Articles | Volume 24, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024
Opinion
 | Highlight paper
 | 
19 Jun 2024
Opinion | Highlight paper |  | 19 Jun 2024

Opinion: Optimizing climate models with process knowledge, resolution, and artificial intelligence

Tapio Schneider, L. Ruby Leung, and Robert C. J. Wills

Related authors

Toward Routing River Water in Land Surface Models with Recurrent Neural Networks
Mauricio Lima, Katherine Deck, Oliver R. A. Dunbar, and Tapio Schneider
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.14212,https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.14212, 2024
Short summary
Large-eddy simulations with ClimateMachine v0.2.0: a new open-source code for atmospheric simulations on GPUs and CPUs
Akshay Sridhar, Yassine Tissaoui, Simone Marras, Zhaoyi Shen, Charles Kawczynski, Simon Byrne, Kiran Pamnany, Maciej Waruszewski, Thomas H. Gibson, Jeremy E. Kozdon, Valentin Churavy, Lucas C. Wilcox, Francis X. Giraldo, and Tapio Schneider
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6259–6284, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6259-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6259-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Climate and Earth System | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Measurement report: Can zenith wet delay from GNSS “see” atmospheric turbulence? Insights from case studies across diverse climate zones
Gaël Kermarrec, Xavier Calbet, Zhiguo Deng, and Cintia Carbajal Henken
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3567–3581, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3567-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3567-2025, 2025
Short summary
Effects of 2010–2045 climate change on ozone levels in China under a carbon neutrality scenario: key meteorological parameters and processes
Ling Kang, Hong Liao, Ke Li, Xu Yue, Yang Yang, and Ye Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3603–3621, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3603-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3603-2025, 2025
Short summary
Too cold, too saturated? Evaluating climate models at the gateway to the Arctic
Felix Pithan, Ann Kristin Naumann, and Marion Maturilli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3269–3285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3269-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3269-2025, 2025
Short summary
Modelled surface climate response to effusive Icelandic volcanic eruptions: sensitivity to season and size
Tómas Zoëga, Trude Storelvmo, and Kirstin Krüger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2989–3010, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2989-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2989-2025, 2025
Short summary
Contrasting the roles of regional anthropogenic aerosols from the western and eastern hemispheres in driving the 1980–2020 Pacific multi-decadal variations
Chenrui Diao, Yangyang Xu, Aixue Hu, and Zhili Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2167–2180, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2167-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2167-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adler, R. F., Sapiano, M. R. P., Huffman, G. J., Wang, J.-J., Gu, G., Bolvin, D., Chiu, L., Schneider, U., Becker, A., Nelkin, E., Xie, P., Ferraro, R., and Shin, D.-B.: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly analysis (new version 2.3) and a review of 2017 global precipitation, Atmosphere, 9, 138, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040138, 2018. a, b
Anber, U. M., Giangrande, S. E., Donner, L. J., and Jensen, M. P.: Updraft constraints on entrainment: insights from Amazonian deep convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 2429–2442, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0234.1, 2019. a
Arakawa, A. and Schubert, W. H.: Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment. Part I, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 674–701, 1974. a, b, c
Arakawa, A. and Wu, C.-M.: A unified representation of deep moist convection in numerical modeling of the atmosphere: Part I, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 1977–1992, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0330.1, 2013. a
Arakawa, A., Jung, J.-H., and Wu, C.-M.: Toward unification of the multiscale modeling of the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3731–3742, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3731-2011, 2011. a
Download
Executive editor
This article was solicited for the ACP 20th Anniversary collection. It received positive reviews that very nicely contributed to the ideas and to which the authors responded thoroughly. It is a stimulating read, combining 'big-picture' considerations with more detailed technical discussion of important and illuminating examples.
Short summary

Climate models are crucial for predicting climate change in detail. This paper proposes a balanced approach to improving their accuracy by combining traditional process-based methods with modern artificial intelligence (AI) techniques while maximizing the resolution to allow for ensemble simulations. The authors propose using AI to learn from both observational and simulated data while incorporating existing physical knowledge to reduce data demands and improve climate prediction reliability.

Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint