Articles | Volume 22, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-16031-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-16031-2022
Research article
 | 
21 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 21 Dec 2022

Factors influencing the temporal variability of atmospheric methane emissions from Upper Silesia coal mines: a case study from the CoMet mission

Justyna Swolkień, Andreas Fix, and Michał Gałkowski

Related authors

Source apportionment of methane emissions from the Upper Silesian Coal Basin using isotopic signatures
Alina Fiehn, Maximilian Eckl, Julian Kostinek, Michał Gałkowski, Christoph Gerbig, Michael Rothe, Thomas Röckmann, Malika Menoud, Hossein Maazallahi, Martina Schmidt, Piotr Korbeń, Jarosław Neçki, Mila Stanisavljević, Justyna Swolkień, Andreas Fix, and Anke Roiger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15749–15765, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15749-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15749-2023, 2023
Short summary
Local-to-regional methane emissions from the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (USCB) quantified using UAV-based atmospheric measurements
Truls Andersen, Zhao Zhao, Marcel de Vries, Jaroslaw Necki, Justyna Swolkien, Malika Menoud, Thomas Röckmann, Anke Roiger, Andreas Fix, Wouter Peters, and Huilin Chen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5191–5216, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5191-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5191-2023, 2023
Short summary
Quantification of CH4 coal mining emissions in Upper Silesia by passive airborne remote sensing observations with the Methane Airborne MAPper (MAMAP) instrument during the CO2 and Methane (CoMet) campaign
Sven Krautwurst, Konstantin Gerilowski, Jakob Borchardt, Norman Wildmann, Michał Gałkowski, Justyna Swolkień, Julia Marshall, Alina Fiehn, Anke Roiger, Thomas Ruhtz, Christoph Gerbig, Jaroslaw Necki, John P. Burrows, Andreas Fix, and Heinrich Bovensmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17345–17371, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17345-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17345-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Field Measurements | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
What caused large ozone variabilities in three megacity clusters in eastern China during 2015–2020?
Tingting Hu, Yu Lin, Run Liu, Yuepeng Xu, Shanshan Ouyang, Boguang Wang, Yuanhang Zhang, and Shaw Chen Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1607–1626, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1607-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1607-2024, 2024
Short summary
Atmospheric turbulence observed during a fuel-bed-scale low-intensity surface fire
Joseph Seitz, Shiyuan Zhong, Joseph J. Charney, Warren E. Heilman, Kenneth L. Clark, Xindi Bian, Nicholas S. Skowronski, Michael R. Gallagher, Matthew Patterson, Jason Cole, Michael T. Kiefer, Rory Hadden, and Eric Mueller
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1119–1142, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1119-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1119-2024, 2024
Short summary
Fingerprints of the COVID-19 economic downturn and recovery on ozone anomalies at high-elevation sites in North America and western Europe
Davide Putero, Paolo Cristofanelli, Kai-Lan Chang, Gaëlle Dufour, Gregory Beachley, Cédric Couret, Peter Effertz, Daniel A. Jaffe, Dagmar Kubistin, Jason Lynch, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Melissa Puchalski, Timothy Sharac, Barkley C. Sive, Martin Steinbacher, Carlos Torres, and Owen R. Cooper
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15693–15709, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15693-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15693-2023, 2023
Short summary
Six years of continuous carbon isotope composition measurements of methane in Heidelberg (Germany) – a study of source contributions and comparison to emission inventories
Antje Hoheisel and Martina Schmidt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2079,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2079, 2023
Short summary
Ozone in the boreal forest in the Alberta Oil Sands Region
Xuanyi Zhang, Mark Gordon, Paul A. Makar, Timothy Jiang, Jonathan Davies, and David Tarasick
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13647–13664, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13647-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13647-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Amediek, A., Ehret, G., Fix, A., Wirth, M., Büdenbender, C., Quatrevalet, M., Kiemle, C., and Gerbig, C.: CHARM-F – a new airborne integrated-path differential-absorption lidar for car- bon dioxide and methane observations: measurement perfor- mance and quantification of strong point source emissions, Appl. Optics, 56, 5182–5197, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.005182, 2017. 
Andersen, T., Vinkovic, K. , De Vries, M. , Kers, B. , Necki, J., Swolkień, J., Roiger, A., Peters W., and Chen H.: Quantifying methane emissions from coal mining ventilation shafts using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based active AirCore system, Atmos. Environ., 12, 19–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100135, 2021. 
Andersen, T., de Vries, M., Necki, J., Swolkień, J., Menoud, M., Röckmann, T., Roiger, A., Fix, A., Peters, W., and Chen, H.: Local to regional methane emissions from the Upper Silesia Coal Basin (USCB) quantified using UAV-based atmospheric measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-1061, in review, 2022. 
Black, D. J. and Aziz, N. I.: Developments in coal mine methane drainage and utilization in Australia, Ninth Int. Mine Vent. Congress, 10–13 November 2009, India, 445–460, 2009. 
Download
Short summary
Determination of emissions from coal mines on a local scale requires instantaneous data. We analysed temporal emission data for ventilation shafts and factors influencing their variability. They were saturation of the seams with methane, the permeability of the rock mass, and coal output. The data for the verification should reflect the actual values of emissions from point sources. It is recommended to achieve this by using a standardised emission measurement system for all coal mines.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint