Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1475-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1475-2018
Research article
 | 
02 Feb 2018
Research article |  | 02 Feb 2018

Relating large-scale subsidence to convection development in Arctic mixed-phase marine stratocumulus

Gillian Young, Paul J. Connolly, Christopher Dearden, and Thomas W. Choularton

Related authors

Evaluating Arctic clouds modelled with the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System
Gillian Young McCusker, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4819–4847, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, 2023
Short summary
Secondary ice production in summer clouds over the Antarctic coast: an underappreciated process in atmospheric models
Georgia Sotiropoulou, Étienne Vignon, Gillian Young, Hugh Morrison, Sebastian J. O'Shea, Thomas Lachlan-Cope, Alexis Berne, and Athanasios Nenes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 755–771, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-755-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-755-2021, 2021
Short summary
Summertime Arctic Aircraft Measurements during ACCACIA
Hazel M. Jones, Gillian Young, Thomas W. Choularton, Keith N. Bower, Thomas Lachlan-Cope, Sebastian O'Shea, James Dorsey, Russell Ladkin, Amelié Kirchgaessner, and Alexandra Weiss
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-283,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-283, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Microphysical sensitivity of coupled springtime Arctic stratocumulus to modelled primary ice over the ice pack, marginal ice, and ocean
Gillian Young, Paul J. Connolly, Hazel M. Jones, and Thomas W. Choularton
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4209–4227, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4209-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4209-2017, 2017
Short summary
Observed microphysical changes in Arctic mixed-phase clouds when transitioning from sea ice to open ocean
Gillian Young, Hazel M. Jones, Thomas W. Choularton, Jonathan Crosier, Keith N. Bower, Martin W. Gallagher, Rhiannon S. Davies, Ian A. Renfrew, Andrew D. Elvidge, Eoghan Darbyshire, Franco Marenco, Philip R. A. Brown, Hugo M. A. Ricketts, Paul J. Connolly, Gary Lloyd, Paul I. Williams, James D. Allan, Jonathan W. Taylor, Dantong Liu, and Michael J. Flynn
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13945–13967, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13945-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13945-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions
Shiye Huang, Jing Yang, Jiaojiao Li, Qian Chen, Qilin Zhang, and Fengxia Guo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1831–1850, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1831-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1831-2025, 2025
Short summary
Model analysis of biases in the satellite-diagnosed aerosol effect on the cloud liquid water path
Harri Kokkola, Juha Tonttila, Silvia M. Calderón, Sami Romakkaniemi, Antti Lipponen, Aapo Peräkorpi, Tero Mielonen, Edward Gryspeerdt, Timo Henrik Virtanen, Pekka Kolmonen, and Antti Arola
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1533–1543, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1533-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluation of biases in mid-to-high-latitude surface snowfall and cloud phase in ERA5 and CMIP6 using satellite observations
Franziska Hellmuth, Tim Carlsen, Anne Sophie Daloz, Robert Oscar David, Haochi Che, and Trude Storelvmo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1353–1383, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1353-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1353-2025, 2025
Short summary
Dynamical imprints on precipitation cluster statistics across a hierarchy of high-resolution simulations
Claudia Christine Stephan and Bjorn Stevens
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1209–1226, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1209-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1209-2025, 2025
Short summary
Role of a key microphysical factor in mixed-phase stratocumulus clouds and their interactions with aerosols
Seoung Soo Lee, Chang Hoon Jung, Jinho Choi, Young Jun Yoon, Junshik Um, Youtong Zheng, Jianping Guo, Manguttathil G. Manoj, and Sang-Keun Song
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 705–726, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-705-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-705-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Abel, S. J., Boutle, I. A., Waite, K., Fox, S., Brown, P. R., Cotton, R., Lloyd, G., Choularton, T. W., and Bower, K. N.: The Role of Precipitation in Controlling the Transition from Stratocumulus to Cumulus Clouds in a Northern Hemisphere Cold-Air Outbreak, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2293–2314, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0362.1, 2017.
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Williams, K. D., Field, P. R., and Lock, A. P.: The Surface Downwelling Solar Radiation Surplus over the Southern Ocean in the Met Office Model: The Role of Midlatitude Cyclone Clouds, J. Climate, 25, 7467–7486, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00702.1, 2012.
Bretherton, C. S., Macvean, M. K., Bechtold, P., Chlond, A., Cotton, W. R., Cuxart, J., Cuijpers, H., Mhairoutdinov, M., Kosovic, B., Lewellen, D., Moeng, C.-H., Siebesma, P., Stevens, B., Stevens, D. E., Sykes, I., and Wyant, M. C.: An intercomparison of radiatively driven entrainment and turbulence in a smoke cloud, as simulated by different numerical models, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 391–423, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555402, 1999.
Bryan, G. H. and Fritsch, J. M.: A Reevaluation of Ice-Liquid Water Potential Temperature, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 2421–2431, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<2421:AROIWP>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Connolly, P. J., Vaughan, G., Cook, P., Allen, G., Coe, H., Choularton, T. W., Dearden, C., and Hill, A.: Modelling the effects of gravity waves on stratocumulus clouds observed during VOCALS-UK, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7133–7152, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7133-2013, 2013.
Download
Short summary
Large-scale subsidence, associated with high-pressure systems, is often used in cloud-resolving models to maintain the height of boundary layer clouds; however, its influence on the small-scale interactions in mixed-phase clouds has not been previously investigated. Using large-eddy simulations, we have identified a relationship between subsidence and convection development in such clouds, with implications for mixed-phase boundary layer clouds forming in the ocean-exposed Arctic regions.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint