Articles | Volume 18, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17405-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17405-2018
Research article
 | 
07 Dec 2018
Research article |  | 07 Dec 2018

Evaluation of autoconversion and accretion enhancement factors in general circulation model warm-rain parameterizations using ground-based measurements over the Azores

Peng Wu, Baike Xi, Xiquan Dong, and Zhibo Zhang

Related authors

Aerosol-induced closure of marine cloud cells: enhanced effects in the presence of precipitation
Matthew W. Christensen, Peng Wu, Adam C. Varble, Heng Xiao, and Jerome D. Fast
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6455–6476, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6455-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6455-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of four ground-based retrievals of cloud droplet number concentration in marine stratocumulus with aircraft in situ measurements
Damao Zhang, Andrew M. Vogelmann, Fan Yang, Edward Luke, Pavlos Kollias, Zhien Wang, Peng Wu, William I. Gustafson Jr., Fan Mei, Susanne Glienke, Jason Tomlinson, and Neel Desai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5827–5846, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5827-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5827-2023, 2023
Short summary
Earth System Model Aerosol–Cloud Diagnostics (ESMAC Diags) package, version 2: assessing aerosols, clouds, and aerosol–cloud interactions via field campaign and long-term observations
Shuaiqi Tang, Adam C. Varble, Jerome D. Fast, Kai Zhang, Peng Wu, Xiquan Dong, Fan Mei, Mikhail Pekour, Joseph C. Hardin, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6355–6376, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6355-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6355-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of aerosol–cloud interactions in E3SM using a Lagrangian framework
Matthew W. Christensen, Po-Lun Ma, Peng Wu, Adam C. Varble, Johannes Mülmenstädt, and Jerome D. Fast
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2789–2812, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2789-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2789-2023, 2023
Short summary
Cloud phase and macrophysical properties over the Southern Ocean during the MARCUS field campaign
Baike Xi, Xiquan Dong, Xiaojian Zheng, and Peng Wu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3761–3777, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3761-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3761-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
A thermal-driven graupel generation process to explain dry-season convective vigor over the Amazon
Toshi Matsui, Daniel Hernandez-Deckers, Scott E. Giangrande, Thiago S. Biscaro, Ann Fridlind, and Scott Braun
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10793–10814, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10793-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10793-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling homogeneous ice nucleation from drop-freezing experiments: impact of droplet volume dispersion and cooling rates
Ravi Kumar Reddy Addula, Ingrid de Almeida Ribeiro, Valeria Molinero, and Baron Peters
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10833–10848, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10833-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10833-2024, 2024
Short summary
Cloud water adjustments to aerosol perturbations are buffered by solar heating in non-precipitating marine stratocumuli
Jianhao Zhang, Yao-Sheng Chen, Takanobu Yamaguchi, and Graham Feingold
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10425–10440, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10425-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10425-2024, 2024
Short summary
Glaciation of mixed-phase clouds: insights from bulk model and bin-microphysics large-eddy simulation informed by laboratory experiment
Aaron Wang, Steve Krueger, Sisi Chen, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, Will Cantrell, and Raymond A. Shaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10245–10260, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10245-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10245-2024, 2024
Short summary
Microphysical processes involving the vapour phase dominate in simulated low-level Arctic clouds
Theresa Kiszler, Davide Ori, and Vera Schemann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10039–10053, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10039-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10039-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahlgrimm, M. and Forbes, R.: Improving the Representation of Low Clouds and Drizzle in the ECMWF Model Based on ARM Observations from the Azores, J. Climate, 142, 668–685, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00153.1, 2014. 
Albrecht, B., Fairall, C., Thomson, D., White, A., Snider, J., and Schubert, W.: Surface-based remote-sensing of the observed and the adiabatic liquid water-content of stratocumulus clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17, 89–92, https://doi.org/10.1029/Gl017i001p00089, 1990. 
Austin, P., Wang, Y., Kujala, V., and Pincus, R.: Precipitation in Stratocumulus Clouds: Observational and Modeling Results, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 2329–2352, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<2329:PISCOA>2.0.CO;2, 1995. 
Bai, H., Gong, C., Wang, M., Zhang, Z., and L'Ecuyer, T.: Estimating precipitation susceptibility in warm marine clouds using multi-sensor aerosol and cloud products from A-Train satellites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1763–1783, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1763-2018, 2018. 
Barker, H. W., Wiellicki, B. A., and Parker, L.: A parameterization for computing grid-averaged solar fluxes for inhomogeneous marine boundary layer clouds. Part II: Validation using satellite data, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 2304–2316, 1996. 
Download
Short summary
Prescribed autoconversion and accretion enhancement factors in GCM warm-rain parameterizations contribute partially to the too-frequent and too-light problem in precipitation simulation. The two factors should be regime- and resolution-dependent. A decreased autoconversion enhancement factor and increased accretion enhancement factor in the Morrison and Gettleman (2008) scheme can improve the simulated precipitation frequency and intensity. The two factors for other schemes are also suggested.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint