Articles | Volume 23, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13613-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13613-2023
Opinion
 | 
02 Nov 2023
Opinion |  | 02 Nov 2023

Opinion: Establishing a science-into-policy process for tropospheric ozone assessment

Richard G. Derwent, David D. Parrish, and Ian C. Faloona

Related authors

Maximum ozone concentrations in the southwestern US and Texas: Implications of growing predominance of background contribution
David D. Parrish, Ian C. Faloona, and Richard G. Derwent
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-342,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-342, 2024
Short summary
COVID-19 lockdown emission reductions have the potential to explain over half of the coincident increase in global atmospheric methane
David S. Stevenson, Richard G. Derwent, Oliver Wild, and William J. Collins
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14243–14252, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14243-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14243-2022, 2022
Short summary
Technical note: Northern midlatitude baseline ozone – long-term changes and the COVID-19 impact
David D. Parrish, Richard G. Derwent, Ian C. Faloona, and Charles A. Mims
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13423–13430, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13423-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13423-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
A better representation of volatile organic compound chemistry in WRF-Chem and its impact on ozone over Los Angeles
Qindan Zhu, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Matthew Coggon, Colin Harkins, Jordan Schnell, Jian He, Havala O. T. Pye, Meng Li, Barry Baker, Zachary Moon, Ravan Ahmadov, Eva Y. Pfannerstill, Bryan Place, Paul Wooldridge, Benjamin C. Schulze, Caleb Arata, Anthony Bucholtz, John H. Seinfeld, Carsten Warneke, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Lu Xu, Kristen Zuraski, Michael A. Robinson, J. Andrew Neuman, Patrick R. Veres, Jeff Peischl, Steven S. Brown, Allen H. Goldstein, Ronald C. Cohen, and Brian C. McDonald
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5265–5286, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5265-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5265-2024, 2024
Short summary
High-resolution US methane emissions inferred from an inversion of 2019 TROPOMI satellite data: contributions from individual states, urban areas, and landfills
Hannah Nesser, Daniel J. Jacob, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Alba Lorente, Zichong Chen, Xiao Lu, Lu Shen, Zhen Qu, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Margaux Winter, Shuang Ma, A. Anthony Bloom, John R. Worden, Robert N. Stavins, and Cynthia A. Randles
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5069–5091, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5069-2024, 2024
Short summary
Summertime tropospheric ozone source apportionment study in the Madrid region (Spain)
David de la Paz, Rafael Borge, Juan Manuel de Andrés, Luis Tovar, Golam Sarwar, and Sergey L. Napelenok
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4949–4972, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4949-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4949-2024, 2024
Short summary
CO anthropogenic emissions in Europe from 2011 to 2021: insights from Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) satellite data
Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Gregoire Broquet, Elise Potier, Robin Plauchu, Antoine Berchet, Isabelle Pison, Hugo Denier van der Gon, and Stijn Dellaert
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4635–4649, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4635-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4635-2024, 2024
Short summary
Constraining long-term NOx emissions over the United States and Europe using nitrate wet deposition monitoring networks
Amy Christiansen, Loretta J. Mickley, and Lu Hu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4569–4589, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4569-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4569-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abalos, M., Orbe, C., Kinnison, D. E., Plummer, D., Oman, L. D., Jöckel, P., Morgenstern, O., Garcia, R. R., Zeng, G., Stone, K. A., and Dameris, M.: Future trends in stratosphere-to-troposphere transport in CCMI models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6883–6901, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6883-2020, 2020. 
Arrhenius, S.: On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground, Philos. Mag., 41, 237–276, 1896. 
Birks, J., Calvert, J. G., and Sievers, R.: CHEMRAWN VII, The Chemistry of the Atmosphere: Its Impact on Global Change, Perspectives and Recommendations, IUPAC, ISBN 978-084122 5336, 1992. 
Cardelino, C. A. and Chameides, W. L.: An Observation-Based Model for Analyzing Ozone Precursor Relationships in the Urban Atmosphere, J. Air Waste Manage., 45, 161–180, 1995. 
Download
Executive editor
Tropospheric ozone is an extremely important atmospheric compound as it oxidises, and thus removes, chemical compounds in the atmosphere. One important source in the troposphere are anthropogenic emissions. At elevated concentrations ozone presents a pollutant that is harmful to human health and ecosystems, and it acts as a short-lived greenhouse gas in the upper troposphere. Based on previously developed community models to describe the spatial and temporal variation of tropospheric ozone, this highly controversially discussed Opinion article proposes the establishment of a conceptual, simplified, but widely accepted tropospheric ozone model to facilitate communication between different communities concerned with different ozone impacts, and between ozone research and policy. This step could pave the way for a coordinated global action to improve air quality standards worldwide in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Short summary
Elevated tropospheric ozone concentrations driven by anthropogenic precursor emissions are a world-wide health and environmental concern; however, this issue lacks a generally accepted understanding of the scientific issues. Here, we briefly outline the elements required to conduct an international assessment process to establish a conceptual model of the underpinning science and motivate international policy forums for regulating ozone production over hemispheric and global scales.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint