Articles | Volume 22, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13797-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13797-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
26 Oct 2022
Research article |
| 26 Oct 2022
| 26 Oct 2022
Sources of surface O3 in the UK: tagging O3 within WRF-Chem
Johana Romero-Alvarez
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia,
Norwich, UK
now at: Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado
Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
now at: Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental
Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
now at: NOAA Global Systems Laboratory (GSL), Boulder, CO, USA
Aurelia Lupaşcu
Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Potsdam,
Germany
Douglas Lowe
Centre for Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
now at: Research IT, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Alba Badia
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia,
Norwich, UK
now at: Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA),
Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Scott Archer-Nicholls
Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry, University
of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
now at: Research IT, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Steve Dorling
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia,
Norwich, UK
Claire E. Reeves
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia,
Norwich, UK
Tim Butler
Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Potsdam,
Germany
Institut für Meteorologie, Freie Universität Berlin,
Berlin, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Tim Butler, Tabish Ansari, Claudio A. Belis, Elisa Bergas-Masso, Willem van Caspel, Hilde Fagerli, Johannes Flemming, Marta Garcia Vivanco, Paul Griffiths, Douglas S. Hamilton, Coralina Hernandez Trujillo, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Vincent Huijnen, Matthew Kasoar, Johannes W. Kaiser, Gerbrand Koren, Zbigniew Klimont, Florian Lindl, Aura Lupascu, Mariano Mertens, Martijn Schaap, Steven T. Turnock, Oliver Wild, Philipp Weiss, Jacek Kaminski, Rosa Wu, and Terry Keating
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1367, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1367, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Air pollution travels across continents, meaning emissions in one region can affect air quality far away. To better understand this, scientists from many groups are planning to run coordinated computer simulations of the atmosphere. By comparing results across models and emission scenarios, the planned study will show how pollution moves between regions and which sources matter most, helping governments design more effective air quality policies.
Tabish Ansari, Aditya Nalam, Aurelia Lupaşcu, Carsten Hinz, Simon Grasse, and Tim Butler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 16833–16876, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16833-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16833-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Surface ozone can travel far from its sources. In recent decades, emissions of ozone-forming gases have decreased in North America and Europe but risen in Asia, alongside rising global methane levels. Using advanced modeling, this study reveals that while local reductions in nitrogen oxides have lowered summer ozone, increases in ozone production from natural and foreign sources offset these gains. Methane remains important, but its ozone impact has declined with reduced local emissions.
Diego Guizzardi, Monica Crippa, Tim Butler, Terry Keating, Rosa Wu, Jacek Kaminski, Jeroen Kuenen, Junichi Kurokawa, Satoru Chatani, Tazuko Morikawa, George Pouliot, Jacinthe Racine, Michael D. Moran, Zbigniew Klimont, Patrick M. Manseau, Rabab Mashayekhi, Barron H. Henderson, Steven J. Smith, Rachel Hoesly, Marilena Muntean, Manjola Banja, Edwin Schaaf, Federico Pagani, Jung-Hun Woo, Jinseok Kim, Enrico Pisoni, Junhua Zhang, David Niemi, Mourad Sassi, Annie Duhamel, Tabish Ansari, Kristen Foley, Guannan Geng, Yifei Chen, and Qiang Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 5915–5950, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5915-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5915-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The global air pollution emission mosaic HTAP_v3.2 is the state-of-the-art inventory to address the evolution of a set of policy-relevant pollutants over the past 2 decades. The mosaic is made harmonising and blending seven regional inventories, gapfilled with the most recent release of the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research. By incorporating the best available local information, the HTAP_v3.2 emission mosaic can be used for policy-relevant studies at regional and global level.
Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Christian Hogrefe, Paul A. Makar, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Jesse O. Bash, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Butler, Olivia E. Clifton, Philip Cheung, Alma Hodzic, Richard Kranenburg, Aura Lupascu, Kester Momoh, Juan Luis Perez-Camaño, Jonathan Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Donna Schwede, Ranjeet Sokhi, and Stefano Galmarini
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12923–12953, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12923-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12923-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Deposition is key in air quality modeling. An unprecedented evaluation of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative phase 4 models is performed on different deposition schemes in relation to the land use and land cover (LULC) used. Among the results, LULC masks have to be harmonized and up-to-date information used in place of masks that are outdated and too coarse. Alternatively, LULC masks should be evaluated and intercompared when multiple model results are analyzed.
Christian Hogrefe, Stefano Galmarini, Paul A. Makar, Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Olivia E. Clifton, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Jesse O. Bash, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Butler, Philip Cheung, Alma Hodzic, Richard Kranenburg, Aurelia Lupascu, Kester Momoh, Juan Luis Perez-Camanyo, Jonathan E. Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Martijn Schaap, Donna B. Schwede, and Ranjeet Sokhi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12629–12656, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12629-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12629-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Performed under the umbrella of Phase 4 of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII4), this study applies AQMEII4 diagnostic tools to better characterize how dry deposition removes pollutants from the atmosphere in regional-scale models. The results also strongly suggest that improvement and harmonization of the representation of land use in these models would serve the community in their future development efforts.
Nikhil Korhale, Tabish Ansari, Tim Butler, Jurgita Ovadndevaite, Colin D. O'Dowd, and Liz Coleman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3824, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3824, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the distribution and trends of surface ozone and its precursors over Ireland using advanced modelling to determine the drivers of ozone. Trajectory analysis is used to trace the origins of air masses, revealing the impact of transboundary pollution and atmospheric transport. The rising trend has been observed at urban sites over the past two decades, but without a similar trend at coastal sites. Coastal areas consistently show higher ozone levels than rural and urban areas.
Xiao Lu, Yiming Liu, Jiayin Su, Xiang Weng, Tabish Ansari, Yuqiang Zhang, Guowen He, Yuqi Zhu, Haolin Wang, Ganquan Zeng, Jingyu Li, Cheng He, Shuai Li, Teerachai Amnuaylojaroen, Tim Butler, Qi Fan, Shaojia Fan, Grant L. Forster, Meng Gao, Jianlin Hu, Yugo Kanaya, Mohd Talib Latif, Keding Lu, Philippe Nédélec, Peer Nowack, Bastien Sauvage, Xiaobin Xu, Lin Zhang, Ke Li, Ja-Ho Koo, and Tatsuya Nagashima
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7991–8028, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7991-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7991-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study analyzes summertime ozone trends in East and Southeast Asia derived from a comprehensive observational database spanning from 1995 to 2019, incorporating aircraft observations, ozonesonde data, and measurements from 2500 surface sites. Multiple models are applied to attribute to changes in anthropogenic emissions and climate. The results highlight that increases in anthropogenic emissions are the primary driver of ozone increases both in the free troposphere and at the surface.
Cynthia H. Whaley, Tim Butler, Jose A. Adame, Rupal Ambulkar, Steve R. Arnold, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Benjamin Gaubert, Douglas S. Hamilton, Min Huang, Hayley Hung, Johannes W. Kaiser, Jacek W. Kaminski, Christoph Knote, Gerbrand Koren, Jean-Luc Kouassi, Meiyun Lin, Tianjia Liu, Jianmin Ma, Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon, Elisa Bergas Masso, Jessica L. McCarty, Mariano Mertens, Mark Parrington, Helene Peiro, Pallavi Saxena, Saurabh Sonwani, Vanisa Surapipith, Damaris Y. T. Tan, Wenfu Tang, Veerachai Tanpipat, Kostas Tsigaridis, Christine Wiedinmyer, Oliver Wild, Yuanyu Xie, and Paquita Zuidema
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3265–3309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3265-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3265-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The multi-model experiment design of the HTAP3 Fires project takes a multi-pollutant approach to improving our understanding of transboundary transport of wildland fire and agricultural burning emissions and their impacts. The experiments are designed with the goal of answering science policy questions related to fires. The options for the multi-model approach, including inputs, outputs, and model setup, are discussed, and the official recommendations for the project are presented.
Aditya Nalam, Aura Lupaşcu, Tabish Ansari, and Tim Butler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5287–5311, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Tropospheric O3 molecules are labeled with the identity of their precursor source to simulate contributions from various emission sources to the global tropospheric O3 burden (TOB) and its trends. With an equatorward shift, anthropogenic NOx emissions become significantly more efficient at producing O3 and play a major role in driving TOB trends, mainly due to larger convection at the tropics effectively lifting O3 and its precursors to the free troposphere, where O3 lifetime is longer.
Paul A. Makar, Philip Cheung, Christian Hogrefe, Ayodeji Akingunola, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Jesse O. Bash, Michael D. Bell, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Butler, Hazel Cathcart, Olivia E. Clifton, Alma Hodzic, Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Richard Kranenburg, Aurelia Lupascu, Jason A. Lynch, Kester Momoh, Juan L. Perez-Camanyo, Jonathan Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Donna Schwede, Thomas Scheuschner, Mark W. Shephard, Ranjeet S. Sokhi, and Stefano Galmarini
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3049–3107, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3049-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3049-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The large range of sulfur and nitrogen deposition estimates from air quality models results in a large range of predicted impacts. We used models and deposition diagnostics to identify the processes controlling atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen deposition variability. Controlling factors included the uptake of gases and aerosols by hydrometeors, aerosol inorganic chemistry, particle dry deposition, ammonia bidirectional fluxes, gas deposition via plant cuticles and soil, and land use data.
Edward C. Chan, Ilona J. Jäkel, Basit Khan, Martijn Schaap, Timothy M. Butler, Renate Forkel, and Sabine Banzhaf
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1119–1139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1119-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1119-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
An enhanced emission module has been developed for the PALM model system, improving flexibility and scalability of emission source representation across different sectors. A model for parametrized domestic emissions has also been included, for which an idealized model run is conducted for particulate matter (PM10). The results show that, in addition to individual sources and diurnal variations in energy consumption, vertical transport and urban topology play a role in concentration distribution.
Ben A. Cala, Scott Archer-Nicholls, James Weber, N. Luke Abraham, Paul T. Griffiths, Lorrie Jacob, Y. Matthew Shin, Laura E. Revell, Matthew Woodhouse, and Alexander T. Archibald
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14735–14760, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14735-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14735-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is an important trace gas emitted from the ocean recognised as setting the sulfate aerosol background, but its oxidation is complex. As a result representation in chemistry-climate models is greatly simplified. We develop and compare a new mechanism to existing mechanisms via a series of global and box model experiments. Our studies show our updated DMS scheme is a significant improvement but significant variance exists between mechanisms.
Robert Woodward-Massey, Roberto Sommariva, Lisa K. Whalley, Danny R. Cryer, Trevor Ingham, William J. Bloss, Stephen M. Ball, Sam Cox, James D. Lee, Chris P. Reed, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, Brian J. Bandy, Grant L. Forster, Claire E. Reeves, Paul S. Monks, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14393–14424, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14393-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14393-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of OH, HO2 and RO2 radicals and also OH reactivity were made at a UK coastal site and compared to calculations from a constrained box model utilising the Master Chemical Mechanism. The model agreement displayed a strong dependence on the NO concentration. An experimental budget analysis for OH, HO2, RO2 and total ROx demonstrated significant imbalances between HO2 and RO2 production rates. Ozone production rates were calculated from measured radicals and compared to modelled values.
Ioannis Cheliotis, Thomas Lauvaux, Jinghui Lian, Theodoros Christoudias, George Georgiou, Alba Badia, Frédéric Chevallier, Pramod Kumar, Yathin Kudupaje, Ruixue Lei, and Philippe Ciais
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2487, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2487, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
A consistent estimation of CO2 emissions is complicated due to the scarcity of CO2 observations. In this study, we showcase the potential to improve the CO2 emissions estimations from the NO2 concentrations based on the NO2-to-CO2 ratio, which should be constant for a source co-emitting NO2 and CO2, by comparing satellite observations with atmospheric chemistry and transport model simulations for NO2 and CO2. Furthermore, we demonstrate the significance of the chemistry in NO2 simulations.
Alba Badia, Veronica Vidal, Sergi Ventura, Roger Curcoll, Ricard Segura, and Gara Villalba
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10751–10774, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10751-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10751-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Improving air quality is a top priority in urban areas. In this study, we used an air quality model to analyse the air quality changes occurring over the metropolitan area of Barcelona and other rural areas affected by transport of the atmospheric plume from the city during mobility restrictions. Our results show that mitigation strategies intended to reduce O3 should be designed according to the local meteorology, air transport, and particular ozone chemistry of the urban area.
Chupeng Zhang, Shangfei Hai, Yang Gao, Yuhang Wang, Shaoqing Zhang, Lifang Sheng, Bin Zhao, Shuxiao Wang, Jingkun Jiang, Xin Huang, Xiaojing Shen, Junying Sun, Aura Lupascu, Manish Shrivastava, Jerome D. Fast, Wenxuan Cheng, Xiuwen Guo, Ming Chu, Nan Ma, Juan Hong, Qiaoqiao Wang, Xiaohong Yao, and Huiwang Gao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10713–10730, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10713-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10713-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
New particle formation is an important source of atmospheric particles, exerting critical influences on global climate. Numerical models are vital tools to understanding atmospheric particle evolution, which, however, suffer from large biases in simulating particle numbers. Here we improve the model chemical processes governing particle sizes and compositions. The improved model reveals substantial contributions of newly formed particles to climate through effects on cloud condensation nuclei.
Monica Crippa, Diego Guizzardi, Tim Butler, Terry Keating, Rosa Wu, Jacek Kaminski, Jeroen Kuenen, Junichi Kurokawa, Satoru Chatani, Tazuko Morikawa, George Pouliot, Jacinthe Racine, Michael D. Moran, Zbigniew Klimont, Patrick M. Manseau, Rabab Mashayekhi, Barron H. Henderson, Steven J. Smith, Harrison Suchyta, Marilena Muntean, Efisio Solazzo, Manjola Banja, Edwin Schaaf, Federico Pagani, Jung-Hun Woo, Jinseok Kim, Fabio Monforti-Ferrario, Enrico Pisoni, Junhua Zhang, David Niemi, Mourad Sassi, Tabish Ansari, and Kristen Foley
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2667–2694, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study responds to the global and regional atmospheric modelling community's need for a mosaic of air pollutant emissions with global coverage, long time series, spatially distributed data at a high time resolution, and a high sectoral resolution in order to enhance the understanding of transboundary air pollution. The mosaic approach to integrating official regional emission inventories with a global inventory based on a consistent methodology ensures policy-relevant results.
Scott Archer-Nicholls, Rachel Allen, Nathan L. Abraham, Paul T. Griffiths, and Alex T. Archibald
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5801–5813, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5801-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5801-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The nitrate radical is a major oxidant at nighttime, but much less is known about it than about the other oxidants ozone and OH. We use Earth system model calculations to show how the nitrate radical has changed in abundance from 1850–2014 and to 2100 under a range of different climate and emission scenarios. Depending on the emissions and climate scenario, significant increases are projected with implications for the oxidation of volatile organic compounds and the formation of fine aerosol.
Ernesto Reyes-Villegas, Douglas Lowe, Jill S. Johnson, Kenneth S. Carslaw, Eoghan Darbyshire, Michael Flynn, James D. Allan, Hugh Coe, Ying Chen, Oliver Wild, Scott Archer-Nicholls, Alex Archibald, Siddhartha Singh, Manish Shrivastava, Rahul A. Zaveri, Vikas Singh, Gufran Beig, Ranjeet Sokhi, and Gordon McFiggans
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5763–5782, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5763-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5763-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Organic aerosols (OAs), their sources and their processes remain poorly understood. The volatility basis set (VBS) approach, implemented in air quality models such as WRF-Chem, can be a useful tool to describe primary OA (POA) production and aging. However, the main disadvantage is its complexity. We used a Gaussian process simulator to reproduce model results and to estimate the sources of model uncertainty. We do this by comparing the outputs with OA observations made at Delhi, India, in 2018.
Edward C. Chan, Joana Leitão, Andreas Kerschbaumer, and Timothy M. Butler
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1427–1444, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1427-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1427-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Yeti is a Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport-based traffic emission inventory written in the Python 3 scripting language, which adopts a generalized treatment for activity data using traffic information of varying levels of detail introduced in a systematic and consistent manner, with the ability to maximize reusability. Thus, Yeti has been conceived and implemented with a high degree of data and process symmetry, allowing scalable and flexible execution while affording ease of use.
Felix Kleinert, Lukas H. Leufen, Aurelia Lupascu, Tim Butler, and Martin G. Schultz
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8913–8930, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8913-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8913-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We examine the effects of spatially aggregated upstream information as input for a deep learning model forecasting near-surface ozone levels. Using aggregated data from one upstream sector (45°) improves the forecast by ~ 10 % for 4 prediction days. Three upstream sectors improve the forecasts by ~ 14 % on the first 2 d only. Our results serve as an orientation for other researchers or environmental agencies focusing on pointwise time-series predictions, for example, due to regulatory purposes.
Aurelia Lupaşcu, Noelia Otero, Andrea Minkos, and Tim Butler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11675–11699, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11675-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11675-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-level ozone is an important air pollutant that affects human health, ecosystems, and climate. Ozone is not emitted directly but rather formed in the atmosphere through chemical reactions involving two distinct precursors. Our results provide detailed information about the origin of ozone in Germany during two peak ozone events that took place in 2015 and 2018, thus improving our understanding of ground-level ozone.
Robert Woodward-Massey, Roberto Sommariva, Lisa K. Whalley, Danny R. Cryer, Trevor Ingham, William J1 Bloss, Sam Cox, James D. Lee, Chris P. Reed, Leigh R. Crilley, Louisa J. Kramer, Brian J. Bandy, Grant L. Forster, Claire E. Reeves, Paul S. Monks, and Dwayne E. Heard
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-207, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-207, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
We measured radicals (OH, HO2, RO2) and OH reactivity at a UK coastal site and compared our observations to the predictions of an MCMv3.3.1 box model. We find variable agreement between measured and modelled radical concentrations and OH reactivity, where the levels of agreement for individual species display strong dependences on NO concentrations. The most substantial disagreement is found for RO2 at high NO (> 1 ppbv), when RO2 levels are underpredicted by a factor of ~10–30.
Noelia Otero, Oscar E. Jurado, Tim Butler, and Henning W. Rust
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1905–1919, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1905-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1905-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Surface ozone and temperature are strongly dependent and their extremes might be exacerbated by underlying climatological drivers, such as atmospheric blocking. Using an observational data set, we measure the dependence structure between ozone and temperature under the influence of atmospheric blocking. Blocks enhanced the probability of occurrence of compound ozone and temperature extremes over northwestern and central Europe, leading to greater health risks.
Wedad Alahamade, Iain Lake, Claire E. Reeves, and Beatriz De La Iglesia
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 10, 265–285, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-265-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-265-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The goal is to reduce the uncertainty in air quality assessment by imputing all missing pollutants in monitoring stations and identify where more measurements can be beneficial. The proposed approach is based on spatial or temporal similarity between stations. Our proposed approach enables us to impute and estimate plausible concentrations of multiple pollutants at stations across the UK, and the modelled concentrations from the selected models correlated well with the observed concentrations.
Stefano Galmarini, Paul Makar, Olivia E. Clifton, Christian Hogrefe, Jesse O. Bash, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Johannes Bieser, Tim Butler, Jason Ducker, Johannes Flemming, Alma Hodzic, Christopher D. Holmes, Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Richard Kranenburg, Aurelia Lupascu, Juan Luis Perez-Camanyo, Jonathan Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Donna Schwede, Sam Silva, and Ralf Wolke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15663–15697, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15663-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15663-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This technical note presents the research protocols for phase 4 of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII4). This initiative has three goals: (i) to define the state of wet and dry deposition in regional models, (ii) to evaluate how dry deposition influences air concentration and flux predictions, and (iii) to identify the causes for prediction differences. The evaluation compares LULC-specific dry deposition and effective conductances and fluxes.
James Weber, Scott Archer-Nicholls, Nathan Luke Abraham, Youngsub M. Shin, Thomas J. Bannan, Carl J. Percival, Asan Bacak, Paulo Artaxo, Michael Jenkin, M. Anwar H. Khan, Dudley E. Shallcross, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Jonathan Williams, and Alex T. Archibald
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5239–5268, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5239-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5239-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The new mechanism CRI-Strat 2 features state-of-the-art isoprene chemistry not previously available in UKCA and improves UKCA's ability to reproduce observed concentrations of isoprene, monoterpenes, and OH in tropical regions. The enhanced ability to model isoprene, the most widely emitted non-methane volatile organic compound (VOC), will allow understanding of how isoprene and other biogenic VOCs affect atmospheric composition and, through biosphere–atmosphere feedbacks, climate change.
Benjamin A. Nault, Duseong S. Jo, Brian C. McDonald, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Douglas A. Day, Weiwei Hu, Jason C. Schroder, James Allan, Donald R. Blake, Manjula R. Canagaratna, Hugh Coe, Matthew M. Coggon, Peter F. DeCarlo, Glenn S. Diskin, Rachel Dunmore, Frank Flocke, Alan Fried, Jessica B. Gilman, Georgios Gkatzelis, Jacqui F. Hamilton, Thomas F. Hanisco, Patrick L. Hayes, Daven K. Henze, Alma Hodzic, James Hopkins, Min Hu, L. Greggory Huey, B. Thomas Jobson, William C. Kuster, Alastair Lewis, Meng Li, Jin Liao, M. Omar Nawaz, Ilana B. Pollack, Jeffrey Peischl, Bernhard Rappenglück, Claire E. Reeves, Dirk Richter, James M. Roberts, Thomas B. Ryerson, Min Shao, Jacob M. Sommers, James Walega, Carsten Warneke, Petter Weibring, Glenn M. Wolfe, Dominique E. Young, Bin Yuan, Qiang Zhang, Joost A. de Gouw, and Jose L. Jimenez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11201–11224, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11201-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11201-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) is an important aspect of poor air quality for urban regions around the world, where a large fraction of the population lives. However, there is still large uncertainty in predicting SOA in urban regions. Here, we used data from 11 urban campaigns and show that the variability in SOA production in these regions is predictable and is explained by key emissions. These results are used to estimate the premature mortality associated with SOA in urban regions.
Edward C. Chan and Timothy M. Butler
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4555–4572, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4555-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4555-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A large-eddy simulation based chemical transport model is implemented for an idealized street canyon. The dynamics of the model are evaluated using stationary measurements. A transient model run is also conducted over a 24 h period, where variations of pollutant concentrations indicate dependence on emissions, background concentrations, and solar state. Comparison stationary model runs show changes in flow structure concentrations.
Daniel P. Phillips, Frances E. Hopkins, Thomas G. Bell, Peter S. Liss, Philip D. Nightingale, Claire E. Reeves, Charel Wohl, and Mingxi Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10111–10132, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10111-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10111-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present the first measurements of the rate of transfer (flux) of three gases between the atmosphere and the ocean, using a direct flux measurement technique, at a coastal site. We show greater atmospheric loss of acetone and acetaldehyde into the ocean than estimated by global models for the open water; importantly, the acetaldehyde transfer direction is opposite to the model estimates. Measured dimethylsulfide fluxes agreed with a recent model. Isoprene fluxes were too weak to be measured.
Anoop S. Mahajan, Qinyi Li, Swaleha Inamdar, Kirpa Ram, Alba Badia, and Alfonso Saiz-Lopez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8437–8454, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8437-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8437-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Using a regional model, we show that iodine-catalysed reactions cause large regional changes in the chemical composition in the northern Indian Ocean, with peak changes of up to 25 % in O3, 50 % in nitrogen oxides (NO and NO2), 15 % in hydroxyl radicals (OH), 25 % in hydroperoxyl radicals (HO2), and up to a 50 % change in the nitrate radical (NO3). These results show the importance of including iodine chemistry in modelling the atmosphere in this region.
Claire E. Reeves, Graham P. Mills, Lisa K. Whalley, W. Joe F. Acton, William J. Bloss, Leigh R. Crilley, Sue Grimmond, Dwayne E. Heard, C. Nicholas Hewitt, James R. Hopkins, Simone Kotthaus, Louisa J. Kramer, Roderic L. Jones, James D. Lee, Yanhui Liu, Bin Ouyang, Eloise Slater, Freya Squires, Xinming Wang, Robert Woodward-Massey, and Chunxiang Ye
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6315–6330, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6315-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6315-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of isoprene on atmospheric chemistry is dependent on how its oxidation products interact with other pollutants, specifically nitrogen oxides. Such interactions can lead to isoprene nitrates. We made measurements of the concentrations of individual isoprene nitrate isomers in Beijing and used a model to test current understanding of their chemistry. We highlight areas of uncertainty in understanding, in particular the chemistry following oxidation of isoprene by the nitrate radical.
Cited articles
Archer-Nicholls, S., Lowe, D., Utembe, S., Allan, J., Zaveri, R. A., Fast, J. D., Hodnebrog, Ø., Denier van der Gon, H., and McFiggans, G.: Gaseous chemistry and aerosol mechanism developments for version 3.5.1 of the online regional model, WRF-Chem, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 2557–2579, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2557-2014, 2014.
Atkinson, R.: Atmospheric chemistry of VOCs and NOx, Atmos. Environ.,
34, 2063–2101, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00460-4, 2000.
Aulinger, A., Matthias, V., Zeretzke, M., Bieser, J., Quante, M., and Backes, A.: The impact of shipping emissions on air pollution in the greater North Sea region – Part 1: Current emissions and concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 739–758, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-739-2016, 2016.
Auvray, M. and Bey, I.: Long-range transport to Europe: Seasonal variations
and implications for the European ozone budget, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005503,
2005.
Badia, A. and Jorba, O.: Gas-phase evaluation of the online NMMB/BSC-CTM
model over Europe for 2010 in the framework of the AQMEII-Phase2 project,
Atmos. Environ., 115, 657–669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.055, 2015.
Beljaars, A. C. M.: The parametrization of surface fluxes in large scale
models under free convection, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 255–270.
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152203, 1995.
Butler, T., Lupascu, A., Coates, J., and Zhu, S.: TOAST 1.0: Tropospheric Ozone Attribution of Sources with Tagging for CESM 1.2.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2825–2840, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2825-2018, 2018.
Butler, T., Lupascu, A., and Nalam, A.: Attribution of ground-level ozone to anthropogenic and natural sources of nitrogen oxides and reactive carbon in a global chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10707–10731, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10707-2020, 2020.
Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an Advanced Land Surface–Hydrology Model
with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 Modeling System. Part I: Model Implementation
and Sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: An efficient thermal infrared radiation
parameterization for use in general circulation models, NASA Tech. Memo,
104606, 85, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.26.4850 (last access: 20 January 2022), 1994.
Coyle, M., Smith, R. I., Stedman, J. R., Weston, K. J., and Fowler, D.:
Quantifying the spatial distribution of surface ozone concentration in the
UK, Atmos. Environ., 36, 1013–1024,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00303-X, 2002.
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P.,
Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P.,
Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N.,
Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy,
S.B., Hersbach, H., Holm, E.V., Isaksen, L., Kallberg, P., Koehler, M.,
Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J., Park,
B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thepaut, J. N., and Vitart, F.:
The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data
assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011.
DEFRA: Air Pollution in the UK, Report, https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/assets/documents/annualreport/air_pollution_uk_2019_issue_1.pdf (last access: 20 January 2022), 2020.
Derwent, R. G., Stevenson, D. S., Collins, W. J., and Johnson, C. E.:
Intercontinental transport and the origins of the ozone observed at surface
sites in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 38, 1891–1901,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.01.008, 2004.
Derwent, R. G, Simmonds, P. G., Manning, A. J., and Spain, T. G.: Trends
over a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007 in surface ozone at the atmospheric
research station, Mace Head, Ireland, Atmos. Environ., 41, 9091–9098,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.008, 2007.
Derwent, R. G., Stevenson, D. S., Doherty, R. M., Collins, W. J., and
Sanderson, M. G.: How is surface ozone in Europe linked to Asian and North
American NOx emissions?, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7412–7422,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.037, 2008.
Derwent, R. G, Manning, A. J., Simmonds, P. G., Spain, T. G., and O'Doherty,
S.: Analysis and interpretation of 25 years of ozone observations at the
Mace Head Atmospheric Research Station on the Atlantic Ocean coast of
Ireland from 1987 to 2012, Atmos. Environ., 80, 361–368, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.003, 2013.
Derwent, R. G., Utembe, S. R., Jenkin, M. E., and Shallcross, D. E.: Tropospheric ozone production regions and the intercontinental origins of surface ozone over Europe, Atmos. Environ., 112, 216–224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.049, 2015.
Derwent, R. G., Manning, A. J., Simmonds, P. G., Spain, T. G., and
O'Doherty, S.: Long-term trends in ozone in baseline and European
regionally-polluted air at Mace Head, Ireland over a 30-year period, Atmos.
Environ., 179, 279–287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.024, 2018.
EEA: Air quality in Europe – 2017 report, European
Environmental Agency, https://doi.org/10.2800/850018, 2017.
Emmons, L. K., Walters, S., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., Pfister, G. G., Fillmore, D., Granier, C., Guenther, A., Kinnison, D., Laepple, T., Orlando, J., Tie, X., Tyndall, G., Wiedinmyer, C., Baughcum, S. L., and Kloster, S.: Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 43–67, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-43-2010, 2010.
Emmons, L. K., Hess, P. G., Lamarque, J.-F., and Pfister, G. G.: Tagged ozone mechanism for MOZART-4, CAM-chem and other chemical transport models, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1531–1542, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1531-2012, 2012.
Fares, S., Goldstein, A., and Loreto, F.: Determinants of ozone fluxes and
metrics for ozone risk assessment in plants, J. Exp. Bot., 61, 629–633,
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp336, 2010.
Finch, D. P. and Palmer, P. I.: Increasing ambient surface ozone levels
over the UK accompanied by fewer extreme events, Atmos. Environ., 237,
117627, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117627, 2020.
Francis, X. V., Chemel, C., Sokhi, R. S., Norton, E. G., Ricketts, H. M. A.,
and Fisher, B. E. A.: Mechanisms responsible for the build-up of ozone over
South East England during the August 2003 heatwave, Atmos. Environ., 45,
6880–6890, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.035, 2011.
Fuhrer, J.: Ozone risk for crops and pastures in present and future
climates, Naturwissenschaften, 96, 173–194,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0468-7, 2009.
Grell, G. A. and Dévényi, D.: A generalized approach to
parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation
techniques, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10–13,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015311, 2002.
Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G.,
Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within
the WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027, 2005.
Grewe, V., Dahlmann, K., Matthes, S., and Steinbrecht, W.: Attributing ozone
to NOx emissions: Implications for climate mitigation measures, Atmos.
Environ., 59, 102–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.002,
2012.
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012, 2012.
Heal, M. R., Heaviside, C., Doherty, R. M., Vieno, M., Stevenson, D. S., and
Vardoulakis, S.: Health burdens of surface ozone in the UK for a range of
future scenarios, Environ. Int., 61, 36–44,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.09.010, 2013.
Heath, R. L., Lefohn, A. S., and Musselman, R. C.: Temporal processes that
contribute to nonlinearity in vegetation responses to ozone exposure and
dose, Atmos. Environ., 43, 2919–2928,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.011, 2009.
Hong, S.-Y., Noh, Y., and Dudhia, J.: A new vertical diffusion package with
an explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Weather Rev., 134,
2318–2341, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3199.1, 2006.
HTAP: Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution 2010, Part A: Ozone and Particulate Matter, Air Pollution Studies, No. 17, Geneva, Switzerland, ISBN 9789211170436, 2010.
Huszar, P., Cariolle, D., Paoli, R., Halenka, T., Belda, M., Schlager, H., Miksovsky, J., and Pisoft, P.: Modeling the regional impact of ship emissions on NOx and ozone levels over the Eastern Atlantic and Western Europe using ship plume parameterization, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6645–6660, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6645-2010, 2010.
Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S.
A., and Collins, W. D.: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases:
Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944, 2008.
Im, U., Bianconi, R., Solazzo, E., Kioutsioukis, I., Badia, A., Balzarini,
A., Baró, R., Bellasio, R., Brunner, D., Chemel, C., Curci, G., Denier
van der Gon, H., Flemming, J., Forkel, R., Giordano, L.,
Jiménez-Guerrero, P., Hirtl, M., Hodzic, A., Honzak, L., Jorba,
O.,Knote, C., Kuenen, J. J. P., Makar, P. A., Manders-Groot, A.,Neal, L.,
Pérez, J. L., Pirovano, G., Pouliot, G., San Jose,R., Savage, N.,
Schroder, W., Sokhi, R. S., Syrakov, D., To-rian, A., Tuccella, P., Werhahn,
J., Wolke, R., Yahya, K., Zabkar, R., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Hogrefe, C., and
Galmarini, S.: Evaluation of operational on-line-coupled regional air
quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase
2. Part I: Ozone, Atmos. Environ., 115, 404–420,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.042, 2014.
Jenkin, M. E.: Trends in ozone concentration distributions in the UK since
1990: Local, regional and global influences, Atmos. Environ., 42,
5434–5445, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.036, 2008.
Jenkin, M. E., Davies, T. J., and Stedman, J. R.: The origin and day of week
dependence of photochemical ozone episodes in the UK, Atmos. Environ.,
36, 999–1012, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00360-0, 2002.
Johnson, C. E., Collins, W. J., Stevenson, D. S., and Derwent, R. G.:
Relative roles of climate and emissions changes on future tropospheric
oxidant concentrations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 18631–18645,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900204, 1999.
Karamchandani, P., Long, Y., Pirovano, G., Balzarini, A., and Yarwood, G.: Source-sector contributions to European ozone and fine PM in 2010 using AQMEII modeling data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5643–5664, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5643-2017, 2017.
Kley, D., Geiss, H., and Mohnen, V. A.: Tropospheric ozone at elevated sites
and precursor emissions in the United States and Europe, Atmos. Environ.,
28, 149–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90030-2, 1994.
Knote, C., Tuccella, P., Curci, G., Emmons, L., Orlando, J. J., Madronich,
S., Baró, R., Jiménez-Guerrero, P., Luecken, D., Hogrefe, C.,
Forkel, R., Werhahn, J., Hirtl, M., Pérez, J. L., San José, R.,
Giordano, L., Brunner, D., Yahya, K., and Zhang, Y.: Influence of the choice
of gas-phase mechanism on predictions of key gaseous pollutants during the
AQMEII phase-2 intercomparison, Atmos. Environ., 115, 553–568,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.066, 2014.
Kuenen, J. J. P., Visschedijk, A. J. H., Jozwicka, M., and Denier van der Gon, H. A. C.: TNO-MACC_II emission inventory; a multi-year (2003–2009) consistent high-resolution European emission inventory for air quality modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10963–10976, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10963-2014, 2014
Kuik, F., Lauer, A., Churkina, G., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Fenner, D., Mar, K. A., and Butler, T. M.: Air quality modelling in the Berlin–Brandenburg region using WRF-Chem v3.7.1: sensitivity to resolution of model grid and input data, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4339–4363, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4339-2016, 2016.
Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Monks, P. S., Jacob, M., Hamilton, J. F., Hopkins,
J. R., Watson, N. M., Saxton, J. E., Ennis, C., Carpenter, L. J., Carslaw,
N., Fleming, Z., Bandy, B. J., Oram, D. E., Penkett, S. A., Slemr, J.,
Norton, E., Rickard, A. R., K Whalley, L., Heard, D. E., Bloss, W. J.,
Gravestock, T.,Smith, S. C., Stanton, J., Pilling, M. J., and Jenkin, M. E.:
Ozone photochemistry and elevated isoprene during the UK heatwave of august
2003, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7598–7613,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.057, 2006.
Lin, Y.-L., Farley, R. D., and Orville, H. D.: Bulk Parameterization of the
Snow Field in a Cloud Model, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 1065–1092, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1065:BPOTSF>2.0.CO;2, 1983.
Li, Q.: Transatlantic transport of pollution and its effects on surface
ozone in Europe and North America, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4166,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001422, 2002.
Lupaşcu, A. and Butler, T.: Source attribution of European surface O3 using a tagged O3 mechanism, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14535–14558, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14535-2019, 2019.
Lupaşcu, A., Otero, N., Minkos, A., and Butler, T.: Attribution of surface ozone to NOx and volatile organic compound sources during two different high ozone events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11675–11699, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11675-2022, 2022.
Mar, K. A., Ojha, N., Pozzer, A., and Butler, T. M.: Ozone air quality simulations with WRF-Chem (v3.5.1) over Europe: model evaluation and chemical mechanism comparison, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3699–3728, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3699-2016, 2016.
Mertens, M., Grewe, V., Rieger, V. S., and Jöckel, P.: Revisiting the contribution of land transport and shipping emissions to tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5567–5588, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5567-2018, 2018.
Monks, P. S.: A review of the observations and origins of the spring ozone
maximum, Atmos. Environ., 34, 3545–3561,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00129-1, 2000.
Monks, P. S.: Gas-phase radical chemistry in the troposphere, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 34, 376–395, https://doi.org/10.1039/b307982c, 2005.
Munir, S., Chen, H., and Ropkins, K.: Quantifying temporal trends in ground
level ozone concentration in the UK, Sci. Total Environ., 458–460,
217–227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.045, 2013.
NCAR: WRF-Chem model, NCAR [code], http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/download/get_source.html, last access: 15 December 2020.
Ordóñez, C., Barriopedro, D., García-Herrera, R., Sousa, P. M., and Schnell, J. L.: Regional responses of surface ozone in Europe to the location of high-latitude blocks and subtropical ridges, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3111–3131, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3111-2017, 2017.
Pilling, M., ApSimon, H., Carruthers, D., Carslaw, D., Colvile, R., Derwent, D., Dorling, S., Fisher, B., Harrison, R., Heal, M., Laxen, D., Lindley, S., McCrae, I., and Stedman, J.: Ozone in the United Kingdom, Defra Defra publications, Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, 156 pp., ISBN: 978-0-85521-184-4, 2009.
Pirovano, G., Balzarini, A., Bessagnet, B., Emery, C., Kallos, G., Meleux,
F., Mitsakou, C., Nopmongcol, U., Riva,G., and Yarwood, G.: Investigating
impacts of chemistry and transport model formulation on model performance at
European scale, Atmos. Environ., 53,
93–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.052, 2012.
Pope, R. J., Butt, E. W., Chipperfield, M. P., Doherty, R. M., Fenech, S.,
Schmidt, A., Arnold, S. R., and Savage, N. H.: The impact of synoptic
weather on UK surface ozone and implications for premature mortality,
Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 124004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124004,
2016.
Powers, J. G., Klemp, J. B., Skamarock, W. C., Davis, C. A., Dudhia, J.,
Gill, D. O., Coen, J. L., Gochis, D. J., Ahmadov, R., Peckham, S. E., Grell,
G. A., Michalakes, J., Trahan, S., Benjamin, S. G., Alexander, C. R.,
Dimego, G. J., Wang, W., Schwartz, C. S., Romine, G. S., Liu, Z., Sny-der,
C., Chen, F., Barlage, M., Yu, W., and Duda, M. G.: The weather research and
forecasting model: Overview, system efforts, and future directions, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1717–1737,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00308.1, 2017.
Reidmiller, D. R., Fiore, A. M., Jaffe, D. A., Bergmann, D., Cuvelier, C., Dentener, F. J., Duncan, B. N., Folberth, G., Gauss, M., Gong, S., Hess, P., Jonson, J. E., Keating, T., Lupu, A., Marmer, E., Park, R., Schultz, M. G., Shindell, D. T., Szopa, S., Vivanco, M. G., Wild, O., and Zuber, A.: The influence of foreign vs. North American emissions on surface ozone in the US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5027–5042, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5027-2009, 2009.
Romero-Alvarez, J.: WRF-Chem ozone tagging output, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6968040, 2022a.
Romero-Alvarez, J.: WRF-Chem ozone tagging output, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6968649, 2022b.
Romero-Alvarez, J., Lupaşcu, A., Lowe, D., Archer-Nicholls, L., Bloss,
W., Reeves, C., and Butler, T.: The source of ozone during a high concentration
episode in South England, in preparation, 2022.
Sillman, S.: The relation between ozone, NO and hydrocarbons in urban and
polluted rural environments, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1821–1845,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00345-8, 1999.
Stevenson, D. S., Dentener, F. J., Schultz, M. G., Ellingsen, K., van Noije,
T. P. C., Wild, O., Zeng, G., Amann, M., Atherton, C. S., Bell, N.,
Bergmann, D. J., Bey, I., Butler, T., Cofala, J., Collins, W. J., Derwent,
R. G., Doherty, R. M., Drevet, J., Eskes, H. J., Fiore, A. M., Gauss, M.,
Hauglustaine, D. A., Horowitz, L. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Krol, M. C.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Lawrence, M. G., Montanaro, V., Muller, J. F., Pitari, G.,
Prather, M. J., Pyle, J. A., Rast, S., Rodriguez, J. M., Sanderson, M. G.,
Savage, N. H., Shindell, D. T., Strahan, S. E., Sudo, K., and Szopa, S.:
Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric
ozone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 111, D08301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006338,
2006.
Stock, Z. S., Russo, M. R., Butler, T. M., Archibald, A. T., Lawrence, M. G., Telford, P. J., Abraham, N. L., and Pyle, J. A.: Modelling the impact of megacities on local, regional and global tropospheric ozone and the deposition of nitrogen species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12215–12231, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12215-2013, 2013.
Stone, D., Evans, M. J., Walker, H., Ingham, T., Vaughan, S., Ouyang, B., Kennedy, O. J., McLeod, M. W., Jones, R. L., Hopkins, J., Punjabi, S., Lidster, R., Hamilton, J. F., Lee, J. D., Lewis, A. C., Carpenter, L. J., Forster, G., Oram, D. E., Reeves, C. E., Bauguitte, S., Morgan, W., Coe, H., Aruffo, E., Dari-Salisburgo, C., Giammaria, F., Di Carlo, P., and Heard, D. E.: Radical chemistry at night: comparisons between observed and modelled HOx, NO3 and N2O5 during the RONOCO project, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1299–1321, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1299-2014, 2014.
Sudo, K. and Akimoto, H.: Global source attribution of tropospheric ozone:
Long-range transport from various source regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
112, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007992, 2007.
Tarrason, L., Hamer, P., Guerreiro, C., Meleux, F., and Rouil, L.: Interim
Annual Assessment Report for 2015 – European air quality in 2015,
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15127.78249, 2016.
Tørseth, K., Aas, W., Breivik, K., Fjæraa, A. M., Fiebig, M., Hjellbrekke, A. G., Lund Myhre, C., Solberg, S., and Yttri, K. E.: Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5447–5481, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5447-2012, 2012.
Tuccella, P., Curci, G., Visconti, G., Bessagnet, B., and Menut,L.: Modeling
of gas and aerosol with WRF/Chem over Europe: Evaluation and sensitivity
study, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D03303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016302, 2012.
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Mu, M., Kasibhatla, P. S., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Jin, Y., and van Leeuwen, T. T.: Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11707–11735, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11707-2010, 2010.
Wild, O., Pochanart, P., and Akimoto, H.: Trans-Eurasian transport of ozone
and its precursors, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004501, 2004.
World Health Organization (WHO): Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment Of Exposure And Burden Of Disease, Vol. 121, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1–131, ISBN 9789241511353, 2016.
Short summary
As ozone can be transported across countries, efficient air quality management and regulatory policies rely on the assessment of local ozone production vs. transport. In our study, we investigate the origin of surface ozone in the UK and the contribution of the different source regions to regulatory ozone metrics. It is shown that emission controls would be necessary over western Europe to improve health-related metrics and over larger areas to reduce impacts on ecosystems.
As ozone can be transported across countries, efficient air quality management and regulatory...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint