Articles | Volume 15, issue 16
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9711–9730, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9711-2015
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9711–9730, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9711-2015

Research article 31 Aug 2015

Research article | 31 Aug 2015

Trajectory mapping of middle atmospheric water vapor by a mini network of NDACC instruments

M. Lainer et al.

Related authors

Insights into wind turbine reflectivity and RCS and their variability using X-band weather radar observations
Martin Lainer, Jordi Figueras i Ventura, Zaira Schauwecker, Marco Gabella, Montserrat F.-Bolaños, Reto Pauli, and Jacopo Grazioli
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-384,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-384, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Significant decline of mesospheric water vapor at the NDACC site near Bern in the period 2007 to 2018
Martin Lainer, Klemens Hocke, Ellen Eckert, and Niklaus Kämpfer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6611–6620, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6611-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6611-2019, 2019
Short summary
Long-term observation of midlatitude quasi 2-day waves by a water vapor radiometer
Martin Lainer, Klemens Hocke, and Niklaus Kämpfer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12061–12074, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12061-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12061-2018, 2018
Short summary
Quasi 18 h wave activity in ground-based observed mesospheric H2O over Bern, Switzerland
Martin Lainer, Klemens Hocke, Rolf Rüfenacht, and Niklaus Kämpfer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14905–14917, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14905-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14905-2017, 2017
Short summary
The SPARC water vapor assessment II: intercomparison of satellite and ground-based microwave measurements
Gerald E. Nedoluha, Michael Kiefer, Stefan Lossow, R. Michael Gomez, Niklaus Kämpfer, Martin Lainer, Peter Forkman, Ole Martin Christensen, Jung Jin Oh, Paul Hartogh, John Anderson, Klaus Bramstedt, Bianca M. Dinelli, Maya Garcia-Comas, Mark Hervig, Donal Murtagh, Piera Raspollini, William G. Read, Karen Rosenlof, Gabriele P. Stiller, and Kaley A. Walker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14543–14558, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14543-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14543-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Remote Sensing | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Is there a direct solar proton impact on lower-stratospheric ozone?
Jia Jia, Antti Kero, Niilo Kalakoski, Monika E. Szeląg, and Pekka T. Verronen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14969–14982, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14969-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14969-2020, 2020
Short summary
Small-scale variability of stratospheric ozone during the sudden stratospheric warming 2018/2019 observed at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard
Franziska Schranz, Jonas Hagen, Gunter Stober, Klemens Hocke, Axel Murk, and Niklaus Kämpfer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10791–10806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10791-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10791-2020, 2020
Short summary
Seasonal stratospheric ozone trends over 2000–2018 derived from several merged data sets
Monika E. Szeląg, Viktoria F. Sofieva, Doug Degenstein, Chris Roth, Sean Davis, and Lucien Froidevaux
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7035–7047, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7035-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7035-2020, 2020
Short summary
Evidence for energetic particle precipitation and quasi-biennial oscillation modulations of the Antarctic NO2 springtime stratospheric column from OMI observations
Emily M. Gordon, Annika Seppälä, and Johanna Tamminen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6259–6271, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6259-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6259-2020, 2020
Short summary
Stratospheric ozone trends for 1985–2018: sensitivity to recent large variability
William T. Ball, Justin Alsing, Johannes Staehelin, Sean M. Davis, Lucien Froidevaux, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12731–12748, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12731-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12731-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, M., Yung, Y. L., and Waters, J. W.: Vertical transport and photochemistry in the terrestrial mesosphere and lower thermosphere (50–120\;km), J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 86, 3617–3627, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA086iA05p03617, 1981.
Bacmeister, J. T., Kuell, V., Offermann, D., Riese, M., and Elkins, J. W.: Intercomparison of satellite and aircraft observations of ozone, CFC-11 and NOy using trajectory mapping, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16379–16390, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900173, 1999.
Bevilacqua, R., Olivero, J., Schwartz, P., Gibbins, C., Bologna, J., and Thacker, D.: An observational study of water vapor in the mid-latitude mesosphere using ground-based microwave techniques, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 88, 8523–8534, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC13p08523, 1983.
Brasseur, G. and Solomon, S.: Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere: Chemistry and Physics of the Stratosphere and Mesosphere, vol. 32, Springer, 2006.
Deuber, B. and Kämpfer, N.: A new 22-GHz radiometer for middle atmospheric water vapor profile measurements, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 42, 974–984, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.825581, 2004.
Download
Short summary
We use water vapor profiles from ground-based microwave radiometers at five locations distributed over the Northern Hemisphere and operated in the frame of NDACC (Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change) to generate hemispheric water vapor maps based on the so-called trajectory mapping technique. The novelty is to show that a mini network of instruments is capable of providing information about the hemispheric distribution of water vapor under most conditions.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint