Articles | Volume 18, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12491-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12491-2018
Research article
 | 
29 Aug 2018
Research article |  | 29 Aug 2018

How reliable are CMIP5 models in simulating dust optical depth?

Bing Pu and Paul Ginoux

Related authors

The emission, transport, and impacts of the extreme Saharan dust storm of 2015
Brian Harr, Bing Pu, and Qinjian Jin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8625–8651, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8625-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8625-2024, 2024
Short summary
Understanding day–night differences in dust aerosols over the dust belt of North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia
Jacob Z. Tindan, Qinjian Jin, and Bing Pu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5435–5466, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5435-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5435-2023, 2023
Short summary
Retrieving the global distribution of the threshold of wind erosion from satellite data and implementing it into the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory land–atmosphere model (GFDL AM4.0/LM4.0)
Bing Pu, Paul Ginoux, Huan Guo, N. Christina Hsu, John Kimball, Beatrice Marticorena, Sergey Malyshev, Vaishali Naik, Norman T. O'Neill, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Juliette Paireau, Joseph M. Prospero, Elena Shevliakova, and Ming Zhao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 55–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-55-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-55-2020, 2020
Short summary
Climatic factors contributing to long-term variations in surface fine dust concentration in the United States
Bing Pu and Paul Ginoux
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4201–4215, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4201-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4201-2018, 2018
Short summary
The impact of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation on springtime dust activity in Syria
Bing Pu and Paul Ginoux
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13431–13448, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13431-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13431-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Regional variability of aerosol impacts on clouds and radiation in global kilometer-scale simulations
Ross J. Herbert, Andrew I. L. Williams, Philipp Weiss, Duncan Watson-Parris, Elisabeth Dingley, Daniel Klocke, and Philip Stier
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7789–7814, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7789-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7789-2025, 2025
Short summary
A novel method to quantify the uncertainty contribution of aerosol–radiation interaction factors
Bishuo He and Chunsheng Zhao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7765–7776, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7765-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7765-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring the aerosol activation properties in coastal shallow convection using cloud- and particle-resolving models
Ge Yu, Yueya Wang, Zhe Wang, and Xiaoming Shi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7527–7542, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7527-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7527-2025, 2025
Short summary
Machine-learning-assisted inference of the particle charge fraction and the ion-induced nucleation rates during new particle formation events
Pan Wang, Yue Zhao, Jiandong Wang, Veli-Matti Kerminen, Jingkun Jiang, and Chenxi Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7431–7446, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7431-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7431-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modeling CMAQ dry deposition treatment over the western Pacific: a distinct characteristic of mineral dust and anthropogenic aerosols
Steven Soon-Kai Kong, Joshua S. Fu, Neng-Huei Lin, Guey-Rong Sheu, and Wei-Syun Huang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7245–7268, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7245-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7245-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abudu, S., Cui, C. L., King, J. P., Moreno, J., and Bawazir, A. S.: Modeling of daily pan evaporation using partial least squares regression, Sci. China Technol. Sc., 54, 163–174, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4205-z, 2011. 
Arora, V. K., Scinocca, J. F., Boer, G. J., Christian, J. R., Denman, K. L., Flato, G. M., Kharin, V. V., Lee, W. G., and Merryfield, W. J.: Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl046270, 2011. 
Ashpole, I. and Washington, R.: A new high-resolution central and western Saharan summertime dust source map from automated satellite dust plume tracking, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 6981–6995, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50554, 2013. 
Baddock, M. C., Ginoux, P., Bullard, J. E., and Gill, T. E.: Do MODIS-defined dust sources have a geomorphological signature?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 2606–2613, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl067327, 2016. 
Bangert, M., Nenes, A., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Barahona, D., Karydis, V. A., Kumar, P., Kottmeier, C., and Blahak, U.: Saharan dust event impacts on cloud formation and radiation over Western Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4045–4063, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4045-2012, 2012. 
Download
Short summary
Biases in dust modeling may result in biases in simulating energy budget and regional climate. Output of seven Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models is examined. Seasonal cycle and spatial pattern of dust optical depth (DOD) in very dusty regions are largely captured by multi-model mean. But observed connections between DOD and local controlling factors such as bareness are not well represented. Future projections by CMIP5 models and a regression model are also analyzed.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint