Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2669-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2669-2022
Research article
 | 
25 Feb 2022
Research article |  | 25 Feb 2022

Comparison of six approaches to predicting droplet activation of surface active aerosol – Part 1: moderately surface active organics​​​​​​​

Sampo Vepsäläinen, Silvia M. Calderón, Jussi Malila, and Nønne L. Prisle

Related authors

Comparison of six approaches to predicting droplet activation of surface active aerosol – Part 2: Strong surfactants
Sampo Vepsäläinen, Silvia M. Calderón, and Nønne L. Prisle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15149–15164, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15149-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15149-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
A global dust emission dataset for estimating dust radiative forcings in climate models
Danny M. Leung, Jasper F. Kok, Longlei Li, David M. Lawrence, Natalie M. Mahowald, Simone Tilmes, and Erik Kluzek
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2311–2331, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2311-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2311-2025, 2025
Short summary
Tropospheric aerosols over the western North Atlantic Ocean during the winter and summer deployments of ACTIVATE 2020: life cycle, transport, and distribution
Hongyu Liu, Bo Zhang, Richard H. Moore, Luke D. Ziemba, Richard A. Ferrare, Hyundeok Choi, Armin Sorooshian, David Painemal, Hailong Wang, Michael A. Shook, Amy Jo Scarino, Johnathan W. Hair, Ewan C. Crosbie, Marta A. Fenn, Taylor J. Shingler, Chris A. Hostetler, Gao Chen, Mary M. Kleb, Gan Luo, Fangqun Yu, Mark A. Vaughan, Yongxiang Hu, Glenn S. Diskin, John B. Nowak, Joshua P. DiGangi, Yonghoon Choi, Christoph A. Keller, and Matthew S. Johnson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2087–2121, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2087-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2087-2025, 2025
Short summary
Spatial and temporal evolution of future atmospheric reactive nitrogen deposition in China under different climate change mitigation strategies
Mingrui Ma, Jiachen Cao, Dan Tong, Bo Zheng, and Yu Zhao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2147–2166, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2147-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2147-2025, 2025
Short summary
Steady-state mixing state of black carbon aerosols from a particle-resolved model
Zhouyang Zhang, Jiandong Wang, Jiaping Wang, Nicole Riemer, Chao Liu, Yuzhi Jin, Zeyuan Tian, Jing Cai, Yueyue Cheng, Ganzhen Chen, Bin Wang, Shuxiao Wang, and Aijun Ding
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1869–1881, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1869-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1869-2025, 2025
Short summary
Distinctive dust weather intensities in North China resulted from two types of atmospheric circulation anomalies
Qianyi Huo, Zhicong Yin, Xiaoqing Ma, and Huijun Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1711–1724, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1711-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1711-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbatt, J., Broekhuizen, K., and Pradeep Kumar, P.: Cloud condensation nucleus activity of internally mixed ammonium sulfate/organic acid aerosol particles, Atmos. Environ., 39, 4767–4778, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.029, 2005. a, b, c
AIOMFAC-web: version 2.32, available at: https://aiomfac.lab.mcgill.ca, last access: 19 August 2020. a, b, c
Aumann, E., Hildemann, L. M., and Tabazadeh, A.: Measuring and modeling the composition and temperature-dependence of surface tension for organic solutions, Atmos. Environ., 44, 329–337, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.033, 2010. a
Bondi, A.: Van der Waals Volumes and Radii, J. Phys. Chem., 68, 441–451, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100785a001, 1964. a
Booth, A. M., Topping, D. O., McFiggans, G., and Percival, C. J.: Surface tension of mixed inorganic and dicarboxylic acid aqueous solutions at 298.15 K and their importance for cloud activation predictions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11, 8021–8028, https://doi.org/10.1039/B906849J, 2009. a, b, c, d
Short summary
Atmospheric aerosols act as seeds for cloud formation. Many aerosols contain surface active material that accumulates at the surface of growing droplets. This can affect cloud droplet activation, but the broad significance of the effect and the best way to model it are still debated. We compare predictions of six different model approaches to surface activity of organic aerosols and find significant differences between the models, especially with large fractions of organics in the dry particles.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint