Articles | Volume 26, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-14111-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-14111-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
09 Oct 2026
Research article |
| 09 Oct 2026
| 09 Oct 2026
Estimating Twomey forcing sensitivity to aerosol plume spreading rates
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Ehsan Erfani
Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA
Robert Wood
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Knut von Salzen
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Related authors
Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7867–7888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is a climate intervention technique to potentially cool the climate. Climate models used to gauge regional climate impacts associated with MCB often assume large areas of the ocean are uniformly perturbed. However, a more realistic representation of MCB application would require information about how an injected particle plume spreads. This work aims to develop such a plume-spreading model.
Michael S. Diamond, Andrew S. Ackerman, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Ann M. Fridlind, Ehsan Erfani, Caspar Jungbacker, Hyunho Lee, David Painemal, Frida A.-M. Bender, Annica M. L. Ekman, Franziska Glassmeier, Graham Feingold, Fredrik Jansson, David A. Johnson, Matthias Schwarz, Robert Wood, Takanobu Yamaguchi, Jianhao Zhang, Xiaoli Zhou, and Paquita Zuidema
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5350, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5350, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We compare how cloud resolving models represent an important cloud transition over the subtropical oceans. Clouds can either break up by deepening and drying out or by raining and forming an open cell pattern. Compared to observations, the clouds deepen a bit too much and get too polluted when smoke is present. In clean conditions, some models drizzle and break up into open cells while others barely rain; the model spread stems from different rain amounts for similar clouds.
Haruki Hirasawa, Knut von Salzen, Matthew Henry, Josh Smith, Frida A.-M. Bender, Cindy Wang, Sarah Doherty, Robert Wood, Philip J. Rasch, and James Haywood
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5460, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5460, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is a solar climate intervention proposal to spray sea salt aerosol (SSA) to increase sunlight reflection by low marine clouds. Earth System Models (ESMs) are our main tool for studying potential MCB climate impacts, but there is a large range across ESMs in the MCB sunlight reflection. Comparing MCB in ten ESMs, we find that much of this range is from the size of the SSA and cloud droplet formation from the SSA, both relatively well understood processes.
Logan T. Mitchell, Connor J. Flynn, Kristina Pistone, Samuel E. LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt, Hong Chen, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, and Jens Redemann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 13083–13102, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13083-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13083-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
During 2016–2018, NASA conducted an airborne field campaign over the Southeast Atlantic Ocean to study biomass burning aerosols emitted from Southern African fires. We have found that aerosol absorption decreases over the course of the emission season, which is due to a compositional change within black carbon as the source fires shift southeastward, rather than an increase in brown carbon. This aerosol brightening is also noted within a 30-year aerosol climatology from ground-based stations.
Sylwester Arabas, Agnieszka Żaba, Daria Klimaszewska, Emma C. Ware, Clare E. Singer, Manhal Alhilali, Jason Barr, Daniel G. Partridge, Shin-ichiro Shima, and Robert Wood
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3906, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3906, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
The paper focuses on the use of Python and its package ecosystem for modeling the dynamics of atmospheric aerosol and cloud droplets. We highlight that concise code and high-level abstractions (incl. programmatic expression of physical units) can be used without performance tradeoffs. The paper features two cloud-microphysics classics: an adiabatic parcel model and a Monte-Carlo coagulation solver. The presented code constitutes a single Jupyter notebook that can be executed "in the cloud".
Katherine Mifsud, Jason Barr, Robert Wood, Yonghoon Choi, Ewan Crosbie, Glenn S. Diskin, Joshua P. DiGangi, Richard H. Moore, Claire Robinson, Michael A. Shook, Armin Sorooshian, Christiane Voigt, and Luke Ziemba
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3027, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3027, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Salt particles from the ocean can help marine clouds precipitate more quickly, but their role is not fully understood. Using aircraft observations over the northwest Atlantic Ocean and computer simulations, we studied how these particles affect warm rain formation. We found that clouds containing more large sea salt particles, even at relatively low amounts, produce more rain. These results improve understanding of how sea salt aerosols influence clouds, rainfall, and climate.
Bosi Sheng, Massimo A. Bollasina, Alexandre S. Gagnon, Laura J. Wilcox, Thomas P. S. Reynolds, Christopher T. S. Beckett, Haolin Wang, Qingxiang Li, Pierre Nabat, Robert J. Allen, Bjørn H. Samset, Joonas Merikanto, Geeta G. Persad, Toshihiko Takemura, Kostas Tsigaridis, Sharar Ahmadi, Maxwell T. Elling, Knut von Salzen, Daniel M. Westervelt, Naga Oshima, and Tsuyoshi Koshiro
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2198, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2198, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Observational records indicate that austral summer rainfall over southern Africa experienced substantial wetting during the late 20th century, followed by pronounced drying over the past two decades. We show that East Asian sulphate aerosol emissions played a key role in shaping these rainfall trends. These findings have important implications for reducing uncertainties in regional rainfall projections and for understanding their links to ecosystem changes.
Haruki Hirasawa, Matthew Henry, Philip J. Rasch, Robert Wood, Sarah J. Doherty, James Haywood, Alex Wong, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Ezra Brody, and Hailong Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 3257–3283, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3257-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3257-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is a proposal to emit sea salt aerosols to make clouds more reflective and cool the climate. Here, we use three climate models to study a hypothetical future where MCB is used to maintain temperatures near 2020–2039 conditions. The simulation results indicate that using MCB in midlatitude ocean regions can keep the climate close to present day conditions. This reduces many of the negative impacts shown in previous studies, informing future modeling efforts.
John J. D'Alessandro, Robert Wood, and Peter N. Blossey
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4067–4088, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4067-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4067-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Many theories speculate drop clustering is an important facet of precipitation initiation. This study evaluates the relationship between drop size and drop clustering surrounding the individual drops. Large drops are generally isolated from neighboring drops, particularly in subsaturated environments. Samples capturing this trend also have the broadest drop size distributions and largest drops, suggesting the importance of entrainment-mixing to precipitation initiation.
Ehsan Erfani and David L. Mitchell
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 523–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-523-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-523-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Cirrus clouds play a key role in Earth’s climate by trapping heat. Using satellite observations and radiative transfer modeling, we examined how thinning these clouds might help cool the planet. We find that natural homogeneous and heterogeneous cirrus have distinct radiative effects, and that the instantaneous impact of cirrus cloud thinning can lead to either cooling or warming, depending on atmospheric dynamics. These insights help guide future studies of cirrus clouds using climate models.
Ehsan Erfani, Robert Wood, Peter Blossey, Sarah J. Doherty, and Ryan Eastman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8743–8768, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8743-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8743-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we explore how marine clouds interact with aerosols. We introduce a novel approach to identify a reduced number of representative cases from a wide array of observed environmental conditions prevalent in the Northeast Pacific. We create over 2200 trajectories from observations and use cloud-resolving simulations to investigate how marine low clouds evolve in two different cases. It is shown that aerosols can delay cloud breakup, but their impact depends on precipitation.
Je-Yun Chun, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Sarah J. Doherty
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5251–5271, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5251-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5251-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores how aerosols affect clouds transitioning from stratocumulus to cumulus along trade winds under varying atmospheric conditions. We found that aerosols typically reduce precipitation and raise cloud height, but their impact changes when subsidence changes by aerosol enhancement are considered. Our findings indicate that the cooling effect of aerosols might be overestimated if these atmospheric changes are not accounted for.
Chris J. Wright, Joel A. Thornton, Lyatt Jaeglé, Yang Cao, Yannian Zhu, Jihu Liu, Randall Jones II, Robert Holzworth, Daniel Rosenfeld, Robert Wood, Peter Blossey, and Daehyun Kim
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2937–2946, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2937-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2937-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles influence clouds, which exert a large forcing on solar radiation and freshwater. To better understand the mechanisms by which aerosol influences thunderstorms, we look at the two busiest shipping lanes in the world, where recent regulations have reduced sulfur emissions by nearly an order of magnitude. We find that the reduction in emissions has been accompanied by a dramatic decrease in both lightning and the number of droplets in clouds over the shipping lanes.
Philip J. Rasch, Haruki Hirasawa, Mingxuan Wu, Sarah J. Doherty, Robert Wood, Hailong Wang, Andy Jones, James Haywood, and Hansi Singh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7963–7994, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a protocol to compare computer climate simulations to better understand a proposed strategy intended to counter warming and climate impacts from greenhouse gas increases. This slightly changes clouds in six ocean regions to reflect more sunlight and cool the Earth. Example changes in clouds and climate are shown for three climate models. Cloud changes differ between the models, but precipitation and surface temperature changes are similar when their cooling effects are made similar.
Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7867–7888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is a climate intervention technique to potentially cool the climate. Climate models used to gauge regional climate impacts associated with MCB often assume large areas of the ocean are uniformly perturbed. However, a more realistic representation of MCB application would require information about how an injected particle plume spreads. This work aims to develop such a plume-spreading model.
Ryan Eastman, Isabel L. McCoy, Hauke Schulz, and Robert Wood
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6613–6634, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6613-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6613-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Cloud types are determined using machine learning image classifiers applied to satellite imagery for 1 year in the North Atlantic. This survey of these cloud types shows that the climate impact of a cloud scene is, in part, a function of cloud type. Each type displays a different mix of thick and thin cloud cover, with the fraction of thin cloud cover having the strongest impact on the clouds' radiative effect. Future studies must account for differing properties and processes among cloud types.
Calvin Howes, Pablo E. Saide, Hugh Coe, Amie Dobracki, Steffen Freitag, Jim M. Haywood, Steven G. Howell, Siddhant Gupta, Janek Uin, Mary Kacarab, Chongai Kuang, L. Ruby Leung, Athanasios Nenes, Greg M. McFarquhar, James Podolske, Jens Redemann, Arthur J. Sedlacek, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Jenny P. S. Wong, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Yang Zhang, Jianhao Zhang, and Paquita Zuidema
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13911–13940, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13911-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand smoke properties and its interactions with clouds, we compare the WRF-CAM5 model with observations from ORACLES, CLARIFY, and LASIC field campaigns in the southeastern Atlantic in August 2017. The model transports and mixes smoke well but does not fully capture some important processes. These include smoke chemical and physical aging over 4–12 days, smoke removal by rain, sulfate particle formation, aerosol activation into cloud droplets, and boundary layer turbulence.
Amie Dobracki, Paquita Zuidema, Steven G. Howell, Pablo Saide, Steffen Freitag, Allison C. Aiken, Sharon P. Burton, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Jens Redemann, and Robert Wood
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4775–4799, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4775-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4775-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Southern Africa produces approximately one-third of the world’s carbon from fires. The thick smoke layer can flow westward, interacting with the southeastern Atlantic cloud deck. The net radiative impact can alter regional circulation patterns, impacting rainfall over Africa. We find that the smoke is highly absorbing of sunlight, mostly because it contains more black carbon than smoke over the Northern Hemisphere.
Ian Chang, Lan Gao, Connor J. Flynn, Yohei Shinozuka, Sarah J. Doherty, Michael S. Diamond, Karla M. Longo, Gonzalo A. Ferrada, Gregory R. Carmichael, Patricia Castellanos, Arlindo M. da Silva, Pablo E. Saide, Calvin Howes, Zhixin Xue, Marc Mallet, Ravi Govindaraju, Qiaoqiao Wang, Yafang Cheng, Yan Feng, Sharon P. Burton, Richard A. Ferrare, Samuel E. LeBlanc, Meloë S. Kacenelenbogen, Kristina Pistone, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, Kerry G. Meyer, Ju-Mee Ryoo, Leonhard Pfister, Adeyemi A. Adebiyi, Robert Wood, Paquita Zuidema, Sundar A. Christopher, and Jens Redemann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4283–4309, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4283-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4283-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Abundant aerosols are present above low-level liquid clouds over the southeastern Atlantic during late austral spring. The model simulation differences in the proportion of aerosol residing in the planetary boundary layer and in the free troposphere can greatly affect the regional aerosol radiative effects. This study examines the aerosol loading and fractional aerosol loading in the free troposphere among various models and evaluates them against measurements from the NASA ORACLES campaign.
Francesca Gallo, Janek Uin, Kevin J. Sanchez, Richard H. Moore, Jian Wang, Robert Wood, Fan Mei, Connor Flynn, Stephen Springston, Eduardo B. Azevedo, Chongai Kuang, and Allison C. Aiken
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4221–4246, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4221-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4221-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides a summary statistic of multiday aerosol plume transport event influences on aerosol physical properties and the cloud condensation nuclei budget at the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Facility in the eastern North Atlantic (ENA). An algorithm that integrates aerosol properties is developed and applied to identify multiday aerosol transport events. The influence of the aerosol plumes on aerosol populations at the ENA is successively assessed.
Zhenquan Wang, Jian Yuan, Robert Wood, Yifan Chen, and Tiancheng Tong
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3247–3266, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3247-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3247-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study develops a novel profile-based algorithm based on the ERA5 to estimate the inversion strength in the planetary boundary layer better than the previous inversion index, which is a key low-cloud-controlling factor. This improved measure is more effective at representing the meteorological influence on low-cloud variations. It can better constrain the meteorological influence on low clouds to better isolate cloud responses to aerosols or to estimate low cloud feedbacks in climate models.
Je-Yun Chun, Robert Wood, Peter Blossey, and Sarah J. Doherty
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1345–1368, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1345-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1345-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the impact of injected aerosol on subtropical low marine clouds under a variety of meteorological conditions using high-resolution model simulations. This study illustrates processes perturbed by aerosol injections and their impact on cloud properties (e.g., cloud number concentration, thickness, and cover). We show that those responses are highly sensitive to background meteorological conditions, such as precipitation, and background cloud properties.
Ju-Mee Ryoo, Leonhard Pfister, Rei Ueyama, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, Ian Chang, and Jens Redemann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14209–14241, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14209-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14209-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The variability in the meteorological fields during each deployment is highly modulated at a daily to synoptic timescale. This paper, along with part 1, the climatological overview paper, provides a meteorological context for interpreting the airborne measurements gathered during the three ORACLES deployments. This study supports related studies focusing on the detailed investigation of the processes controlling stratocumulus decks, aerosol lifting, transport, and their interactions.
Paul A. Barrett, Steven J. Abel, Hugh Coe, Ian Crawford, Amie Dobracki, James Haywood, Steve Howell, Anthony Jones, Justin Langridge, Greg M. McFarquhar, Graeme J. Nott, Hannah Price, Jens Redemann, Yohei Shinozuka, Kate Szpek, Jonathan W. Taylor, Robert Wood, Huihui Wu, Paquita Zuidema, Stéphane Bauguitte, Ryan Bennett, Keith Bower, Hong Chen, Sabrina Cochrane, Michael Cotterell, Nicholas Davies, David Delene, Connor Flynn, Andrew Freedman, Steffen Freitag, Siddhant Gupta, David Noone, Timothy B. Onasch, James Podolske, Michael R. Poellot, Sebastian Schmidt, Stephen Springston, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Jamie Trembath, Alan Vance, Maria A. Zawadowicz, and Jianhao Zhang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6329–6371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6329-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand weather and climate, it is vital to go into the field and collect observations. Often measurements take place in isolation, but here we compared data from two aircraft and one ground-based site. This was done in order to understand how well measurements made on one platform compared to those made on another. Whilst this is easy to do in a controlled laboratory setting, it is more challenging in the real world, and so these comparisons are as valuable as they are rare.
Michael S. Diamond, Pablo E. Saide, Paquita Zuidema, Andrew S. Ackerman, Sarah J. Doherty, Ann M. Fridlind, Hamish Gordon, Calvin Howes, Jan Kazil, Takanobu Yamaguchi, Jianhao Zhang, Graham Feingold, and Robert Wood
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12113–12151, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12113-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12113-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Smoke from southern Africa blankets the southeast Atlantic from June-October, overlying a major transition region between overcast and scattered clouds. The smoke affects Earth's radiation budget by absorbing sunlight and changing cloud properties. We investigate these effects in regional climate and large eddy simulation models based on international field campaigns. We find that large-scale circulation changes more strongly affect cloud transitions than smoke microphysical effects in our case.
Jessica Danker, Odran Sourdeval, Isabel L. McCoy, Robert Wood, and Anna Possner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10247–10265, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10247-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10247-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using spaceborne lidar-radar retrievals, we show that seasonal changes in cloud phase outweigh changes in cloud-phase statistics across cloud morphologies at given cloud-top temperatures. These results show that cloud morphology does not seem to pose a primary constraint on cloud-phase statistics in the Southern Ocean. Meanwhile, larger changes in in-cloud albedo across cloud morphologies are observed in supercooled liquid rather than mixed-phase stratocumuli.
Matthew W. Christensen, Andrew Gettelman, Jan Cermak, Guy Dagan, Michael Diamond, Alyson Douglas, Graham Feingold, Franziska Glassmeier, Tom Goren, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Edward Gryspeerdt, Ralph Kahn, Zhanqing Li, Po-Lun Ma, Florent Malavelle, Isabel L. McCoy, Daniel T. McCoy, Greg McFarquhar, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Sandip Pal, Anna Possner, Adam Povey, Johannes Quaas, Daniel Rosenfeld, Anja Schmidt, Roland Schrödner, Armin Sorooshian, Philip Stier, Velle Toll, Duncan Watson-Parris, Robert Wood, Mingxi Yang, and Tianle Yuan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 641–674, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-641-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-641-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Trace gases and aerosols (tiny airborne particles) are released from a variety of point sources around the globe. Examples include volcanoes, industrial chimneys, forest fires, and ship stacks. These sources provide opportunistic experiments with which to quantify the role of aerosols in modifying cloud properties. We review the current state of understanding on the influence of aerosol on climate built from the wide range of natural and anthropogenic laboratories investigated in recent decades.
Amie Dobracki, Paquita Zuidema, Steve Howell, Pablo Saide, Steffen Freitag, Allison C. Aiken, Sharon P. Burton, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Jens Redemann, and Robert Wood
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-1081, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-1081, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
The global maximum of shortwave-absorbing aerosol above cloud occurs above the southeast Atlantic, where the biomass-burning aerosol provides a distinct aerosol radiative warming of regional climate. The smoke aerosols are unusually highly absorbing of sunlight. This study seeks to understand the cause. We conclude the aerosol is already strongly absorbing at the fire emission source, but that chemical aging, through encouraging a net loss of organic aerosol, also contributes.
Sarah J. Doherty, Pablo E. Saide, Paquita Zuidema, Yohei Shinozuka, Gonzalo A. Ferrada, Hamish Gordon, Marc Mallet, Kerry Meyer, David Painemal, Steven G. Howell, Steffen Freitag, Amie Dobracki, James R. Podolske, Sharon P. Burton, Richard A. Ferrare, Calvin Howes, Pierre Nabat, Gregory R. Carmichael, Arlindo da Silva, Kristina Pistone, Ian Chang, Lan Gao, Robert Wood, and Jens Redemann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1–46, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Between July and October, biomass burning smoke is advected over the southeastern Atlantic Ocean, leading to climate forcing. Model calculations of forcing by this plume vary significantly in both magnitude and sign. This paper compares aerosol and cloud properties observed during three NASA ORACLES field campaigns to the same in four models. It quantifies modeled biases in properties key to aerosol direct radiative forcing and evaluates how these biases propagate to biases in forcing.
Ju-Mee Ryoo, Leonhard Pfister, Rei Ueyama, Paquita Zuidema, Robert Wood, Ian Chang, and Jens Redemann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16689–16707, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16689-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16689-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Part 1 of the meteorological overview paper highlights the anomalous meteorological characteristics during the ORACLES deployment compared to the climatological mean at monthly timescales. The upper-level wave disturbance and the associated anomalous circulation explain the weakening of AEJ-S through the reduction of the strength of the heat low over the land during August 2017. This may also help explain the anomalously low aerosol optical depth observed in the August 2017 ORACLES deployment.
Rachel Atlas, Johannes Mohrmann, Joseph Finlon, Jeremy Lu, Ian Hsiao, Robert Wood, and Minghui Diao
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7079–7101, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7079-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7079-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Many clouds with temperatures between 0 °C and −40 °C contain both liquid and ice particles, and the ratio of liquid to ice particles influences how the clouds interact with radiation and moderate Earth's climate. We use a machine learning method called random forest to classify images of individual cloud particles as either liquid or ice. We apply our algorithm to images captured by aircraft within clouds overlying the Southern Ocean, and we find that it outperforms two existing algorithms.
Cited articles
Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation: 2. Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 6837–6844, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901161, 2000. a
Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., and Toon, O. B.: The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing, Nature, 432, 1014–1017, 2004. a
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989. a
Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson-Parris, D., Boucher, O., Carslaw, K. S., Christensen, M., Daniau, A.-L., Dufresne, J.-L., Feingold, G., Fiedler, S., Forster, P., Gettelman, A., Haywood, J. M., Lohmann, U., Malavelle, F., Mauritsen, T., McCoy, D. T., Myhre, G., Mülmenstädt, J., Neubauer, D., Possner, A., Rugenstein, M., Sato, Y., Schulz, M., Schwartz, S. E., Sourdeval, O., Storelvmo, T., Toll, V., Winker, D., and Stevens, B.: Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000660, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000660, 2020. a
Berner, A. H., Bretherton, C. S., Wood, R., and Muhlbauer, A.: Marine boundary layer cloud regimes and POC formation in a CRM coupled to a bulk aerosol scheme, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12549–12572, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12549-2013, 2013. a
Berner, A. H., Bretherton, C. S., and Wood, R.: Large eddy simulation of ship tracks in the collapsed marine boundary layer: a case study from the Monterey area ship track experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5851–5871, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5851-2015, 2015. a
Boerner, T. J., Deems, S., Furlani, T. R., Knuth, S. L., and Towns, J.: ACCESS: Advancing Innovation: NSF's Advanced CyberinfrastructureCoordination Ecosystem: Services & Support, in: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing (PEARC23), ACM, https://doi.org/10.1145/3569951.3597559, 2023. a
Bretherton, C. S., McCoy, I. L., Mohrmann, J., and Wood, R.: Cloud, Aerosol, and Boundary Layer Structure across the Northeast Pacific Stratocumulus–Cumulus Transition as Observed during CSET, Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 2083–2103, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0281.1, 2019. a, b
Brown, S. T., Buitrago, P., Hanna, E., Sanielevici, S., Scibek, R., and Nystrom, N. A.: Bridges‐2: A platform for rapidly‐evolving and dataintensive research, in: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing, ACM, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1145/3437359.3465593, 2021. a
Burleyson, C. D. and Yuter, S. E.: Patterns of Diurnal Marine Stratocumulus Cloud Fraction Variability, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 54, 847–866, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0178.1, 2015. a
Caldwell, P., Bretherton, C. S., and Wood, R.: Mixed-Layer Budget Analysis of the Diurnal Cycle of Entrainment in Southeast Pacific Stratocumulus, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3775–3791, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3561.1, 2005. a
Chen, C.-C., Richter, J. H., Lee, W. R., Tye, M., MacMartin, D. G., and Kravitz, B.: Climate impact of marine cloud brightening solar climate intervention under a susceptibility-based strategy simulated by CESM2, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD041245, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041245, 2025. a, b
Christensen, M. W., Geiss, A., Varble, A. C., and Ma, P.-L.: Machine learning reveals strong grid-scale dependence in the satellite Nd–LWP relationship, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 59–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-59-2026, 2026. a, b
Chun, J.-Y., Wood, R., Blossey, P., and Doherty, S. J.: Microphysical, macrophysical, and radiative responses of subtropical marine clouds to aerosol injections, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1345–1368, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1345-2023, 2023. a, b, c, d
de Roode, S. R., Sandu, I., van der Dussen, J. J., Ackerman, A. S., Blossey, P., Jarecka, D., Lock, A., Siebesma, A. P., and Stevens, B.: Large-Eddy Simulations of EUCLIPSE–GASS Lagrangian Stratocumulus-to-Cumulus Transitions: Mean State, Turbulence, and Decoupling, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 2485–2508, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0215.1, 2016. a
Dhandapani, C., Kaul, C. M., Pressel, K. G., Blossey, P. N., Wood, R., and Kulkarni, G.: Sensitivities of Large Eddy Simulations of Aerosol Plume Transport and Cloud Response, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 17, e2024MS004546, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004546, 2025. a
Diamond, M. S., Director, H. M., Eastman, R., Possner, A., and Wood, R.: Substantial Cloud Brightening from Shipping in Subtropical Low Clouds, AGU Adv., 1, e2019AV000111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019AV000111, 2020. a, b
Doelling, D. R., Sun, M., Nguyen, L. T., Nordeen, M. L., Haney, C. O., Keyes, D. F., and Mlynczak, P. E.: Advances in Geostationary-Derived Longwave Fluxes for the CERES Synoptic (SYN1deg) Product, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 33, 503–521, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0147.1, 2016. a
Eastman, R. M. and Wood, R.: Factors Controlling Low-Cloud Evolution over the Eastern Subtropical Oceans: A Lagrangian Perspective Using the A-Train Satellites, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 331–351, 2016. a
Erfani, E., Blossey, P. N., Wood, R., Mohrmann, J., Doherty, S. J., Wyant, M., and O, K.-T.: Simulating aerosol lifecycle impacts on the subtropical stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition using large-eddy simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037258, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037258, 2022. a, b, c, d
Erfani, E., Wood, R., Blossey, P. N., Doherty, S. J., and Eastman, R.: Building a comprehensive library of observed Lagrangian trajectories for testing modeled cloud evolution, aerosol–cloud interactions, and marine cloud brightening, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8743–8768, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8743-2025, 2025. a, b, c, d, e, f
Erfani, E., Wood., R., Blossey, P. N., McMichael, L. A., Doherty, S. J., and Eastman, R.: Library of Lagrangian Large Eddy Simulations for Studying Aerosol-Cloud Interactions in Northeast Pacific [Data set], Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20097959, 2026. a
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017. a
Glassmeier, F., Yuan, J., Feingold, G., Christensen, T. W., and Stevens, B.: Aerosol-cloud-climate cooling overestimated by ship-track data, Science, 371, 485–489, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd3980, 2021. a, b
Goren, T., Choudhury, G., Kretzschmar, J., and McCoy, I.: Co-variability drives the inverted-V sensitivity between liquid water path and droplet concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3413–3423, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3413-2025, 2025. a
Goren, T., Choudhury, G., and Feingold, G.: Beyond discrete stratocumulus regimes: a ternary continuum of morphology reveals within-regime variability in cloud susceptibilities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 7193–7206, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7193-2026, 2026. a
Gryspeerdt, E., Quaas, J., and Bellouin, N.: Constraining the aerosol influence on cloud fraction, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 3566–3583, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023744, 2016. a
Hernandez-Jaramillo, D. C., Kelaher, B., and Harrison, D. P.: A review of plume dispersion and measurement techniques applicable to marine cloud brightening, Front. Mar. Sci., 12, 1450175, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1450175, 2025. a
Hirasawa, H., Hingmire, D. S., Singh, H. A., Rasch, P. J., and Mitra, P.: Effect of Regional Marine Cloud Brightening Interventions on Climate Tipping Elements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL104314, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104314, 2023. a
Hirasawa, H., Henry, M., Mason, A. M., Rasch, P. J., Doherty, S. J., Wood, R., Haywood, J., and von Salzen, K.: Forcing Susceptibility and Climate Sensitivity to Midlatitude Marine Cloud Brightening, J. Climate, 39, 769–784, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-25-0337.1, 2026. a, b
Igel, A. L.: Processes controlling the entrainment and liquid water response to aerosol perturbations in non‐precipitating stratocumulusclouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 81, 1605–1616, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-23-0238.1, 2024. a
Jenkins, A. K. L., Forster, P. M., and Jackson, L. S.: The effects of timing and rate of marine cloud brightening aerosol injection on albedo changes during the diurnal cycle of marine stratocumulus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1659–1673, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1659-2013, 2013. a, b, c
Jones, A., Haywood, J., and Boucher, O.: Climate impacts of geoengineering marine stratocumulus clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D10106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011450, 2009. a
Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D. A.: Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 607–625, 2003. a
Latham, J.: Control of global warming?, Nature, 347, 339–340, 1990. a
McMichael, L. A.: lmcmichael/ParticleModel2D_Twomey: ParticleModel2D_Twomey, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20145149, 2026. a
McMichael, L. A. and Blossey, P. N.: SAM v6.10.9 for Mechanism Denial Simulations, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14895699, 2025. a
McMichael, L. A., Mechem, D. B., Wang, S., Wang, Q., Kogan, Y., and Teixeira, J.: Assessing the mechanisms governing the daytime evolution of marine stratocumulus using large-eddy simulation, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 845–866, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3469, 2019. a, b
Mohrmann, J., Bretherton, C. S., McCoy, I. L., McGibbon, J., Wood, R., Ghate, V. P., Albrecht, B. A., Sarkar, M., Zuidema, P., and Palikonda, R.: Lagrangian Evolution of the Northeast Pacific Marine Boundary Layer Structure and Cloud during CSET, Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 4681–4700, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0053.1, 2019. a, b, c
Painemal, D. and Zuidema, P.: Assessment of MODIS cloud effective radius and optical thickness retrievals over the Southeast Pacific with VOCALS-REx in situ measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D24206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016155, 2011. a
Park, S., Leovy, C. B., and Rozendaal, M. A.: A New Heuristic Lagrangian Marine Boundary Layer Cloud Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 3002–3024, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-3344.1, 2004. a
Pope, S.: Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780521598866, 2000. a
Pringle, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. M., and Chipperfield, M. P.: The relationship between aerosol and cloud drop number concentrations in a global aerosol microphysics model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4131–4144, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4131-2009, 2009. a
Rasch, P. J., Latham, J., and Chen, C.-C. J.: Geoengineering by cloud seeding: influence on sea ice and climate system, Environ. Res. Lett., 4, 045112, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045112, 2009. a
Sandu, I. and Stevens, B.: On the Factors Modulating the Stratocumulus to Cumulus Transitions, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 1865–1881, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JAS3614.1, 2011. a
Sandu, I., Stevens, B., and Pincus, R.: On the Transitions in Marine Boundary Layer Cloudiness, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2377–2391, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2377-2010, 2010. a
Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08281, 2009. a, b
Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005, 2005. a, b
Svensmark, H., Enghoff, M. B., Svensmark, J., Thaler, I., and Shaviv, N. J.: Supersaturation and critical size of cloud condensation nuclei in marine stratus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2024GL108140, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108140, 2024. a
Textor, C., Schulz, M., Guibert, S., Kinne, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, H., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Horowitz, L., Huang, P., Isaksen, I., Iversen, I., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kirkevåg, A., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Liu, X., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1777–1813, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006, 2006. a
Tippett, A., Gryspeerdt, E., Manshausen, P., Stier, P., and Smith, T. W. P.: Weak liquid water path response in ship tracks, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13269–13283, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13269-2024, 2024. a, b
Tippett, A., Field, P. R., and Gryspeerdt, E.: Evaluating simulations of ship tracks in a km-scale model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 4251–4274, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4251-2026, 2026. a, b
Twomey, S.: Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8, 1251–1256, 1974. a
Wang, H., Rasch, P. J., and Feingold, G.: Manipulating marine stratocumulus cloud amount and albedo: a process-modelling study of aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions in response to injection of cloud condensation nuclei, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4237–4249, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4237-2011, 2011. a, b
Wood, R.: Rate of loss of cloud droplets by coalescence in warm clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1777–1785, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3702.1, 2006. a
Wood, R. and Bretherton, C. S.: Boundary Layer Depth, Entrainment, and Decoupling in the Cloud-Capped Subtropical and Tropical Marine Boundary Layer, J. Climate, 17, 3576–3588, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3576:bldead>2.0.co;2, 2004. a, b
Wood, R., Bretherton, C. S., and Hartmann, D. L.: Diurnal cycle of liquid water path over the subtropical and tropical oceans, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2092, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015371, 2002. a
Wyant, M. C., Bretherton, C. S., Rand, H. A., and Stevens, D. E.: Numerical Simulations and a Conceptual Model of the Stratocumulus to Trade Cumulus Transition, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 168–192, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0168:NSAACM>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a
Yamaguchi, T., Feingold, G., and Kazil, J.: Stratocumulus to Cumulus Transition by Drizzle, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 9, 2333–2349, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS001104, 2017. a
Yuan, T., Song, H., Boss, L. F., et al.: Detectable ship tracks account for just 5 % of aerosol indirect forcing from ship emissions, Commun. Earth Environ., 6, 899, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02825-w, 2025. a
Zhang, Y., Xie, S., Qin, Y., Lin, W., Golaz, J.-C., Zheng, X., Ma, P.-L., Qian, Y., Tang, Q., Terai, C. R., and Zhang, M.: Understanding changes in cloud simulations from E3SM version 1 to version 2, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 169–189, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-169-2024, 2024. a
Zhu, P., Bretherton, C. S., Köhler, M., Cheng, A., Chlond, A., Geng, Q., Austin, P., Golaz, J.-C., Lenderink, G., Lock, A., and Stevens, B.: Intercomparison and Interpretation of Single-Column Model Simulations of a Nocturnal Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 2741–2758, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2997.1, 2005. a, b
Short summary
This study explores how aerosol plumes spread in marine clouds and how that affects cloud brightening. Changes in turbulence strongly affect plume spreading rates, but have little effect on the overall brightening in the cases studied. The main uncertainties are aerosol lifetime and how clouds adjust to the aerosols. Climate models often assume that plumes spread instantly, and we find that this may overestimate cooling in some cases.
This study explores how aerosol plumes spread in marine clouds and how that affects cloud...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint