Articles | Volume 24, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1855-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1855-2024
Research article
 | 
12 Feb 2024
Research article |  | 12 Feb 2024

Revisiting day-of-week ozone patterns in an era of evolving US air quality

Heather Simon, Christian Hogrefe, Andrew Whitehill, Kristen M. Foley, Jennifer Liljegren, Norm Possiel, Benjamin Wells, Barron H. Henderson, Lukas C. Valin, Gail Tonnesen, K. Wyat Appel, and Shannon Koplitz

Related authors

Sensitivity of northeastern US surface ozone predictions to the representation of atmospheric chemistry in the Community Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Multiphase Mechanism (CRACMMv1.0)
Bryan K. Place, William T. Hutzell, K. Wyat Appel, Sara Farrell, Lukas Valin, Benjamin N. Murphy, Karl M. Seltzer, Golam Sarwar, Christine Allen, Ivan R. Piletic, Emma L. D'Ambro, Emily Saunders, Heather Simon, Ana Torres-Vasquez, Jonathan Pleim, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Matthew M. Coggon, Lu Xu, William R. Stockwell, and Havala O. T. Pye
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9173–9190, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9173-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0
K. W. Appel, G. A. Pouliot, H. Simon, G. Sarwar, H. O. T. Pye, S. L. Napelenok, F. Akhtar, and S. J. Roselle
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 883–899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
An improved estimate of inorganic iodine emissions from the ocean using a coupled surface microlayer box model
Ryan J. Pound, Lucy V. Brown, Mat J. Evans, and Lucy J. Carpenter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9899–9921, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9899-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9899-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impact of improved representation of volatile organic compound emissions and production of NOx reservoirs on modeled urban ozone production
Katherine R. Travis, Benjamin A. Nault, James H. Crawford, Kelvin H. Bates, Donald R. Blake, Ronald C. Cohen, Alan Fried, Samuel R. Hall, L. Gregory Huey, Young Ro Lee, Simone Meinardi, Kyung-Eun Min, Isobel J. Simpson, and Kirk Ullman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9555–9572, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9555-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9555-2024, 2024
Short summary
The effect of different climate and air quality policies in China on in situ ozone production in Beijing
Beth S. Nelson, Zhenze Liu, Freya A. Squires, Marvin Shaw, James R. Hopkins, Jacqueline F. Hamilton, Andrew R. Rickard, Alastair C. Lewis, Zongbo Shi, and James D. Lee
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9031–9044, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9031-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Enhancing long-term trend simulation of the global tropospheric hydroxyl (TOH) and its drivers from 2005 to 2019: a synergistic integration of model simulations and satellite observations
Amir H. Souri, Bryan N. Duncan, Sarah A. Strode, Daniel C. Anderson, Michael E. Manyin, Junhua Liu, Luke D. Oman, Zhen Zhang, and Brad Weir
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8677–8701, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8677-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8677-2024, 2024
Short summary
Intercomparison of GEOS-Chem and CAM-chem tropospheric oxidant chemistry within the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2)
Haipeng Lin, Louisa K. Emmons, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Laura Hyesung Yang, Xu Feng, Ruijun Dang, Shixian Zhai, Yunxiao Tang, Makoto M. Kelp, Nadia K. Colombi, Sebastian D. Eastham, Thibaud M. Fritz, and Daniel J. Jacob
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8607–8624, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8607-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8607-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adame, J. A., Hernández-Ceballos, M. Á., Sorribas, M., Lozano, A., and Morena, B. A. D. L.: Weekend-Weekday Effect Assessment for O3, NOx, CO and PM10 in Andalusia, Spain (2003–2008), Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 14, 1862–1874, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.02.0026, 2014. 
Almaraz, M., Bai, E., Wang, C., Trousdell, J., Conley, S., Faloona, I., and Houlton, B. Z.: Agriculture is a major source of NOx pollution in California, Sci. Adv., 4, eaao3477, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao3477, 2018. 
Atkinson-Palombo, C. M., Miller, J. A., and Balling, R. C.: Quantifying the ozone “weekend effect” at various locations in Phoenix, Arizona, Atmos. Environ., 40, 7644–7658, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.023, 2006. 
Blanchard, C. L. and Tanenbaum, S.: Weekday/Weekend Differences in Ambient Air Pollutant Concentrations in Atlanta and the Southeastern United States, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 56, 271–284, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464455, 2006. 
Download
Short summary
We assess observed and modeled ozone weekend–weekday differences in the USA from 2002–2019. A subset of urban areas that were NOx-saturated at the beginning of the period transitioned to NOx-limited conditions. Multiple rural areas of California were NOx-limited for the entire period but become less influenced by local day-of-week emission patterns in more recent years. The model produces more NOx-saturated conditions than the observations but captures trends in weekend–weekday ozone patterns.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint