Articles | Volume 18, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018
Research article
 | 
13 Aug 2018
Research article |  | 13 Aug 2018

An update on global atmospheric ice estimates from satellite observations and reanalyses

David Ian Duncan and Patrick Eriksson

Related authors

Synergistic radar and sub-millimeter radiometer retrievals of ice hydrometeors in mid-latitude frontal cloud systems
Simon Pfreundschuh, Stuart Fox, Patrick Eriksson, David Duncan, Stefan A. Buehler, Manfred Brath, Richard Cotton, and Florian Ewald
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-677-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-677-2022, 2022
Short summary
Can machine learning correct microwave humidity radiances for the influence of clouds?
Inderpreet Kaur, Patrick Eriksson, Simon Pfreundschuh, and David Ian Duncan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2957–2979, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2957-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2957-2021, 2021
Short summary
Synergistic radar and radiometer retrievals of ice hydrometeors
Simon Pfreundschuh, Patrick Eriksson, Stefan A. Buehler, Manfred Brath, David Duncan, Richard Larsson, and Robin Ekelund
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4219–4245, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4219-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4219-2020, 2020
Short summary
An experimental 2D-Var retrieval using AMSR2
David Ian Duncan, Patrick Eriksson, and Simon Pfreundschuh
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6341–6359, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6341-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6341-2019, 2019
Short summary
On the distinctiveness of observed oceanic raindrop distributions
David Ian Duncan, Patrick Eriksson, Simon Pfreundschuh, Christian Klepp, and Daniel C. Jones
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6969–6984, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6969-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6969-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Remote Sensing | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Anvil–radiation diurnal interaction: shortwave radiative-heating destabilization driving the diurnal variation of convective anvil outflow and its modulation on the radiative cancellation
Zhenquan Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5021–5039, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5021-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5021-2025, 2025
Short summary
Impact of wildfire smoke on Arctic cirrus formation – Part 1: Analysis of MOSAiC 2019–2020 observations
Albert Ansmann, Cristofer Jimenez, Johanna Roschke, Johannes Bühl, Kevin Ohneiser, Ronny Engelmann, Martin Radenz, Hannes Griesche, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Daniel A. Knopf, Sandro Dahlke, Tom Gaudek, Patric Seifert, and Ulla Wandinger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4847–4866, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4847-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4847-2025, 2025
Short summary
A new aggregation and riming discrimination algorithm based on polarimetric weather radars
Armin Blanke, Mathias Gergely, and Silke Trömel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4167–4184, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4167-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4167-2025, 2025
Short summary
Study of optical scattering properties and direct radiative effects of high-altitude cirrus clouds in Barcelona, Spain, with 4 years of lidar measurements
Cristina Gil-Díaz, Michäel Sicard, Odran Sourdeval, Athulya Saiprakash, Constantino Muñoz-Porcar, Adolfo Comerón, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, and Daniel Camilo Fortunato dos Santos Oliveira
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3445–3464, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3445-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3445-2025, 2025
Short summary
Co-variability drives the inverted-V sensitivity between liquid water path and droplet concentrations
Tom Goren, Goutam Choudhury, Jan Kretzschmar, and Isabel McCoy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3413–3423, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3413-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3413-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Austin, R. T., Heymsfield, A. J., and Stephens, G. L.: Retrieval of ice cloud microphysical parameters using the CloudSat millimeter-wave radar and temperature, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00A23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010049, 2009. a
Baran, A. J. and Francis, P. N.: On the radiative properties of cirrus cloud at solar and thermal wavelengths: A test of model consistency using high-resolution airborne radiance measurements, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 763–778, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.151, 2004. a
Bauer, P. and Schlüssel, P.: Rainfall, total water, ice water, and water vapor over sea from polarized microwave simulations and Special Sensor Microwave/Imager data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 20737–20759, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD01577, 1993. a
Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., and Brunet, G.: The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction, Nature, 525, 47–55, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14956, 2015. a
Birman, C., Mahfouf, J. F., Milz, M., Mendrok, J., Buehler, S. A., and Brath, M.: Information content on hydrometeors from millimeter and sub-millimeter wavelengths, Tellus A, 69, 1271562, https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2016.1271562, 2017. a, b
Download
Short summary
Ice cloud mass is assessed on a global scale using the latest satellite and reanalysis datasets. While ice cloud variability driven by large-scale circulations is an area of relative consensus, models and observations disagree strongly on the overall magnitude and finer-scale variability of atmospheric ice mass. The results reflect limitations of the current Earth observing system and indicate ice microphysical assumptions as the likely culprit of disagreement.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint