Articles | Volume 25, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13665-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13665-2025
Research article
 | 
24 Oct 2025
Research article |  | 24 Oct 2025

Effects of different emission inventories on tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime

Catherine Acquah, Laura Stecher, Mariano Mertens, and Patrick Jöckel

Related authors

Airborne remote sensing of nitrous acid in the troposphere: potential sources of excess HONO
Benjamin Weyland, Simon Rosanka, Domenico Taraborrelli, Birger Bohn, Andreas Zahn, Florian Obersteiner, Eric Förster, Mariano Mertens, Patrick Jöckel, Helmut Ziereis, Katharina Kaiser, Horst Fischer, John N. Crowley, Nijing Wang, Achim Edtbauer, Jonathan Williams, Maria Dolores Andrés Hernández, John P. Burrows, Flora Kluge, Meike Rotermund, Andre Butz, and Klaus Pfeilsticker
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5085,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5085, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
AIRTRAC v2.0: a Lagrangian aerosol tagging submodel for the analysis of aviation SO4 transport patterns
Jin Maruhashi, Mattia Righi, Monica Sharma, Johannes Hendricks, Patrick Jöckel, Volker Grewe, and Irene C. Dedoussi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4204,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4204, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Changes in global atmospheric oxidant chemistry from land cover conversion
Ryan Vella, Sergey Gromov, Clara M. Nussbaumer, Laura Stecher, Matthias Kohl, Samuel Ruhl, Holger Tost, Jos Lelieveld, and Andrea Pozzer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 9885–9904, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9885-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9885-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluation of atmospheric sulfur dioxide simulated with the EMAC (version 2.55) Chemistry-Climate Model using satellite and ground-based observations
Ismail Makroum, Patrick Jöckel, Martin Dameris, Nicolas Theys, and Johannes De Leeuw
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3915,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3915, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Climate forcing due to future ozone changes: an intercomparison of metrics and methods
William J. Collins, Fiona M. O'Connor, Rachael E. Byrom, Øivind Hodnebrog, Patrick Jöckel, Mariano Mertens, Gunnar Myhre, Matthias Nützel, Dirk Olivié, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Laura Stecher, Larry W. Horowitz, Vaishali Naik, Gregory Faluvegi, Ulas Im, Lee T. Murray, Drew Shindell, Kostas Tsigaridis, Nathan Luke Abraham, and James Keeble
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 9031–9060, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9031-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9031-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Acquah, C., Stecher, L., Mertens, M., and Jöckel, P.: Effects of different emission inventories on tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime, results of EMIS-01 simulation (1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14712802, 2025a. a
Acquah, C., Stecher, L., Mertens, M., and Jöckel, P.: Effects of different emission inventories on tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime, results of EMIS-02 simulation (1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14712940, 2025b. a
Acquah, C., Stecher, L., Mertens, M., and Jöckel, P.: Effects of different emission inventories on tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime, results of EMIS-01-ODS simulation (1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17276193, 2025c. a
Ashmore, M. R.: Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation, Plant Cell and Environment, 28, 949–964, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01341.x, 2005. a
Bell, M. L., McDermott, A., Zeger, S. L., Samet, J. M., and Dominici, F.: Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities, 1987-2000, Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 2372–2378, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.19.2372, 2004. a
Download
Short summary
Short-lived ozone precursor species influence the formation of ozone and also the atmospheric lifetime of methane. Our study assesses the effect of two widely used emission inventories of these species on ozone and the methane lifetime. Our results indicate tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime differences of around 4 % even though both emission inventories aim at representing present-day conditions. We further attribute the differences to emissions of individual sectors, e.g. land traffic.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint