Articles | Volume 21, issue 20
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15647–15661, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15647–15661, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15647-2021

Technical note 20 Oct 2021

Technical note | 20 Oct 2021

Technical note: Quality assessment of ozone reanalysis products and gap-filling over subarctic Europe for vegetation risk mapping

Stefanie Falk et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2021-527', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Jul 2021
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Stefanie Falk, 02 Aug 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on acp-2021-527', Anonymous Referee #2, 23 Aug 2021
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Stefanie Falk, 24 Aug 2021
      • AC3: 'Reply on AC2', Stefanie Falk, 24 Aug 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Stefanie Falk on behalf of the Authors (06 Sep 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (20 Sep 2021) by Jens-Uwe Grooß
AR by Stefanie Falk on behalf of the Authors (20 Sep 2021)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
We evaluate regional and global models for ozone modeling and damage risk mapping of vegetation over subarctic Europe. Our analysis suggests that low-resolution global models do not reproduce the observed ozone seasonal cycle at ground level, underestimating ozone by 30–50 %. High-resolution regional models capture the seasonal cycle well, still underestimating ozone by up to 20 %. Our proposed gap-filling method for site observations shows a 76 % accuracy compared to the regional model (80 %).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint