Articles | Volume 15, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10453-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10453-2015
Research article
 | 
24 Sep 2015
Research article |  | 24 Sep 2015

Ice phase in altocumulus clouds over Leipzig: remote sensing observations and detailed modeling

M. Simmel, J. Bühl, A. Ansmann, and I. Tegen

Related authors

Extended POLIPHON dust conversion factor dataset for lidar-derived cloud condensation nuclei and ice-nucleating particle concentration profiles
Yun He, Goutam Choudhury, Matthias Tesche, Albert Ansmann, Fan Yi, Detlef Müller, and Zhenping Yin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2666,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2666, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Impact of seeder-feeder cloud interaction on precipitation formation: a case study based on extensive remote-sensing, in-situ and model data
Kevin Ohneiser, Patric Seifert, Willi Schimmel, Fabian Senf, Tom Gaudek, Martin Radenz, Audrey Teisseire, Veronika Ettrichrätz, Teresa Vogl, Nina Maherndl, Nils Pfeifer, Jan Henneberger, Anna J. Miller, Nadja Omanovic, Christopher Fuchs, Huiying Zhang, Fabiola Ramelli, Robert Spirig, Anton Kötsche, Heike Kalesse-Los, Maximilian Maahn, Heather Corden, Alexis Berne, Majid Hajipour, Hannes Griesche, Julian Hofer, Ronny Engelmann, Annett Skupin, Albert Ansmann, and Holger Baars
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2482,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2482, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Impact of wildfire smoke on Arctic cirrus formation – Part 1: Analysis of MOSAiC 2019–2020 observations
Albert Ansmann, Cristofer Jimenez, Johanna Roschke, Johannes Bühl, Kevin Ohneiser, Ronny Engelmann, Martin Radenz, Hannes Griesche, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Daniel A. Knopf, Sandro Dahlke, Tom Gaudek, Patric Seifert, and Ulla Wandinger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4847–4866, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4847-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4847-2025, 2025
Short summary
Impact of wildfire smoke on Arctic cirrus formation – Part 2: Simulation of MOSAiC 2019–2020 cases
Albert Ansmann, Cristofer Jimenez, Daniel A. Knopf, Johanna Roschke, Johannes Bühl, Kevin Ohneiser, and Ronny Engelmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4867–4884, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4867-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4867-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modeling Anthropogenic Aerosol Sources and Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation: A Wintertime Study in Central Europe
Hanna Wiedenhaus, Roland Schrödner, Ralf Wolke, Marie L. Luttkus, Shubhi Arora, Laurent Poulain, Radek Lhotka, Petr Vodička, Jaroslav Schwarz, Petra Pokorna, Jakub Ondráček, Vladimir Ždímal, Hartmut Herrmann, and Ina Tegen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1225,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1225, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Sensitivities of simulated mixed-phase Arctic multilayer clouds to primary and secondary ice processes
Gabriella Wallentin, Annika Oertel, Luisa Ickes, Peggy Achtert, Matthias Tesche, and Corinna Hoose
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6607–6631, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6607-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6607-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing glaciogenic seeding impacts in Australia's Snowy Mountains: an ensemble modeling approach
Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, Sarah A. Tessendorf, Thomas Chubb, Andrew Peace, Suzanne Kenyon, Johanna Speirs, Jamie Wolff, and Bill Petzke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6703–6724, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6703-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6703-2025, 2025
Short summary
How the representation of microphysical processes affects tropical condensate in the global storm-resolving model ICON
Ann Kristin Naumann, Monika Esch, and Bjorn Stevens
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6429–6444, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6429-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6429-2025, 2025
Short summary
Magnitude and timescale of liquid water path adjustments to cloud droplet number concentration perturbations for nocturnal non-precipitating marine stratocumulus
Yao-Sheng Chen, Prasanth Prabhakaran, Fabian Hoffmann, Jan Kazil, Takanobu Yamaguchi, and Graham Feingold
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6141–6159, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6141-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6141-2025, 2025
Short summary
Cold pools mediate mesoscale adjustments of trade-cumulus fields to changes in cloud droplet number concentration
Pouriya Alinaghi, Fredrik Jansson, Daniel A. Blázquez, and Franziska Glassmeier
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6121–6139, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6121-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6121-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Althausen, D., Engelmann, R., Baars, H., Heese, B., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., and Komppula, M.: Portable Raman Lidar PollyXT for Automated Profiling of Aerosol Backscatter, Extinction, and Depolarization, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 2366–2378, 2009.
Asai, T. and Kasahara, A.: A theoretical study of compensating downward motions associated with cumulus clouds, JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 24, 487–496, 1967.
Bauer-Pfundstein, M. R. and Görsdorf, U.: Target Separation and Classification Using Cloud Radar Doppler-Spectra, in: Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on Radar Meteorology, 2007.
Bergeron, T.: On the physics of clouds and precipitation, in: Proces verbaux de l'association de Météorologie, pp. 156–178, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, Lisboa, Portugal, 1935.
Bühl, J., Ansmann, A., Seifert, P., Baars, H., and Engelmann, R.: Toward a quantitative characterization of heterogeneous ice formation with lidar/radar: Comparison of CALIPSO/CloudSat with ground-based observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4404–4408, 2013.
Download
Short summary
The paper combines remote sensing observations and detailed cloud modeling. It was shown that the main features of the observations could be captured which allows one to perform sensitivity studies. Those show that the liquid phase is mainly determined by the dynamical parameters of the model, whereas the ice phase is dominated by microphysical parameters such as ice nuclei number and ice particle shape.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint