Articles | Volume 24, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7041-2024
Opinion
 | Highlight paper
 | 
19 Jun 2024
Opinion | Highlight paper |  | 19 Jun 2024

Opinion: Optimizing climate models with process knowledge, resolution, and artificial intelligence

Tapio Schneider, L. Ruby Leung, and Robert C. J. Wills

Related authors

Toward routing river water in land surface models with recurrent neural networks
Mauricio Lima, Katherine Deck, Oliver R. A. Dunbar, and Tapio Schneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3145–3164, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3145-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3145-2025, 2025
Short summary
Large-eddy simulations with ClimateMachine v0.2.0: a new open-source code for atmospheric simulations on GPUs and CPUs
Akshay Sridhar, Yassine Tissaoui, Simone Marras, Zhaoyi Shen, Charles Kawczynski, Simon Byrne, Kiran Pamnany, Maciej Waruszewski, Thomas H. Gibson, Jeremy E. Kozdon, Valentin Churavy, Lucas C. Wilcox, Francis X. Giraldo, and Tapio Schneider
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6259–6284, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6259-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6259-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Climate and Earth System | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Polar winter climate change: strong local effects from sea ice loss, widespread consequences from warming seas
Tuomas Naakka, Daniel Köhler, Kalle Nordling, Petri Räisänen, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Risto Makkonen, Joonas Merikanto, Bjørn H. Samset, Victoria A. Sinclair, Jennie L. Thomas, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8127–8145, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8127-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8127-2025, 2025
Short summary
Limitations in the use of atmospheric CO2 observations to directly infer changes in the length of the biospheric carbon uptake period
Theertha Kariyathan, Ana Bastos, Markus Reichstein, Wouter Peters, and Julia Marshall
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7863–7878, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7863-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7863-2025, 2025
Short summary
Volcanic emission estimates from the inversion of ACTRIS lidar observations and their use for quantitative dispersion modeling
Anna Kampouri, Vassilis Amiridis, Thanasis Georgiou, Stavros Solomos, Anna Gialitaki, Maria Tsichla, Michael Rennie, Simona Scollo, and Prodromos Zanis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7343–7368, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7343-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7343-2025, 2025
Short summary
Emission inventory development for spatiotemporal release of vanadium from anthropogenic sources in China
Han Zhang, Baogang Zhang, Bo Jiang, Qimin Li, Xuewen Hu, and Yi Xing
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5577–5589, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5577-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5577-2025, 2025
Short summary
Surface temperature effects of recent reductions in shipping SO2 emissions are within internal variability
Duncan Watson-Parris, Laura J. Wilcox, Camilla W. Stjern, Robert J. Allen, Geeta Persad, Massimo A. Bollasina, Annica M. L. Ekman, Carley E. Iles, Manoj Joshi, Marianne T. Lund, Daniel McCoy, Daniel M. Westervelt, Andrew I. L. Williams, and Bjørn H. Samset
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4443–4454, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4443-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4443-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adler, R. F., Sapiano, M. R. P., Huffman, G. J., Wang, J.-J., Gu, G., Bolvin, D., Chiu, L., Schneider, U., Becker, A., Nelkin, E., Xie, P., Ferraro, R., and Shin, D.-B.: The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly analysis (new version 2.3) and a review of 2017 global precipitation, Atmosphere, 9, 138, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9040138, 2018. a, b
Anber, U. M., Giangrande, S. E., Donner, L. J., and Jensen, M. P.: Updraft constraints on entrainment: insights from Amazonian deep convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 2429–2442, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0234.1, 2019. a
Arakawa, A. and Schubert, W. H.: Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment. Part I, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 674–701, 1974. a, b, c
Arakawa, A. and Wu, C.-M.: A unified representation of deep moist convection in numerical modeling of the atmosphere: Part I, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 1977–1992, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0330.1, 2013. a
Arakawa, A., Jung, J.-H., and Wu, C.-M.: Toward unification of the multiscale modeling of the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3731–3742, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3731-2011, 2011. a
Download
Executive editor
This article was solicited for the ACP 20th Anniversary collection. It received positive reviews that very nicely contributed to the ideas and to which the authors responded thoroughly. It is a stimulating read, combining 'big-picture' considerations with more detailed technical discussion of important and illuminating examples.
Short summary

Climate models are crucial for predicting climate change in detail. This paper proposes a balanced approach to improving their accuracy by combining traditional process-based methods with modern artificial intelligence (AI) techniques while maximizing the resolution to allow for ensemble simulations. The authors propose using AI to learn from both observational and simulated data while incorporating existing physical knowledge to reduce data demands and improve climate prediction reliability.

Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint