Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 21, issue 20
Articles | Volume 21, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 21, issue 20
Technical note
 | 
20 Oct 2021
Technical note |  | 20 Oct 2021

Technical note: Quality assessment of ozone reanalysis products and gap-filling over subarctic Europe for vegetation risk mapping

Stefanie Falk, Ane V. Vollsnes, Aud B. Eriksen, Frode Stordal, and Terje Koren Berntsen

Viewed

Total article views: 2,957 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,013 840 104 2,957 80 113
  • HTML: 2,013
  • PDF: 840
  • XML: 104
  • Total: 2,957
  • BibTeX: 80
  • EndNote: 113
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jul 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,957 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,957 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
We evaluate regional and global models for ozone modeling and damage risk mapping of vegetation over subarctic Europe. Our analysis suggests that low-resolution global models do not reproduce the observed ozone seasonal cycle at ground level, underestimating ozone by 30–50 %. High-resolution regional models capture the seasonal cycle well, still underestimating ozone by up to 20 %. Our proposed gap-filling method for site observations shows a 76 % accuracy compared to the regional model (80 %).
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint