Articles | Volume 21, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-289-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-289-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
13 Jan 2021
Research article |
| 13 Jan 2021
| 13 Jan 2021
Meteorological and cloud conditions during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and
Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
Peggy Achtert
Meteorological Observatory Hohenpeißenberg, German Weather
Service, 82383 Hohenpeißenberg, Germany
Ian M. Brooks
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and
Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
Michael Tjernström
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm,
Sweden
John Prytherch
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm,
Sweden
Annika Burzik
Leipzig Institute for Meteorology, Leipzig University, 04109 Leipzig, Germany
Ryan Neely III
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and
Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
Related authors
Gillian Young McCusker, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4819–4847, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we show that recent versions of two atmospheric models – the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System – overestimate Arctic cloud fraction within the lower troposphere by comparison with recent remote-sensing measurements made during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition. The overabundance of cloud is interlinked with the modelled thermodynamic structure, with strong negative temperature biases coincident with these overestimated cloud layers.
Theresa Mathes, Heather Guy, John Prytherch, Julia Kojoj, Ian Brooks, Sonja Murto, Paul Zieger, Birgit Wehner, Michael Tjernström, and Andreas Held
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8455–8474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8455-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8455-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Arctic is warming faster than the global average and an investigation of aerosol–cloud–sea ice interactions is crucial for studying its climate system. During the ARTofMELT Expedition 2023, particle and sensible heat fluxes were measured over different surfaces. Wide lead surfaces acted as particle sources, with the strongest sensible heat fluxes, while closed ice surfaces acted as particle sinks. In this study, methods to measure these interactions are improved, enhancing our understanding of Arctic climate processes.
Peggy Achtert, Torsten Seelig, Gabriella Wallentin, Luisa Ickes, Matthew D. Shupe, Corinna Hoose, and Matthias Tesche
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3529, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3529, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We quantify the occurrence of single- and multi-layer clouds in the Arctic based on combining soundings with cloud-radar observations. We also assess the rate of ice-crystal seeding in multi-layer cloud systems as this is an important initiator of glaciation in super-cooled liquid cloud layers. We find an abundance of multi-layer clouds in the Arctic with seeding in about half to two thirds of cases in which the gap between upper and lower layers ranges between 100 and 1000 m.
Gabriella Wallentin, Annika Oertel, Luisa Ickes, Peggy Achtert, Matthias Tesche, and Corinna Hoose
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6607–6631, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6607-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6607-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Multilayer clouds are common in the Arctic but remain underrepresented. We use an atmospheric model to simulate multilayer cloud cases from the Arctic expedition MOSAiC 2019/2020. We find that it is complex to accurately model these cloud layers due to the lack of correct temperature profiles. The model also struggles to capture the observed cloud phase and the relative concentration of cloud droplets and cloud ice. We constrain our model to measured aerosols to mitigate this issue.
Thea Bisander, John Prytherch, and Volker Brüchert
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1583, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1583, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Coastal waters exchange greenhouse gases with the atmosphere, but their exact contributions are not well understood. This study measured carbon dioxide and methane emissions in different Baltic Sea habitats using floating chambers. The results show that methane emissions, especially from bubbling, play a dominant role in the total exchange of many habitats. When scaled up over the Stockholm archipelago, the coastal emissions add significantly to the regional greenhouse gas budget.
Michail Karalis, Gunilla Svensson, Manfred Wendisch, and Michael Tjernström
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3709, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3709, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
During the spring Arctic warm-air intrusion captured by HALO-(𝒜𝒞)3, the airmass demonstrated a column-like structure. We built a Lagrangian modeling framework using a single-column model (AOSCM) to simulate the airmass transformation. Comparing to observations, reanalysis and forecast data, we found that the AOSCM can successfully reproduce the main features of the transformation. The framework can be used for future model development to improve Arctic weather and climate prediction.
Heather Guy, Andrew S. Martin, Erik Olson, Ian M. Brooks, and Ryan R. Neely III
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11103–11114, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11103-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11103-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles impact cloud properties which influence Greenland Ice Sheet melt. Understanding the aerosol population that interacts with clouds is important for constraining future melt. Measurements of aerosols at cloud height over Greenland are rare, and surface measurements are often used to investigate cloud–aerosol interactions. We use a tethered balloon to measure aerosols up to cloud base and show that surface measurements are often not equivalent to those just below the cloud.
Fani Alexandri, Felix Müller, Goutam Choudhury, Peggy Achtert, Torsten Seelig, and Matthias Tesche
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1739–1757, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1739-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1739-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a novel method for studying aerosol–cloud interactions. It combines cloud-relevant aerosol concentrations from polar-orbiting lidar observations with the development of individual clouds from geostationary observations. Application to 1 year of data gives first results on the impact of aerosols on the concentration and size of cloud droplets and on cloud phase in the regime of heterogeneous ice formation. The method could enable the systematic investigation of warm and cold clouds.
John Prytherch, Sonja Murto, Ian Brown, Adam Ulfsbo, Brett F. Thornton, Volker Brüchert, Michael Tjernström, Anna Lunde Hermansson, Amanda T. Nylund, and Lina A. Holthusen
Biogeosciences, 21, 671–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-671-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-671-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We directly measured methane and carbon dioxide exchange between ocean or sea ice and the atmosphere during an icebreaker-based expedition to the central Arctic Ocean (CAO) in summer 2021. These measurements can help constrain climate models and carbon budgets. The methane measurements, the first such made in the CAO, are lower than previous estimates and imply that the CAO is an insignificant contributor to Arctic methane emission. Gas exchange rates are slower than previous estimates.
Ines Bulatovic, Julien Savre, Michael Tjernström, Caroline Leck, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7033–7055, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7033-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7033-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We use numerical modeling with detailed cloud microphysics to investigate a low-altitude cloud system consisting of two cloud layers – a type of cloud situation which was commonly observed during the summer of 2018 in the central Arctic (north of 80° N). The model generally reproduces the observed cloud layers and the thermodynamic structure of the lower atmosphere well. The cloud system is maintained unless there are low aerosol number concentrations or high large-scale wind speeds.
Gillian Young McCusker, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4819–4847, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we show that recent versions of two atmospheric models – the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System – overestimate Arctic cloud fraction within the lower troposphere by comparison with recent remote-sensing measurements made during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition. The overabundance of cloud is interlinked with the modelled thermodynamic structure, with strong negative temperature biases coincident with these overestimated cloud layers.
Ruth Price, Andrea Baccarini, Julia Schmale, Paul Zieger, Ian M. Brooks, Paul Field, and Ken S. Carslaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2927–2961, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2927-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2927-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic clouds can control how much energy is absorbed by the surface or reflected back to space. Using a computer model of the atmosphere we investigated the formation of atmospheric particles that allow cloud droplets to form. We found that particles formed aloft are transported to the lowest part of the Arctic atmosphere and that this is a key source of particles. Our results have implications for the way Arctic clouds will behave in the future as climate change continues to impact the region.
Heather Guy, David D. Turner, Von P. Walden, Ian M. Brooks, and Ryan R. Neely
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5095–5115, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5095-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5095-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Fog formation is highly sensitive to near-surface temperatures and humidity profiles. Passive remote sensing instruments can provide continuous measurements of the vertical temperature and humidity profiles and liquid water content, which can improve fog forecasts. Here we compare the performance of collocated infrared and microwave remote sensing instruments and demonstrate that the infrared instrument is especially sensitive to the onset of thin radiation fog.
Lucas J. Sterzinger, Joseph Sedlar, Heather Guy, Ryan R. Neely III, and Adele L. Igel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8973–8988, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8973-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8973-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles are required for cloud droplets to form, and the Arctic atmosphere often has much fewer aerosols than at lower latitudes. In this study, we investigate whether aerosol concentrations can drop so low as to no longer support a cloud. We use observations to initialize idealized model simulations to investigate a worst-case scenario where all aerosol is removed from the environment instantaneously. We find that this mechanism is possible in two cases and is unlikely in the third.
Cheng You, Michael Tjernström, and Abhay Devasthale
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8037–8057, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In winter when solar radiation is absent in the Arctic, the poleward transport of heat and moisture into the high Arctic becomes the main contribution of Arctic warming. Over completely frozen ocean sectors, total surface energy budget is dominated by net long-wave heat, while over the Barents Sea, with an open ocean to the south, total net surface energy budget is dominated by the surface turbulent heat.
Helen Czerski, Ian M. Brooks, Steve Gunn, Robin Pascal, Adrian Matei, and Byron Blomquist
Ocean Sci., 18, 565–586, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-565-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-565-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The bubbles formed by breaking waves speed up the movement of gases like carbon dioxide and oxygen between the atmosphere and the ocean. Understanding where these gases go is an important part of understanding Earth's climate. In this paper we describe measurements of the bubbles close to the ocean surface during big storms in the North Atlantic. We observed small bubbles collecting in distinctive patterns which help us to understand the contribution they make to the ocean breathing.
Helen Czerski, Ian M. Brooks, Steve Gunn, Robin Pascal, Adrian Matei, and Byron Blomquist
Ocean Sci., 18, 587–608, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-587-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-587-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The bubbles formed by breaking waves at the ocean surface are important because they are thought to speed up the movement of gases like carbon dioxide and oxygen between the atmosphere and ocean. We collected data on the bubbles in the top few metres of the ocean which were created by storms in the North Atlantic. The focus in this paper is the bubble sizes and their position in the water. We saw that there are very predictable patterns and set out what happens to bubbles after a wave breaks.
Piyush Srivastava, Ian M. Brooks, John Prytherch, Dominic J. Salisbury, Andrew D. Elvidge, Ian A. Renfrew, and Margaret J. Yelland
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4763–4778, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4763-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4763-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The parameterization of surface turbulent fluxes over sea ice remains a weak point in weather forecast and climate models. Recent theoretical developments have introduced more extensive physics but these descriptions are poorly constrained due to a lack of observation data. Here we utilize a large dataset of measurements of turbulent fluxes over sea ice to tune the state-of-the-art parameterization of wind stress, and compare it with a previous scheme.
Tiina Nygård, Michael Tjernström, and Tuomas Naakka
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 1263–1282, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1263-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1263-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Temperature and humidity profiles in the Arctic atmosphere in winter are affected by both the large-scale dynamics and the local processes, such as radiation, cloud formation and turbulence. The results show that the influence of different large-scale flows on temperature and humidity profiles must be viewed as a progressing set of processes. Within the Arctic, there are notable regional differences in how large-scale flows affect the temperature and specific humidity profiles.
Heather Guy, Ian M. Brooks, Ken S. Carslaw, Benjamin J. Murray, Von P. Walden, Matthew D. Shupe, Claire Pettersen, David D. Turner, Christopher J. Cox, William D. Neff, Ralf Bennartz, and Ryan R. Neely III
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15351–15374, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15351-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15351-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present the first full year of surface aerosol number concentration measurements from the central Greenland Ice Sheet. Aerosol concentrations here have a distinct seasonal cycle from those at lower-altitude Arctic sites, which is driven by large-scale atmospheric circulation. Our results can be used to help understand the role aerosols might play in Greenland surface melt through the modification of cloud properties. This is crucial in a rapidly changing region where observations are sparse.
Erik Johansson, Abhay Devasthale, Michael Tjernström, Annica M. L. Ekman, Klaus Wyser, and Tristan L'Ecuyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4087–4101, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4087-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4087-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding the coupling of clouds to large-scale circulation is a grand challenge for the climate community. Cloud radiative heating (CRH) is a key parameter in this coupling and is therefore essential to model realistically. We, therefore, evaluate a climate model against satellite observations. Our findings indicate good agreement in the seasonal pattern of CRH even if the magnitude differs. We also find that increasing the horizontal resolution in the model has little effect on the CRH.
Maryna Lukach, David Dufton, Jonathan Crosier, Joshua M. Hampton, Lindsay Bennett, and Ryan R. Neely III
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1075–1098, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1075-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1075-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a novel technique of data-driven hydrometeor classification (HC) from quasi-vertical profiles, where the hydrometeor types are identified from an optimal number of hierarchical clusters, obtained recursively. This data-driven HC approach is capable of providing an optimal number of classes from dual-polarimetric weather radar observations. The embedded flexibility in the extent of granularity is the main advantage of this technique.
Matthias Tesche, Peggy Achtert, and Michael C. Pitts
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 505–516, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-505-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-505-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We combine spaceborne lidar observations of clouds in the troposphere and stratosphere to assess the outcome of ground-based polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) observations that are often performed at the mercy of tropospheric clouds. We find that the outcome of ground-based lidar measurements of PSCs depends on the location of the measurement. We also provide recommendations regarding the most suitable sites in the Arctic and Antarctic.
Peggy Achtert, Ewan J. O'Connor, Ian M. Brooks, Georgia Sotiropoulou, Matthew D. Shupe, Bernhard Pospichal, Barbara J. Brooks, and Michael Tjernström
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14983–15002, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14983-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14983-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present observations of precipitating and non-precipitating Arctic liquid and mixed-phase clouds during a research cruise along the Russian shelf in summer and autumn of 2014. Active remote-sensing observations, radiosondes, and auxiliary measurements are combined in the synergistic Cloudnet retrieval. Cloud properties are analysed with respect to cloud-top temperature and boundary layer structure. About 8 % of all liquid clouds show a liquid water path below the infrared black body limit.
Cited articles
Achtert, P., Brooks, I. M., Brooks, B. J., Moat, B. I., Prytherch, J., Persson, P. O. G., and Tjernström, M.: Measurement of wind profiles by motion-stabilised ship-borne Doppler lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4993–5007, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4993-2015, 2015.
Achtert, P., O'Connor, E. J., Brooks, I. M., Sotiropoulou, G., Shupe, M. D., Pospichal, B., Brooks, B. J., and Tjernström, M.: Properties of Arctic liquid and mixed phase clouds from ship-borne Cloudnet observations during ACSE 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-56, in review, 2020.
Akperov, M., Rinke, A., Mokhov, I. I., Semenov, V. A., Parfenova, M. R.,
Matthes, H., Adakudlu, M., Boberg, F., Christensen, J. H., Dembitskaya, M.
A., Dethloff, K., Fettweis, X., Gutjahr, O., Heinemann, G., Koenigk, T.,
Koldunov, N. V., Laprise, R., Mottram, R., Nikiéma, O., Sein, D.,
Sobolowski, S., Winger, K., and Zhang, W.: Future projections of cyclone
activity in the Arctic for the 21st century from regional climate models
(Arctic-CORDEX), Glob. Planet. Change, 182, 103005,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.103005, 2019.
Andreas, E. L., Guest, P. S., Persson, P. O. G., Fairall, C. W., Horst, T.
W., Moritz, R. E., and Semmer, S. R.: Near-surface water vapor over polar sea
ice is always near ice saturation, J. Geophys. Res.-C Ocean., 107, 8033,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc000411, 2002.
Birch, C. E., Brooks, I. M., Tjernström, M., Shupe, M. D., Mauritsen, T., Sedlar, J., Lock, A. P., Earnshaw, P., Persson, P. O. G., Milton, S. F., and Leck, C.: Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3419–3435, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012, 2012.
Boeke, R. C. and Taylor, P. C.: Evaluation of the Arctic surface radiation
budget in CMIP5 models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8525–8548,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025099, 2016.
Brooks, I. and Vüllers, J.: Microbiology-Ocean-Cloud Coupling in the High Arctic (MOCCHA): SPRS Icebreaker Oden ship navigation data. Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, available at: https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/9405b2f8056947609da4bcc0bc88c5e8 (last access: 4 January 2021), 2020.
Brooks, I. M., Tjernström, M., Persson, P. O. G., Shupe, M. D.,
Atkinson, R. A., Canut, G., Birch, C. E., Mauritsen, T., Sedlar, J., and Brooks, B. J.: The
turbulent structure of the Arctic summer boundary layer during
The Arctic Summer Cloud-Ocean Study, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 9685–9704, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027234, 2017.
Brooks, M. E., Hogan, R. J., and Illingworth, A. J.: Parameterizing the
Difference in Cloud Fraction Defined by Area and by Volume as Observed with
Radar and Lidar, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 2248–2260, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3467.1, 2005.
Colony, R., Appel, I., and Rigor, I.: Surface air temperature observations in
the Arctic Basin. Tech. Memo. TM 1-92, Applied Physics Laboratory,
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 120 pp., 1992.
Devasthale, A., Sedlar, J., and Tjernström, M.: Characteristics of water-vapour inversions observed over the Arctic by Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and radiosondes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9813–9823, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9813-2011, 2011.
Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: Tools for quality assessment of surface-based
flux measurements, Agric. For. Meteorol., 78, 83–105,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(95)02248-1, 1996.
Graversen, R. G., Mauritsen, T., Tjernström, M., Källen, E., and
Svensson, G.: Vertical structure of recent Arctic warming, Nature, 451,
53–57, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06502, 2008.
Hartfield, G., Blunden, J., and Arndt, D. S.: A Look at 2017: Takeaway Points
from the State of the Climate Supplement, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99,
1527–1539, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0173.1, 2018.
Hodson, D. L. R., Keeley, S. P. E., West, A., Ridley, J., Hawkins, E., and
Hewitt, H. T.: Identifying uncertainties in Arctic climate change
projections, Clim. Dynam., 40, 2849–2865,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1512-z, 2013.
Holland, M. M. and Bitz, C. M.: Polar amplification of climate change in
coupled models, Clim. Dynam., 21, 221–232,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0332-6, 2003.
Illingworth, A. J., Hogan, R. J., O'Connor, E. J., Bouniol, D., Brooks, M.
E., Delanoé, J., Donovan, D. P., Eastment, J. D., Gaussiat, N., Goddard,
J. W. F., Haeffelin, M., Baltink, H. K., Krasnov, O. A., Pelon, J., Piriou,
J.-M., Protat, A., Russchenberg, H. W. J., Seifert, A., Tompkins, A. M., van
Zadelhoff, G.-J., Vinit, F., Willén, U., Wilson, D. R. and Wrench, C.
L.: Cloudnet, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 883–898,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-6-883, 2007.
Intrieri, J. M., Fairall, C. W., Shupe, M. D., Persson, P. O. G., Andreas, E. L., Guest, P. S., and Moritz, R. E.: An annual cycle of Arctic surface cloud forcing at SHEBA, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8039, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000439, 2002.
IPCC: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007.
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United
Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013.
IPCC: Global warming of 1.5 ∘C. An IPCC Special Report on the
impacts of global warming of 1.5 ∘C above pre-industrial levels
and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of
strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte,
V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J.,
Shukla, P. R., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W., Péan, C., Pidcock, R., Connors, S., Matthews, J.
B. R., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Gomis, M. I., Lonnoy, E., Maycock, T.,
Tignor, M., and Waterfield, T., 2018.
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L.,
Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M.,
Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang,
J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., Joseph, D., Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu,
M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S.,
White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W.,
Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds,
R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–472,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2,
1996.
Leck, C., Nilsson, E. D., Bigg, E. K., and Bäcklin, L.: Atmospheric
program on the Arctic Ocean Expedition 1996 (AOE-96): An overview of
scientific goals, experimental approach, and instruments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 32051–32067, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900461, 2001.
Liu, Y., Key, J. R., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Key, J. R., and Wang, X.: The
Influence of Changes in Cloud Cover on Recent Surface Temperature Trends in
the Arctic, J. Climate, 21, 705–715, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1681.1, 2008.
Mauritsen, T., Sedlar, J., Tjernström, M., Leck, C., Martin, M., Shupe, M., Sjogren, S., Sierau, B., Persson, P. O. G., Brooks, I. M., and Swietlicki, E.: An Arctic CCN-limited cloud-aerosol regime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 165–173, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-165-2011, 2011.
Morrison, H., de Boer, G., Feingold, G., Harrington, J., Shupe, M. D., and
Sulia, K.: Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds, Nat. Geosci.,
5, 11–17, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1332, 2012.
Nishii, K., Nakamura, H., and Orsolini, Y. J.: Arctic summer storm track in
CMIP3/5 climate models, Clim. Dynam., 44, 1311–1327,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2229-y, 2015.
Onarheim, I. H., Eldevik, T., Smedsrud, L. H., and Stroeve, J. C.: Seasonal
and Regional Manifestation of Arctic Sea Ice Loss, J. Climate, 31, 4917–4932,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0427.1, 2018.
Orsolini, Y. J. and Sorteberg, A.: Projected Changes in Eurasian and Arctic
Summer Cyclones under Global Warming in the Bergen Climate Model, Atmos.
Ocean. Sc. Lett., 2, 62–67, https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2009.11446776, 2009.
Osborne, E., Richter-Menge, J., and Jeffries, M.: Arctic Report Card 2018, available at: https://www.arctic.noaa.gov/Report-Card (last access: 4 January 2021), 2018.
Overland, J. E., Wang, M., and Salo, S.: The recent Arctic warm period,
Tellus A, 60, 589–597, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2008.00327.x, 2008.
Pearson, G., Davies, F., and Collier, C.: An analysis of the performance of
the UFAM pulsed Doppler lidar for observing the boundary layer, J. Atmos.
Ocean. Tech., 26, 240–250, 2009.
Perovich, D. K., Richter-Menge, J. A., Jones, K. F., and Light, B.: Sunlight,
water, and ice: Extreme Arctic sea ice melt during the summer of 2007,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L11501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034007, 2008.
Pithan, F. and Mauritsen, T.: Arctic amplification dominated by temperature
feedbacks in contemporary climate models, Nat. Geosci., 7, 181–184,
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2071, 2014.
Prenni, A. J., Harrington, J. Y., Tjernstöm, M., DeMott, P. J., Avramov,
A., Long, C. N., Kreidenweis, S. M., Olsson, P. Q., and Verlinde, J.: Can
ice-nucleating aerosols affect arctic seasonal climate?, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 88, 541–550, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-4-541, 2007.
Prytherch, J.: Present weather sensor visibility and precipitation data from the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, Dataset version 1.0, Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, https://doi.org/10.17043/ao2018-present-weather, 2019.
Prytherch, J.: Weather data from MISU weather station during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, Dataset version 2.0, Bolin Centre Database, https://doi.org/10.17043/ao2018-misu-weather-2, 2020.
Prytherch, J. and Tjernström, M.: Micrometeorological data from icebreaker Oden's foremast during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, Dataset version 3.0, Bolin Centre Database, https://doi.org/10.17043/ao2018-micromet-oden-3, 2020.
Prytherch, J., Yelland, M. J., Brooks, I. M., Tupman, D. J., Pascal, R. W., Moat, B. I., and Norris, S. J.: Motion-correlated flow distortion and wave-induced biases in air–sea flux measurements from ships, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10619–10629, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10619-2015, 2015.
Prytherch, J., Brooks, I. M., Crill, P. M., Thornton, B. F., Salisbury, D.
J., Tjernström, M., Anderson, L. G., Geibel, M. C., and Humborg, C.:
Direct determination of the air-sea CO2 gas transfer velocity in Arctic sea
ice regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 3770–3778,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073593, 2017.
Prytherch, J., Tjernström, M., Vuellers, J., Achtert, P., Brooks, I., Porter, G., and Adams, M.: Radiosonde data from the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, Dataset version 2.0, Bolin Centre Database, https://doi.org/10.17043/ao2018-radiosonde-2, 2019.
Richter-Menge, J., Jeffries, M. O., and Osborne, E.: The Arctic in “State of
the Climate in 2017”, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 143–173,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2018BAMSStateoftheClimate.1, 2018.
Richter-Menge, J., Druckenmiller, M. L., and Jeffries, M. (Eds.): Arctic Report
Card 2019, available at: https://www.arctic.noaa.gov/Report-Card (last access: 4 January 2021), 2019.
Rigor, I. G., Colony, R. L., Martin, S., Rigor, I. G., Colony, R. L., and
Martin, S.: Variations in Surface Air Temperature Observations in the
Arctic, 1979–97, J. Climate, 13, 896–914,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<0896:VISATO>2.0.CO;2,
2000.
Sedlar, J., Tjernström M., Mauritsen, T., Shupe, M. D., Brooks, I. M.,
Persson, P. O. G., Birch, C. E., Leck, C., Sirevaag, A., and Nicolaus, M.: A
transitioning Arctic surface energy budget: the impacts of solar zenith
angle, surface albedo and cloud radiative forcing, Clim. Dynam., 37,
1643–1660, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0937-5, 2011.
Serreze, M. C. and Barry, R. G.: Processes and impacts of Arctic
amplification: A research synthesis, Glob. Planet. Change, 77, 85–96,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.03.004, 2011.
Shupe, M. D.: Clouds at Arctic Atmospheric Observatories. Part II:
Thermodynamic Phase Characteristics, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 50,
645–661, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2468.1, 2011.
Shupe, M. D. and Intrieri, J. M.: Cloud Radiative Forcing of the Arctic
Surface: The Influence of Cloud Properties, Surface Albedo, and Solar Zenith
Angle, J. Climate, 17, 616–628, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0616:CRFOTA>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Shupe, M. D., Walden, V. P., Eloranta, E., Uttal, T., Campbell, J. R.,
Starkweather, S. M., and Shiobara, M.: Clouds at Arctic Atmospheric
Observatories. Part I: Occurrence and Macrophysical Properties, J. Appl.
Meteorol. Climatol., 50, 626–644, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2467.1, 2011.
Shupe, M. D., Persson, P. O. G., Brooks, I. M., Tjernström, M., Sedlar, J., Mauritsen, T., Sjogren, S., and Leck, C.: Cloud and boundary layer interactions over the Arctic sea ice in late summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9379–9399, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9379-2013, 2013.
Sotiropoulou, G., Sedlar, J., Tjernström, M., Shupe, M. D., Brooks, I. M., and Persson, P. O. G.: The thermodynamic structure of summer Arctic stratocumulus and the dynamic coupling to the surface, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12573–12592, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12573-2014, 2014.
Sotiropoulou, G., Sedlar, J., Forbes, R., and Tjernström, M.: Summer
Arctic clouds in the ECMWF forecast model: An evaluation of cloud
parameterization schemes, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 387–400,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2658, 2016.
Spreen, G., Kaleschke, L., and Heygster, G.: Sea ice remote sensing
using AMSR-E 89 GHz channels, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
C02S03, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003384, 2008.
Stroeve, J. C., Kattsov, V., Barrett, A., Serreze, M., Pavlova, T., Holland,
M., and Meier, W. N.: Trends in Arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and
observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L16502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052676,
2012.
Taylor, P. C., Cai, M., Hu, A., Meehl, J., Washington, W., and Zhang, G. J.: A
Decomposition of Feedback Contributions to Polar Warming Amplification, J.
Climate, 26, 7023–7043, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00696.1, 2013.
Tjernström, M.: The summer Arctic boundary layer during the Arctic Ocean Experiment 2001 (AOE-2001), Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 117, 5–36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-004-5641-8, 2005.
Tjernström, M. and Graversen, R. G.: The vertical structure of the lower
Arctic troposphere analysed from observations and the ERA-40 reanalysis, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 431–443, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.380, 2009.
Tjernström, M., Leck, C., Persson, P. O. G., Jensen, M. L., Oncley, S.
P., and Targino, A.: The summertime Arctic atmosphere: Meteorological
measurements during the Arctic Ocean Experiment (AOE-2001), B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 85, 1305–1321, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-9-1305, 2004a.
Tjernström, M., Leck, C., Persson, P. O. G., Jensen, M. L., Oncley, S.
P., and Targino, A.: Experimental equipment: An electronic supplement to
“The summertime Arctic atmosphere: Meteorological measurements during the
Arctic Ocean Experiment (AOE-2001)”, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 85, 1322–1322,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-85-9-Tjernstrom, 2004b.
Tjernström, M., Birch, C. E., Brooks, I. M., Shupe, M. D., Persson, P. O. G., Sedlar, J., Mauritsen, T., Leck, C., Paatero, J., Szczodrak, M., and Wheeler, C. R.: Meteorological conditions in the central Arctic summer during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6863–6889, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6863-2012, 2012.
Tjernström, M., Leck, C., Birch, C. E., Bottenheim, J. W., Brooks, B. J., Brooks, I. M., Bäcklin, L., Chang, R. Y.-W., de Leeuw, G., Di Liberto, L., de la Rosa, S., Granath, E., Graus, M., Hansel, A., Heintzenberg, J., Held, A., Hind, A., Johnston, P., Knulst, J., Martin, M., Matrai, P. A., Mauritsen, T., Müller, M., Norris, S. J., Orellana, M. V., Orsini, D. A., Paatero, J., Persson, P. O. G., Gao, Q., Rauschenberg, C., Ristovski, Z., Sedlar, J., Shupe, M. D., Sierau, B., Sirevaag, A., Sjogren, S., Stetzer, O., Swietlicki, E., Szczodrak, M., Vaattovaara, P., Wahlberg, N., Westberg, M., and Wheeler, C. R.: The Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS): overview and experimental design, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2823–2869, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2823-2014, 2014.
Vassel, M., Ickes, L., Maturilli, M., and Hoose, C.: Classification of Arctic multilayer clouds using radiosonde and radar data in Svalbard, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5111–5126, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5111-2019, 2019.
Vickers, D. and Mahrt, L.: Quality Control and Flux Sampling Problems for
Tower and Aircraft Data, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 14, 512–526,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<0512:qcafsp>2.0.co;2,
1997.
Vihma, T., Pirazzini, R., Fer, I., Renfrew, I. A., Sedlar, J., Tjernström, M., Lüpkes, C., Nygård, T., Notz, D., Weiss, J., Marsan, D., Cheng, B., Birnbaum, G., Gerland, S., Chechin, D., and Gascard, J. C.: Advances in understanding and parameterization of small-scale physical processes in the marine Arctic climate system: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9403–9450, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9403-2014, 2014.
Vüllers, J., Achtert, P., Brooks, I., Neely III, R., and Brooks, B.: Cloudnet remote sensing retrievals of cloud properties during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition, Dataset version 3.0, Bolin Centre Database, https://doi.org/10.17043/ao2018-cloudnet-3, 2020.
Wendisch, M., Macke, A., Ehrlich, A., Lüpkes, C., Mech, M., Chechin, D.,
Dethloff, K., Velasco, C. B., Bozem, H., Brückner, M., Clemen, H.-C.,
Crewell, S., Donth, T., Dupuy, R., Ebell, K., Egerer, U., Engelmann, R.,
Engler, C., Eppers, O., Gehrmann, M., Gong, X., Gottschalk, M., Gourbeyre,
C., Griesche, H., Hartmann, J., Hartmann, M., Heinold, B., Herber, A.,
Herrmann, H., Heygster, G., Hoor, P., Jafariserajehlou, S., Jäkel, E.,
Järvinen, E., Jourdan, O., Kästner, U., Kecorius, S., Knudsen, E.
M., Köllner, F., Kretzschmar, J., Lelli, L., Leroy, D., Maturilli, M.,
Mei, L., Mertes, S., Mioche, G., Neuber, R., Nicolaus, M., Nomokonova, T.,
Notholt, J., Palm, M., van Pinxteren, M., Quaas, J., Richter, P.,
Ruiz-Donoso, E., Schäfer, M., Schmieder, K., Schnaiter, M., Schneider,
J., Schwarzenböck, A., Seifert, P., Shupe, M. D., Siebert, H., Spreen,
G., Stapf, J., Stratmann, F., Vogl, T., Welti, A., Wex, H., Wiedensohler,
A., Zanatta, M., and Zeppenfeld, S.: The Arctic Cloud Puzzle: Using
ACLOUD/PASCAL Multiplatform Observations to Unravel the Role of Clouds and
Aerosol Particles in Arctic Amplification, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100,
841–871, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0072.1, 2019.
Zhang, X., Walsh, J. E., Zhang, J., Bhatt, U. S., Ikeda, M., Zhang, X.,
Walsh, J. E., Zhang, J., Bhatt, U. S., and Ikeda, M.: Climatology and
Interannual Variability of Arctic Cyclone Activity: 1948–2002, J. Climate, 17, 2300–2317,,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2300:CAIVOA>2.0.CO;2,
2004.
Short summary
This paper provides interesting new results on the thermodynamic structure of the boundary layer, cloud conditions, and fog characteristics in the Arctic during the Arctic Ocean 2018 campaign. It provides information for interpreting further process studies on aerosol–cloud interactions and shows substantial differences in thermodynamic conditions and cloud characteristics based on comparison with previous campaigns. This certainly raises the question of whether it is just an exceptional year.
This paper provides interesting new results on the thermodynamic structure of the boundary...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint