Articles | Volume 23, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9229-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9229-2023
Measurement report
 | 
22 Aug 2023
Measurement report |  | 22 Aug 2023

Measurement report: Assessment of Asian emissions of ethane and propane with a chemistry transport model based on observations from the island of Hateruma

Adedayo R. Adedeji, Stephen J. Andrews, Matthew J. Rowlinson, Mathew J. Evans, Alastair C. Lewis, Shigeru Hashimoto, Hitoshi Mukai, Hiroshi Tanimoto, Yasunori Tohjima, and Takuya Saito

Related authors

Sensitivity of WRF-Chem model resolution in simulating particulate matter in South-East Asia
Adedayo Rasak Adedeji, Lalit Dagar, Mohammad Iskandar Petra, Liyanage C. De Silva, and Zhining Tao
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-692,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-692, 2020
Publication in ACP not foreseen
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Regional and sectoral contributions of NOx and reactive carbon emission sources to global trends in tropospheric ozone during the 2000–2018 period
Aditya Nalam, Aura Lupaşcu, Tabish Ansari, and Tim Butler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5287–5311, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Underappreciated contributions of biogenic volatile organic compounds from urban green spaces to ozone pollution
Haofan Wang, Yuejin Li, Yiming Liu, Xiao Lu, Yang Zhang, Qi Fan, Chong Shen, Senchao Lai, Yan Zhou, Tao Zhang, and Dingli Yue
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5233–5250, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5233-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5233-2025, 2025
Short summary
Chemistry–climate feedback of atmospheric methane in a methane-emission-flux-driven chemistry–climate model
Laura Stecher, Franziska Winterstein, Patrick Jöckel, Michael Ponater, Mariano Mertens, and Martin Dameris
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5133–5158, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5133-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5133-2025, 2025
Short summary
Surface ozone trend variability across the United States and the impact of heat waves (1990–2023)
Kai-Lan Chang, Brian C. McDonald, Colin Harkins, and Owen R. Cooper
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5101–5132, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5101-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5101-2025, 2025
Short summary
Sensitivity of climate effects of hydrogen to leakage size, location, and chemical background
Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Marit Sandstad, Srinath Krishnan, Gunnar Myhre, and Maria Sand
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4929–4942, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4929-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4929-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adedeji, A. R., Andrews, S. J., Evans, M. J., Lewis, A. C., and Saito, T.: GEOS-Chem model output for surface atmospheric compositions over East Asia, National Institute for Environmental Studies [data set], Japan, https://doi.org/10.17595/20230707.001, 2023. a
Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4039–4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011, 2011. a
Andreae, M. O. and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 955–966, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GB001382, 2001. a
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res-.Atmos., 106, 23073–23095, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807, 2001. a
Bouwman, A. F., Lee, D. S., Asman, W. A. H., Dentener, F. J., Van Der Hoek, K. W., and Olivier, J. G. J.: A global high-resolution emission inventory for ammonia, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 561–587, https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB02266, 1997. a
Download
Short summary
We use the GEOS-Chem model to interpret observations of CO, C2H6, C3H8, NOx, NOy and O3 made from Hateruma Island in 2018. The model captures many synoptic-scale events and the seasonality of most pollutants at the site but underestimates C2H6 and C3H8 during the winter. These underestimates are unlikely to be reconciled by increases in biomass burning emissions but could be reconciled by increasing the Asian anthropogenic source of C2H6 and C3H8 by factors of around 2 and 3, respectively.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint