Articles | Volume 22, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13713-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13713-2022
Research article
 | 
24 Oct 2022
Research article |  | 24 Oct 2022

Decay times of atmospheric acoustic–gravity waves after deactivation of wave forcing

Nikolai M. Gavrilov, Sergey P. Kshevetskii, and Andrey V. Koval

Related authors

Numerical modelling of relative contribution of planetary waves to the atmospheric circulation
Andrey V. Koval, Olga N. Toptunova, Maxim A. Motsakov, Ksenia A. Didenko, Tatiana S. Ermakova, Nikolai M. Gavrilov, and Eugene V. Rozanov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4105–4114, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4105-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4105-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modelling the residual mean meridional circulation at different stages of sudden stratospheric warming events
Andrey V. Koval, Wen Chen, Ksenia A. Didenko, Tatiana S. Ermakova, Nikolai M. Gavrilov, Alexander I. Pogoreltsev, Olga N. Toptunova, Ke Wei, Anna N. Yarusova, and Anton S. Zarubin
Ann. Geophys., 39, 357–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-357-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-357-2021, 2021
Short summary
Correct boundary conditions for DNS models of nonlinear acoustic-gravity waves forced by atmospheric pressure variations
Yuliya Kurdyaeva, Sergey Kshevetskii, Nikolay Gavrilov, and Sergey Kulichkov
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-76,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2017-76, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Verifications of the high-resolution numerical model and polarization relations of atmospheric acoustic-gravity waves
N. M. Gavrilov, S. P. Kshevetskii, and A. V. Koval
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1831–1838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1831-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1831-2015, 2015
Short summary
Comparisons of CH4 ground-based FTIR measurements near Saint Petersburg with GOSAT observations
N. M. Gavrilov, M. V. Makarova, A. V. Poberovskii, and Yu. M. Timofeyev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1003–1010, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1003-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1003-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Mesosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Numerical modelling of relative contribution of planetary waves to the atmospheric circulation
Andrey V. Koval, Olga N. Toptunova, Maxim A. Motsakov, Ksenia A. Didenko, Tatiana S. Ermakova, Nikolai M. Gavrilov, and Eugene V. Rozanov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4105–4114, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4105-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4105-2023, 2023
Short summary
Suppressed migrating diurnal tides in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere region during El Niño in northern winter and its possible mechanism
Yetao Cen, Chengyun Yang, Tao Li, James M. Russell III, and Xiankang Dou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7861–7874, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7861-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7861-2022, 2022
Short summary
Intercomparison of middle atmospheric meteorological analyses for the Northern Hemisphere winter 2009–2010
John P. McCormack, V. Lynn Harvey, Cora E. Randall, Nicholas Pedatella, Dai Koshin, Kaoru Sato, Lawrence Coy, Shingo Watanabe, Fabrizio Sassi, and Laura A. Holt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17577–17605, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17577-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17577-2021, 2021
Short summary
Self-consistent global transport of metallic ions with WACCM-X
Jianfei Wu, Wuhu Feng, Han-Li Liu, Xianghui Xue, Daniel Robert Marsh, and John Maurice Campbell Plane
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15619–15630, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15619-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15619-2021, 2021
Short summary
Does the coupling of the semiannual oscillation with the quasi-biennial oscillation provide predictability of Antarctic sudden stratospheric warmings?
Viktoria J. Nordström and Annika Seppälä
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12835–12853, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12835-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12835-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Afraimovich, E. L., Kosogorov, E. A., and Plotnikov, A. V.: Shock–acoustic waves generated during rocket launches and earthquakes, Cosmic Res.+, 40, 241–254, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015925020387, 2002. 
AtmoSym: Multi-scale atmosphere model from the Earth's surface up to 500 km, AtmoSym [code], http://atmos.kantiana.ru (last access: 15 September 2021), 2017. 
Blanc, E., Farges, T., Le Pichon, A., and Heinrich, P.: Ten year observations of gravity waves from thunderstorms in western Africa, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 6409–6418, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020499, 2014. 
Dalin, P., Gavrilov, N., Pertsev, N., Perminov, V., A. Pogoreltsev, A., N. Shevchuk, N., Dubietis, A., Völger, P., Zalcik, M., Ling, A., Kulikov, S., Zadorozhny, A., Salakhutdinov, G., and I. Grigoryeva, I.: A case study of long gravity wave crests in noctilucent clouds and their origin in the upper tropospheric jet stream, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 14102–14116, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025422, 2016. 
De Angelis, S., McNutt, S. R., and Webley, P. W.: Evidence of atmospheric gravity waves during the 2008 eruption of Okmok volcano from seismic and remote sensing observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L10303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047144, 2011. 
Download
Short summary
We make high-resolution simulations of poorly understood decays of nonlinear atmospheric acoustic–gravity waves (AGWs) after deactivations of the wave forcing. The standard deviations of AGW perturbations, after fast dispersions of traveling modes, experience slower exponential decreases. AGW decay times are estimated for the first time and are 20–100 h in the stratosphere and mesosphere. This requires slow, quasi-standing and secondary modes in parameterizations of AGW impacts to be considered.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint