Articles | Volume 20, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9371-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9371-2020
Research article
 | 
11 Aug 2020
Research article |  | 11 Aug 2020

Modelling of the public health costs of fine particulate matter and results for Finland in 2015

Jaakko Kukkonen, Mikko Savolahti, Yuliia Palamarchuk, Timo Lanki, Väinö Nurmi, Ville-Veikko Paunu, Leena Kangas, Mikhail Sofiev, Ari Karppinen, Androniki Maragkidou, Pekka Tiittanen, and Niko Karvosenoja

Related authors

Measurement Report: The effects of SECA regulations on the atmospheric SO2 concentrations in the Baltic Sea, based on long-term observations at the Finnish Utö Island
Androniki Maragkidou, Tiia Grönholm, Laura Rautiainen, Juha Nikmo, Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen, Timo Mäkelä, Timo Anttila, Lauri Laakso, and Jaakko Kukkonen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1703,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1703, 2024
Short summary
The contribution of residential wood combustion to the PM2.5 concentrations in the Helsinki metropolitan area
Leena Kangas, Jaakko Kukkonen, Mari Kauhaniemi, Kari Riikonen, Mikhail Sofiev, Anu Kousa, Jarkko V. Niemi, and Ari Karppinen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1489–1507, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1489-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1489-2024, 2024
Short summary
Effects of temperature and salinity on bubble-bursting aerosol formation simulated with a bubble-generating chamber
Svetlana Sofieva, Eija Asmi, Nina S. Atanasova, Aino E. Heikkinen, Emeline Vidal, Jonathan Duplissy, Martin Romantschuk, Rostislav Kouznetsov, Jaakko Kukkonen, Dennis H. Bamford, Antti-Pekka Hyvärinen, and Mikhail Sofiev
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6201–6219, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6201-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6201-2022, 2022
Short summary
An emergency response model for the formation and dispersion of plumes originating from major fires (BUOYANT v4.20)
Jaakko Kukkonen, Juha Nikmo, Kari Riikonen, Ilmo Westerholm, Pekko Ilvessalo, Tuomo Bergman, and Klaus Haikarainen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4027–4054, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4027-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4027-2022, 2022
Short summary
Description and evaluation of the community aerosol dynamics model MAFOR v2.0
Matthias Karl, Liisa Pirjola, Tiia Grönholm, Mona Kurppa, Srinivasan Anand, Xiaole Zhang, Andreas Held, Rolf Sander, Miikka Dal Maso, David Topping, Shuai Jiang, Leena Kangas, and Jaakko Kukkonen
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3969–4026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3969-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3969-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
The surface tension and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation of sea spray aerosol particles
Judith Kleinheins, Nadia Shardt, Ulrike Lohmann, and Claudia Marcolli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 881–903, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-881-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-881-2025, 2025
Short summary
Exploring the processes controlling secondary inorganic aerosol: evaluating the global GEOS-Chem simulation using a suite of aircraft campaigns
Olivia G. Norman, Colette L. Heald, Solomon Bililign, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Hugh Coe, Marc N. Fiddler, Jaime R. Green, Jose L. Jimenez, Katharina Kaiser, Jin Liao, Ann M. Middlebrook, Benjamin A. Nault, John B. Nowak, Johannes Schneider, and André Welti
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 771–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025, 2025
Short summary
Influence of land cover change on atmospheric organic gases, aerosols, and radiative effects
Ryan Vella, Matthew Forrest, Andrea Pozzer, Alexandra P. Tsimpidi, Thomas Hickler, Jos Lelieveld, and Holger Tost
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 243–262, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-243-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-243-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying the impacts of marine aerosols over the southeast Atlantic Ocean using a chemical transport model: implications for aerosol–cloud interactions
Mashiat Hossain, Rebecca M. Garland, and Hannah M. Horowitz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 14123–14143, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14123-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14123-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantifying the impact of global nitrate aerosol on tropospheric composition fields and its production from lightning NOx
Ashok K. Luhar, Anthony C. Jones, and Jonathan M. Wilkinson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 14005–14028, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14005-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-14005-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Al-Thani, H., Koç, M., and Isaifan, R. J.: A review on the direct effect of particulate atmospheric pollution on materials and its mitigation for sustainable cities and societies, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 25, 27839–27857, 2018. 
Baumol, W. J. and Oates, W. E.: The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd Edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988. 
Bickel, P. and Friedrich, R. (Eds.): ExternE Externalities of Energy Methodology 2005 Update. Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung — IER Universität Stuttgart, Germany. Directorate-General for Research Sustainable Energy Systems, EUR 21951. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004, ISBN 92-79-00423-9, European Communities, 2005, printed in Luxemburg, 270 pp., 2005. 
Bickel, P., Schmid, S., Tervonen, J., Hämekoski, K., Otterström, T., Anton, P., Enei, R., Leone, G., van Donselaar, P., and Carmigchelt, H.: Environmental Marginal Cost Case Studies, UNITE (UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency) Working Funded by 5th Framework RTD Programme, IER, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 2003. 
Brandt, J., Silver, J. D., Gross, A., and Christensen, J. H.: Marginal damage cost per unit of air pollution emissions, Roskilde: National Environmental Research Institute, 23 p., Specific agreement 3555/B2010/EEA.54131 implementing framework contract ref. no. EEA/IEA/09/002, National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark, 2010. 
Download
Short summary
We have developed a mathematical model that can be used to analyse the benefits that could be achieved by implementing alternative air quality abatement measures, policies or strategies. The model was applied to determine pollution sources in the whole of Finland in 2015. Clearly the most economically effective measures were the reduction in emissions from low-level sources in urban areas. Such sources include road transport, non-road vehicles and machinery, and residential wood combustion.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint