Articles | Volume 23, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13685-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13685-2023
Research article
 | 
03 Nov 2023
Research article |  | 03 Nov 2023

Understanding offshore high-ozone events during TRACER-AQ 2021 in Houston: insights from WRF–CAMx photochemical modeling

Wei Li, Yuxuan Wang, Xueying Liu, Ehsan Soleimanian, Travis Griggs, James Flynn, and Paul Walter

Related authors

Modeling on the drought stress impact on the summertime biogenic isoprene emissions in South Korea
Yong-Cheol Jeong, Yuxuan Wang, Wei Li, Hyeonmin Kim, Rokjin J. Park, and Mahmoudreza Momeni
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3616,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3616, 2025
Short summary
Observed and CMIP6-model-simulated organic aerosol response to drought in the contiguous United States during summertime
Wei Li and Yuxuan Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9339–9353, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9339-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9339-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating WRF-GC v2.0 predictions of boundary layer height and vertical ozone profile during the 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign in Houston, Texas
Xueying Liu, Yuxuan Wang, Shailaja Wasti, Wei Li, Ehsan Soleimanian, James Flynn, Travis Griggs, Sergio Alvarez, John T. Sullivan, Maurice Roots, Laurence Twigg, Guillaume Gronoff, Timothy Berkoff, Paul Walter, Mark Estes, Johnathan W. Hair, Taylor Shingler, Amy Jo Scarino, Marta Fenn, and Laura Judd
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5493–5514, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5493-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5493-2023, 2023
Short summary
Satellite-derived constraints on the effect of drought stress on biogenic isoprene emissions in the southeastern US
Yuxuan Wang, Nan Lin, Wei Li, Alex Guenther, Joey C. Y. Lam, Amos P. K. Tai, Mark J. Potosnak, and Roger Seco
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14189–14208, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14189-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14189-2022, 2022
Short summary
Interactive biogenic emissions and drought stress effects on atmospheric composition in NASA GISS ModelE
Elizabeth Klovenski, Yuxuan Wang, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Greg Faluvegi, Igor Aleinov, Nancy Y. Kiang, Alex Guenther, Xiaoyan Jiang, Wei Li, and Nan Lin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13303–13323, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13303-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13303-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Regional and sectoral contributions of NOx and reactive carbon emission sources to global trends in tropospheric ozone during the 2000–2018 period
Aditya Nalam, Aura Lupaşcu, Tabish Ansari, and Tim Butler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5287–5311, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5287-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Underappreciated contributions of biogenic volatile organic compounds from urban green spaces to ozone pollution
Haofan Wang, Yuejin Li, Yiming Liu, Xiao Lu, Yang Zhang, Qi Fan, Chong Shen, Senchao Lai, Yan Zhou, Tao Zhang, and Dingli Yue
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5233–5250, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5233-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5233-2025, 2025
Short summary
Chemistry–climate feedback of atmospheric methane in a methane-emission-flux-driven chemistry–climate model
Laura Stecher, Franziska Winterstein, Patrick Jöckel, Michael Ponater, Mariano Mertens, and Martin Dameris
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5133–5158, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5133-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5133-2025, 2025
Short summary
Surface ozone trend variability across the United States and the impact of heat waves (1990–2023)
Kai-Lan Chang, Brian C. McDonald, Colin Harkins, and Owen R. Cooper
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5101–5132, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5101-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5101-2025, 2025
Short summary
Sensitivity of climate effects of hydrogen to leakage size, location, and chemical background
Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Marit Sandstad, Srinath Krishnan, Gunnar Myhre, and Maria Sand
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4929–4942, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4929-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4929-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdi-Oskouei, M., Carmichael, G., Christiansen, M., Ferrada, G., Roozitalab, B., Sobhani, N., Wade, K., Czarnetzki, A., Pierce, R. B., Wagner, T., and Stanier, C.: Sensitivity of Meteorological Skill to Selection of WRF-Chem Physical Parameterizations and Impact on Ozone Prediction During the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031971, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031971, 2020. 
Abdi-Oskouei, M., Roozitalab, B., Stanier, C. O., Christiansen, M., Pfister, G., Pierce, R. B., McDonald, B. C., Adelman, Z., Janseen, M., Dickens, A. F., and Carmichael, G. R.: The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NOx on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037042, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037042, 2022. 
Baker, K. R., Liljegren, J., Valin, L., Judd, L., Szykman, J., Millet, D. B., Czarnetzki, A., Whitehill, A., Murphy, B., and Stanier, C.: Photochemical model representation of ozone and precursors during the 2017 Lake Michigan ozone study (LMOS), Atmos. Environ., 293, 119465, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119465, 2023. 
Banta, R. M., Senff, C. J., Nielsen-Gammon, J., Darby, L. S., Ryerson, T. B., Alvarez, R. J., Sandberg, S. P., Williams, E. J., and Trainer, M.: A Bad Air Day in Houston, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 657–670, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-5-657, 2005. 
Bernier, C., Wang, Y., Gronoff, G., Berkoff, T., Knowland, K. E., Sullivan, J. T., Delgado, R., Caicedo, V., and Carroll, B.: Cluster-based characterization of multi-dimensional tropospheric ozone variability in coastal regions: an analysis of lidar measurements and model results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15313–15331, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15313-2022, 2022. 
Download
Short summary
This study examined high offshore ozone events in Galveston Bay and the Gulf of Mexico, using boat data and WRF–CAMx modeling during the TRACER-AQ 2021 field campaign. On average, high ozone is caused by chemistry due to the regional transport of volatile organic compounds and downwind advection of NOx from the ship channel. Two case studies show advection of ozone can be another process leading to high ozone, and accurate wind prediction is crucial for air quality forecasting in coastal areas.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint