Articles | Volume 21, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note
| 
20 Oct 2021
Technical note |
| 20 Oct 2021
| 20 Oct 2021
Technical note: Quality assessment of ozone reanalysis products and gap-filling over subarctic Europe for vegetation risk mapping
Stefanie Falk
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Ane V. Vollsnes
Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Aud B. Eriksen
Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Frode Stordal
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Terje Koren Berntsen
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Related authors
Rubaya Pervin, Scott Robeson, Mallory Barnes, Stephen Sitch, Anthony Walker, Ben Poulter, Fabienne Maignan, Qing Sun, Thomas Colligan, Sönke Zaehle, Kashif Mahmud, Peter Anthoni, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Vladislav Bastrikov, Liam Bogucki, Bertrand Decharme, Christine Delire, Stefanie Falk, Akihiko Ito, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Michael O’Sullivan, Wenping Yuan, and Natasha MacBean
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Drylands contribute more than a third of the global vegetation productivity. Yet, these regions are not well represented in global vegetation models. Here, we tested how well 15 global models capture annual changes in dryland vegetation productivity. Models that didn’t have vegetation change over time or fire have lower variability in vegetation productivity. Models need better representation of grass cover types and their coverage. Our work highlights where and how these models need to improve.
Stefanie Falk, Luca Reißig, Bianca Zilker, Andreas Richter, and Björn-Martin Sinnhuber
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3181, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3181, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate ozone depletion events (ODEs) and bromine explosions in 2019/20. Model results evaluated against surface ozone measurements, satellite-derived tropospheric BrO vertical column densities, and in situ data from the MOSAiC expedition suggest that increased Br2 emissions do not resolve model discrepancies, Br2 emissions from first-year sea ice may not fully account for observed ODE variability, and additional climate-sensitive mechanisms may modulate Arctic ozone chemistry.
Sabine Egerer, Stefanie Falk, Dorothea Mayer, Tobias Nützel, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, and Julia Pongratz
Biogeosciences, 21, 5005–5025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5005-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5005-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using a state-of-the-art land model, we find that bioenergy plants can store carbon more efficiently than forests over long periods in the soil, in geological reservoirs, or by substituting fossil-fuel-based energy. Planting forests is more suitable for reaching climate targets by 2050. The carbon removal potential depends also on local environmental conditions. These considerations have important implications for climate policy, spatial planning, nature conservation, and agriculture.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Bertrand Decharme, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Patricia Cadule, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Thi-Tuyet-Trang Chau, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Xinyu Dou, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Thomas Gasser, Josefine Ghattas, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Fortunat Joos, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Arne Körtzinger, Xin Lan, Nathalie Lefèvre, Hongmei Li, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Lei Ma, Greg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Gesa Meyer, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin M. O'Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Melf Paulsen, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Carter M. Powis, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Erik van Ooijen, Rik Wanninkhof, Michio Watanabe, Cathy Wimart-Rousseau, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2023 describes the methodology, main results, and data sets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2023). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek K. Arora, Christian Seiler, Almut Arneth, Stefanie Falk, Atul K. Jain, Fortunat Joos, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Stephen Sitch, Michael O'Sullivan, Naiqing Pan, Qing Sun, Hanqin Tian, Nicolas Vuichard, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 767–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrogen (N) is an essential limiting nutrient to terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration. We evaluate N cycling in an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models. We find that variability in N processes across models is large. Models tended to overestimate C storage per unit N in vegetation and soil, which could have consequences for projecting the future terrestrial C sink. However, N cycling measurements are highly uncertain, and more are necessary to guide the development of N cycling in models.
Giacomo Grassi, Clemens Schwingshackl, Thomas Gasser, Richard A. Houghton, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Alessandro Cescatti, Philippe Ciais, Sandro Federici, Pierre Friedlingstein, Werner A. Kurz, Maria J. Sanz Sanchez, Raúl Abad Viñas, Ramdane Alkama, Selma Bultan, Guido Ceccherini, Stefanie Falk, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Anu Korosuo, Joana Melo, Matthew J. McGrath, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Benjamin Poulter, Anna A. Romanovskaya, Simone Rossi, Hanqin Tian, Anthony P. Walker, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, and Julia Pongratz
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1093–1114, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1093-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1093-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Striking differences exist in estimates of land-use CO2 fluxes between the national greenhouse gas inventories and the IPCC assessment reports. These differences hamper an accurate assessment of the collective progress under the Paris Agreement. By implementing an approach that conceptually reconciles land-use CO2 flux from national inventories and the global models used by the IPCC, our study is an important step forward for increasing confidence in land-use CO2 flux estimates.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Luke Gregor, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Ramdane Alkama, Almut Arneth, Vivek K. Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Lucas Gloege, Giacomo Grassi, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Annika Jersild, Koji Kadono, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Keith Lindsay, Junjie Liu, Zhu Liu, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Matthew J. McGrath, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin O'Brien, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Naiqing Pan, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Carmen Rodriguez, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Jamie D. Shutler, Ingunn Skjelvan, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Xiangjun Tian, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Chris Whitehead, Anna Willstrand Wranne, Rebecca Wright, Wenping Yuan, Chao Yue, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4811–4900, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2022 describes the datasets and methodology used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, the land ecosystems, and the ocean. These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Stefanie Falk, Ane V. Vollsnes, Aud B. Eriksen, Lisa Emberson, Connie O'Neill, Frode Stordal, and Terje Koren Berntsen
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-260, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-260, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Subarctic vegetation is threatened by climate change and ozone. We assess essential climate variables in 2018/19. 2018 was warmer and brighter than usual in Spring with forest fires and elevated ozone in summer. Visible damage was observed on plant species in 2018. We find that generic parameterizations used in modeling ozone dose do not suffice. We propose a method to acclimate these parameterizations and find an ozone-induced biomass loss of 2.5 to 17.4 % (up to 6 % larger than default).
Rubaya Pervin, Scott Robeson, Mallory Barnes, Stephen Sitch, Anthony Walker, Ben Poulter, Fabienne Maignan, Qing Sun, Thomas Colligan, Sönke Zaehle, Kashif Mahmud, Peter Anthoni, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Vladislav Bastrikov, Liam Bogucki, Bertrand Decharme, Christine Delire, Stefanie Falk, Akihiko Ito, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Michael O’Sullivan, Wenping Yuan, and Natasha MacBean
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Drylands contribute more than a third of the global vegetation productivity. Yet, these regions are not well represented in global vegetation models. Here, we tested how well 15 global models capture annual changes in dryland vegetation productivity. Models that didn’t have vegetation change over time or fire have lower variability in vegetation productivity. Models need better representation of grass cover types and their coverage. Our work highlights where and how these models need to improve.
Stefanie Falk, Luca Reißig, Bianca Zilker, Andreas Richter, and Björn-Martin Sinnhuber
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3181, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3181, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate ozone depletion events (ODEs) and bromine explosions in 2019/20. Model results evaluated against surface ozone measurements, satellite-derived tropospheric BrO vertical column densities, and in situ data from the MOSAiC expedition suggest that increased Br2 emissions do not resolve model discrepancies, Br2 emissions from first-year sea ice may not fully account for observed ODE variability, and additional climate-sensitive mechanisms may modulate Arctic ozone chemistry.
Astrid Vatne, Norbert Pirk, Kolbjørn Engeland, Ane Victoria Vollsnes, and Lena Merete Tallaksen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1140, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1140, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of evaporation are important to understand how evaporation modifies the water balance of northern ecosystems. However, evaporation data in these regions are scarce. We explored a new dataset of evaporation measurements from four wetland sites in Norway and found that up to 30 % of the annual precipitation evaporate back to the atmosphere. Our results indicate that earlier snow melt-out and drier air can increase annual evaporation in the region.
Sabine Egerer, Stefanie Falk, Dorothea Mayer, Tobias Nützel, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, and Julia Pongratz
Biogeosciences, 21, 5005–5025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5005-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5005-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using a state-of-the-art land model, we find that bioenergy plants can store carbon more efficiently than forests over long periods in the soil, in geological reservoirs, or by substituting fossil-fuel-based energy. Planting forests is more suitable for reaching climate targets by 2050. The carbon removal potential depends also on local environmental conditions. These considerations have important implications for climate policy, spatial planning, nature conservation, and agriculture.
Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Magne Aldrin, Terje K. Berntsen, Marit Holden, Ragnar Bang Huseby, Gunnar Myhre, and Trude Storelvmo
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1435–1458, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1435-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1435-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate sensitivity and aerosol forcing are central quantities in climate science that are uncertain and contribute to the spread in climate projections. To constrain them, we use observations of temperature and ocean heat content as well as prior knowledge of radiative forcings over the industrialized period. The estimates are sensitive to how aerosol cooling evolved over the latter part of the 20th century, and a strong aerosol forcing trend in the 1960s–1970s is not supported by our analysis.
Elin Ristorp Aas, Inge Althuizen, Hui Tang, Sonya Geange, Eva Lieungh, Vigdis Vandvik, and Terje Koren Berntsen
Biogeosciences, 21, 3789–3817, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3789-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-3789-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We used a soil model to replicate two litterbag decomposition experiments to examine the implications of climate, litter quality, and soil microclimate representation. We found that macroclimate was more important than litter quality for modeled mass loss. By comparing different representations of soil temperature and moisture we found that using observed data did not improve model results. We discuss causes for this and suggest possible improvements to both the model and experimental design.
Elin Ristorp Aas, Heleen A. de Wit, and Terje K. Berntsen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2929–2959, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2929-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2929-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By including microbial processes in soil models, we learn how the soil system interacts with its environment and responds to climate change. We present a soil process model, MIMICS+, which is able to reproduce carbon stocks found in boreal forest soils better than a conventional land model. With the model we also find that when adding nitrogen, the relationship between soil microbes changes notably. Coupling the model to a vegetation model will allow for further study of these mechanisms.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Bertrand Decharme, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Patricia Cadule, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Thi-Tuyet-Trang Chau, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Xinyu Dou, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Thomas Gasser, Josefine Ghattas, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Fortunat Joos, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Arne Körtzinger, Xin Lan, Nathalie Lefèvre, Hongmei Li, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Lei Ma, Greg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Gesa Meyer, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin M. O'Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Melf Paulsen, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Carter M. Powis, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Erik van Ooijen, Rik Wanninkhof, Michio Watanabe, Cathy Wimart-Rousseau, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2023 describes the methodology, main results, and data sets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2023). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Vivek K. Arora, Christian Seiler, Almut Arneth, Stefanie Falk, Atul K. Jain, Fortunat Joos, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Stephen Sitch, Michael O'Sullivan, Naiqing Pan, Qing Sun, Hanqin Tian, Nicolas Vuichard, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 767–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-767-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrogen (N) is an essential limiting nutrient to terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration. We evaluate N cycling in an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models. We find that variability in N processes across models is large. Models tended to overestimate C storage per unit N in vegetation and soil, which could have consequences for projecting the future terrestrial C sink. However, N cycling measurements are highly uncertain, and more are necessary to guide the development of N cycling in models.
Norbert Pirk, Kristoffer Aalstad, Yeliz A. Yilmaz, Astrid Vatne, Andrea L. Popp, Peter Horvath, Anders Bryn, Ane Victoria Vollsnes, Sebastian Westermann, Terje Koren Berntsen, Frode Stordal, and Lena Merete Tallaksen
Biogeosciences, 20, 2031–2047, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2031-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2031-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We measured the land–atmosphere exchange of CO2 and water vapor in alpine Norway over 3 years. The extremely snow-rich conditions in 2020 reduced the total annual evapotranspiration to 50 % and reduced the growing-season carbon assimilation to turn the ecosystem from a moderate annual carbon sink to an even stronger source. Our analysis suggests that snow cover anomalies are driving the most consequential short-term responses in this ecosystem’s functioning.
Giacomo Grassi, Clemens Schwingshackl, Thomas Gasser, Richard A. Houghton, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Alessandro Cescatti, Philippe Ciais, Sandro Federici, Pierre Friedlingstein, Werner A. Kurz, Maria J. Sanz Sanchez, Raúl Abad Viñas, Ramdane Alkama, Selma Bultan, Guido Ceccherini, Stefanie Falk, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Anu Korosuo, Joana Melo, Matthew J. McGrath, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Benjamin Poulter, Anna A. Romanovskaya, Simone Rossi, Hanqin Tian, Anthony P. Walker, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, and Julia Pongratz
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1093–1114, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1093-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1093-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Striking differences exist in estimates of land-use CO2 fluxes between the national greenhouse gas inventories and the IPCC assessment reports. These differences hamper an accurate assessment of the collective progress under the Paris Agreement. By implementing an approach that conceptually reconciles land-use CO2 flux from national inventories and the global models used by the IPCC, our study is an important step forward for increasing confidence in land-use CO2 flux estimates.
Marius S. A. Lambert, Hui Tang, Kjetil S. Aas, Frode Stordal, Rosie A. Fisher, Yilin Fang, Junyan Ding, and Frans-Jan W. Parmentier
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8809–8829, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8809-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8809-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we implement a hardening mortality scheme into CTSM5.0-FATES-Hydro and evaluate how it impacts plant hydraulics and vegetation growth. Our work shows that the hydraulic modifications prescribed by the hardening scheme are necessary to model realistic vegetation growth in cold climates, in contrast to the default model that simulates almost nonexistent and declining vegetation due to abnormally large water loss through the roots.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Luke Gregor, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Ramdane Alkama, Almut Arneth, Vivek K. Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Lucas Gloege, Giacomo Grassi, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Annika Jersild, Koji Kadono, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Keith Lindsay, Junjie Liu, Zhu Liu, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Matthew J. McGrath, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin O'Brien, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Naiqing Pan, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Carmen Rodriguez, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Jamie D. Shutler, Ingunn Skjelvan, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Xiangjun Tian, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Chris Whitehead, Anna Willstrand Wranne, Rebecca Wright, Wenping Yuan, Chao Yue, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4811–4900, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2022 describes the datasets and methodology used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, the land ecosystems, and the ocean. These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Sara Marie Blichner, Moa Kristina Sporre, and Terje Koren Berntsen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17243–17265, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17243-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17243-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we quantify how a new way of modeling the formation of new particles in the atmosphere affects the estimated cooling from aerosol–cloud interactions since pre-industrial times. Our improved scheme merges two common approaches to aerosol modeling: a sectional scheme for treating early growth and the pre-existing modal scheme in NorESM. We find that the cooling from aerosol–cloud interactions since pre-industrial times is reduced by 10 % when the new scheme is used.
Stefanie Falk, Ane V. Vollsnes, Aud B. Eriksen, Lisa Emberson, Connie O'Neill, Frode Stordal, and Terje Koren Berntsen
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-260, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-260, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Subarctic vegetation is threatened by climate change and ozone. We assess essential climate variables in 2018/19. 2018 was warmer and brighter than usual in Spring with forest fires and elevated ozone in summer. Visible damage was observed on plant species in 2018. We find that generic parameterizations used in modeling ozone dose do not suffice. We propose a method to acclimate these parameterizations and find an ozone-induced biomass loss of 2.5 to 17.4 % (up to 6 % larger than default).
Sara M. Blichner, Moa K. Sporre, Risto Makkonen, and Terje K. Berntsen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3335–3359, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3335-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3335-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol–cloud interactions are the largest contributor to climate forcing uncertainty. In this study we combine two common approaches to aerosol representation in global models: a sectional scheme, which is closer to first principals, for the smallest particles forming in the atmosphere and a log-modal scheme, which is faster, for the larger particles. With this approach, we improve the aerosol representation compared to observations, while only increasing the computational cost by 15 %.
Peter Horvath, Hui Tang, Rune Halvorsen, Frode Stordal, Lena Merete Tallaksen, Terje Koren Berntsen, and Anders Bryn
Biogeosciences, 18, 95–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-95-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-95-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated the performance of three methods for representing vegetation cover. Remote sensing provided the best match to a reference dataset, closely followed by distribution modelling (DM), whereas the dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) in CLM4.5BGCDV deviated strongly from the reference. Sensitivity tests show that use of threshold values for predictors identified by DM may improve DGVM performance. The results highlight the potential of using DM in the development of DGVMs.
Marianne T. Lund, Borgar Aamaas, Camilla W. Stjern, Zbigniew Klimont, Terje K. Berntsen, and Bjørn H. Samset
Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 977–993, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-977-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-977-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Achieving the Paris Agreement temperature goals requires both near-zero levels of long-lived greenhouse gases and deep cuts in emissions of short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs). Here we quantify the near- and long-term global temperature impacts of emissions of individual SLCFs and CO2 from 7 economic sectors in 13 regions in order to provide the detailed knowledge needed to design efficient mitigation strategies at the sectoral and regional levels.
Cited articles
Ainsworth, E. A.: Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone
pollution, Plant J., 90, 886–897, https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13298, 2017. a
Andersson, C., Alpfjord, H., Robertson, L., Karlsson, P. E., and Engardt, M.: Reanalysis of and attribution to near-surface ozone concentrations in Sweden during 1990–2013, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13869–13890, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13869-2017, 2017. a, b
Barten, J. G. M., Ganzeveld, L. N., Steeneveld, G.-J., and Krol, M. C.: Role of oceanic ozone deposition in explaining temporal variability in surface ozone at High Arctic sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10229–10248, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10229-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d
Björklund, J.-Å., Ekelund, K., Henningsson, A., Perers, K., Peters, J.,
Siverstig, A., Uddholm, L.-G., and Wisén, J.: Betänkande av 2018 års
skogsbrandsutredning, SOU2019 7, Statens Offentliga Utredningar (SOU),
available at: https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2019/02/sou-20197/ (last access: April 2020),
2019. a
Chuwah, C., van Noije, T., van Vuuren, D. P., Stehfest, E., and Hazeleger, W.:
Global impacts of surface ozone changes on crop yields and land use,
Atmos. Environ., 106, 11–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.062,
2015. a
Clifton, O., Fiore, A., Massman, W., Baublitz, C., Coyle, M., Emberson, L.,
Fares, S., Farmer, D., Gentine, P., Gerosa, G., Guenther, A., Helmig, D.,
Lombardozzi, D., Munger, J., Patton, E., Pusede, S., Schwede, D., Silva, S.,
Sörgel, M., and Tai, A.: Dry Deposition of Ozone Over Land: Processes,
Measurement, and Modeling, Rev. Geophys., e2019RG000670,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000670, 2020. a
Cooper, O., Parrish, D., Ziemke, J., Balashov, N., Cupeiro, M., Galbally, I.,
Gilge, S., Horowitz, L., Jensen, N., Lamarque, J.-F., Naik, V., Oltmans, S.,
Schwab, J., Shindell, D., Thompson, A., Thouret, V., Wang, Y., and Zbinden,
R.: Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone: An
observation-based review, Elementa-Sci Anthrop., 2, 000029,
https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000029, 2014. a
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service: Verification plots:
documentation,
available at: http://macc-raq-op.meteo.fr/doc/USER_GUIDE_VERIFICATION_STATISTICS.pdf (last access: May 2021),
2020a. a
Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service: CAMS Regional Air Quality reanalysis, available at: http://macc-raq-op.meteo.fr/index.php?category=data_access&subensemble=reanalysis_products, last access: July 2020b. a
Emberson, L.: Effects of ozone on agriculture, forests and grasslands,
Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering
sciences, 378, 20190327, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0327, 2020. a
Emberson, L. D., for Monitoring, C. P., of the Long Range Transmission of Air
Pollutants in Europe, E., meteorologiske institutt, N., and Meteorological
Synthesizing Centre-West (Oslo, N.: Towards a Model of Ozone Deposition and
Stomatal Uptake Over Europe, EMEP/MSC-W Note, Norwegian Meteorological
Institute, available at: https://books.google.no/books?id=hj_ntgAACAAJ (last access: May 2019),
2000. a
Falk, S.: numerical recipe, python_scripts/ozone_metrics/ozone_anomalies/, GitHub [code], available at: https://github.com/ziu1986/python_scripts/tree/master/ozone_metrics/ozone_anomalies, last access: 14 October 2021. a
Falk, S. and Sinnhuber, B.-M.: Polar boundary layer bromine explosion and ozone depletion events in the chemistry–climate model EMAC v2.52: implementation and evaluation of AirSnow algorithm, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1115–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1115-2018, 2018. a
Falk, S. and Søvde Haslerud, A.: Update and evaluation of the ozone dry deposition in Oslo CTM3 v1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4705–4728, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4705-2019, 2019. a
Fleming, Z. L., Doherty, R. M., von Schneidemesser, E., Malley, C. S., Cooper,
O. R., Pinto, J. P., Colette, A., Xu, X., Simpson, D., Schultz, M. G.,
Lefohn, A. S., Hamad, S., Moolla, R., Solberg, S., and Feng, Z.:
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day ozone distribution and
trends relevant to human health, Elementa-Sci Anthrop., 6, 12,
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.273, 2018. a
Franz, M. and Zaehle, S.: Competing effects of nitrogen deposition and ozone exposure on northern hemispheric terrestrial carbon uptake and storage, 1850–2099, Biogeosciences, 18, 3219–3241, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3219-2021, 2021. a
Gangstø Skaland, R., Colleuille, H., Håvelsrud Andersen, A. S., Mamen, J.,
Grinde, L., Tajet, H. T. T., Lundstad, E., Sidselrud, L. F., Tunheim, K.,
Hanssen-Bauer, I., Benestad, R., Heiberg, H., and Hygen, H. O.:
Tørkesommeren 2018, METinfo 14, Norwegian Meteorological Institute,
available at: https://www.met.no/publikasjoner/met-info/met-info-2019 (last access: March 2020), 2019. a
Gaudel, A., Cooper, O. R., Ancellet, G., Barret, B., Boynard, A., Burrows,
J. P., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P. F., Cuesta, J., Cuevas, E., Doniki, S.,
Dufour, G., Ebojie, F., Foret, G., Garcia, O., Granados-Munoz, M. J.,
Hannigan, J. W., Hase, F., Hassler, B., Huang, G., Hurtmans, D., Jaffe, D.,
Jones, N., Kalabokas, P., Kerridge, B., Kulawik, S., Latter, B., Leblanc, T.,
Le Flochmoen, E., Lin, W., Liu, J., Liu, X., Mahieu, E., McClure-Begley, A.,
Neu, J. L., Osman, M., Palm, M., Petetin, H., Petropavlovskikh, I., Querel,
R., Rahpoe, N., Rozanov, A., Schultz, M. G., Schwab, J., Siddans, R., Smale,
D., Steinbacher, M., Tanimoto, H., Tarasick, D. W., Thouret, V., Thompson,
A. M., Trickl, T., Weatherhead, E., Wespes, C., Worden, H. M., Vigouroux, C.,
Xu, X., Zeng, G., and Ziemke, J.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report:
Present-day distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone relevant to climate
and global atmospheric chemistry model evaluation, Elementa-Sci Anthrop.,
6, 39, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.291, 2018. a
Hatakka, J., Aalto, T., Aaltonen, V., Aurela, M., Hakola, H., Komppula, M.,
Laurila, T., Lihavainen, H., Paatero, J., Salminen, K., and Viisanen, Y.:
Overview of the atmospheric research activities and results at Pallas GAW
station, Boreal Environ. Res., 8, 365–383, 2003. a
Hayes, F., Mills, G., Alonso, R., González, I., Coyle, M., Grünhage, L.,
Gerosa, G., Karlsson, P., and Marzuoli, R.: A Site-Specific Analysis of the
Implications of a Changing Ozone Profile and Climate for Stomatal Ozone
Fluxes in Europe, Water Air Soil Poll., 230, 1–15,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-4057-x, 2018. a, b
Høgda, K., Tømmervik, H., and Karlsen, S.: Trends in the Start of the
Growing Season in Fennoscandia 1982-2011, Remote Sens., 5, 4304–4318,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5094304, 2013. a
Hoshika, Y., Katata, G., Deushi, M., Watanabe, M., Koike, T., and Paoletti, E.:
Ozone-induced stomatal sluggishness changes carbon and water balance of
temperate deciduous forests, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 09871, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09871,
2015. a
Inness, A., Baier, F., Benedetti, A., Bouarar, I., Chabrillat, S., Clark, H., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P., Engelen, R. J., Errera, Q., Flemming, J., George, M., Granier, C., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Huijnen, V., Hurtmans, D., Jones, L., Kaiser, J. W., Kapsomenakis, J., Lefever, K., Leitão, J., Razinger, M., Richter, A., Schultz, M. G., Simmons, A. J., Suttie, M., Stein, O., Thépaut, J.-N., Thouret, V., Vrekoussis, M., Zerefos, C., and the MACC team: The MACC reanalysis: an 8 yr data set of atmospheric composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4073–4109, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4073-2013, 2013. a
Inness, A., Ades, M., Agustí-Panareda, A., Barré, J., Benedictow, A., Blechschmidt, A.-M., Dominguez, J. J., Engelen, R., Eskes, H., Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Jones, L., Kipling, Z., Massart, S., Parrington, M., Peuch, V.-H., Razinger, M., Remy, S., Schulz, M., and Suttie, M.: The CAMS reanalysis of atmospheric composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3515–3556, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3515-2019, 2019. a, b
Hartmann, D. L., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Rusticucci, M., Alexander, L. V., Brönnimann, S., Charabi, Y., Dentener, F. J., Dlugokencky, E. J., Easterling, D. R., Kaplan, A., Soden, B. J., Thorne, P. W., Wild, M., and Zhai, P. M.: Observations: Atmosphere and Surface, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, chap. 2, 159–254, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.008, 2013. a
Jarvis, P. G.: The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and
stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field, Philos. T. Roy. Soc.
B., 273, 593–610, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1976.0035, 1976. a
Kangaskärvi, J., Jaspers, P., and Kollist, H.: Signalling and cell death in
ozone-exposed plants, Plant Cell Environ., 28, 1021–1036,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01325.x, 2005. a
Karlsen, S., Solheim, I., Beck, P., Høgda, K., Wielgolaski, F., and
Tømmervik, H.: Variability of the start of the growing season in
Fennoscandia, 1982–2002, Int. J. Biometeorol., 51, 513–24,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-007-0091-x, 2007. a
Karlsson, P., Ferm, M., Tømmervik, H., Hole, L., Karlsson, G., Ruoho-Airola,
T., Aas, W., Hellsten, S., Akselsson, C., Mikkelsen, T., and Nihlgård, B.:
Biomass burning in eastern Europe during spring 2006 caused high deposition
of ammonium in northern Fennoscandia, Environ. Pollut., 176, 71–79,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.12.006, 2013. a
Karlsson, P. E., Pleijel, H., Andersson, C., Bergström, R., Engardt, M.,
Eriksen, A., Falk, S., Klingberg, J., Langner, J., Manninen, S., Stordal, F.,
Tømmervik, H., and Vollsnes, A.: The vulnerability of northern European
vegetation to ozone damage in a changing climate - An assessment based on
current knowledge, Tech. Rep. C586, IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet,
available at: https://www.ivl.se/publikationer/publikation.html?id=6220 (last access: May 2021),
2021. a
Kobayashi, S., Ota, Y., Harada, Y., Ebita, A., Moriya, M., Onoda, H., Onogi,
K., Kamahori, H., Kobayashi, C., Endo, H., Miyaoka, K., and Takahashi, K.:
The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics,
J. Meteor. Soc. Jpn., 93, 5–48,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001, 2015. a
Linderholm, H.: Growing Season Changes in the Last Century, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 137, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.006, 2006. a
Lindskog, A., Karlsson, P., Grennfelt, P., Solberg, S., and Forster, C.: An
exceptional ozone episode in northern Fennoscandia, Atmos. Environ., 41,
950–958, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.027, 2007. a
Lombardozzi, D., Bonan, G. B., Smith, N. G., Dukes, J. S., and Fisher, R. A.:
Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis and respiration: A key uncertainty
in the carbon cycle-climate feedback, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8624–8631,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065934, 2015a. a
Lombardozzi, D., Levis, S., Bonan, G., Hess, P., and Sparks, J.: The Influence
of Chronic Ozone Exposure on Global Carbon and Water Cycles, J. Climate,
28, 292–305, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00223.1, 2015b. a
Mills, G., Hayes, F., Simpson, D., Emberson, L., Norris, D., Harmens, H., and
Büker, P.: Evidence of widespread effects of ozone on crops and
(semi‐)natural vegetation in Europe (1990–2006) in relation to AOT40- and flux-based risk maps, Glob. Change Biol., 17, 592–613,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02217.x, 2011. a, b, c
Mills, G., Sharps, K., Simpson, D., Pleijel, H., Broberg, M., Uddling, J.,
Jaramillo, F., Davies, W. J., Dentener, F., Van den Berg, M., Agrawal, M.,
Agrawal, S. B., Ainsworth, E. A., Büker, P., Emberson, L., Feng, Z.,
Harmens, H., Hayes, F., Kobayashi, K., Paoletti, E., and Van Dingenen, R.:
Ozone pollution will compromise efforts to increase global wheat production,
Glob. Change Biol., 24, 3560–3574, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14157, 2018. a
Mills, G., Harmens, H., Hayes, F., Pleijel, H., Büker, P.,
González-Fernandéz, I., Alonso, R., Bender, J., Bergmann, E. Bermejo,
V., Braun, S., Danielsson, H., Gerosa, G., Grünhage, L., Karlsson, P. E.,
Marzuoli, R., Schaub, M., and Simpson, D.: ICP Mapping Manual - Chapter III:
Mapping Critical Levels for Vegetation, International Cooperative Programme
on Effects of Air Pollution on Natural Vegetation and Crops,
available at: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/Coordination_Centre_for_Effects (last access: February 2019), minor
edits OCT 2017, 2017. a, b, c, d
Mills, G., Pleijel, H., Malley, C. S., Sinha, B., Cooper, O. R., Schultz,
M. G., Neufeld, H. S., Simpson, D., Sharps, K., Feng, Z., Gerosa, G.,
Harmens, H., Kobayashi, K., Saxena, P., Paoletti, E., Sinha, V., and Xu, X.:
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day tropospheric ozone
distribution and trends relevant to vegetation, Elementa-Sci Anthrop.,
6, 47, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302, 2018. a
Mills, G., Harmens, H., Hayes, F., Pleijel, H., Büker, P.,
González-Fernandéz, I., Alonso, R., Hayes, F., and Sharps, K.:
Scientific background document B – developing areas of research of relevance
to chapter III (mapping critical levels for vegetation) of the modelling and
mapping manual of the lrtap convention, International Cooperative Programme
on Effects of Air Pollution on Natural Vegetation and Crops,
available at: https://icpvegetation.ceh.ac.uk/get-involved/manuals/mapping-manual (last access: May 2021),
2020. a, b, c, d, e
Miyazaki, K., Bowman, K., Sekiya, T., Eskes, H., Boersma, F., Worden, H., Livesey, N., Payne, V. H., Sudo, K., Kanaya, Y., Takigawa, M., and Ogochi, K.: Updated tropospheric chemistry reanalysis and emission estimates, TCR-2, for 2005–2018, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2223–2259, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2223-2020, 2020. a
Monks, P. S.: A review of the observations and origins of the spring ozone
maximum, Atmos. Environ., 34, 3545–3561,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00129-1, 2000. a
Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.: Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015, 2015. a, b
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang,
J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock,
A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and Natural
Radiative Forcing, book section 8, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
659–740, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018, 2013. a
NILU: ebas.nilu.no website, available at: http://ebas.nilu.no/, last access: July 2020. a
Pellegrini, E., Francini, A., Lorenzini, G., and Nali, C.: PSII photochemistry
and carboxylation efficiency in Liriodendron tulipifera under ozone
exposure, Environ. Exp. Bot., 70, 217–226, 2011. a
Stevenson, D. S., Dentener, F. J., Schultz, M. G., Ellingsen, K., van Noije, T.
P. C., Wild, O., Zeng, G., Amann, M., Atherton, C. S., Bell, N., Bergmann,
D. J., Bey, I., Butler, T., Cofala, J., Collins, W. J., Derwent, R. G.,
Doherty, R. M., Drevet, J., Eskes, H. J., Fiore, A. M., Gauss, M.,
Hauglustaine, D. A., Horowitz, L. W., Isaksen, I. S. A., Krol, M. C.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Lawrence, M. G., Montanaro, V., Müller, J.-F., Pitari, G.,
Prather, M. J., Pyle, J. A., Rast, S., Rodriguez, J. M., Sanderson, M. G.,
Savage, N. H., Shindell, D. T., Strahan, S. E., Sudo, K., and Szopa, S.:
Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric
ozone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006338, 2005. a
Tai, A. P. K., Martin, M. V., and Heald, C. L.: Threat to future global food
security from climate change and ozone air pollution, Nat. Clim. Change,
4, 817–821, https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2317, 2014. a
Tang, H., Takigawa, M., Liu, G., Zhu, J., and Kobayashi, K.: A projection of
ozone-induced wheat production loss in China and India for the years 2000 and
2020 with exposure-based and flux-based approaches, Glob. Change Biol.,
19, 2739–2752, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12252, 2013. a
Škerlak, B., Sprenger, M., Pfahl, S., Tyrlis, E., and Wernli, H.:
Tropopause folds in ERA-Interim: Global climatology and relation to extreme
weather events, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 4860–4877,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022787, 2015. a
Watanabe, M., Hoshika, Y., and Koike, T.: Photosynthetic responses of Monarch
birch seedlings to differing timings of free air ozone fumigation, J. Plant
Res., 127, 339–345, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-013-0622-y, 2014. a
Wespes, C., Hurtmans, D., Clerbaux, C., Boynard, A., and Coheur, P.-F.: Decrease in tropospheric O3 levels in the Northern Hemisphere observed by IASI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6867–6885, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6867-2018, 2018. a
WHO – World Health Organization: Health risks of ozone from long-range
transboundary air pollution, 36 pp., 2008. a
Young, P. J., Archibald, A. T., Bowman, K. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Naik, V., Stevenson, D. S., Tilmes, S., Voulgarakis, A., Wild, O., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R. M., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R. B., Shindell, D. T., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2063–2090, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013, 2013. a
Zhu, J., Tai, A. P. K., and Yim, S. H. L.: Effects of ozone-vegetation interactions on meteorology and air quality in China using a two-way coupled land-atmosphere model, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-165, in review, 2021. a
Short summary
We evaluate regional and global models for ozone modeling and damage risk mapping of vegetation over subarctic Europe. Our analysis suggests that low-resolution global models do not reproduce the observed ozone seasonal cycle at ground level, underestimating ozone by 30–50 %. High-resolution regional models capture the seasonal cycle well, still underestimating ozone by up to 20 %. Our proposed gap-filling method for site observations shows a 76 % accuracy compared to the regional model (80 %).
We evaluate regional and global models for ozone modeling and damage risk mapping of vegetation...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint