Articles | Volume 23, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10625-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10625-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| Highlight paper
| 
26 Sep 2023
Research article | Highlight paper |
| 26 Sep 2023
| 26 Sep 2023
Molecular simulations reveal that heterogeneous ice nucleation occurs at higher temperatures in water under capillary tension
Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
Will Cantrell
Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
Tianshu Li
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
Issei Nakamura
Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
Raymond A. Shaw
Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
Related authors
Samuel Ephraim, Paquita Zuidema, Aaron Bansemer, Lintong Cai, Markus Petters, Elise Rosky, Jefferson R. Snider, Zhien Wang, Sarah Woods, Kevin Barry, Theresa Campos, Owen Cruikshank, Sabine Eckhardt, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Romanos Foskinis, Jeffrey R. French, Bart Geerts, Coltin Grasmick, Silvia Henning, Varun Kumar, Andreas Massling, Camille Mavis, Greg M. McFarquhar, Athanasios Nenes, Gunnar Noer, Ryan Patnaude, Russell Perkins, Lise Lotte Sorensen, Henrik Skov, Tyler Tatro, Florian Tornow, and Lu Zhang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2940, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2940, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
The processes that establish how mixed-phase closed-cell clouds transition to more open cellular structures are poorly known. First-of-its kind aircraft observations document such a transition in the presence of anomalously high aerosol concentrations over the Nordic Seas at cloud temperatures < -15 °C. The reduces the drop size, discouraging riming. Eventually, ice precipitation produces surface cold pools that drive the convective transition, despite strong counteracting surface fluxes.
Samuel Ephraim, Paquita Zuidema, Aaron Bansemer, Lintong Cai, Markus Petters, Elise Rosky, Jefferson R. Snider, Zhien Wang, Sarah Woods, Kevin Barry, Theresa Campos, Owen Cruikshank, Sabine Eckhardt, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Romanos Foskinis, Jeffrey R. French, Bart Geerts, Coltin Grasmick, Silvia Henning, Varun Kumar, Andreas Massling, Camille Mavis, Greg M. McFarquhar, Athanasios Nenes, Gunnar Noer, Ryan Patnaude, Russell Perkins, Lise Lotte Sorensen, Henrik Skov, Tyler Tatro, Florian Tornow, and Lu Zhang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2940, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2940, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
The processes that establish how mixed-phase closed-cell clouds transition to more open cellular structures are poorly known. First-of-its kind aircraft observations document such a transition in the presence of anomalously high aerosol concentrations over the Nordic Seas at cloud temperatures < -15 °C. The reduces the drop size, discouraging riming. Eventually, ice precipitation produces surface cold pools that drive the convective transition, despite strong counteracting surface fluxes.
James Simmons, Jesse Anderson, Corey Bois, Hamed Fahandezh Sadi, Kadja Flore Gali, Suryadev Pratap Singh, Andrei Vakhtin, Kurt Hibert, Bruce Boe, Youssef Wehbe, Steve Krueger, Raymond Shaw, and Will Cantrell
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-794, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-794, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Precipitation from warm clouds requires large droplets to promote collision-coalescence. As part of an investigation into cloud seeding, we tested two hygroscopic materials in a laboratory cloud chamber where they formed large droplets and increased the concentration of liquid water. Sodium chloride particles with diameters of 4 to 25 micrometers proved most effective, supporting in-cloud seeding for precipitation enhancement in warm clouds, particularly in arid regions.
Robert Grosz, Kamal Kant Chandrakar, Raymond A. Shaw, Jesse C. Anderson, Will Cantrell, and Szymon P. Malinowski
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2619–2638, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2619-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2619-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our objective was to enhance understanding of thermally driven convection in terms of small-scale variations in the temperature scalar field. We conducted a small-scale study of the temperature field in the Π Chamber using three different temperature differences (10 K, 15 K, and 20 K). Measurements were carried out using a miniaturized UltraFast Thermometer operating at 2 kHz, allowing undisturbed vertical temperature profiling from 8 cm above the floor to 5 cm below the ceiling.
Fan Yang, Hamed Fahandezh Sadi, Raymond A. Shaw, Fabian Hoffmann, Pei Hou, Aaron Wang, and Mikhail Ovchinnikov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3785–3806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3785-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3785-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Large-eddy simulations of a convection cloud chamber show two new microphysics regimes, cloud oscillation and cloud collapse, due to haze–cloud interactions. Our results suggest that haze particles and their interactions with cloud droplets should be considered especially in polluted conditions. To properly simulate haze–cloud interactions, we need to resolve droplet activation and deactivation processes, instead of using Twomey-type activation parameterization.
Aaron Wang, Steve Krueger, Sisi Chen, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, Will Cantrell, and Raymond A. Shaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10245–10260, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10245-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10245-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We employ two methods to examine a laboratory experiment on clouds with both ice and liquid phases. The first assumes well-mixed properties; the second resolves the spatial distribution of turbulence and cloud particles. Results show that while the trends in mean properties generally align, when turbulence is resolved, liquid droplets are not fully depleted by ice due to incomplete mixing. This underscores the threshold of ice mass fraction in distinguishing mixed-phase clouds from ice clouds.
Zeen Zhu, Fan Yang, Pavlos Kollias, Raymond A. Shaw, Alex B. Kostinski, Steve Krueger, Katia Lamer, Nithin Allwayin, and Mariko Oue
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1133–1143, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1133-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1133-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this article, we demonstrate the feasibility of applying advanced radar technology to detect liquid droplets generated in the cloud chamber. Specifically, we show that using radar with centimeter-scale resolution, single drizzle drops with a diameter larger than 40 µm can be detected. This study demonstrates the applicability of remote sensing instruments in laboratory experiments and suggests new applications of ultrahigh-resolution radar for atmospheric sensing.
Jesse C. Anderson, Subin Thomas, Prasanth Prabhakaran, Raymond A. Shaw, and Will Cantrell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5473–5485, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5473-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5473-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Fluctuations due to turbulence in Earth's atmosphere can play a role in how many droplets a cloud has and, eventually, whether that cloud rains or evaporates. We study such processes in Michigan Tech's cloud chamber. Here, we characterize the turbulent and large-scale motions of air in the chamber, measuring the spatial and temporal distributions of temperature and water vapor, which we can combine to get the distribution of relative humidity, which governs cloud formation and dissipation.
Cited articles
Alkezweeny, A. J.: Freezing of supercooled water droplets due to collision, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 8, 994–995, 1969. a
Allen, M. P. and Tildesley, D. J.: Computer Simulation of Liquids, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, ISBN 0198803206, 2017. a
Baker, M. and Baker, M.: A new look at homogeneous freezing of water,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L19102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020483, 2004. a
Bianco, V., de Hijes, P. M., Lamas, C. P., Sanz, E., and Vega, C.: Anomalous behavior in the nucleation of ice at negative pressures, Phys. Rev. Lett., 126, 015704, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.015704, 2021. a, b, c, d
Cantrell, W. and Heymsfield, A.: Production of ice in tropospheric clouds: A
review, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 795–808, 2005. a
Cantrell, W., Li, T., Nakamura, I., Rosky, E., and Shaw, R.: Molecular dynamics simulation data: mW and MLmW water model ice nucleation on a hydrophilic substrate with negative pressure, Michigan Tech Research Data [data set], https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.all-datasets/41, 2023. a
Cao, B., Xu, E., and Li, T.: Anomalous stability of two-dimensional ice
confined in hydrophobic nanopores, ACS Nano, 13, 4712–4719, 2019. a
Cheng, X., Sun, T.-P., and Gordillo, L.: Drop impact dynamics: Impact force and stress distributions, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 54, 57–81, 2022. a
David, R. O., Fahrni, J., Marcolli, C., Mahrt, F., Brühwiler, D., and Kanji, Z. A.: The role of contact angle and pore width on pore condensation and freezing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9419–9440, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9419-2020, 2020. a
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D.,
Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D.: Predicting
global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, 2010. a
Dhabal, D., Sankaranarayanan, S. K. R. S., and Molinero, V.: Stability and Metastability of Liquid Water in a Machine-Learned Coarse-Grained Model with
Short-Range Interactions, J. Phys. Chem. B, 126, 9881–9892, 2022. a
Diehl, K., Matthias-Maser, S., Jaenicke, R., and Mitra, S.: The ice nucleating ability of pollen:: Part II. Laboratory studies in immersion and contact freezing modes, Atmos. Res., 61, 125–133, 2002. a
Elliott, J. A. W.: Surface thermodynamics at the nanoscale, J. Chem. Phys., 154, 190901, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0049031, 2021. a, b
Espinosa, J. R., Zaragoza, A., Rosales-Pelaez, P., Navarro, C., Valeriani, C., Vega, C., and Sanz, E.: Interfacial free energy as the key to the
pressure-induced deceleration of ice nucleation, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
117, 135702, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.135702, 2016. a, b
Evans, L. F.: Two-dimensional Nucleation of Ice, Nature, 213, 384–385, 1967. a
Fitzner, M., Sosso, G. C., Cox, S. J., and Michaelides, A.: The many faces of
heterogeneous ice nucleation: Interplay between surface morphology and
hydrophobicity, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 137, 13658–13669, 2015. a
Frostenberg, H. C., Welti, A., Luhr, M., Savre, J., S. Thomson, E., and Ickes, L.: The Chance of Freezing – Parameterizing temperature dependent freezing including randomness of INP concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-696, in review, 2022. a
Fu, S. and Xue, H.: The effect of ice nuclei efficiency on Arctic mixed-phase clouds from large-eddy simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 3901–3913, 2017. a
Giovambattista, N., Debenedetti, P. G., and Rossky, P. J.: Effect of surface polarity on water contact angle and interfacial hydration structure, J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 9581–9587, 2007. a
Gurganus, C., Charnawskas, J., Kostinski, A., and Shaw, R.: Nucleation at the contact line observed on nanotextured surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113,
235701, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.235701, 2014. a
Haji-Akbari, A. and Debenedetti, P. G.: Computational investigation of surface freezing in a molecular model of water, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 3316–3321, 2017. a
Haji-Akbari, A., DeFever, R. S., Sarupria, S., and Debenedetti, P. G.:
Suppression of sub-surface freezing in free-standing thin films of a
coarse-grained model of water, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16,
25916–25927, 2014. a
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012, 2012. a, b
Hussain, S. and Haji-Akbari, A.: Role of Nanoscale Interfacial Proximity in Contact Freezing in Water, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 143, 2272–2284, 2021. a
Jacobsen, A. L., Pratt, R. B., Ewers, F. W., and Davis, S. D.: Cavitation resistance among 26 chaparral species of southern California, Ecol. Monogr., 77, 99–115, 2007. a
James, R. L., Phillips, V. T. J., and Connolly, P. J.: Secondary ice production during the break-up of freezing water drops on impact with ice particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18519–18530, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18519-2021, 2021. a
Klumpp, K., Marcolli, C., Alonso-Hellweg, A., Dreimol, C. H., and Peter, T.: Comparing the ice nucleation properties of the kaolin minerals kaolinite and halloysite, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1579–1598, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1579-2023, 2023. a
Koop, T., Luo, B., Biermann, U. M., Crutzen, P. J., and Peter, T.: Freezing of HNO3/H2SO4/H2O solutions at stratospheric temperatures: Nucleation statistics and experiments, J. Phys. Chem. A, 101, 1117–1133, 1997. a
Lamb, D. and Verlinde, J.: Physics and Chemistry of Clouds, Cambridge
University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976377, 2011. a, b, c
Lance, S., Shupe, M. D., Feingold, G., Brock, C. A., Cozic, J., Holloway, J. S., Moore, R. H., Nenes, A., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R., Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Brioude, J., Cooper, O. R., Stohl, A., and Burkhart, J. F.: Cloud condensation nuclei as a modulator of ice processes in Arctic mixed-phase clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8003–8015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8003-2011, 2011. a
Levin, Z. and Yankofsky, S. A.: Contact versus immersion freezing of freely suspended droplets by bacterial ice nuclei, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 1964–1966, 1983. a
Li, T., Donadio, D., Ghiringhelli, L. M., and Galli, G.: Surface-induced crystallization in supercooled tetrahedral liquids, Nat. Mater., 8, 726–730, 2009. a
Li, T., Donadio, D., Russo, G., and Galli, G.: Homogeneous ice nucleation from supercooled water, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 19807–19813, 2011. a
Li, T., Donadio, D., and Galli, G.: Ice nucleation at the nanoscale probes no
man's land of water, Nat. Commun., 4, 1–6, 2013. a
Lintunen, A., Hölttä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Anatomical regulation of ice nucleation and cavitation helps trees to survive freezing and drought stress, Sci. Rep., 3, 1–7, 2013. a
Lu, J., Chakravarty, C., and Molinero, V.: Relationship between the line of
density anomaly and the lines of melting, crystallization, cavitation, and
liquid spinodal in coarse-grained water models, J. Chem. Phys., 144, 234507, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4953854, 2016. a, b, c
Lupi, L. and Molinero, V.: Does hydrophilicity of carbon particles improve
their ice nucleation ability?, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118,
7330–7337, 2014. a
Marcolli, C.: Deposition nucleation viewed as homogeneous or immersion freezing in pores and cavities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2071–2104, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014, 2014. a
Marcolli, C.: Ice nucleation triggered by negative pressure, Sci. Rep., 7, 16634, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16787-3, 2017. a, b
Marcolli, C.: Technical note: Fundamental aspects of ice nucleation via pore condensation and freezing including Laplace pressure and growth into macroscopic ice, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3209–3230, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3209-2020, 2020. a
Montero de Hijes, P., R Espinosa, J., Vega, C., and Dellago, C.: Minimum in the pressure dependence of the interfacial free energy between ice Ih and water, J. Chem. Phys., 158, 124503, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0140814, 2023. a
Niedermeier, D., Shaw, R. A., Hartmann, S., Wex, H., Clauss, T., Voigtländer, J., and Stratmann, F.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation: exploring the transition from stochastic to singular freezing behavior, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8767–8775, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8767-2011, 2011. a
Niehaus, J. and Cantrell, W.: Contact freezing of fater by falts, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 6, 3490–3495, 2015. a
Pitter, R. and Pruppacher, H.: A wind tunnel investigation of freezing of small water drops falling at terminal velocity in air, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 99, 540–550, 1973. a
Plimpton, S.: Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J. Comput. Phys., 117, 1–19, 1995. a
Powell-Palm, M. J., Koh-Bell, A., and Rubinsky, B.: Isochoric conditions enhance stability of metastable supercooled water, Appl. Phys. Lett., 116, 123702, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5145334, 2020. a
Qiu, Y. and Molinero, V.: Why Is It So Difficult to Identify the Onset of Ice
Premelting?, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 9, 5179–5182, 2018. a
Rangno, A. L. and Hobbs, P. V.: Ice particle concentrations and precipitation development in small polar maritime cumuliform clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 117, 207–241, 1991. a
Roedder, E.: Metastable superheated ice in liquid-water inclusions under high
negative pressure, Science, 155, 1413–1417, 1967. a
Roudsari, G., Pakarinen, O. H., Reischl, B., and Vehkamäki, H.: Atomistic and coarse-grained simulations reveal increased ice nucleation activity on silver iodide surfaces in slit and wedge geometries, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10099–10114, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10099-2022, 2022. a
Shaw, R. A., Durant, A. J., and Mi, Y.: Heterogeneous surface crystallization observed in undercooled water, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109, 9865–9868, 2005. a
Steinhardt, P. J., Nelson, D. R., and Ronchetti, M.: Bond-orientational order
in liquids and glasses, Phys. Rev. B, 28, 784–805, 1983. a
Stillinger, F. H. and Weber, T. A.: Computer simulation of local order in
condensed phases of silicon, Phys. Rev. B, 31, 5262, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262, 1985. a
Stukowski, A.: Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO – the Open Visualization Tool, Modeling and Simulation in Materials
Science and Engineering, 18, 015012, https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012, 2010. a
Tan, I., Barahona, D., and Coopman, Q.: Potential link between ice nucleation and climate model spread in arctic amplification, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097373, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097373, 2022. a
Wang, L., Wang, F., Lu, C., and Liu, H.: Nucleation in supercooled water triggered by mechanical impact: Experimental and theoretical analyses, Journal of Energy Storage, 52, 104755, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104755, 2022. a
Wheeler, T. D. and Stroock, A. D.: The transpiration of water at negative
pressures in a synthetic tree, Nature, 455, 208–212, 2008. a
Yang, F., Ovchinnikov, M., and Shaw, R. A.: Minimalist model of ice microphysics in mixed-phase stratiform clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 3756–3760, 2013. a
Yang, F., Shaw, R. A., Gurganus, C. W., Chong, S. K., and Yap, Y. K.: Ice nucleation at the contact line triggered by transient electrowetting fields,
Appl. Phys. Lett., 107, 264101, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4938749, 2015.
a
Yang, F., Cruikshank, O., He, W., Kostinski, A., and Shaw, R.: Nonthermal ice nucleation observed at distorted contact lines of supercooled water drops, Phys. Rev. E, 97, 023103, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.023103, 2018. a, b
Yang, F., Cantrell, W. H., Kostinski, A. B., Shaw, R. A., and Vogelmann, A. M.: Is contact nucleation caused by pressure perturbation?, Atmosphere, 11, 1, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010001, 2020. a
Editorial statement
I agree with the handling editor that this paper shows an important aspect of heterogeneous ice nucleation in water under capillary tension. The results can be of general interest to a broad geoscience community.
I agree with the handling editor that this paper shows an important aspect of heterogeneous ice...
Short summary
Using computer simulations of water, we find that water under tension freezes more easily than under normal conditions. A linear equation describes how freezing temperature increases with tension. Accordingly, simulations show that naturally occurring tension in water capillary bridges leads to higher freezing temperatures. This work is an early step in determining if atmospheric cloud droplets freeze due to naturally occurring tension, for example, during processes such as droplet collisions.
Using computer simulations of water, we find that water under tension freezes more easily than...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint