Articles | Volume 21, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16387-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16387-2021
Research article
 | 
08 Nov 2021
Research article |  | 08 Nov 2021

A predictive thermodynamic framework of cloud droplet activation for chemically unresolved aerosol mixtures, including surface tension, non-ideality, and bulk–surface partitioning

Nønne L. Prisle

Related authors

Partitioning of ionic surfactants in aerosol droplets containing glutaric acid, sodium chloride, or sea salts
Alison Bain, Kunal Ghosh, Konstantin Tumashevich, Nonne L. Prisle, and Bryan R. Bzdek
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3993,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3993, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Impact of acidity and surface-modulated acid dissociation on cloud response to organic aerosol
Gargi Sengupta, Minjie Zheng, and Nønne L. Prisle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1467–1487, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1467-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1467-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparison of six approaches to predicting droplet activation of surface active aerosol – Part 2: Strong surfactants
Sampo Vepsäläinen, Silvia M. Calderón, and Nønne L. Prisle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15149–15164, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15149-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15149-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simulations of 7Be and 10Be with the GEOS-Chem global model v14.0.2 using state-of-the-art production rates
Minjie Zheng, Hongyu Liu, Florian Adolphi, Raimund Muscheler, Zhengyao Lu, Mousong Wu, and Nønne L. Prisle
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 7037–7057, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7037-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7037-2023, 2023
Short summary
Comparison of six approaches to predicting droplet activation of surface active aerosol – Part 1: moderately surface active organics​​​​​​​
Sampo Vepsäläinen, Silvia M. Calderón, Jussi Malila, and Nønne L. Prisle
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2669–2687, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2669-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2669-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Impact of mineral dust on the global nitrate aerosol direct and indirect radiative effect
Alexandros Milousis, Klaus Klingmüller, Alexandra P. Tsimpidi, Jasper F. Kok, Maria Kanakidou, Athanasios Nenes, and Vlassis A. Karydis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1333–1351, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1333-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1333-2025, 2025
Short summary
The surface tension and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation of sea spray aerosol particles
Judith Kleinheins, Nadia Shardt, Ulrike Lohmann, and Claudia Marcolli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 881–903, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-881-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-881-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring the processes controlling secondary inorganic aerosol: evaluating the global GEOS-Chem simulation using a suite of aircraft campaigns
Olivia G. Norman, Colette L. Heald, Solomon Bililign, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Hugh Coe, Marc N. Fiddler, Jaime R. Green, Jose L. Jimenez, Katharina Kaiser, Jin Liao, Ann M. Middlebrook, Benjamin A. Nault, John B. Nowak, Johannes Schneider, and André Welti
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 771–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025, 2025
Short summary
Influence of land cover change on atmospheric organic gases, aerosols, and radiative effects
Ryan Vella, Matthew Forrest, Andrea Pozzer, Alexandra P. Tsimpidi, Thomas Hickler, Jos Lelieveld, and Holger Tost
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 243–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-243-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-243-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying the impacts of marine aerosols over the southeast Atlantic Ocean using a chemical transport model: implications for aerosol–cloud interactions
Mashiat Hossain, Rebecca M. Garland, and Hannah M. Horowitz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 14123–14143, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14123-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14123-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adamson, A. and Gast, A.: Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., sixth edn., 808 pp., 1997. a
Alvarez, N. J., Walker, L. M., and Anna, S. L.: A Microtensiometer To Probe the Effect of Radius of Curvature on Surfactant Transport to a Spherical Interface, Langmuir, 26, 13310–13319, https://doi.org/10.1021/la101870m, 2010. a, b
Asa-Awuku, A., Sullivan, A. P., Hennigan, C. J., Weber, R. J., and Nenes, A.: Investigation of molar volume and surfactant characteristics of water-soluble organic compounds in biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 799–812, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-799-2008, 2008. a
Aumann, E., Hildemann, L., and Tabazadeh, A.: Measuring and modeling the composition and temperature-dependence of surface tension for organic solutions, Atmos. Environ., 44, 329–337, 1967. a
Bianco, H. and Marmur, A.: The Dependence of the Surface Tension of Surfactant Solutions on Drop Size, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 151, 517–522, 1992. a
Download
Short summary
A mass-based Gibbs adsorption model is presented to enable predictive Köhler calculations of droplet growth and activation with considerations of surface partitioning, surface tension, and non-ideal water activity for chemically complex and unresolved surface active aerosol mixtures, including actual atmospheric samples. The model is used to calculate cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity of aerosol particles comprising strongly surface-active model atmospheric humic-like substances (HULIS).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint