Articles | Volume 24, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1855-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1855-2024
Research article
 | 
12 Feb 2024
Research article |  | 12 Feb 2024

Revisiting day-of-week ozone patterns in an era of evolving US air quality

Heather Simon, Christian Hogrefe, Andrew Whitehill, Kristen M. Foley, Jennifer Liljegren, Norm Possiel, Benjamin Wells, Barron H. Henderson, Lukas C. Valin, Gail Tonnesen, K. Wyat Appel, and Shannon Koplitz

Related authors

Sensitivity of northeastern US surface ozone predictions to the representation of atmospheric chemistry in the Community Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Multiphase Mechanism (CRACMMv1.0)
Bryan K. Place, William T. Hutzell, K. Wyat Appel, Sara Farrell, Lukas Valin, Benjamin N. Murphy, Karl M. Seltzer, Golam Sarwar, Christine Allen, Ivan R. Piletic, Emma L. D'Ambro, Emily Saunders, Heather Simon, Ana Torres-Vasquez, Jonathan Pleim, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Matthew M. Coggon, Lu Xu, William R. Stockwell, and Havala O. T. Pye
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9173–9190, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9173-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0
K. W. Appel, G. A. Pouliot, H. Simon, G. Sarwar, H. O. T. Pye, S. L. Napelenok, F. Akhtar, and S. J. Roselle
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 883–899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Constraining the budget of NOx and volatile organic compounds at a remote tropical island using multi-platform observations and WRF-Chem model simulations
Catalina Poraicu, Jean-François Müller, Trissevgeni Stavrakou, Crist Amelynck, Bert W. D. Verreyken, Niels Schoon, Corinne Vigouroux, Nicolas Kumps, Jérôme Brioude, Pierre Tulet, and Camille Mouchel-Vallon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6903–6941, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6903-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6903-2025, 2025
Short summary
Multi-observational estimation of regional and sectoral emission contributions to the persistent high growth rate of atmospheric CH4 for 2020–2022
Yosuke Niwa, Yasunori Tohjima, Yukio Terao, Tazu Saeki, Akihiko Ito, Taku Umezawa, Kyohei Yamada, Motoki Sasakawa, Toshinobu Machida, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Hideki Nara, Hiroshi Tanimoto, Hitoshi Mukai, Yukio Yoshida, Shinji Morimoto, Shinya Takatsuji, Kazuhiro Tsuboi, Yousuke Sawa, Hidekazu Matsueda, Kentaro Ishijima, Ryo Fujita, Daisuke Goto, Xin Lan, Kenneth Schuldt, Michal Heliasz, Tobias Biermann, Lukasz Chmura, Jarsolaw Necki, Irène Xueref-Remy, and Damiano Sferlazzo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6757–6785, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6757-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6757-2025, 2025
Short summary
Representing improved tropospheric ozone distribution over the Northern Hemisphere by including lightning NOx emissions in CHIMERE
Sanhita Ghosh, Arineh Cholakian, Sylvain Mailler, and Laurent Menut
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6273–6297, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6273-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6273-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing the ability to quantify the decrease in NOx anthropogenic emissions in 2019 compared to 2005 using OMI and TROPOMI satellite observations
Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Grégoire Broquet, Elise Potier, Antoine Berchet, Isabelle Pison, Adrien Martinez, Robin Plauchu, Rimal Abeed, Aurélien Sicsik-Paré, Gaelle Dufour, Adriana Coman, Dilek Savas, Guillaume Siour, Henk Eskes, Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon, and Stijn N. C. Dellaert
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6047–6068, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6047-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6047-2025, 2025
Short summary
Tracking daily NOx emissions from an urban agglomeration based on TROPOMI NO2 and a local ensemble transform Kalman filter
Yawen Kong, Bo Zheng, and Yuxi Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5959–5976, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5959-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5959-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Adame, J. A., Hernández-Ceballos, M. Á., Sorribas, M., Lozano, A., and Morena, B. A. D. L.: Weekend-Weekday Effect Assessment for O3, NOx, CO and PM10 in Andalusia, Spain (2003–2008), Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 14, 1862–1874, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.02.0026, 2014. 
Almaraz, M., Bai, E., Wang, C., Trousdell, J., Conley, S., Faloona, I., and Houlton, B. Z.: Agriculture is a major source of NOx pollution in California, Sci. Adv., 4, eaao3477, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao3477, 2018. 
Atkinson-Palombo, C. M., Miller, J. A., and Balling, R. C.: Quantifying the ozone “weekend effect” at various locations in Phoenix, Arizona, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7644–7658, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.023, 2006. 
Blanchard, C. L. and Tanenbaum, S.: Weekday/Weekend Differences in Ambient Air Pollutant Concentrations in Atlanta and the Southeastern United States, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 56, 271–284, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464455, 2006. 
Download
Short summary
We assess observed and modeled ozone weekend–weekday differences in the USA from 2002–2019. A subset of urban areas that were NOx-saturated at the beginning of the period transitioned to NOx-limited conditions. Multiple rural areas of California were NOx-limited for the entire period but become less influenced by local day-of-week emission patterns in more recent years. The model produces more NOx-saturated conditions than the observations but captures trends in weekend–weekday ozone patterns.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint