garfinkel, C. I., Gerber, E. P., Jucker, M., Hitchcock, P., and Rao, J.: The generic nature of the tropospheric response to sudden stratospheric warmings, J. Climate, 33, 5589–5610, 2020.
Wittman, L., Polvani, M., Scott, R. K., and Charlton, A. J.: Stratospheric influence
on baroclinic lifecycles and its connection to the Arctic Oscillation,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L16113, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020503, 2004.
Wittman, A., Charlton, J., and Polvani, L. M.: The effect of lower stratospheric
shear on baroclinic instability, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 479–496, 2007.
Woo, S. H., Sung, M. K., Son, S. W. and Kug, J. S.: Connection between weak stratospheric
vortex events and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, Clim. Dynam., 45, 3481–3492, 2015.
Yamazaki, K., Nakamura, T., Ukita, J., and Hoshi, K.: A tropospheric pathway of the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) impact on the boreal winter polar vortex, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5111–5127, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5111-2020, 2020.
Yoo, C. and Son, S.-W.: Modulation of the boreal wintertime Madden-Julian
oscillation by the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 43, 1392–1398, 2016.
Zambri, B., Solomon, S., Thompson, D. W. J., and Fu, Q.: Emergence of Southern Hemisphere stratospheric circulation changes in response to ozone recovery, Nat. Geosci. 14, 638–644, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00803-3, 2021.
Zappa, G. and Shepherd, T. G.: Storylines of atmospheric circulation change
for European regional climate impact assessment, J. Climate, 30, 6561–6577,
2017.
Zappa, G., Pithan, F., and Shepherd, T. G.: Multimodel evidence for an
atmospheric circulation response to Arctic sea ice loss in the CMIP5 future
projections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1011–1019, 2018.
Zhang, F., Sun, Y. Q., Magnusson, L., Buizza, R., Lin, S., Chen, J., and
Emanuel, K.: What Is the Predictability Limit of Midlatitude Weather?, J.
Atm. Sci., 76, 1077–1091, 2019.
Zhang, P., Wu, Y., Simpson, I. R., Smith, K. L., Zhang, X., De, B., and
Callaghan, P.: A stratospheric pathway linking a colder Siberia to
Barents-Kara Sea sea ice loss, Science Advances, 4, eaat6025, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat6025, 2018.
Short summary
Great progress has been made in computer modelling and simulation of the whole climate system, including the stratosphere. Since the late 20th century we also gained a much clearer understanding of how the stratosphere interacts with the lower atmosphere. The latest generation of numerical prediction systems now explicitly represents the stratosphere and its interaction with surface climate, and here we review its role in long-range predictions and projections from weeks to decades ahead.
Great progress has been made in computer modelling and simulation of the whole climate system,...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint