Articles | Volume 22, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13087-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13087-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 Oct 2022
Research article |
| 12 Oct 2022
| 12 Oct 2022
Possible influence of sudden stratospheric warmings on the atmospheric environment in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region
Qian Lu
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC)/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation
of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Key Laboratory of Meteorology and Ecological Environment of Hebei
Province, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
Chengde Meteorological Service of Hebei Province, Chengde, Hebei
067000, China
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC)/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation
of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Chunhua Shi
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC)/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation
of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Dong Guo
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC)/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation
of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Guiqin Fu
Key Laboratory of Meteorology and Ecological Environment of Hebei
Province, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
Ji Wang
Beijing Regional Climate Center, Beijing 100089, China
Zhuoqi Liang
Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education
(KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment
Change (ILCEC)/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation
of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information
Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Related authors
Zefan Ju, Jian Rao, Yue Wang, Junfeng Yang, and Qian Lu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14903–14918, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14903-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14903-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the paper, we explored the impact of the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) and the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) on East China summer rainfall variability. It is novel to find that the combined impact of MJO and QBO is not maximized when the QBO and MJO are in phase to enhance (or suppress) the tropical convection.
Rongzhao Lu and Jian Rao
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2179, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2179, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The SSWs are classified into downward-propagating (DW) SSWs with noticeable impacts on the troposphere and non-downward-propagating (NDW). The DW events are further classified into three types. This study improves our understanding of the diversity of the SSWs.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zachary D. Lawrence, Amy H. Butler, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Irene Erner, Alexey Yu. Karpechko, Gerbrand Koren, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzaguena, David Barriopedro, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Judah Cohen, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Javier García-Serrano, Neil P. Hindley, Martin Jucker, Hera Kim, Robert W. Lee, Simon H. Lee, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Inna Polichtchouk, Jian Rao, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1762, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1762, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Variability in the extratropical stratosphere and troposphere are coupled, and because of the longer timescales characteristic of the stratosphere, this allows for a window of opportunity for surface prediction. This paper assesses whether models used for operational prediction capture these coupling processes accurately. We find that most processes are too-weak, however downward coupling from the lower stratosphere to the near surface is too strong.
Zefan Ju, Jian Rao, Yue Wang, Junfeng Yang, and Qian Lu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14903–14918, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14903-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14903-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the paper, we explored the impact of the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) and the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) on East China summer rainfall variability. It is novel to find that the combined impact of MJO and QBO is not maximized when the QBO and MJO are in phase to enhance (or suppress) the tropical convection.
Yajuan Li, Sandip S. Dhomse, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Wuhu Feng, Jianchun Bian, Yuan Xia, and Dong Guo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13029–13047, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13029-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13029-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time a regularized multivariate regression model is used to estimate stratospheric ozone trends. Regularized regression avoids the over-fitting issue due to correlation among explanatory variables. We demonstrate that there are considerable differences in satellite-based and chemical-model-based ozone trends, highlighting large uncertainties in our understanding about ozone variability. We argue that caution is needed when interpreting results with different methods and datasets.
Yuan Xia, Jing Jiao, Satonori Nozawa, Xuewu Cheng, Jihong Wang, Chunhua Shi, Lifang Du, Yajuan Li, Haoran Zheng, Faquan Li, and Guotao Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13817–13831, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13817-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13817-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The layer of sodium atoms is generally located above 80 km. This study reports the significant enhancements of the sodium layer below 75 km where sodium atoms are short-lived. The neutral chemical reactions were suggested as making a critical contribution. The reported results provide clear observational evidence for the role of planetary waves in the variation of metal layers, and have implications for the response of the metal layers to perturbations in the lower atmosphere.
Yajuan Li, Sandip S. Dhomse, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Wuhu Feng, Andreas Chrysanthou, Yuan Xia, and Dong Guo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10635–10656, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10635-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10635-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Chemical transport models forced with (re)analysis meteorological fields are ideally suited for interpreting the influence of important physical processes on the ozone variability. We use TOMCAT forced by ECMWF ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalysis data sets to investigate the effects of reanalysis forcing fields on ozone changes. Our results show that models forced by ERA5 reanalyses may not yet be capable of reproducing observed changes in stratospheric ozone, particularly in the lower stratosphere.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Ohad Harari, Shlomi Ziskin Ziv, Jian Rao, Olaf Morgenstern, Guang Zeng, Simone Tilmes, Douglas Kinnison, Fiona M. O'Connor, Neal Butchart, Makoto Deushi, Patrick Jöckel, Andrea Pozzer, and Sean Davis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3725–3740, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3725-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3725-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Water vapor is the dominant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, and El Niño is the dominant mode of variability in the ocean–atmosphere system. The connection between El Niño and water vapor above ~ 17 km is unclear, with single-model studies reaching a range of conclusions. This study examines this connection in 12 different models. While there are substantial differences among the models, all models appear to capture the fundamental physical processes correctly.
Yajuan Li, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Wuhu Feng, Sandip S. Dhomse, Richard J. Pope, Faquan Li, and Dong Guo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8627–8639, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8627-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8627-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Tibetan Plateau (TP) exerts important thermal and dynamical effects on atmospheric circulation, climate change as well as the ozone distribution. In this study, we use updated observations and model simulations to investigate the ozone trends and variations over the TP. Wintertime TP ozone variations are largely controlled by tropical to high-latitude transport processes, whereas summertime concentrations are a combined effect of photochemical decay and tropical processes.
G. Q. Fu, W. Y. Xu, R. F. Yang, J. B. Li, and C. S. Zhao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11949–11958, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11949-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11949-2014, 2014
Related subject area
Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Field Measurements | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Identification of stratospheric disturbance information in China based on the round-trip intelligent sounding system
Mean age from observations in the lowermost stratosphere: an improved method and interhemispheric differences
In situ observations of CH2Cl2 and CHCl3 show efficient transport pathways for very short-lived species into the lower stratosphere via the Asian and the North American summer monsoon
A case study on the impact of severe convective storms on the water vapor mixing ratio in the lower mid-latitude stratosphere observed in 2019 over Europe
Upward transport into and within the Asian monsoon anticyclone as inferred from StratoClim trace gas observations
Seasonal characteristics of trace gas transport into the extratropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere
Gravity waves excited during a minor sudden stratospheric warming
Mixing and ageing in the polar lower stratosphere in winter 2015–2016
Age and gravitational separation of the stratospheric air over Indonesia
Intercomparison of meteorological analyses and trajectories in the Antarctic lower stratosphere with Concordiasi superpressure balloon observations
Case study of wave breaking with high-resolution turbulence measurements with LITOS and WRF simulations
A comparison of Loon balloon observations and stratospheric reanalysis products
Stratospheric tropical warming event and its impact on the polar and tropical troposphere
Gravity-wave effects on tracer gases and stratospheric aerosol concentrations during the 2013 ChArMEx campaign
Transport of Antarctic stratospheric strongly dehydrated air into the troposphere observed during the HALO-ESMVal campaign 2012
Aircraft measurements of gravity waves in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere during the START08 field experiment
Comparing turbulent parameters obtained from LITOS and radiosonde measurements
Northern Hemisphere stratospheric winds in higher midlatitudes: longitudinal distribution and long-term trends
On the structural changes in the Brewer-Dobson circulation after 2000
Temperature variability and trends in the UT-LS over a subtropical site: Reunion (20.8° S, 55.5° E)
Diagnostics of the Tropical Tropopause Layer from in-situ observations and CCM data
Increase of upper troposphere/lower stratosphere wave baroclinicity during the second half of the 20th century
Yang He, Xiaoqian Zhu, Zheng Sheng, and Mingyuan He
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3839–3856, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3839-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3839-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The round-trip intelligent sounding system (RTISS) is a new detection technology, developed in recent years, that can capture atmospheric fine-structure information via three-stage (rising, flat-floating, and falling) detection. Based on the RTISS, we developed a method to quantify stratospheric atmospheric disturbance information; this method shows sufficient potential in the analysis of stratospheric disturbances and their role in material transport and energy transfer.
Thomas Wagenhäuser, Markus Jesswein, Timo Keber, Tanja Schuck, and Andreas Engel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3887–3903, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3887-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3887-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A common assumption to derive mean age from trace gas observations is that all air enters the stratosphere through the tropical tropopause. Using SF6 as an age tracer, this leads to negative mean age values close to the Northern Hemispheric extra-tropical tropopause. Our improved method also considers extra-tropical input into the stratosphere. More realistic values are derived using this method. Interhemispheric differences in mean age are found when comparing data from two aircraft campaigns.
Valentin Lauther, Bärbel Vogel, Johannes Wintel, Andrea Rau, Peter Hoor, Vera Bense, Rolf Müller, and C. Michael Volk
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2049–2077, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2049-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2049-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We show airborne in situ measurements of the very short-lived ozone-depleting substances CH2Cl2 and CHCl3, revealing particularly high concentrations of both species in the lower stratosphere. Back-trajectory calculations and 3D model simulations show that the air masses with high concentrations originated in the Asian boundary layer and were transported via the Asian summer monsoon. We also identify a fast transport pathway into the stratosphere via the North American monsoon and by hurricanes.
Dina Khordakova, Christian Rolf, Jens-Uwe Grooß, Rolf Müller, Paul Konopka, Andreas Wieser, Martina Krämer, and Martin Riese
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1059–1079, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1059-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1059-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme storms transport humidity from the troposphere to the stratosphere. Here it has a strong impact on the climate. With ongoing global warming, we expect more storms and, hence, an enhancement of this effect. A case study was performed in order to measure the impact of the direct injection of water vapor into the lower stratosphere. The measurements displayed a significant transport of water vapor into the lower stratosphere, and this was supported by satellite and reanalysis data.
Marc von Hobe, Felix Ploeger, Paul Konopka, Corinna Kloss, Alexey Ulanowski, Vladimir Yushkov, Fabrizio Ravegnani, C. Michael Volk, Laura L. Pan, Shawn B. Honomichl, Simone Tilmes, Douglas E. Kinnison, Rolando R. Garcia, and Jonathon S. Wright
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1267–1285, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1267-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Asian summer monsoon (ASM) is known to foster transport of polluted tropospheric air into the stratosphere. To test and amend our picture of ASM vertical transport, we analyse distributions of airborne trace gas observations up to 20 km altitude near the main ASM vertical conduit south of the Himalayas. We also show that a new high-resolution version of the global chemistry climate model WACCM is able to reproduce the observations well.
Yoichi Inai, Ryo Fujita, Toshinobu Machida, Hidekazu Matsueda, Yousuke Sawa, Kazuhiro Tsuboi, Keiichi Katsumata, Shinji Morimoto, Shuji Aoki, and Takakiyo Nakazawa
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7073–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7073-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7073-2019, 2019
Andreas Dörnbrack, Sonja Gisinger, Natalie Kaifler, Tanja Christina Portele, Martina Bramberger, Markus Rapp, Michael Gerding, Jens Faber, Nedjeljka Žagar, and Damjan Jelić
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12915–12931, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12915-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12915-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
A deep upper-air sounding stimulated the current investigation of internal gravity waves excited during a minor sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in the Arctic winter 2015/16. The analysis of the radiosonde profile revealed large kinetic and potential energies in the upper stratosphere without any simultaneous enhancement of upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric values. In combination with high-resolution meteorological analyses we identified an elevated source of gravity wave excitation.
Jens Krause, Peter Hoor, Andreas Engel, Felix Plöger, Jens-Uwe Grooß, Harald Bönisch, Timo Keber, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, Wolfgang Woiwode, and Hermann Oelhaf
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6057–6073, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6057-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6057-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present tracer measurements of CO and N2O measured during the POLSTRACC aircraft campaign in winter 2015–2016. We found enhanced CO values relative to N2O in the polar lower stratosphere in addition to the ageing of this region during winter. By using model simulations it was possible to link this enhancement to an increased mixing of the tropical tropopause. We thus conclude that the polar lower stratosphere in late winter is strongly influenced by quasi-isentropic mixing from the tropics.
Satoshi Sugawara, Shigeyuki Ishidoya, Shuji Aoki, Shinji Morimoto, Takakiyo Nakazawa, Sakae Toyoda, Yoichi Inai, Fumio Hasebe, Chusaku Ikeda, Hideyuki Honda, Daisuke Goto, and Fanny A. Putri
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1819–1833, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1819-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1819-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
This is the first research that shows concrete evidence of gravitational separation in the tropical stratosphere. This implies that gravitational separation occurs within the entire stratosphere, which gives us new insight into atmospheric dynamics.
Lars Hoffmann, Albert Hertzog, Thomas Rößler, Olaf Stein, and Xue Wu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8045–8061, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8045-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8045-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We present an intercomparison of temperatures and horizontal winds of five meteorological data sets (ECMWF operational analysis, ERA-Interim, MERRA, MERRA-2, and NCEP/NCAR) in the Antarctic lower stratosphere. The assessment is based on 19 superpressure balloon flights during the Concordiasi field campaign in September 2010 to January 2011. The balloon data are used to successfully validate trajectory calculations with the new Lagrangian particle dispersion model MPTRAC.
Andreas Schneider, Johannes Wagner, Jens Faber, Michael Gerding, and Franz-Josef Lübken
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7941–7954, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7941-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7941-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Wave breaking is studied with a combination of high-resolution turbulence observations with the balloon-borne instrument LITOS and mesoscale simulations with the WRF model. A relation between observed turbulent energy dissipation rates and the occurrence of wave patterns in modelled vertical winds is found, which is interpreted as the effect of wave saturation. The change of stability plays less of a role for mean dissipation for the flights examined.
Leon S. Friedrich, Adrian J. McDonald, Gregory E. Bodeker, Kathy E. Cooper, Jared Lewis, and Alexander J. Paterson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 855–866, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-855-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-855-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Information from long-duration balloons flying in the Southern Hemisphere stratosphere during 2014 as part of X Project Loon are used to assess the quality of a number of different reanalyses. This work assesses the potential of the X Project Loon observations to validate outputs from the reanalysis models. In particular, we examined how the model winds compared with those derived from the balloon GPS information. We also examined simulated trajectories compared with the true trajectories.
Kunihiko Kodera, Nawo Eguchi, Hitoshi Mukougawa, Tomoe Nasuno, and Toshihiko Hirooka
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 615–625, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-615-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-615-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
An exceptional strengthening of the middle atmospheric subtropical jet occurred without an apparent relationship with the tropospheric circulation. The analysis of this event demonstrated downward penetration of stratospheric influence to the troposphere: in the north polar region amplification of planetary wave occurred due to a deflection by the strong middle atmospheric subtropical jet, whereas in the tropics, increased tropopause temperature suppressed equatorial convective activity.
Fabrice Chane Ming, Damien Vignelles, Fabrice Jegou, Gwenael Berthet, Jean-Baptiste Renard, François Gheusi, and Yuriy Kuleshov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8023–8042, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8023-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8023-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Coupled balloon-borne observations of Light Optical Aerosol Counter (LOAC), M10 meteorological GPS sondes, ozonesondes, and GPS radio occultation data are examined to identify gravity-wave (GW)-induced fluctuations on tracer gases and on the vertical distribution of stratospheric aerosol concentrations during the 2013 ChArMEx campaign. Observed mesoscale GWs induce a strong modulation of the amplitude of tracer gases and the stratospheric aerosol background.
C. Rolf, A. Afchine, H. Bozem, B. Buchholz, V. Ebert, T. Guggenmoser, P. Hoor, P. Konopka, E. Kretschmer, S. Müller, H. Schlager, N. Spelten, O. Sumińska-Ebersoldt, J. Ungermann, A. Zahn, and M. Krämer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9143–9158, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9143-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9143-2015, 2015
Fuqing Zhang, Junhong Wei, Meng Zhang, K. P. Bowman, L. L. Pan, E. Atlas, and S. C. Wofsy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7667–7684, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7667-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7667-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Based on spectral and wavelet analyses, along with a diagnosis of the polarization relations, this study analyzes in situ airborne measurements from the 2008 Stratosphere-Troposphere Analyses of Regional Transport (START08) experiment to characterize gravity waves in the extratropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (ExUTLS) region. The focus is on the second research flight (RF02), which was dedicated to probing gravity waves associated with strong upper-tropospheric jet-front systems.
A. Schneider, M. Gerding, and F.-J. Lübken
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2159–2166, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2159-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2159-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric turbulence is essential for the atmospheric energy budget. We compare in situ observations with our LITOS method based on spectral analysis of mm-scale wind fluctuations with the Thorpe method applied to standard radiosondes. Energy dissipations rates from both methods differ by up to 3 orders of magnitude. Nevertheless, mean values are in good agreement. We present case studies on both methods and examine the applicability of the Thorpe method for calculation of dissipation rates.
M. Kozubek, P. Krizan, and J. Lastovicka
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2203–2213, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2203-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2203-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The main goal of this paper is to show the geographical distribution of meridional wind for several reanalyses and to analyse the wind trends in different areas. We show two areas (100°E-160°E and 140°W-80°W) where the meridional wind is as strong as zonal wind (which is normally dominant in the stratosphere). The trends of meridional wind are significant mostly at 99% level in these areas and insignificant outside. The problem with zonal averages could affect the results.
H. Bönisch, A. Engel, Th. Birner, P. Hoor, D. W. Tarasick, and E. A. Ray
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3937–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3937-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3937-2011, 2011
N. Bègue, H. Bencherif, V. Sivakumar, G. Kirgis, N. Mze, and J. Leclair de Bellevue
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8563–8574, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8563-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8563-2010, 2010
E. Palazzi, F. Fierli, F. Cairo, C. Cagnazzo, G. Di Donfrancesco, E. Manzini, F. Ravegnani, C. Schiller, F. D'Amato, and C. M. Volk
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9349–9367, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9349-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9349-2009, 2009
J. M. Castanheira, J. A. Añel, C. A. F. Marques, J. C. Antuña, M. L. R. Liberato, L. de la Torre, and L. Gimeno
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9143–9153, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9143-2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9143-2009, 2009
Cited articles
Alfons, A., Ateş, N. Y., and Groenen, P. J. F.: A Robust bootstrap test
for mediation analysis, Organ. Res. Methods, 25, 591–617,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428121999096, 2022.
Baldwin, M. P. and Dunkerton, T. J.: Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation
from the stratosphere to the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 104,
30937–30946, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900445, 1999.
Baldwin, M. P. and Dunkerton, T. J.: Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous
weather regimes, Science, 294, 581–584,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063315, 2001.
Baldwin, M. P., Ayarzagüena, B., Birner, T., Butchart, N., Butler, A.
H., Charlton-Perez, A. J., Domeisen, D. I. V., Garfinkel, C. I., Garny, H.,
Gerber, E. P., Hegglin, M. I., Langematz, U., and Pedatella, N. M.: Sudden
stratospheric warmings, Rev. Geophys., 59, e2020RG000708,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020rg000708, 2021.
Bu, X., Xie, Z., Liu, J., Wei, L., Wang, X., Chen, M., and Ren, H.: Global
PM2.5-attributable health burden from 1990 to 2017: Estimates from the
global burden of disease study 2017, Environ. Res., 197, 111123,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111123, 2021.
Butler, A. H., Seidel, D. J., Hardiman, S. C., Butchart, N., Birner, T., and
Match, A.: Defining sudden stratospheric warmings, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
96, 1913–1928, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00173.1, 2015.
Butler, A. H., Lawrence, Z. D., Lee, S. H., Lillo, S. P., and Long, C. S.:
Differences between the 2018 and 2019 stratospheric polar vortex split
events, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 3503–3521,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3858, 2020.
Cao, C., Chen, Y., Rao, J., Liu, S., Li, S., and Ma, M.: Statistical
characteristics of major sudden stratospheric warming events in CESM1-WACCM:
A comparison with the JRA55 and NCEP/NCAR reanalyses, Atmosphere, 10, 519, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090519,
2019.
Chang, L., Wu, Z., and Xu, J.: A comparison of haze pollution variability in
China using haze indices based on observations, Sci. Total Environ., 715,
136929, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136929, 2020.
Charlton, A. J. and Polvani, L. M.: A new look at stratospheric sudden
warmings. Part I: climatology and modeling benchmarks, J. Climate, 20,
449–469, https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-69-03643-6, 2007.
Chen, L., Zhu, J., Liao, H., Yang, Y., and Yue, X.: Meteorological
influences on PM2.5 and O3 trends and associated health burden since China's
clean air actions, Sci. Tot. Environ., 744, 140837,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140837, 2020.
Dang, R. and Liao, H.: Severe winter haze days in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region from 1985 to 2017 and the roles of anthropogenic emissions and meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10801–10816, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10801-2019, 2019.
de La Cámara, A., Birner, T., and Albers, J. R.: Are sudden
stratospheric warmings preceded by anomalous tropospheric wave activity?, J.
Climate, 32, 7173–7189, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0269.1, 2019.
Ding, A., Huang, X., Nie, W., Chi, X., Xu, Z., Zheng, L., Xu, Z., Xie, Y., Qi, X., Shen, Y., Sun, P., Wang, J., Wang, L., Sun, J., Yang, X.-Q., Qin, W., Zhang, X., Cheng, W., Liu, W., Pan, L., and Fu, C.: Significant reduction of PM2.5 in eastern China due to regional-scale emission control: evidence from SORPES in 2011–2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11791–11801, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11791-2019, 2019.
Fan, H., Zhao, C., Yang, Y., and Yang, X.: Spatio-temporal variations of the
PM2.5
Feng, J., Quan, J., Liao, H., Li, Y., and Zhao, X.: An air stagnation index
to qualify extreme haze events in northern China, J. Atmos. Sci., 75,
3489–3505, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0354.1, 2018.
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan,
K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A.,
da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G. K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D.,
Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M.,
Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The modern-era retrospective
analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30,
5419–5454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay,
P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J. N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020.
Hu, B., Chen, R., Xu, J., Yang, G., Xu, D., Chen, C., and Zhao, Y.: Health
effects of ambient ultrafine (nano) particles in haze, Chin. Sci. Bull., 60,
2808–2823, https://doi.org/10.1360/N972014-01404, 2015.
Hu, J., Ren, R., and Xu, H.: Occurrence of winter stratospheric sudden
warming events and the seasonal timing of spring stratospheric final
warming, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 2319–2334,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0349.1, 2014.
Huang, R. J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K. F., Cao, J. J., Han, Y.,
Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P.,
Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G.,
Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J.,
Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., El Haddad, I., and
Prévôt, A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate
pollution during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774, 2015.
Huang, W., Yu, Y., Yin, Z., Chen, H., and Gao, M.: Appreciable role of
stratospheric polar vortex in the abnormal diffusion of air pollutant in
North China in 2015/2016 winter and implications for prediction, Atmos.
Environ., 259, 118549, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118549, 2021.
Huang, X., Wang, Z., and Ding, A.: Impact of aerosol-PBL interaction on haze
pollution: multiyear observational evidences in North China, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 45, 8596–8603, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079239, 2018.
Huang, X., Ding, A., Wang, Z., Ding, K., Gao, J., Chai, F., and Fu, C.:
Amplified transboundary transport of haze by aerosol–boundary layer
interaction in China, Nat. Geosci., 13, 428–434,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0583-4, 2020.
Karpechko, A. Y., Charlton-Perez, A., Balmaseda, M., Tyrrell, N., and
Vitart, F.: Predicting Sudden Stratospheric Warming 2018 and its climate
impacts with a multimodel ensemble, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13538–13546,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081091, 2018.
Krzywinski, M. and Altman, N.: Points of significance: significance, p
values and t-tests, Nat. Methods, 10, 1041–1042,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2698, 2013.
Li, J., Liao, H., Hu, J., and Li, N.: Severe particulate pollution days in
China during 2013–2018 and the associated typical weather patterns in
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the Yangtze River Delta regions, Environ.
Pollut., 248, 74–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.124, 2019.
Li, K., Liao, H., Cai, W., and Yang, Y.: Attribution of anthropogenic
influence on atmospheric patterns conducive to recent most severe haze over
eastern China, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2072–2081,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076570, 2018.
Li, M. and Zhang, L.: Haze in China: Current and future challenges, Environ.
Pollut., 189, 85–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.02.024, 2014.
Li, Z., Lau, W. K. M., Ramanathan, V., Wu, G., Ding, Y., Manoj, M. G., Liu,
J., Qian, Y., Li, J., Zhou, T., Fan, J., Rosenfeld, D., Ming, Y., Wang, Y.,
Huang, J., Wang, B., Xu, X., Lee, S. S., Cribb, M., Zhang, F., Yang, X.,
Zhao, C., Takemura, T., Wang, K., Xia, X., Yin, Y., Zhang, H., Guo, J.,
Zhai, P. M., Sugimoto, N., Babu, S. S., and Brasseur, G. P.: Aerosol and
monsoon climate interactions over Asia, Rev. Geophys., 54, 866–929,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000500, 2016.
Liang, Z., Rao, J., Guo, D., and Lu, Q.: Simulation and projection of the
sudden stratospheric warming events in different scenarios by CESM2-WACCM,
Clim. Dynam., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06293-2, 2022.
Liu, S. M., Chen, Y. H., Rao, J., Cao, C., Li, S. Y., Ma, M. H., and Wang,
Y. B.: Parallel comparison of major sudden stratospheric warming events in
CESM1-WACCM and CESM2-WACCM, Atmosphere, 10, 679,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110679, 2019.
Lu, Q., Rao, J., Guo, D., Yu, M., and Yu, Y.: Downward propagation of sudden
stratospheric warming signals and the local environment in the
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: A comparative study of the 2018 and 2019
winter cases, Atmos. Res., 254, 105514,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105514, 2021a.
Lu, Q., Rao, J., Liang, Z., Guo, D., Luo, J., Liu, S., Wang, C., and Wang,
T.: The sudden stratospheric warming in January 2021b, Environ. Res. Lett.,
16, 084029, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac12f4, 2021b.
Lu, Q., Rao, J., Shi, C., Guo, D., Wang, J., Liang, Z., and Wang, T.:
Observational subseasonal variability of the PM2.5 concentration in the
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area during the January 2021 sudden stratospheric
warming, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1623–1636,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1393-y, 2022.
Matthewman, N. J., Esler, J. G., Charlton-Perez, A. J., and Polvani, L. M.:
A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings. Part III: Polar vortex
evolution and vertical structure, J. Climate, 22, 1566–1585,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2365.1, 2009.
Mei, L., Rozanov, V., Vountas, M., Burrows, J. P., and Richter, A.: XBAER-derived aerosol optical thickness from OLCI/Sentinel-3 observation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2511–2523, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2511-2018, 2018.
Mitchell, D. M., Charlton-Perez, A. J., and Gray, L. J.: Characterizing the
variability and extremes of the stratospheric polar vortices using 2D moment
analysis, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 1194–1213,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3555.1, 2011.
Ou, Y., Li, Z., Chen, C., Zhang, Y., Li, K., Shi, Z., Dong, J., Xu, H.,
Peng, Z., Xie, Y., and Luo, J.: Evaluation of MERRA2 aerosol optical and
component properties over China using SONET and PARASOL/GRASP data, Remote
Sens., 14, 821, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040821, 2022.
Rao, J. and Garfinkel, C. I.: CMIP5/6 models project little change in the
statistical characteristics of sudden stratospheric warmings in the 21st
century, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 034024,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd4fe, 2021.
Rao, J., Ren, R., Chen, H., Yu, Y., and Zhou, Y.: The stratospheric sudden
warming event in February 2018 and its prediction by a climate system model,
J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123, 13332–13345,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028908, 2018.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., Chen, H., and White, I. P.: The 2019 new year
stratospheric sudden warming and its real-time predictions in multiple S2S
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 11155–11174,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030826, 2019a.
Rao, J., Ren, R., Chen, H., Liu, X., Yu, Y., Hu, J., and Zhou, Y.:
Predictability of stratospheric sudden warmings in the Beijing climate
center forecast system with statistical error corrections, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 8385–8400, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030900, 2019b.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., and White, I. P.: Predicting the downward and
surface influence of the February 2018 and January 2019 sudden stratospheric
warming events in subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031919, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031919, 2020.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., Wu, T., Lu, Y., Lu, Q., and Liang, Z.: The
January 2021 sudden stratospheric warming and its prediction in subseasonal
to seasonal models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD035057,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035057, 2021a.
Rao, J., Liu, S., and Chen, Y.: Northern Hemisphere sudden stratospheric
warming and its downward impact in four Chinese CMIP6 models, Adv. Atmos.
Sci., 38, 187–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0250-0, 2021b.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., Wu, T., Lu, Y., and Chu, M.: Mean state of the
Northern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex in three generations of CMIP
models, J. Climate, 35, 4603–4625, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0694.1,
2022.
Seviour, W. J. M., Gray, L. J., and Mitchell, D. M.: Stratospheric polar
vortex splits and displacements in the high-top CMIP5 climate models, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1400–1413, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024178,
2016.
Wang, H.-J. and Chen, H.-P.: Understanding the recent trend of haze pollution in eastern China: roles of climate change, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4205–4211, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4205-2016, 2016.
Wu, P., Ding, Y., and Liu, Y.: Atmospheric circulation and dynamic mechanism
for persistent haze events in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region, Adv.
Atmos. Sci., 34, 429–440, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-016-6158-z, 2017.
Yang, Y., Liao, H., and Lou, S.: Increase in winter haze over eastern China
in recent decades: Roles of variations in meteorological parameters and
anthropogenic emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 13050–13065,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025136, 2016.
Yin, Z. and Wang, H.: Role of atmospheric circulations in haze pollution in December 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11673–11681, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11673-2017, 2017.
Yin, Z., Wang, H., and Yuan, D.: Interdecadal increase of haze in winter
over North China and the Huang-huai Area and the weakening of the East Asia
Winter Monsoon, Chin. Sci. Bull., 60, 1395–1400,
https://doi.org/10.1360/N972014-01348, 2015.
Yin, Z., Wang, H., and Chen, H.: Understanding severe winter haze events in the North China Plain in 2014: roles of climate anomalies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1641–1651, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1641-2017, 2017.
Yu, Y., Ren, R., and Cai, M.: Dynamic linkage between cold air outbreaks and
intensity variations of the meridional mass circulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 72,
3214–3232, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0390.1, 2015.
Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Wang, X., Shen, L., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Gui, K., Zhao, T., and Liao, H.: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) trends in China, 2013–2018: separating contributions from anthropogenic emissions and meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11031–11041, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11031-2019, 2019.
Zhao, C., Wang, Y., Shi, X., Zhang, D., Wang, C., Jiang, J. H., Zhang, Q.,
and Fan, H.: Estimating the contribution of local primary emissions to
particulate pollution using high-density station observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 1648–1661, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028888, 2019.
Short summary
Existing evidence mainly focuses on the possible impact of tropospheric climate anomalies on the regional air pollutions, but few studies pay attention to the impact of stratospheric changes on haze pollutions in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region. Our study reveals the linkage between the stratospheric variability and the regional atmospheric environment. The downward-propagating stratospheric signals might have a cleaning effect on the atmospheric environment in the BTH region.
Existing evidence mainly focuses on the possible impact of tropospheric climate anomalies on the...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint