Articles | Volume 23, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7033-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7033-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
26 Jun 2023
Research article |
| 26 Jun 2023
| 26 Jun 2023
Large-eddy simulation of a two-layer boundary-layer cloud system from the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition
Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research,
Stockholm University, Stockholm 106 91, Sweden
Julien Savre
Meteorological Institute, Fakultät für Physik,
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich 80333, Germany
Michael Tjernström
Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research,
Stockholm University, Stockholm 106 91, Sweden
Caroline Leck
Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research,
Stockholm University, Stockholm 106 91, Sweden
Annica M. L. Ekman
Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research,
Stockholm University, Stockholm 106 91, Sweden
Related authors
No articles found.
Tuomas Naakka, Sonja Murto-Menger, Timo Vihma, and Michael Tjernström
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5666, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5666, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
A west-east orientated jet stream and large temperature difference in north-south direction prevents cyclone driven moisture transport to the central Arctic because of moisture condensation caused by cooling warm airmass due to lifting of it above the cold air mass on frontal zones between warm and cold air associated with closure of the warm sector of a cyclone. This kind of conditions caused dry condition in the Fram Strait during the first half of the ARTofMELT-expedition in May 2023.
Michael S. Diamond, Andrew S. Ackerman, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Ann M. Fridlind, Ehsan Erfani, Caspar Jungbacker, Hyunho Lee, David Painemal, Frida A.-M. Bender, Annica M. L. Ekman, Franziska Glassmeier, Graham Feingold, Fredrik Jansson, David A. Johnson, Matthias Schwarz, Robert Wood, Takanobu Yamaguchi, Jianhao Zhang, Xiaoli Zhou, and Paquita Zuidema
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5350, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5350, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We compare how cloud resolving models represent an important cloud transition over the subtropical oceans. Clouds can either break up by deepening and drying out or by raining and forming an open cell pattern. Compared to observations, the clouds deepen a bit too much and get too polluted when smoke is present. In clean conditions, some models drizzle and break up into open cells while others barely rain; the model spread stems from different rain amounts for similar clouds.
Dominic Heslin-Rees, Peter Tunved, Diego Aliaga, Janne Lampilahti, Ilona Riipinen, Annica M. L. Ekman, Ki-Tae Park, Martina Mazzini, Stefania Gilardoni, Roseline Thakur, Kihong Park, Young Jun Yoon, Kitack Lee, Mikko Sipilä, Mauro Mazzola, and Radovan Krejci
Aerosol Research, 4, 457–483, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-457-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-4-457-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
New particles form in the atmosphere and can influence the climate. We studied Arctic new particle formation (NPF) from 2022 to 2024 at the Zeppelin Observatory, on Svalbard. NPF occurs from April to November, peaking in late spring as sunlight increases. Some particles measured on-site grow large enough to seed clouds. Sunlight and existing aerosol particles strongly impact the likelihood of NPF, which mainly originates from marine regions, particularly the Greenland Sea.
Timothy W. Juliano, Florian Tornow, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Bart Geerts, Christian P. Lackner, David Painemal, Israel Silber, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, Gunilla Svensson, Michael Tjernström, Peng Wu, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Peter Bogenschutz, Dmitry Chechin, Kamal Kant Chandrakar, Jan Chylik, Andrey Debolskiy, Rostislav Fadeev, Anu Gupta, Luisa Ickes, Michail Karalis, Martin Köhler, Branko Kosović, Peter Kuma, Weiwei Li, Evgeny Mortikov, Hugh Morrison, Roel A. J. Neggers, Anna Possner, Tomi Raatikainen, Lea Raillard, Sami Romakkaniemi, Niklas Schnierstein, Shin-ichiro Shima, Nikita Silin, Mikhail Tolstykh, Étienne Vignon, Lulin Xue, Meng Zhang, and Xue Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 13267–13302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Models struggle to capture cloud and precipitation processes and their radiative effects in marine cold-air outbreaks. We use a quasi-Lagrangian framework to compare large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) output with field and satellite observations. With fixed droplet and ice numbers, LES and SCM agree in liquid-only tests. In mixed-phase conditions, LES plausibly capture cloud thinning and breakup, while SCMs largely remain overcast and thereby miss cloud radiative effects.
Liine Heikkinen, Rahul Ranjan, Sini Talvinen, Niels Behr, Sara M. Blichner, Maura Dewey, Lauri R. Ahonen, Mikael Ehn, Annica M. L. Ekman, Radovan Krejci, Tuukka Petäjä, Peter Tunved, and Ilona Riipinen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5082, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5082, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
The impacts of clouds on atmospheric particulate matter (PM) composition are not well understood. Here, we use a new method to infer these interactions as particle number size distributions with bimodal shapes serve as markers of chemical cloud processing. Using concurrent PM composition data from a boreal forest in Finland, we find cloud chemistry to enrich PM in sulfate, but no enhanced formation of organics was observed, despite the abundance of precursors emitted by the forest.
Almuth Neuberger, Rahul Ranjan, Hao Ding, Fredrik Mattsson, Lea Haberstock, Darrel Baumgardner, Stefano Decesari, Annica M. L. Ekman, Dagen D. Hughes, Claudia Mohr, Marco Paglione, Ilona Riipinen, Matteo Rinaldi, and Paul Zieger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 11991–12017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11991-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11991-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how particles from air pollution that absorb water but do not yet form fog droplets influence fog and visibility in northern Italy’s Po Valley. Using detailed field observations and computer modeling, we found that these “hydrated” particles can explain many low-visibility events. Recognizing their role helps improve forecasts of fog, air quality, and climate effects in polluted regions.
Roman Pohorsky, Heather Guy, Ian Morley Brooks, Lea Haberstock, Nicolas Fauré, Paul Zieger, Julia Kojoj, Sonja Murto, Radiance Calmer, Benjamin Heutte, Michael Lonardi, Erik Schurch Thomson, Michael Tjernström, Jessie Creamean, Athanasios Nenes, and Julia Schmale
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 10331–10353, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10331-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10331-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents tethered-balloon observations above Arctic sea ice showing that enhanced aerosol concentrations above low-level clouds are commonly observed. A closure analysis demonstrates that entrainment of these aerosols is required to reproduce observed cloud droplet numbers. Simulations indicate that neglecting this source can bias longwave radiative forcing, highlighting the need for vertical aerosol observations and improved model representation of aerosol entrainment at cloud top.
Hao Ding, Almuth Neuberger, Rahul Ranjan, Fredrik Mattsson, Liine Heikkinen, Karam Mansour, Stefano Decesari, Claudia Mohr, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Nazario Mastroianni, Paul Zieger, Ilona Riipinen, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 9721–9739, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9721-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9721-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Fog poses numerous risks to society, yet it remains challenging to forecast. We use detailed numerical simulations based on fog observations in the Po Valley, Italy, to demonstrate that high concentrations of aerosol particles, as in polluted air, lead to an increase in droplet number, prolonged fog duration, and reduced visibility. The simulations also show the importance of accurately representing haze particles and the shape of the droplet size distribution for improved fog prediction.
Hannah C. Frostenberg, Jessie M. Creamean, Erik S. Thomson, Heather Guy, Roman Pohorsky, Camille Mavis, Ian M. Brooks, Nicolas Fauré, Lea Haberstock, Julia Kojoj, Sonja Murto, Julia Schmale, Michael Tjernström, Paul Zieger, and Luisa Ickes
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2403, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2403, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic low clouds containing both droplets and ice crystals strongly impact sea ice and therefore require accurate modeling. Using a high-resolution atmospheric model, we found that particle and ice concentrations, alongside ice crystal shape, strongly dictate the simulated cloud. Therefore, these specific properties should be prioritized during future Arctic observational campaigns. Furthermore, atmospheric models must be able to represent a variety of ice crystal shapes.
Timothy W. Juliano, Florian Tornow, Ann M. Fridlind, Andrew S. Ackerman, Gregory S. Elsaesser, Bart Geerts, Christian P. Lackner, David Painemal, Israel Silber, Mikhail Ovchinnikov, Gunilla Svensson, Michael Tjernström, Peng Wu, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Peter Bogenschutz, Dmitry Chechin, Kamal Kant Chandrakar, Jan Chylik, Andrey Debolskiy, Rostislav Fadeev, Anu Gupta, Luisa Ickes, Michail Karalis, Martin Köhler, Branko Kosović, Peter Kuma, Weiwei Li, Evgeny Mortikov, Hugh Morrison, Roel A. J. Neggers, Anna Possner, Tomi Raatikainen, Sami Romakkaniemi, Niklas Schnierstein, Shin-ichiro Shima, Nikita Silin, Mikhail Tolstykh, Lulin Xue, Meng Zhang, and Xue Zheng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6217, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6217, 2026
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Models struggle to capture cloud and precipitation processes and their radiative effects in marine cold-air outbreaks. We use a quasi-Lagrangian framework to compare large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) output with field and satellite observations. With fixed droplet and ice numbers, LES and SCM agree in liquid-only tests. In mixed-phase conditions, LES plausibly capture cloud thinning and breakup, while SCMs largely remain overcast and thereby miss cloud radiative effects.
Rahul Ranjan, Maura Dewey, Liine Heikkinen, Lauri R. Ahonen, Krista Luoma, Paul Bowen, Tuukka Petäjä, Annica M. L. Ekman, Daniel G. Partridge, and Ilona Riipinen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 17275–17300, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17275-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17275-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use multi-year measurements of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) at a boreal forest site to inversely infer size-resolved aerosol chemical composition. We find that inorganic species are more enriched in the larger end (accumulation mode) of the sub-micron aerosol population while organics often dominate the smaller end (Aitken mode). Our approach demonstrates the potential of long-term CCN measurements to infer size-resolved chemical composition of sub-micron aerosol.
Caroline Leck, Jost Heintzenberg, Tiina Nygård, and Tuomas Naakka
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 16775–16795, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16775-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16775-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Five summer cruises of the Swedish icebreaker Oden in the inner Arctic in 1990, 1996, 2001, 2008, and 2018 provided a unique dataset on the seasonal distribution of atmospheric aerosol. Coupling these data with the seasonal sea ice distribution strongly indicated a regional biogenic aerosol source during late summer and early autumn freeze-up conditions. Given the expected further warming of the Arctic, we hypothesize an increase in biogenic aerosol in late summer and autumn.
Michail Karalis, Gunilla Svensson, Manfred Wendisch, and Michael Tjernström
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13177–13198, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13177-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13177-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
During the spring warm-air intrusion captured by HALO-(𝒜𝒞)3, the air mass demonstrated a column-like structure. We built a Lagrangian modeling framework using a single-column model (AOSCM) to simulate the air mass transformation. Comparing to observations, reanalysis, and forecast data, we found that the Lagrangian AOSCM can successfully reproduce the main features of the transformation. The Lagrangian AOSCM can be used for future model development to improve Arctic weather and climate prediction.
Theresa Mathes, Heather Guy, John Prytherch, Julia Kojoj, Ian Brooks, Sonja Murto, Paul Zieger, Birgit Wehner, Michael Tjernström, and Andreas Held
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8455–8474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8455-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8455-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Arctic is warming faster than the global average and an investigation of aerosol–cloud–sea ice interactions is crucial for studying its climate system. During the ARTofMELT Expedition 2023, particle and sensible heat fluxes were measured over different surfaces. Wide lead surfaces acted as particle sources, with the strongest sensible heat fluxes, while closed ice surfaces acted as particle sinks. In this study, methods to measure these interactions are improved, enhancing our understanding of Arctic climate processes.
Tuomas Naakka, Daniel Köhler, Kalle Nordling, Petri Räisänen, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Risto Makkonen, Joonas Merikanto, Bjørn H. Samset, Victoria A. Sinclair, Jennie L. Thomas, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8127–8145, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8127-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8127-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The effects of warmer sea surface temperatures and decreasing sea ice cover on polar climates have been studied using four climate models with identical prescribed changes in sea surface temperatures and sea ice cover. The models predict similar changes in air temperature and precipitation in the polar regions in a warmer climate with less sea ice. However, the models disagree on how the atmospheric circulation, i.e. the large-scale winds, will change with warmer temperatures and less sea ice.
Duncan Watson-Parris, Laura J. Wilcox, Camilla W. Stjern, Robert J. Allen, Geeta Persad, Massimo A. Bollasina, Annica M. L. Ekman, Carley E. Iles, Manoj Joshi, Marianne T. Lund, Daniel McCoy, Daniel M. Westervelt, Andrew I. L. Williams, and Bjørn H. Samset
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4443–4454, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4443-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4443-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In 2020, regulations by the International Maritime Organization aimed to reduce aerosol emissions from ships. These aerosols previously had a cooling effect, which the regulations might reduce, revealing more greenhouse gas warming. Here we find that, while there is regional warming, the global 2020–2040 temperature rise is only +0.03 °C. This small change is difficult to distinguish from natural climate variability, indicating the regulations have had a limited effect on observed warming to date.
Luís Filipe Escusa dos Santos, Hannah C. Frostenberg, Alejandro Baró Pérez, Annica M. L. Ekman, Luisa Ickes, and Erik S. Thomson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 119–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-119-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-119-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Arctic is experiencing enhanced surface warming. The observed decline in Arctic sea-ice extent is projected to lead to an increase in Arctic shipping activity, which may lead to further climatic feedbacks. Using an atmospheric model and results from marine engine experiments that focused on fuel sulfur content reduction and exhaust wet scrubbing, we investigate how ship exhaust particles influence the properties of Arctic clouds. Implications for radiative surface processes are discussed.
Alejandro Baró Pérez, Michael S. Diamond, Frida A.-M. Bender, Abhay Devasthale, Matthias Schwarz, Julien Savre, Juha Tonttila, Harri Kokkola, Hyunho Lee, David Painemal, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4591–4610, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4591-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4591-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use a numerical model to study interactions between humid light-absorbing aerosol plumes, clouds, and radiation over the southeast Atlantic. We find that the warming produced by the aerosols reduces cloud cover, especially in highly polluted situations. Aerosol impacts on drizzle play a minor role. However, aerosol effects on cloud reflectivity and moisture-induced changes in cloud cover dominate the climatic response and lead to an overall cooling by the biomass burning plumes.
Dominic Heslin-Rees, Peter Tunved, Johan Ström, Roxana Cremer, Paul Zieger, Ilona Riipinen, Annica M. L. Ekman, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, and Radovan Krejci
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2059–2075, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2059-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Light-absorbing atmospheric particles (e.g. black carbon – BC) exert a warming effect on the Arctic climate. We show that the amount of particle light absorption decreased from 2002 to 2023. We conclude that in addition to reductions in emissions of BC, wet removal plays a role in the long-term reduction of BC in the Arctic, given the increase in surface precipitation experienced by air masses arriving at the site. The potential impact of biomass burning events is shown to have increased.
John Prytherch, Sonja Murto, Ian Brown, Adam Ulfsbo, Brett F. Thornton, Volker Brüchert, Michael Tjernström, Anna Lunde Hermansson, Amanda T. Nylund, and Lina A. Holthusen
Biogeosciences, 21, 671–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-671-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-671-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We directly measured methane and carbon dioxide exchange between ocean or sea ice and the atmosphere during an icebreaker-based expedition to the central Arctic Ocean (CAO) in summer 2021. These measurements can help constrain climate models and carbon budgets. The methane measurements, the first such made in the CAO, are lower than previous estimates and imply that the CAO is an insignificant contributor to Arctic methane emission. Gas exchange rates are slower than previous estimates.
Gillian Young McCusker, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4819–4847, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we show that recent versions of two atmospheric models – the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System – overestimate Arctic cloud fraction within the lower troposphere by comparison with recent remote-sensing measurements made during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition. The overabundance of cloud is interlinked with the modelled thermodynamic structure, with strong negative temperature biases coincident with these overestimated cloud layers.
Cheng You, Michael Tjernström, and Abhay Devasthale
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8037–8057, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In winter when solar radiation is absent in the Arctic, the poleward transport of heat and moisture into the high Arctic becomes the main contribution of Arctic warming. Over completely frozen ocean sectors, total surface energy budget is dominated by net long-wave heat, while over the Barents Sea, with an open ocean to the south, total net surface energy budget is dominated by the surface turbulent heat.
Tiina Nygård, Michael Tjernström, and Tuomas Naakka
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 1263–1282, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1263-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1263-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Temperature and humidity profiles in the Arctic atmosphere in winter are affected by both the large-scale dynamics and the local processes, such as radiation, cloud formation and turbulence. The results show that the influence of different large-scale flows on temperature and humidity profiles must be viewed as a progressing set of processes. Within the Arctic, there are notable regional differences in how large-scale flows affect the temperature and specific humidity profiles.
Cited articles
Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., and Toon, O. B.: The
impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate
forcing, Nature, 432, 1014–1017, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03174, 2004.
Bergeron, T.: On the physics of clouds and precipitation. Proces Verbaux de
l'Association de Météorologie, International Union of Geodesy and
Geophysics, 156–178, 1935.
Bigg, E. K. and Leck, C.: Cloud-active particles over the central Arctic
ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 32155–32166, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901152, 2001.
Bigg, E. K., Leck, C., and Nilsson, E. D.: Sudden changes in arctic
atmospheric aerosol concentrations during summer and autumn, Tellus B, 48,
254–271, 1996.
Bigg, E. K., Leck, C., and Nilsson, E. D.: Sudden Changes in Aerosol and Gas
concentrations in the central Arctic Marine Boundary Layer – Causes and
Consequences, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 32167–32185, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900753, 2001.
Birch, C. E., Brooks, I. M., Tjernström, M., Shupe, M. D., Mauritsen, T., Sedlar, J., Lock, A. P., Earnshaw, P., Persson, P. O. G., Milton, S. F., and Leck, C.: Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3419–3435, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012, 2012.
Boeke, R. C. and Taylor, P. C.: Evaluation of the Arctic surface radiation
budget in CMIP5 models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8525–8548, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025099, 2016.
Brooks, I. M., Tjernström, M., Persson, P. O. G., Shupe, M. D.,
Atkinson, R. A., Canut, G., Birch, C. E., Mauritsen, T., Sedlar, J., and
Brooks, B. J.: The Turbulent structure of the Arctic summer boundary layer
during the Arctic Summer Cloud-Ocean Study., J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 9685–9704, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027234, 2017.
Bulatovic, I., Ekman, A. M. L., Savre, J., Riipinen, I., and Leck, C.:
Aerosol indirect effects in marine stratocumulus: The importance of
explicitly predicting cloud droplet activation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46,
3473–3481, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081746, 2019.
Bulatovic, I., Igel, A. L., Leck, C., Heintzenberg, J., Riipinen, I., and Ekman, A. M. L.: The importance of Aitken mode aerosol particles for cloud sustenance in the summertime high Arctic – a simulation study supported by observational data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 3871–3897, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3871-2021, 2021.
Bulatovic, I., Savre, J., Leck, C., Tjernström, M., and Ekman, A. M. L.:
Data from a modelling study of a two-layer boundary-layer cloud system from
the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, Dataset version 1, Bolin Centre
Database [data set], https://doi.org/10.17043/bulatovic-2022-cloud-structure-1, 2022.
Chang, R. Y.-W., Leck, C., Graus, M., Müller, M., Paatero, J., Burkhart, J. F., Stohl, A., Orr, L. H., Hayden, K., Li, S.-M., Hansel, A., Tjernström, M., Leaitch, W. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Aerosol composition and sources in the central Arctic Ocean during ASCOS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10619–10636, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10619-2011, 2011.
Covert, D. S., Wiedensohler, A., Aalto, P., Heintzenberg, J., McMurry, P.
H., and Leck, C.: Aerosol number size distributions from 3 to 500 nm diameter in the arctic marine boundary layer during summer and autumn,
Tellus B, 48, 197–212, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v48i2.15886, 1996.
Curry, J. A. and Ebert, E. E.: Annual cycle of radiative fluxes over the
Arctic Ocean: Sensitivity to cloud optical properties, J. Climate, 5,
1267–1280, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<1267:ACORFO>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Dada, L., Angot, H., Beck, I., Baccarini, A., Quéléver, L. L., J.,
Boyer, M., Laurila, T., Brasseur, Z, Jozef, G., e Boer, G., Shupe, M. D.,
Henning, S., Bucci, S., Dütsch, M., Stohl, A., Petäjä, T.,
Daellenbach, K., R., Jokinen T., and Schmale, J.: A central arctic extreme
aerosol event triggered by a warm air-mass intrusion, Nat. Commun., 13, 5290,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32872-2, 2022.
Deardorff, J. W.: Three-dimensional numerical study of turbulence in an
entraining mixed layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 7, 199–226, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227913, 1974.
Dimitrelos, A., Ekman, A. M. L., Caballero, R., and Savre, J.: A Sensitivity
Study of Arctic Air-Mass Transformation Using Large Eddy Simulation, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031738, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031738, 2020.
Durran, D. R.: Numerical methods for fluid dynamics, Texts Appl. Math.,
2nd edn., Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6412-0, 2010.
Ekman, A. M. L., Wang, C., Ström, J., and Krejci, R.: Explicit
simulation of aerosol physics in a cloud-resolving model: Aerosol transport
and processing in the free troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 682–696,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3645.1, 2006.
Findeisen, W.: Kolloid-meteorologische Vorgänge bei
Neiderschlags-bildung, Meteor. Z., 55, 121–133, 1938.
Fu, Q. and Liou, K. N.: Parameterization of the radiative properties of
cirrus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2008–2025, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2008:POTRPO>2.0.CO;2, 1993.
Graversen, R. G., Mauritsen, T., Tjernström, M., Källen, E., and
Svensson, G.: Vertical structure of recent Arctic warming, Nature, 451,
53–57, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06502, 2008.
Heintzenberg, J., Leck, C., and Tunved, P.: Potential source regions and processes of aerosol in the summer Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6487–6502, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6487-2015, 2015.
Hoffmann, F. and Feingold, G: Entrainment and Mixing in Stratocumulus:
Effects of a New Explicit Subgrid-Scale Scheme for Large-Eddy Simulations
with Particle-Based Microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1955–1973, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0318.1, 2019.
Holland, M. M. and Bitz, C. M.: Polar amplification of climate change in
coupled models, Clim. Dynam., 21, 221–232, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0332-6, 2003.
Igel, A. L., Ekman, A. M. L., Leck, C., Tjernström, M., Savre, J., and
Sedlar, J.: The free troposphere as a potential source of Arctic boundary
layer aerosol particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 7053–7060, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073808, 2017.
Illingworth, A. J., Hogan, R. J., O'Connor, E. J., Bouniol, D., Brooks, M.
E., Delanoé, J., Donovan, D. P., Eastment, J. D., Gaussiat, N., Goddard,
J. W. F., Haeffelin, M., Baltink, H. K., Krasnov, O. A., Pelon, J., Piriou,
J.-M., Protat, A., Russchenberg, H. W. J., Seifert, A., Tompkins, A. M.,
vanZadelhoff, G.-J., Vinit, F., Willén, U., Wilson, D. R., and Wrench,
C. L.: Cloudnet, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 883–898, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-6-883, 2007.
Intrieri, J. M., Fairall, C. W., Shupe, M. D., Persson, P. O. G., Andreas,
E. L., Guest, P. S., and Moritz, R. E.: An annual cycle of Arctic surface
cloud forcing at SHEBA, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8039, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000439, 2002.
IPCC: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, in: Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, ISBN 978-0-521-70596-7, 2007.
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, in: Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, ISBN 978-1-107-66182-0, 2013.
IPCC: Global warming of 1.5 ∘C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts
of global warming of 1.5 ∘C above pre-industrial levels and related
global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the
global response to the threat of climate change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai,
P., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P. R., Pirani, A.,
Moufouma-Okia, W., Péan, C., Pidcock, R., Connors, S., Matthews, J. B.
R., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Gomis, M. I., Lonnoy, E., Maycock, T., Tignor, M.,
and Waterfield, T., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3–24, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.001, 2018.
IPCC: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, in: Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E.,
Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391 pp.,
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896, 2021.
Karlsson, J. and Svensson, G.: The simulation of Arctic clouds and their
influence on the winter surface temperature in present-day 987climate in the
CMIP3 multi-model dataset, Clim. Dynam., 36, 623–635, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0758-6, 2011.
Karlsson, L., and Zieger, P.: Aerosol particle number size distribution data
collected during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, Bolin Centre Database [data set], https://doi.org/10.17043/oden-ao-2018-aerosol-dmps-1, 2020.
Karlsson, L., Baccarini, A., Duplessis, P., Baumgardner, D., Brooks, I. M.,
Chang, R. Y., Dada, L., Dällenbach, K. R., Heikkinen, L., Krejci, R.,
Leaitch, W. R., Leck, C., Partridge, D. G., Satler, M. E., Werni, H.,
Wheeler, M., J., Schmale, J., and Zieger, P.: Physical and chemical
properties of cloud droplet residuals and aerosol particles during the
Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos, 127, e2021JD036383,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036383, 2022.
Kupiszewski, P., Leck, C., Tjernström, M., Sjogren, S., Sedlar, J., Graus, M., Müller, M., Brooks, B., Swietlicki, E., Norris, S., and Hansel, A.: Vertical profiling of aerosol particles and trace gases over the central Arctic Ocean during summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12405–12431, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12405-2013, 2013.
Leck, C. and Bigg, E. K.: Biogenic particles in the surface microlayer and
overlaying atmosphere in the central Arctic Ocean during summer, Tellus B,
57, 305–316, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v57i4.16546,
2005.
Leck, C. and Persson, C.: Seasonal and short-term variability in dimethyl
sulfide, sulfur dioxide and biogenic sulfur and sea salt aerosol particles
in the arctic marine boundary layer during summer and autumn, Tellus B, 48,
272–299, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v48i2.15891, 1996.
Leck, C. and Svensson, E.: Importance of aerosol composition and mixing state for cloud droplet activation over the Arctic pack ice in summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2545–2568, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2545-2015, 2015.
Leck, C., Bigg, E. K., Covert, D. S., Heintzenberg, J., Maenhaut, W.,
Nilsson, E. D., and Wiedensohler, A.: Overview of the atmospheric research
program during the International Arctic Ocean Expedition 1991 (IAOE-91) and
its scientific results, Tellus B, 48, 136–155, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v48i2.15833, 1996.
Leck, C., Nilsson, E. D., Bigg, E. K., and Bäcklin, L.: Atmospheric
program on the Arctic Ocean Expedition 1996 (AOE96) – An overview of
scientific goals, experimental approach, and instruments, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 106, 32051–32067, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900461, 2001.
Leck, C., Norman, M., Bigg, E. K., and Hillamo, R.: Chemical composition and
sources of the high Arctic aerosol relevant for cloud formation, J. Geophys.
Res., 107, 4135, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001463, 2002.
Leck, C., Tjernström, M., Matrai, P., Swietlicki E., and Bigg, E. K.:
Can marine micro-organisms influence melting of the Arctic pack ice?, EOS T.
Am. Geophys. Un., 85, 25–36, 2004.
Leck, C., Matrai, P., Perttu A.-M., and Gårdfeldt, K.: Expedition report:
SWEDARTIC Arctic Ocean 2018, ISBN 978-91-519-3671-0, 2020.
Lundén J., Svensson, G., and Leck, C.: Influence of meteorological
processes on the spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric dimethyl
sulfide in the high Arctic summer, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D13308, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008183, 2007.
Mauritsen, T., Sedlar, J., Tjernström, M., Leck, C., Martin, M., Shupe, M., Sjogren, S., Sierau, B., Persson, P. O. G., Brooks, I. M., and Swietlicki, E.: An Arctic CCN-limited cloud-aerosol regime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 165–173, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-165-2011, 2011.
McCusker, G. Y., Vüllers, J., Achtert, P., Field, P., Day, J. J., Forbes, R., Price, R., O'Connor, E., Tjernström, M., Prytherch, J., Neely III, R., and Brooks, I. M.: Evaluating Arctic clouds modelled with the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4819–4847, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, 2023.
Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W.: Modeling supersaturation and subgrid-scale
mixing with two-moment bulk warm microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 792–812,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2374.1, 2008.
Morrison, H., De Boer, G., Feingold, G., Harrington, J., Shupe, M. D., and
Sulia, K.: Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds, Nat. Geosci.,
5, 11–17, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1332, 2012.
Orellana, M. V., Matrai, P. A., Leck, C., Rauschenberg, C. D., Lee, A. M.,
and Coz, E.: Marine microgels as a source of cloud condensation nuclei in
the high Arctic, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 108, 13612–13617, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102457108, 2011.
Orellana, M. V., Hansell, D. A., Matrai, P. A., and Leck, C.: Marine
polymer-gels' relevance in the atmosphere as aerosols and CCN, Gels, 7, 185,
https://doi.org/10.3390/gels7040185, 2021.
Ovchinnikov, M., Korolev, A., and Fan, J.: Effects of ice number
concentration on dynamics of a shallow mixedphase stratiform cloud, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015888, 2011.
Ovchinnikov, M., Ackerman, A. S., Avramov, A., Cheng, A., Fan, J., Fridlind,
A. M., Ghan, S., Harrington, J., Hoose, C., Korolev, A., McFarquhar, G. M.,
Morrison, H., Paukert, M., Savre, J., Shipway, B. J., Shupe, M. D., Solomon,
A., and Sulia, K.: Intercomparison of large-eddy simulations of Arctic
mixed-phase clouds: Importance of ice size distribution assumptions, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 6, 223–248, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000282, 2014.
Persson, P. O. G., Shupe, M. D., Perovich, D., and Solomon, A.: Linking
atmospheric synoptic transport, cloud phase, surface energy fluxes, and
sea-ice growth: observations of midwinter SHEBA conditions, Clim. Dynam., 49,
1341–1364, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3383-1, 2017.
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007, 2007.
Pithan, F. and Mauritsen, T.: Arctic amplification dominated by temperature
feedbacks in contemporary climate models, Nat. Geosci., 7, 181–184,
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2071, 2014.
Porter, G. C. E., Adams, M. P., Brooks, I. M., Ickes, L., Karlsson, L.,
Leck, C., Salter, M. E., Schmale, J., Siegel, K., Sikora, S. N. F., Tarn, M.
D., Vüllers, J., Wernli, H., Zieger, P., Zinke, J., and Benjamin, J. M.:
Highly active ice-nucleating particles at the summer North Pole, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD036059, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036059, 2022.
Prytherch, J.: Present weather sensor visibility and precipitation data from
the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, Dataset version 1, Bolin Centre for
Climate Research, Stockholm University, https://doi.org/10.17043/oden-ao-2018-present-weather-1, 2019.
Prytherch, J.: Weather data from MISU weather station during the Arctic
Ocean 2018 expedition, Dataset version 3, Bolin Centre Database [data set], https://doi.org/10.17043/oden-ao-2018-misu-weather-3, 2021.
Prytherch, J. and Tjernström, M.: Ceilometer backscatter, cloud base
height and cloud fraction data from the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition,
Dataset version 2, Bolin Centre Database [data set],
https://doi.org/10.17043/oden-ao-2018-ceilometer-2, 2020.
Prytherch, J., Tjernström, M., Vüllers, J., Achtert, P., Brooks, I.,
Porter, G., and Adams, M.: Radiosonde data from the Arctic Ocean 2018
expedition. Dataset version 2. Bolin Centre Database [data set],
https://doi.org/10.17043/oden-ao-2018-radiosonde-2, 2019.
Richter-Menge, J., Jeffries, M. O., and Osborne, E.: The Arctic in “State
of the Climate in 2017”, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 143–173, https://doi.org/10.1175/2018BAMSStateoftheClimate.1, 2018.
Savre, J., Ekman, A. M. L., and Svensson, G.: Technical note: Introduction
to MIMICA, a large-eddy simulation solver for cloudy planetary boundary
layers, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 630–649, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000292, 2014.
Sedlar, J., Tjernström, M., Mauritsen, T., Shupe, M. D., Brooks, I. M.,
Persson, P. O. G., Birch, C. E., Leck, C., Sirevaag, A., and Nicolaus, M.: A
transitioning Arctic surface energy budget: the impacts of solar zenith
angle, surface albedo and cloud radiative forcing, Clim. Dynam., 37,
1643–1660, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0937-5, 2011.
Sedlar, J., Shupe, M. D., and Tjernström, M.: On the relationship
between thermodynamic structure and cloud top, and its climate significance
in the Arctic, J. Climate, 25, 2374–2393, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00186.1, 2012.
Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics
parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: Model description,
Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4, 2006.
Serreze, M. C. and Barry, R. G.: Processes and impacts of Arctic
amplification: A research synthesis, Global Planet. Change, 77, 85–96,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.03.004, 2011.
Shupe, M. D. and Intrieri, J. M.: Cloud radiative forcing of the Arctic
surface: The influence of cloud properties, surface albedo, and solar zenith
angle, J. Climate, 17, 616–628, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0616:CRFOTA>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Shupe, M. D., Matrosov, S. Y., and Uttal, T.: Arctic mixed-phase cloud
properties derived from surface-based sensors at SHEBA, J. Atmos. Sci., 63,
697–711, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3659.1, 2006.
Shupe, M. D., Persson, P. O. G., Brooks, I. M., Tjernström, M., Sedlar, J., Mauritsen, T., Sjogren, S., and Leck, C.: Cloud and boundary layer interactions over the Arctic sea ice in late summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9379–9399, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9379-2013, 2013.
Solomon, A., Shupe M. D., Persson, O., Morrison, H., Yamaguchi, T.,
Caldwell, P. M., and de Boer, G.: The sensitivity of springtime Arctic
mixed-phase stratocumulus clouds to surface-layer and cloud-top
inversion-layer moisture sources, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 574–595, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0179.1, 2014.
Sotiropoulou, G., Sedlar, J., Tjernström, M., Shupe, M. D., Brooks, I. M., and Persson, P. O. G.: The thermodynamic structure of summer Arctic stratocumulus and the dynamic coupling to the surface, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12573–12592, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12573-2014, 2014.
Sotiropoulou, G., Sedlar, J., Forbes, R., and Tjernström, M.: Summer
Arctic clouds in the ECMWF forecast model: an evaluation of cloud
parametrization schemes, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 387–400,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2658, 2016.
Stevens, R. G., Loewe, K., Dearden, C., Dimitrelos, A., Possner, A., Eirund, G. K., Raatikainen, T., Hill, A. A., Shipway, B. J., Wilkinson, J., Romakkaniemi, S., Tonttila, J., Laaksonen, A., Korhonen, H., Connolly, P., Lohmann, U., Hoose, C., Ekman, A. M. L., Carslaw, K. S., and Field, P. R.: A model intercomparison of CCN-limited tenuous clouds in the high Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11041–11071, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11041-2018, 2018.
Stjern, C. W., Lund, M. T., Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Forster, P. M.,
Andrews, T., Boucher, O., Faluvegi, G., Fläschner, D., Iversen, T.,
Kasoar, M., Kharin, V., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J., Olivié, D.,
Richardson, T., Sand, M., Shawki, D., Shindell, D., Smith, C. J., Takemura,
T., and Voulgarakis, A.: Arctic amplification response to individual climate
drivers, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 6698–6717, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029726, 2019.
Stroeve, J. C., Kattsov, V., Barrett, A., Serreze, M., Pavlova, T., Holland,
M., and Meier, W. N.: Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and
observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L16502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052676, 2012.
Taylor, P. C., Cai, M., Hu, A., Meehl, J., Washington, W., and Zhang, G. J.:
A decomposition of feedback contributions to polar warming amplification, J.
Climate, 26, 7023–7043, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00696.1, 2013.
Tjernström, M.: Is there a diurnal cycle in the summer cloud-capped
Arctic boundary layer?, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3970–3986, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2257.1, 2007.
Tjernström, M., Leck, C., Persson, P. O. G., Jensen, M. L., Oncley, S.
P., and Targino, A.: The summertime Arctic atmosphere: Meteorological
measurements during the Arctic Ocean experiment 2001, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
85, 1305–1322, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-9-1305,
2004a.
Tjernström, M., Leck, C., Persson, P. O. G., Jensen, M. L., Oncley, S.
P., and Targino, A.: Experimental Equipment: A Supplement to The Summertime
Arctic Atmosphere: Meteorological Measurements during the Arctic Ocean
Experiment 2001, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 85, ES14–ES18, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-9-Tjernstrom, 2004b.
Tjernström, M., Birch, C. E., Brooks, I. M., Shupe, M. D., Persson, P. O. G., Sedlar, J., Mauritsen, T., Leck, C., Paatero, J., Szczodrak, M., and Wheeler, C. R.: Meteorological conditions in the central Arctic summer during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6863–6889, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6863-2012, 2012.
Tjernström, M., Leck, C., Birch, C. E., Bottenheim, J. W., Brooks, B. J., Brooks, I. M., Bäcklin, L., Chang, R. Y.-W., de Leeuw, G., Di Liberto, L., de la Rosa, S., Granath, E., Graus, M., Hansel, A., Heintzenberg, J., Held, A., Hind, A., Johnston, P., Knulst, J., Martin, M., Matrai, P. A., Mauritsen, T., Müller, M., Norris, S. J., Orellana, M. V., Orsini, D. A., Paatero, J., Persson, P. O. G., Gao, Q., Rauschenberg, C., Ristovski, Z., Sedlar, J., Shupe, M. D., Sierau, B., Sirevaag, A., Sjogren, S., Stetzer, O., Swietlicki, E., Szczodrak, M., Vaattovaara, P., Wahlberg, N., Westberg, M., and Wheeler, C. R.: The Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS): overview and experimental design, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2823–2869, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2823-2014, 2014.
Tjernström, M., Svensson, G., Magnusson, L., Brooks, I. M., Prytherch,
J., Vüllers, J., and Young, G.: Central Arctic weather forecasting:
Confronting the ECMWF IFS with observations from the Arctic Ocean 2018
expedition, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3971, 2021.
Uttal, T., Curry, J. A., McPhee, M. G., Perovich, D. K., Moritz, R. E.,
Maslanik, J. A., Guest, P. S., Stern, H. L., Moore, J. A., Turenne, R.,
Heiberg, A., Serreze, M. C., Wylie, D. P., Persson, O. G., Paulson, C. A.,
Halle, C., Morison, J. H., Wheeler, P. A., Makshtas, A., Welch, H., Shupe,
M. D., Intrieri, J., M., Stamnes, K., Linsey, R. W., Pinkel, R., Pegau, W.
S., Stanton, T. P., and Grenfeld, T. C.: Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic
Ocean, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc, 83, 255–276, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0255:SHBOTA>2.3.CO;2, 2002.
Vüllers, J., Achtert, P., Brooks, I., Neely III, R., and Brooks, B.:
Cloudnet remote sensing retrievals of cloud properties during the Arctic
Ocean 2018 expedition, Dataset version 4, Bolin Centre Database [data set], https://doi.org/10.17043/oden-ao-2018-cloudnet-4, 2021a.
Vüllers, J., Achtert, P., Brooks, I. M., Tjernström, M., Prytherch, J., Burzik, A., and Neely III, R.: Meteorological and cloud conditions during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 289–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-289-2021, 2021b.
Wegener, A.: Thermodynamik der Atmosphäre, 331 pp., Leipzig, ISBN 0270854282, 1911.
Wesslén, C., Tjernström, M., Bromwich, D. H., de Boer, G., Ekman, A. M. L., Bai, L.-S., and Wang, S.-H.: The Arctic summer atmosphere: an evaluation of reanalyses using ASCOS data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2605–2624, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2605-2014, 2014.
Short summary
We use numerical modeling with detailed cloud microphysics to investigate a low-altitude cloud system consisting of two cloud layers – a type of cloud situation which was commonly observed during the summer of 2018 in the central Arctic (north of 80° N). The model generally reproduces the observed cloud layers and the thermodynamic structure of the lower atmosphere well. The cloud system is maintained unless there are low aerosol number concentrations or high large-scale wind speeds.
We use numerical modeling with detailed cloud microphysics to investigate a low-altitude cloud...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint