Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-327-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-327-2019
Research article
 | 
09 Jan 2019
Research article |  | 09 Jan 2019

Quantification and evaluation of atmospheric pollutant emissions from open biomass burning with multiple methods: a case study for the Yangtze River Delta region, China

Yang Yang and Yu Zhao

Related authors

Improvement of the satellite-derived NOx emissions on air quality modeling and its effect on ozone and secondary inorganic aerosol formation in the Yangtze River Delta, China
Yang Yang, Yu Zhao, Lei Zhang, Jie Zhang, Xin Huang, Xuefen Zhao, Yan Zhang, Mengxiao Xi, and Yi Lu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1191–1209, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1191-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1191-2021, 2021
Short summary
EVALUATING THE INFLUENCE OF SATELLITE OBSERVATION ON INVERSING NOX EMISSION AT REGIONAL SCALE
Y. Yang, Y. Zhao, and L. Zhang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W9, 211–217, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W9-211-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W9-211-2019, 2019
Improved provincial emission inventory and speciation profiles of anthropogenic non-methane volatile organic compounds: a case study for Jiangsu, China
Yu Zhao, Pan Mao, Yaduan Zhou, Yang Yang, Jie Zhang, Shekou Wang, Yanping Dong, Fangjian Xie, Yiyong Yu, and Wenqing Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7733–7756, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7733-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7733-2017, 2017
Short summary
Development of a high-resolution emission inventory and its evaluation and application through air quality modeling for Jiangsu Province, China
Yaduan Zhou, Yu Zhao, Pan Mao, Qiang Zhang, Jie Zhang, Liping Qiu, and Yang Yang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 211–233, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-211-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-211-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Evaluating present-day and future impacts of agricultural ammonia emissions on atmospheric chemistry and climate
Maureen Beaudor, Didier Hauglustaine, Juliette Lathière, Martin Van Damme, Lieven Clarisse, and Nicolas Vuichard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2017–2046, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2017-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2017-2025, 2025
Short summary
Air-pollution-satellite-based CO2 emission inversion: system evaluation, sensitivity analysis, and future research direction
Hui Li, Jiaxin Qiu, and Bo Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1949–1963, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1949-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1949-2025, 2025
Short summary
Insights into ozone pollution control in urban areas by decoupling meteorological factors based on machine learning
Yuqing Qiu, Xin Li, Wenxuan Chai, Yi Liu, Mengdi Song, Xudong Tian, Qiaoli Zou, Wenjun Lou, Wangyao Zhang, Juan Li, and Yuanhang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1749–1763, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1749-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1749-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantification of regional net CO2 flux errors in the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) v10 model intercomparison project (MIP) ensemble using airborne measurements
Jeongmin Yun, Junjie Liu, Brendan Byrne, Brad Weir, Lesley E. Ott, Kathryn McKain, Bianca C. Baier, Luciana V. Gatti, and Sebastien C. Biraud
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1725–1748, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1725-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1725-2025, 2025
Short summary
Reactive nitrogen in and around the northeastern and mid-Atlantic US: sources, sinks, and connections with ozone
Min Huang, Gregory R. Carmichael, Kevin W. Bowman, Isabelle De Smedt, Andreas Colliander, Michael H. Cosh, Sujay V. Kumar, Alex B. Guenther, Scott J. Janz, Ryan M. Stauffer, Anne M. Thompson, Niko M. Fedkin, Robert J. Swap, John D. Bolten, and Alicia T. Joseph
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1449–1476, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1449-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1449-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4039–4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011, 2011. 
Andreae, M. O. and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 955–966, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gb001382, 2001. 
Bi, Y. Y.: Study on straw resources evaluation and utilization, Chinese Academy Agriculture Sciences, Beijing, China, 2010 (in Chinese). 
Cao, G. L., Zhang, X. Y., Wang, D., and Zheng, F. C.: Inventory of atmospheric pollutants discharged from open biomass burning in China continent, Chinese Sci. Bull., 52, 1826–1831, 2007 (in Chinese). 
Chen, D., Cui H. F., Zhao Y., Yin L., Lu, Y., and Wang, Q. G.: A two-year study of carbonaceous aerosols in ambient PM2.5 at a regional background site for western Yangtze River Delta, China, Atmos. Res., 183, 351–361, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
We estimated and evaluated the air pollutant emissions from open biomass burning in the Yangtze River Delta with three methods. Chemistry transport modeling indicated that the constraining method provided the best emissions. The traditional bottom-up method could often overestimate emissions and could hardly track their interannual trends. The emissions based on fire radiative power might be underestimated, which is attributed to the satellite detection limit on small fires.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint