Articles | Volume 24, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12465-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12465-2024
Research article
 | 
11 Nov 2024
Research article |  | 11 Nov 2024

A global re-analysis of regionally resolved emissions and atmospheric mole fractions of SF6 for the period 2005–2021

Martin Vojta, Andreas Plach, Saurabh Annadate, Sunyoung Park, Gawon Lee, Pallav Purohit, Florian Lindl, Xin Lan, Jens Mühle, Rona L. Thompson, and Andreas Stohl

Related authors

A thousand inversions to determine European SF6 emissions from 2005 to 2021
Martin Vojta, Andreas Plach, Rona L. Thompson, Pallav Purohit, Kieran Stanley, Simon O’Doherty, Dickon Young, Joe Pitt, Xin Lan, and Andreas Stohl
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1095,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1095, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
FLEXPART version 11: improved accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility
Lucie Bakels, Daria Tatsii, Anne Tipka, Rona Thompson, Marina Dütsch, Michael Blaschek, Petra Seibert, Katharina Baier, Silvia Bucci, Massimo Cassiani, Sabine Eckhardt, Christine Groot Zwaaftink, Stephan Henne, Pirmin Kaufmann, Vincent Lechner, Christian Maurer, Marie D. Mulder, Ignacio Pisso, Andreas Plach, Rakesh Subramanian, Martin Vojta, and Andreas Stohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7595–7627, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7595-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7595-2024, 2024
Short summary
A comprehensive evaluation of the use of Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inverse modeling of greenhouse gas emissions
Martin Vojta, Andreas Plach, Rona L. Thompson, and Andreas Stohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8295–8323, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8295-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8295-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Comparative ozone production sensitivity to NOx and VOCs in Quito, Ecuador, and Santiago, Chile
María Cazorla, Melissa Trujillo, Rodrigo Seguel, and Laura Gallardo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7087–7109, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7087-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7087-2025, 2025
Short summary
South Asia anthropogenic ammonia emission inversion through assimilating IASI observations
Ji Xia, Yi Zhou, Li Fang, Yingfei Qi, Dehao Li, Hong Liao, and Jianbing Jin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7071–7086, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7071-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7071-2025, 2025
Short summary
A new parameterization of photolysis rates for oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs)
Yuwen Peng, Bin Yuan, Sihang Wang, Xin Song, Zhe Peng, Wenjie Wang, Suxia Yang, Jipeng Qi, Xianjun He, Yibo Huangfu, Xiao-Bing Li, and Min Shao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7037–7052, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7037-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7037-2025, 2025
Short summary
Constraining the budget of NOx and volatile organic compounds at a remote tropical island using multi-platform observations and WRF-Chem model simulations
Catalina Poraicu, Jean-François Müller, Trissevgeni Stavrakou, Crist Amelynck, Bert W. D. Verreyken, Niels Schoon, Corinne Vigouroux, Nicolas Kumps, Jérôme Brioude, Pierre Tulet, and Camille Mouchel-Vallon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6903–6941, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6903-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6903-2025, 2025
Short summary
Multi-observational estimation of regional and sectoral emission contributions to the persistent high growth rate of atmospheric CH4 for 2020–2022
Yosuke Niwa, Yasunori Tohjima, Yukio Terao, Tazu Saeki, Akihiko Ito, Taku Umezawa, Kyohei Yamada, Motoki Sasakawa, Toshinobu Machida, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Hideki Nara, Hiroshi Tanimoto, Hitoshi Mukai, Yukio Yoshida, Shinji Morimoto, Shinya Takatsuji, Kazuhiro Tsuboi, Yousuke Sawa, Hidekazu Matsueda, Kentaro Ishijima, Ryo Fujita, Daisuke Goto, Xin Lan, Kenneth Schuldt, Michal Heliasz, Tobias Biermann, Lukasz Chmura, Jarsolaw Necki, Irène Xueref-Remy, and Damiano Sferlazzo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6757–6785, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6757-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6757-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

AGAGE – Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment: Medusa GC-MS SF6 time series, all stations, years 2005–2021, AGAGE [data set], https://agage2.eas.gatech.edu/data_archive/agage/gc-ms-medusa/ (last access: 1 November 2024), 2024. a
An, M., Prinn, R., Western, L., Zhao, X., Yao, B., Hu, J., Ganesan, A. L., Mühle, J., Weiss, R. F., Krummel, P. B., O'Doherty, S., Young, D., and Rigby, M.: Sustained growth of sulfur hexafluoride emissions in China inferred from atmospheric observations, Nat Commun., 15, 1997, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46084-3, 2024. a, b, c, d
Andersen, O., Gilpin, G., and Andrae, A. S.: Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of the dry etching step in the manufacturing of photovoltaic cells, AIMS Energy, 2, 410–423, https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2014.4.410, 2014.  a
Andrews, A., Crotwell, A., Crotwell, M., Handley, P., Higgs, J., Kofler, J., Lan, X., Legard, T., Madronich, M., McKain, K., Miller, J., Moglia, E., Mund, J., Neff, D., Newberger, T., Petron, G., Turnbull, J., Vimont, I., Wolter, S., and NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory: NOAA Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network Flask-Air PFP Sample Measurements of SF6 at Tall Tower and other Continental Sites, 2005–Present, Version 2022-11-01, NOAA GML [data set], https://doi.org/10.15138/5R14-K382, 2022. a
Arnold, T., Rennick, C., O'Doherty, S., Say, D., Young, D., Stavert, A., and Wenger, A.: Deriving Emissions related to Climate Change Network: CO2, CH4, N2O, SF6 and CO measurements from Heathfield Tall Tower, East Sussex, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/df502fe4715c4177ab5e4e367a99316b (last access: 1 February 2024), 2019. a
Download
Short summary
We constrain the global emissions of the very potent greenhouse gas sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) between 2005 and 2021. We show that SF6 emissions are decreasing in the USA and in the EU, while they are substantially growing in China, leading overall to an increasing global emission trend. The national reports for the USA, EU, and China all underestimated their SF6 emissions. However, stringent mitigation measures can successfully reduce SF6 emissions, as can be seen in the EU emission trend.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint