Articles | Volume 21, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021
Technical note
 | 
20 Oct 2021
Technical note |  | 20 Oct 2021

Technical note: Quality assessment of ozone reanalysis products and gap-filling over subarctic Europe for vegetation risk mapping

Stefanie Falk, Ane V. Vollsnes, Aud B. Eriksen, Frode Stordal, and Terje Koren Berntsen

Viewed

Total article views: 1,770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,271 445 54 1,770 30 32
  • HTML: 1,271
  • PDF: 445
  • XML: 54
  • Total: 1,770
  • BibTeX: 30
  • EndNote: 32
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,792 with geography defined and -22 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 18 May 2024
Download
Short summary
We evaluate regional and global models for ozone modeling and damage risk mapping of vegetation over subarctic Europe. Our analysis suggests that low-resolution global models do not reproduce the observed ozone seasonal cycle at ground level, underestimating ozone by 30–50 %. High-resolution regional models capture the seasonal cycle well, still underestimating ozone by up to 20 %. Our proposed gap-filling method for site observations shows a 76 % accuracy compared to the regional model (80 %).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint