Articles | Volume 11, issue 5
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1961–1977, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1961-2011
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1961–1977, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1961-2011

  03 Mar 2011

03 Mar 2011

Forecasts and assimilation experiments of the Antarctic ozone hole 2008

J. Flemming et al.

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Technical note: Lowermost-stratosphere moist bias in ECMWF IFS model diagnosed from airborne GLORIA observations during winter–spring 2016
Wolfgang Woiwode, Andreas Dörnbrack, Inna Polichtchouk, Sören Johansson, Ben Harvey, Michael Höpfner, Jörn Ungermann, and Felix Friedl-Vallon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15379–15387, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15379-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15379-2020, 2020
Short summary
The response of stratospheric water vapor to climate change driven by different forcing agents
Xun Wang and Andrew E. Dessler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13267–13282, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13267-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13267-2020, 2020
Short summary
Influence of convection on stratospheric water vapor in the North American monsoon region
Wandi Yu, Andrew E. Dessler, Mijeong Park, and Eric J. Jensen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12153–12161, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12153-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12153-2020, 2020
Short summary
Electricity savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions from global phase-down of hydrofluorocarbons
Pallav Purohit, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, John Dulac, Nihar Shah, Max Wei, Peter Rafaj, and Wolfgang Schöpp
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11305–11327, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11305-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11305-2020, 2020
Short summary
Sensitivity of stratospheric water vapour to variability in tropical tropopause temperatures and large-scale transport
Jacob W. Smith, Peter H. Haynes, Amanda C. Maycock, Neal Butchart, and Andrew C. Bushell
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-934,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-934, 2020
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary

Cited articles

Allaart M. A. F., Kelder H., and Heijboer L. C.: On the relation between ozone and potential vorticity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 811–814, 1993.
Balis, D., Kroon, M. E. Koukouli, E. J. Brinksma, G. Labow, J. P., Veefkind, and McPeters, R. D.: Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument total ozone column measurements using Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometer ground-based observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008796, 2007.
Beekmann M., Ancellet G., Megie G., Smit H. G. J., and Kley D.: Intercomparison campaign for vertical ozone profiles including electrochemical sondes of ECC and Brewer-Mast type and a ground based UV-differential absorption radar, J. Atmos. Chem., 10, 259–288, 1994.
Bhartia, P. K., McPeters, R. D., Mateer C. L., Flynn L. E., and Wellemeyer C.: Algorithm for the estimation of vertical ozone profiles from the backscattered ultraviolet technique, J. Geophys. Res.,101, 18793–18806, 1996.
Benedetti, A., Morcrette, J.-J., Boucher, O., Dethof, A., Engelen, R., Fisher, M., Flentje, H., Huneeus, N., Jones, L., Kaiser, J., Kinne, S., Mangold, A., Razinger, M., Simmons, A., and Suttie, M.: Aerosol analysis and forecast in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Integrated Forecast System: 2. Data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D13205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011115, 2009.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint