Articles | Volume 21, issue 20
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15647–15661, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15647–15661, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021
Technical note
20 Oct 2021
Technical note | 20 Oct 2021

Technical note: Quality assessment of ozone reanalysis products and gap-filling over subarctic Europe for vegetation risk mapping

Stefanie Falk et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,265 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
969 268 28 1,265 10 9
  • HTML: 969
  • PDF: 268
  • XML: 28
  • Total: 1,265
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,265 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,283 with geography defined and -18 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 03 Dec 2022
Download
Short summary
We evaluate regional and global models for ozone modeling and damage risk mapping of vegetation over subarctic Europe. Our analysis suggests that low-resolution global models do not reproduce the observed ozone seasonal cycle at ground level, underestimating ozone by 30–50 %. High-resolution regional models capture the seasonal cycle well, still underestimating ozone by up to 20 %. Our proposed gap-filling method for site observations shows a 76 % accuracy compared to the regional model (80 %).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint