Articles | Volume 24, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8457-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8457-2024
Research article
 | 
26 Jul 2024
Research article |  | 26 Jul 2024

Finite domains cause bias in measured and modeled distributions of cloud sizes

Thomas D. DeWitt and Timothy J. Garrett

Related authors

A global analysis of the fractal properties of clouds revealing anisotropy of turbulence across scales
Karlie N. Rees, Timothy J. Garrett, Thomas D. DeWitt, Corey Bois, Steven K. Krueger, and Jérôme C. Riedi
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 497–513, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-497-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-497-2024, 2024
Short summary
Climatologically invariant scale invariance seen in distributions of cloud horizontal sizes
Thomas D. DeWitt, Timothy J. Garrett, Karlie N. Rees, Corey Bois, Steven K. Krueger, and Nicolas Ferlay
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 109–122, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-109-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-109-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Sensitivities of simulated mixed-phase Arctic multilayer clouds to primary and secondary ice processes
Gabriella Wallentin, Annika Oertel, Luisa Ickes, Peggy Achtert, Matthias Tesche, and Corinna Hoose
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6607–6631, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6607-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6607-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing glaciogenic seeding impacts in Australia's Snowy Mountains: an ensemble modeling approach
Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, Sarah A. Tessendorf, Thomas Chubb, Andrew Peace, Suzanne Kenyon, Johanna Speirs, Jamie Wolff, and Bill Petzke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6703–6724, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6703-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6703-2025, 2025
Short summary
How the representation of microphysical processes affects tropical condensate in the global storm-resolving model ICON
Ann Kristin Naumann, Monika Esch, and Bjorn Stevens
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6429–6444, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6429-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6429-2025, 2025
Short summary
Magnitude and timescale of liquid water path adjustments to cloud droplet number concentration perturbations for nocturnal non-precipitating marine stratocumulus
Yao-Sheng Chen, Prasanth Prabhakaran, Fabian Hoffmann, Jan Kazil, Takanobu Yamaguchi, and Graham Feingold
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6141–6159, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6141-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6141-2025, 2025
Short summary
Cold pools mediate mesoscale adjustments of trade-cumulus fields to changes in cloud droplet number concentration
Pouriya Alinaghi, Fredrik Jansson, Daniel A. Blázquez, and Franziska Glassmeier
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6121–6139, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6121-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6121-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Alstott, J., Bullmore, E., and Plenz, D.: powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions, PLOS ONE, 9, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085777, 2014. a
Beals, M. J., Fugal, J. P., Shaw, R. A., Lu, J., Spuler, S. M., and Stith, J. L.: Holographic measurements of inhomogeneous cloud mixing at the centimeter scale, Science, 350, 87–90, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24749476 (last access: 17 July 2024), 2015. a
Benner, T. C. and Curry, J. A.: Characteristics of small tropical cumulus clouds and their impact on the environment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 28753–28767, 1998. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., and West, G. B.: Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 7301–7306, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610172104, 2007. a
Bley, S., Deneke, H., Senf, F., and Scheck, L.: Metrics for the evaluation of warm convective cloud fields in a large-eddy simulation with Meteosat images, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2050–2060, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3067, 2017. a, b
Download
Short summary
There is considerable disagreement on mathematical parameters that describe the number of clouds of different sizes as well as the size of the largest clouds. Both are key defining characteristics of Earth's atmosphere. A previous study provided an incorrect explanation for the disagreement. Instead, the disagreement may be explained by prior studies not properly accounting for the size of their measurement domain. We offer recommendations for how the domain size can be accounted for.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint