Articles | Volume 16, issue 13
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8295–8308, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8295-2016
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8295–8308, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8295-2016

Research article 11 Jul 2016

Research article | 11 Jul 2016

Spectral analysis of atmospheric composition: application to surface ozone model–measurement comparisons

Dene R. Bowdalo et al.

Related authors

Gridded global surface ozone metrics for atmospheric chemistry model evaluation
E. D. Sofen, D. Bowdalo, M. J. Evans, F. Apadula, P. Bonasoni, M. Cupeiro, R. Ellul, I. E. Galbally, R. Girgzdiene, S. Luppo, M. Mimouni, A. C. Nahas, M. Saliba, and K. Tørseth
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 41–59, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-41-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-41-2016, 2016
Short summary
How to most effectively expand the global surface ozone observing network
E. D. Sofen, D. Bowdalo, and M. J. Evans
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1445–1457, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1445-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1445-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Impact of Athabasca oil sands operations on mercury levels in air and deposition
Ashu Dastoor, Andrei Ryjkov, Gregor Kos, Junhua Zhang, Jane Kirk, Matthew Parsons, and Alexandra Steffen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12783–12807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12783-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12783-2021, 2021
Short summary
Study of different Carbon Bond 6 (CB6) mechanisms by using a concentration sensitivity analysis
Le Cao, Simeng Li, and Luhang Sun
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12687–12714, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12687-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12687-2021, 2021
Short summary
Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia
Yi Yin, Frederic Chevallier, Philippe Ciais, Philippe Bousquet, Marielle Saunois, Bo Zheng, John Worden, A. Anthony Bloom, Robert J. Parker, Daniel J. Jacob, Edward J. Dlugokencky, and Christian Frankenberg
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12631–12647, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12631-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12631-2021, 2021
Short summary
Observation and modelling of ozone-destructive halogen chemistry in a passively degassing volcanic plume
Luke Surl, Tjarda Roberts, and Slimane Bekki
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12413–12441, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12413-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12413-2021, 2021
Short summary
Modeling study of the impact of SO2 volcanic passive emissions on the tropospheric sulfur budget
Claire Lamotte, Jonathan Guth, Virginie Marécal, Martin Cussac, Paul David Hamer, Nicolas Theys, and Philipp Schneider
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11379–11404, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11379-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11379-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Altshuler, S., Arcado, T., and Lawson, D.: Weekday vs. weekend ambient ozone concentrations – discussion and hypotheses with focus on northern California, J. Air Waste Manage., 45, 967–972, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1995.10467428, 1995.
Anderson, D. C., Loughner, C. P., Diskin, G., Weinheimer, A., Canty, T. P., Salawitch, R. J., Worden, H. M., Fried, A., Mikoviny, T., Wisthaler, A., and Dickerson, R. R.: Measured and modeled CO and NOy in DISCOVER-AQ: An evaluation of emissions and chemistry over the eastern US, Atmos. Environ., 96, 78–87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.004, 2014.
Beirle, S., Platt, U., Wenig, M., and Wagner, T.: Weekly cycle of NO2 by GOME measurements: a signature of anthropogenic sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 2225–2232, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-2225-2003, 2003.
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q. B., Liu, H. G. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 23073–23095, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000807, 2001.
Download
Short summary
We introduce a new methodology for the assessment of atmospheric models with observations. We apply a spectral analysis methodology to hourly ozone observations and the equivalent model output. The spectrally transformed observational data show significant peaks on daily and annual timescales. Comparison between the amplitude and phase of these peaks introduces a new comparison methodology between model and measurements. We find the model shows significant biases on an annual timescale.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint