Articles | Volume 24, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4949-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4949-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
29 Apr 2024
Research article |
| 29 Apr 2024
| 29 Apr 2024
Summertime tropospheric ozone source apportionment study in the Madrid region (Spain)
David de la Paz
Laboratory of Environmental Modelling, Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, (UPM), c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Laboratory of Environmental Modelling, Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, (UPM), c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Juan Manuel de Andrés
Laboratory of Environmental Modelling, Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, (UPM), c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Luis Tovar
Laboratory of Environmental Modelling, Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, (UPM), c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Golam Sarwar
Center for Environmental Measurement & Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
Sergey L. Napelenok
Center for Environmental Measurement & Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Qingfang Su, Yifei Chen, Yangjun Wang, David C. Wong, Havala O. T. Pye, Ling Huang, Golam Sarwar, Benjamin Murphy, Bryan Place, and Li Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3627, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3627, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the PM2.5 simulation by the latest CRACMM mechanism coupled with CMAQ, covering different seasons and specific regions over China. Results derived by CRACMM are compared with two well-established chemical mechanisms, Saprc07 and CB6. Differences in PM2.5 and SOA drivers between CRACMM and the two existing mechanisms are further explored. Results provide a solid foundation for the further application of CRACMM in understanding and regulating air pollution globally.
Sara L. Farrell, Havala O. T. Pye, Robert Gilliam, George Pouliot, Deanna Huff, Golam Sarwar, William Vizuete, Nicole Briggs, Fengkui Duan, Tao Ma, Shuping Zhang, and Kathleen Fahey
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3287–3312, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3287-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3287-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we implement heterogeneous sulfur chemistry into the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. This new chemistry accounts for the formation of sulfate via aqueous oxidation of SO2 in aerosol liquid water and the formation of hydroxymethanesulfonate (HMS) – often confused by measurement techniques as sulfate. Model performance in predicting sulfur PM2.5 in Fairbanks, Alaska, and other places that experience dark and cold winters is improved.
Yuzhi Jin, Jiandong Wang, Chao Liu, David C. Wong, Golam Sarwar, Kathleen M. Fahey, Shang Wu, Jiaping Wang, Jing Cai, Zeyuan Tian, Zhouyang Zhang, Jia Xing, Aijun Ding, and Shuxiao Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2613–2630, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2613-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2613-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Black carbon (BC) affects climate and the environment, and its aging process alters its properties. Current models, like WRF-CMAQ, lack full accounting for it. We developed the WRF-CMAQ-BCG model to better represent BC aging by introducing bare and coated BC species and their conversion. The WRF-CMAQ-BCG model introduces the capability to simulate BC mixing states and bare and coated BC wet deposition, and it improves the accuracy of BC mass concentration and aerosol optics.
David C. Wong, Jeff Willison, Jonathan E. Pleim, Golam Sarwar, James Beidler, Russ Bullock, Jerold A. Herwehe, Rob Gilliam, Daiwen Kang, Christian Hogrefe, George Pouliot, and Hosein Foroutan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7855–7866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work describe how we linked the meteorological Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) air quality model to form a coupled modelling system. This could be used to study air quality or climate and air quality interaction at a global scale. This new model scales well in high-performance computing environments and performs well with respect to ground surface networks in terms of ozone and PM2.5.
Bryan K. Place, William T. Hutzell, K. Wyat Appel, Sara Farrell, Lukas Valin, Benjamin N. Murphy, Karl M. Seltzer, Golam Sarwar, Christine Allen, Ivan R. Piletic, Emma L. D'Ambro, Emily Saunders, Heather Simon, Ana Torres-Vasquez, Jonathan Pleim, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Matthew M. Coggon, Lu Xu, William R. Stockwell, and Havala O. T. Pye
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 9173–9190, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9173-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9173-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-level ozone is a pollutant with adverse human health and ecosystem effects. Air quality models allow scientists to understand the chemical production of ozone and demonstrate impacts of air quality management plans. In this work, the role of multiple systems in ozone production was investigated for the northeastern US in summer. Model updates to chemical reaction rates and monoterpene chemistry were most influential in decreasing predicted ozone and improving agreement with observations.
Havala O. T. Pye, Bryan K. Place, Benjamin N. Murphy, Karl M. Seltzer, Emma L. D'Ambro, Christine Allen, Ivan R. Piletic, Sara Farrell, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Matthew M. Coggon, Emily Saunders, Lu Xu, Golam Sarwar, William T. Hutzell, Kristen M. Foley, George Pouliot, Jesse Bash, and William R. Stockwell
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5043–5099, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5043-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5043-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Chemical mechanisms describe how emissions from vehicles, vegetation, and other sources are chemically transformed in the atmosphere to secondary products including criteria and hazardous air pollutants. The Community Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Multiphase Mechanism integrates gas-phase radical chemistry with pathways to fine-particle mass. New species were implemented, resulting in a bottom-up representation of organic aerosol, which is required for accurate source attribution of pollutants.
Qian Shu, Sergey L. Napelenok, William T. Hutzell, Kirk R. Baker, Barron H. Henderson, Benjamin N. Murphy, and Christian Hogrefe
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2303–2322, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Source attribution methods are generally used to determine culpability of precursor emission sources to ambient pollutant concentrations. However, source attribution of secondarily formed pollutants such as ozone and its precursors cannot be explicitly measured, making evaluation of source apportionment methods challenging. In this study, multiple apportionment approach comparisons show common features but still reveal wide variations in predicted sector contribution and species dependency.
James D. East, Barron H. Henderson, Sergey L. Napelenok, Shannon N. Koplitz, Golam Sarwar, Robert Gilliam, Allen Lenzen, Daniel Q. Tong, R. Bradley Pierce, and Fernando Garcia-Menendez
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15981–16001, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15981-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15981-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a framework that uses a computer model of air quality, along with air pollution data from satellite instruments, to estimate emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) across the Northern Hemisphere. The framework, which advances current methods to infer emissions from satellite observations, provides observationally constrained NOx estimates, including in regions of the world where emissions are highly uncertain, and can improve simulations of air pollutants relevant for health and policy.
Shuping Zhang, Golam Sarwar, Jia Xing, Biwu Chu, Chaoyang Xue, Arunachalam Sarav, Dian Ding, Haotian Zheng, Yujing Mu, Fengkui Duan, Tao Ma, and Hong He
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15809–15826, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15809-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15809-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Six heterogeneous HONO chemistry updates in CMAQ significantly improve HONO concentration. HONO production is primarily controlled by the heterogeneous reactions on ground and aerosol surfaces during haze. Additional HONO chemistry updates increase OH and production of secondary aerosols: sulfate, nitrate, and SOA.
Syuichi Itahashi, Rohit Mathur, Christian Hogrefe, Sergey L. Napelenok, and Yang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5751–5768, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system extended for hemispheric-scale applications (H-CMAQ) incorporated the satellite-constrained degassing SO2 emissions from 50 volcanos across the Northern Hemisphere. The impact on tropospheric sulfate aerosol (SO42−) is assessed for 2010. Although the considered volcanic emissions occurred at or below the middle of free troposphere (500 hPa), SO42− enhancements of more than 10 % were detected up to the top of free troposphere (250 hPa).
Benjamin N. Murphy, Christopher G. Nolte, Fahim Sidi, Jesse O. Bash, K. Wyat Appel, Carey Jang, Daiwen Kang, James Kelly, Rohit Mathur, Sergey Napelenok, George Pouliot, and Havala O. T. Pye
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3407–3420, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3407-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3407-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The algorithms for applying air pollution emission rates in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model have been improved to better support users and developers. The new features accommodate emissions perturbation studies that are typical in atmospheric research and output a wealth of metadata for each model run so assumptions can be verified and documented. The new approach dramatically enhances the transparency and functionality of this critical aspect of atmospheric modeling.
K. Wyat Appel, Jesse O. Bash, Kathleen M. Fahey, Kristen M. Foley, Robert C. Gilliam, Christian Hogrefe, William T. Hutzell, Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Benjamin N. Murphy, Sergey L. Napelenok, Christopher G. Nolte, Jonathan E. Pleim, George A. Pouliot, Havala O. T. Pye, Limei Ran, Shawn J. Roselle, Golam Sarwar, Donna B. Schwede, Fahim I. Sidi, Tanya L. Spero, and David C. Wong
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2867–2897, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2867-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2867-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper details the scientific updates in the recently released CMAQ version 5.3 (and v5.3.1) and also includes operational and diagnostic evaluations of CMAQv5.3.1 against observations and the previous version of the CMAQ (v5.2.1). This work was done to improve the underlying science in CMAQ. This article is used to inform the CMAQ modeling community of the updates to the modeling system and the expected change in model performance from these updates (versus the previous model version).
David Garcia-Nieto, Nuria Benavent, Rafael Borge, and Alfonso Saiz-Lopez
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2941–2955, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2941-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2941-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Trace gases play a key role in the chemistry of urban atmospheres. Therefore, knowledge about their spatial distribution is needed to fully characterize the air quality in urban areas. Using a new Multi-AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy two-dimensional (MAXDOAS-2D) instrument, along with inversion algorithms, we report for the first time two-dimensional maps of NO2 concentrations in the city of Madrid, Spain.
Yilin Chen, Huizhong Shen, Jennifer Kaiser, Yongtao Hu, Shannon L. Capps, Shunliu Zhao, Amir Hakami, Jhih-Shyang Shih, Gertrude K. Pavur, Matthew D. Turner, Daven K. Henze, Jaroslav Resler, Athanasios Nenes, Sergey L. Napelenok, Jesse O. Bash, Kathleen M. Fahey, Gregory R. Carmichael, Tianfeng Chai, Lieven Clarisse, Pierre-François Coheur, Martin Van Damme, and Armistead G. Russell
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2067–2082, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2067-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2067-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ammonia (NH3) emissions can exert adverse impacts on air quality and ecosystem well-being. NH3 emission inventories are viewed as highly uncertain. Here we optimize the NH3 emission estimates in the US using an air quality model and NH3 measurements from the IASI satellite instruments. The optimized NH3 emissions are much higher than the National Emissions Inventory estimates in April. The optimized NH3 emissions improved model performance when evaluated against independent observation.
Cited articles
AEMET: Informe Anual 2016, Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, https://www.aemet.es/documentos/es/conocenos/a_que_nos_dedicamos/informes/InformeAnualAEMET_2016_web.pdf (last access: 5 January 2023), 2017.
AM: Ayuntamiento de Madrid (AM), Inventario de emisiones de contaminantes a la atmósfera en el Término Municipal de Madrid, https://www.madrid.es/UnidadesDescentralizadas/Sostenibilidad/EspeInf/Acci%C3%B3nClim%C3%A1tica/2EstudiosInventarios/4aInventario/ficheros/Inventario%20de%20Emisiones%20Contaminantes%20a%20la%20Atm%C3%B3sfera%20Ayto.%20Madrid%202021.pdf (last access: 7 January 2023), 2021.
AM: Calidad del Aire Madrid, https://www.madrid.es/UnidadesDescentralizadas/Sostenibilidad/EspeInf/Acci%C3%B3nClim%C3%A1tica/2EstudiosInventarios/4aInventario/ficheros/Inventario%20de%20Emisiones%20Contaminantes%20a%20la%20Atm%C3%B3sfera%20Ayto.%20Madrid%202021.pdf (last access: 7 January 2023), 2022.
Amann, M., Bertok, I., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., Klimont, Z., Rafaj, P., Schöpp,W., and Wagner, F.: National Emission Ceilings for 2020 based on the 2008 Climate & Energy Package, NEC Scenario Analysis Report No. 6, Final report to the European Commission, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria, https://previous.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/researchPrograms/air/policy/NEC6-final110708.pdf (last access: 12 June 2023), 2008.
Appel, K. W., Pouliot, G. A., Simon, H., Sarwar, G., Pye, H. O. T., Napelenok, S. L., Akhtar, F., and Roselle, S. J.: Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 883–899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013, 2013.
Baek, B. H. and Seppanen, C.: Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) Modeling System (Version SMOKE User's Documentation), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1421403, 2018.
Baker, K., Woody, M., Tonnesen, G., Hutzell, W., Pye, H., Beaver, M., Pouliot, G., and Pierce, T.: Contribution of regional-scale fire events to ozone and PM2.5 air quality estimated by photochemical modeling approaches, Atmos. Environ., 140, 539–554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.032, 2016.
Banerjee, A., Maycock, A. C., Archibald, A. T., Abraham, N. L., Telford, P., Braesicke, P., and Pyle, J. A.: Drivers of changes in stratospheric and tropospheric ozone between year 2000 and 2100, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2727–2746, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2727-2016, 2016.
Bates, D., Bell, G., Burnham, C., Hazucha, M., Mantha, J., Pengelly, L., and Silverman, F.: Short-term effects of ozone on the lung, J. Appl. Physiol., 32, 176–181, https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1972.32.2.176, 1972.
Bell, M. L., McDermott, A., Zeger, S. L., Samet, J. M., and Dominici, F.: Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities, 1987–2000, JAMA, 292, 2372–2378, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.19.2372, 2004.
Borge, R., Alexandrov, V., Del Vas, J. J., Lumbreras, J., and Rodríguez, E.: A comprehensive sensitivity analysis of the WRF model for air quality applications over the Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Environ., 42, 8560–8574, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.032, 2008a.
Borge, R., Lumbreras, J., and Rodríguez, E.: Development of a high-resolution emission inventory for Spain using the SMOKE modelling system: a case study for the years 2000 and 2010, Environ. Modell. Softw., 23, 1026–1044, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.11.002, 2008b.
Borge, R., López, J., Lumbreras, J., Narros, A., and Rodríguez, E.: Influence of boundary conditions on CMAQ simulations over the Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2681–2695, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.04.044, 2010.
Borge, R., Lumbreras, J., Pérez, J., de la Paz, D., Vedrenne, M., de Andrés, J. M., and Rodríguez, M. E.: Emission inventories and modeling requirements for the development of air quality plans. Application to Madrid (Spain), Sci. Total Environ., 466–467, 809–819, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.093, 2014.
Borge, R., Santiago, J. L., de la Paz, D., Martín, F., Domingo, J., Valdes, C., Sanchez, B., Rivas, E., Rozas, M. T., Lázaro, S., Perez, J., and Fernandez, A.: Application of a short term air quality action plan in Madrid (Spain) under a high-pollution episode – Part II: Assessment from multi-scale modelling, Sci. Total Environ., 635, 1574–1584, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.323, 2018.
Borge, R., Requia, W. J., Yagüe, C., Jhun, I., and Koutrakis, P.: Impact of weather changes on air quality and related mortality in Spain over a 25 year period [1993–2017], Environ. Int., 133, 105272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105272, 2019.
Borge, R., de la Paz, D., Sarwar, G., and Napelenok, S.: Comparison of source apportionment methods using CMAQ for the Madrid region, in: 21st Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, 17–19 October 2022, https://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2022/slides/0920am_ComparisonSourceApportionment_RBorge.pptx (last access: 11 February 2023), 2022.
Brodin, M., Helmig, D., and Oltmans, S.: Seasonal ozone behavior along an elevation gradient in the Colorado Front Range Mountains, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5305–5315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.033, 2010.
Brook, J. R., Makar, P. A., Sills, D. M. L., Hayden, K. L., and McLaren, R.: Exploring the nature of air quality over southwestern Ontario: main findings from the Border Air Quality and Meteorology Study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10461–10482, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10461-2013, 2013.
Butler, T., Lupascu, A., Coates, J., and Zhu, S.: TOAST 1.0: Tropospheric Ozone Attribution of Sources with Tagging for CESM 1.2.2, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2825–2840, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2825-2018, 2018.
Butler, T., Lupascu, A., and Nalam, A.: Attribution of ground-level ozone to anthropogenic and natural sources of nitrogen oxides and reactive carbon in a global chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10707–10731, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10707-2020, 2020.
Byun, D. and Schere, K. L.: Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 51–77, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2128636, 2006.
Cao, J., Qiu, X., Liu, Y., Yan, X., Gao, J., and Peng, L.: Identifying the dominant driver of elevated surface ozone concentration in North China plain during summertime 2012–2017, Environ. Pollut., 300, 118912, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118912, 2022.
Carnero, J. A. A., Bolívar, J. P., and Benito, A.: Surface ozone measurements in the southwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Huelva, Spain), Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 17, 355–368, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0098-9, 2009.
Carter, W. P. L.: Updated maximum incremental reactivity scale and hydrocarbon bin reactivities for regulatory applications, California Air Resources Board Contract, vol. 339, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2009/mir2009/mir10.pdf (last access: 7 February 2023), 2009.
Carter, W. P. L. and Atkinson, R.: Computer modeling study of incremental hydrocarbon reactivity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 23, 864–880, https://doi.org/10.1021/es00065a017, 1989.
Ching, J. and Byun, D.: Introduction to the Models-3 framework and the Community Multiscale Air Quality model (CMAQ), Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System, https://www.cmascenter.org/cmaq/science_documentation/pdf/ch01.pdf (last access: 21 November 2022), 1999.
Ciccioli, P., Silibello, C., Finardi, S., Pepe, N., Ciccioli, P., Rapparini, F., Neri, L., Fares, S., Brilli, F., Mircea, M., Magliulo, E., and Baraldi, R.: The potential impact of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) from terrestrial vegetation on a Mediterranean area using two different emission models, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 328, 109255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109255, 2023.
CM: Inventario de emisiones a la atmósfera en la Comunidad de Madrid. Años 1990–2018, Comunidad de Madrid, Dirección General de Sostenibilidad y Cambio Climático, https://www.comunidad.madrid/sites/default/files/doc/medio-ambiente/documento_de_sintesis_inventario_de_emisiones_comunidad_de_madrid.pdf (last access: 14 August 2022), 2021.
Coggon, M. M., Gkatzelis, G. I., McDonald, B. C., Gilman, J. B., Schwantes, R. H., Abuhassan, N., and Warneke, C.: Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2026653118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026653118, 2021.
Cohan, D. S. and Napelenok, S. L.: Air quality response modeling for decision support, Atmosphere, 2, 407–425, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2030407, 2011.
Collet, S., Kidokoro, T., Karamchandani, P., Jung, J., and Shah, T.: Future year ozone source attribution modeling study using CMAQ-ISAM, J. Air Waste Manage., 68, 1239–1247, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2018.1496954, 2018.
De Andrés, J. M., Borge, R., De La Paz, D., Lumbreras, J., and Rodríguez, E.: Implementation of a module for risk of ozone impacts assessment to vegetation in the Integrated Assessment Modelling system for the Iberian Peninsula. Evaluation for wheat and Holm oak, Environ. Pollut., 165, 25–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.01.048, 2012.
de la Paz, D., Borge, R., and Martilli, A.: Assessment of a high resolution annual WRF-BEP/CMAQ simulation for the urban area of Madrid (Spain), Atmos. Environ., 144, 282–296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.082, 2016.
de la Paz, D., Borge, R., Perez, J., and de Andrés, J. M.: Contributions to summer ground-level O3 in the Madrid Region, Proceedings of Abstracts of the 12th International Conference on Air Quality Science and Application, Thessaloniki, Greece, 18–22 May 2020, 153, https://doi.org/10.18745/PB.22217, 2020.
Dunker, A. M., Koo, B., and Yarwood, G.: Ozone sensitivity to isoprene chemistry and emissions and anthropogenic emissions in central California, Atmos. Environ., 145, 326–337, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.048, 2016.
EEA: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019. Technical guidance to prepare national emission inventories, EEA Report no. 13/2019, European Environmental Agency (EEA), https://doi.org/10.2800/293657, https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2019 (last access: 22 January 2023), 2019.
EEA: Air quality in europe 2020 report, European Environment Agency, https://doi.org/10.2800/786656, 2020.
EEA: European Union emission inventory report 1990–2020 under the UNECE Air Convention European Environment Agency, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, https://doi.org/10.2800/928370, 2022.
Emery, C., Jung, J., Koo, B., and Yarwood, G.: Final Report, Improvements to CAMx Snow Cover Treatments and Carbon Bond Chemical Mechanism for Winter Ozone, Tech. rep., Ramboll Environ, https://www.camx.com/files/emaq4-07_task7_techmemo_r1_1aug16.pdf (last access: 22 March 2023), 2015.
Escudero, M., Segers, A., Kranenburg, R., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Borge, R., de la Paz, D., Gangoiti, G., and Schaap, M.: Analysis of summer O3 in the Madrid air basin with the LOTOS-EUROS chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14211–14232, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14211-2019, 2019.
European Environment Agency, Guerreiro, C., Colette, A., Leeuw, F., and González Ortiz, A.: Air quality in Europe 2018 report, European Environmental Agency (EEA), Publications Office, https://doi.org/10.2800/777411, 2018.
García, R., Prieto, L., Díaz, J., Hernández, E., and del Teso, T.: Synoptic conditions leading to extremely high temperatures in Madrid, Ann. Geophys., 20, 237–245, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-20-237-2002, 2002.
Garrido-Pérez, J. M., Ordóñez, C., García-Herrera, R., and Schnell, J. L.: The differing impact of air stagnation on near-surface ozone across Europe, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-9213, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9213, 2020.
Gaudel, A., Cooper, O., Ancellet, G., Barret, B., Boynard, A., Burrows, J., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Cuesta, J., and Cuevas Agulló, E.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Presentday distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone relevant to climate and global atmospheric chemistry model evaluation, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 39, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.291, 2018.
Goodman, J. E., Zu, K., Loftus, C. T., Lynch, H. N., Prueitt, R. L., Mohar, I., Shubin, S. P., and Sax, S. N.: Short-term ozone exposure and asthma severity: Weight-of-evidence analysis, Environ. Res., 160, 391–397, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.018, 2018.
Granados-Muñoz, M. J. and Leblanc, T.: Tropospheric ozone seasonal and long-term variability as seen by lidar and surface measurements at the JPL-Table Mountain Facility, California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9299–9319, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9299-2016, 2016.
Grewe, V., Tsati, E., Mertens, M., Frömming, C., and Jöckel, P.: Contribution of emissions to concentrations: the TAGGING 1.0 submodel based on the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy 2.52), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2615–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2615-2017, 2017.
Guenther, A., Karl, T., Harley, P., Wiedinmyer, C., Palmer, P. I., and Geron, C.: Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3181–3210, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3181-2006, 2006.
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012, 2012.
Han, X., Zhu, L., Wang, S., Meng, X., Zhang, M., and Hu, J.: Modeling study of impacts on surface ozone of regional transport and emissions reductions over North China Plain in summer 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12207–12221, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12207-2018, 2018.
Harmens, H., Mills, G., Hayes, F., and Norris, D.: Air pollution and vegetation: ICP Vegetation annual report 2010/2011, ISBN 978-1-906698-26-3, 2011.
Hsu, J., Prather, M. J., and Wild, O.: Diagnosing the stratosphere-to-troposphere flux of ozone in a chemistry transport model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D19305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006045, 2005.
Hsu, Y., Strait, R., Roe, S., and Holoman, D.: SPECIATE 4.0 Speciation database development documentation: Final Report, EPA/600/R-06/161, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and and Development U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=459904&Lab=NRMRL (last access: 21 March 2023), 2006.
IPCC: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp., ISBN 978-0-521-88009-1, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/ar4_wg1_full_report-1.pdf (last access: 21 March 2023), 2007.
IPCC: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., and Minx, J. C., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, ISBN 978-1-107-05821-7, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_full.pdf (last access: 21 March 2023), 2014.
Jenkin, M. E. and Clemitshaw, K. C.: Ozone and other secondary photochemical pollutants: chemical processes governing their formation in the planetary boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2499–2527, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00478-1, 2000.
Jerrett, M., Burnett, R. T., Pope III, C. A., Ito, K., Thurston, G., Krewski, D., Shi, Y., Calle, E., and Thun, M.: Long-term ozone exposure and mortality, New Engl. J. Med., 360, 1085–1095, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa0803894 (last access: 24 March 2023), 2009.
Jhun, I., Coull, B. A., Zanobetti, A., and Koutrakis, P.: The impact of nitrogen oxides concentration decreases on ozone trends in the USA, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 8, 283–292, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-014-0279-2, 2015.
Jiang, J., Aksoyoglu, S., Ciarelli, G., Oikonomakis, E., El-Haddad, I., Canonaco, F., O'Dowd, C., Ovadnevaite, J., Minguillón, M. C., Baltensperger, U., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Effects of two different biogenic emission models on modelled ozone and aerosol concentrations in Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3747–3768, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3747-2019, 2019.
Jung, D., de la Paz, D., Notario, A., and Borge, R.: Analysis of emissions-driven changes in the oxidation capacity of the atmosphere in Europe, Sci. Total Environ., 827, 154126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154126, 2022.
Jung, D., Soler, R., de la Paz, D., Notario, A., Muñoz, A., Ródenas, M., Vera, T., Borrás, E., and Borge, R.: Oxidation capacity changes in the atmosphere of large urban areas in Europe: Modelling and experimental campaigns in atmospheric simulation chambers, Chemosphere, 341, 139919, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139919, 2023.
Karamchandani, P., Long, Y., Pirovano, G., Balzarini, A., and Yarwood, G.: Source-sector contributions to European ozone and fine PM in 2010 using AQMEII modeling data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5643–5664, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5643-2017, 2017.
Kwok, R. H. F., Napelenok, S. L., and Baker, K. R.: Implementation and evaluation of PM2.5 source contribution analysis in a photochemical model, Atmos. Environ., 80, 398–407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.017, 2013.
Kwok, R. H. F., Baker, K. R., Napelenok, S. L., and Tonnesen, G. S.: Photochemical grid model implementation and application of VOC, NOx, and O3 source apportionment, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 99–114, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-99-2015, 2015.
Li, X., Qin, M., Li, L., Gong, K., Shen, H., Li, J., and Hu, J.: Examining the implications of photochemical indicators for O3–NOx–VOC sensitivity and control strategies: a case study in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14799–14811, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14799-2022, 2022.
Logan, J. A.: Tropospheric ozone: Seasonal behavior, trends, and anthropogenic influence, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 90, 10463–10482, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD090iD06p10463, 1985.
Lu, X., Ye, X., Zhou, M., Zhao, Y., Weng, H., Kong, H., Li, K., Gao, M., Zheng, B., and Lin, J.: The underappreciated role of agricultural soil nitrogen oxide emissions in ozone pollution regulation in North China, Nat. Commun., 12, 5021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25147-9, 2021.
Lupaşcu, A., Otero, N., Minkos, A., and Butler, T.: Attribution of surface ozone to NOx and volatile organic compound sources during two different high ozone events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11675–11699, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11675-2022, 2022.
Massagué, J., Escudero, M., Alastuey, A., Mantilla, E., Monfort, E., Gangoiti, G., García-Pando, C. P., and Querol, X.: Spatiotemporal variations of tropospheric ozone in Spain (2008–2019), Environ. Int., 176, 107961, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.107961, 2023.
Mathur, R., Xing, J., Gilliam, R., Sarwar, G., Hogrefe, C., Pleim, J., Pouliot, G., Roselle, S., Spero, T. L., Wong, D. C., and Young, J.: Extending the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system to hemispheric scales: overview of process considerations and initial applications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12449–12474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12449-2017, 2017.
Meng, Y., Song, J., Zeng, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, X., Guo, H., Zhong, L., Ou, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhang, T., Yue, D., and Lai, S.: Ambient volatile organic compounds at a receptor site in the Pearl River Delta region: Variations, source apportionment and effects on ozone formation, J. Environ. Sci., 111, 104–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.02.024, 2022.
Meul, S., Langematz, U., Kröger, P., Oberländer-Hayn, S., and Jöckel, P.: Future changes in the stratosphere-to-troposphere ozone mass flux and the contribution from climate change and ozone recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7721–7738, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7721-2018, 2018.
Millán, M. M., Mantilla, E., Salvador, R., Carratalá, A., Sanz, M. J., Alonso, L., Gangoiti, G., and Navazo, M.: Ozone cycles in the western Mediterranean basin: interpretation of monitoring data in complex coastal terrain, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 487–508, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0487:OCITWM>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Mills, G., Pleijel, H., Braun, S., Büker, P., Bermejo, V., Calvo, E., Danielsson, H., Emberson, L., Fernández, I. G., and Grünhage, L.: New stomatal flux-based critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation, Atmos. Environ., 45, 5064–5068, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.009, 2011.
MMA: Inventario Nacional de contaminantes atmosféricos, https://unfccc.int/resource/podcast/nir/ES_NIR_UNFCCC_2018.pdf (last access: 24 March 2023), 2018.
Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.: Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015, 2015.
Napelenok, S.: Description of the ISAM Chemistry Method, https://github.com/USEPA/CMAQ/blob/main/DOCS/Users_Guide/CMAQ_UG_ch11_ISAM.md (last access: 24 March 2023), 2020.
Nguyen, D.-H., Lin, C., Vu, C.-T., Cheruiyot, N. K., Nguyen, M. K., Le, T. H., Lukkhasorn, W., and Bui, X.-T.: Tropospheric ozone and NOX: a review of worldwide variation and meteorological influences, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 28, 102809, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102809, 2022.
Oliveira, K., Guevara, M., Jorba, O., Querol, X., and García-Pando, C. P.: A new NMVOC speciated inventory for a reactivity-based approach to support ozone control strategies in Spain, Sci. Total Environ., 867, 161449, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161449, 2023.
Otte, T. L. and Pleim, J. E.: The Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP) for the CMAQ modeling system: updates through MCIPv3.4.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 243–256, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-243-2010, 2010.
Paoletti, E., De Marco, A., Beddows, D. C., Harrison, R. M., and Manning, W. J.: Ozone levels in European and USA cities are increasing more than at rural sites, while peak values are decreasing, Environ. Pollut., 192, 295–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.04.040, 2014.
Pay, M. T., Gangoiti, G., Guevara, M., Napelenok, S., Querol, X., Jorba, O., and Pérez García-Pando, C.: Ozone source apportionment during peak summer events over southwestern Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5467–5494, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5467-2019, 2019.
Plaza, J., Pujadas, M., and Artíñano, B.: Formation and transport of the Madrid ozone plume, J. Air Waste Manage., 47, 766–774, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1997.10463938, 1997.
Poupkou, A., Giannaros, T., Markakis, K., Kioutsioukis, I., Curci, G., Melas, D., and Zerefos, C.: A model for European Biogenic Volatile Organic Compound emissions: Software development and first validation, Environ. Modell. Softw., 25, 1845–1856, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.05.004, 2010.
Qu, K., Wang, X., Cai, X., Yan, Y., Jin, X., Vrekoussis, M., Kanakidou, M., Brasseur, G. P., Shen, J., Xiao, T., Zeng, L., and Zhang, Y.: Rethinking the role of transport and photochemistry in regional ozone pollution: insights from ozone concentration and mass budgets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7653–7671, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7653-2023, 2023.
Qu, Z., Wu, D., Henze, D. K., Li, Y., Sonenberg, M., and Mao, F.: Transboundary transport of ozone pollution to a US border region: A case study of Yuma, Environ. Pollut., 273, 116421, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116421, 2021.
Quaassdorff, C., Borge, R., Pérez, J., Lumbreras, J., de la Paz, D., and de Andrés, J. M.: Microscale traffic simulation and emission estimation in a heavily trafficked roundabout in Madrid (Spain), Sci. Total Environ., 566, 416–427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.051, 2016.
Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Pandolfi, M., Reche, C., Pérez, N., Minguillón, M. C., Moreno, T., Viana, M., Escudero, M., and Orio, A.: 2001–2012 trends on air quality in Spain, Sci. Total Environ., 490, 957–969, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.074, 2014.
Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Reche, C., Orio, A., Pallares, M., Reina, F., Dieguez, J., Mantilla, E., Escudero, M., and Alonso, L.: On the origin of the highest ozone episodes in Spain, Sci. Total Environ., 572, 379–389, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.193, 2016.
Querol, X., Gangoiti, G., Mantilla, E., Alastuey, A., Minguillón, M. C., Amato, F., Reche, C., Viana, M., Moreno, T., Karanasiou, A., Rivas, I., Pérez, N., Ripoll, A., Brines, M., Ealo, M., Pandolfi, M., Lee, H.-K., Eun, H.-R., Park, Y.-H., Escudero, M., Beddows, D., Harrison, R. M., Bertrand, A., Marchand, N., Lyasota, A., Codina, B., Olid, M., Udina, M., Jiménez-Esteve, B., Soler, M. R., Alonso, L., Millán, M., and Ahn, K.-H.: Phenomenology of high-ozone episodes in NE Spain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2817–2838, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2817-2017, 2017.
Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Gangoiti, G., Perez, N., Lee, H. K., Eun, H. R., Park, Y., Mantilla, E., Escudero, M., Titos, G., Alonso, L., Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Moreta, J. R., Revuelta, M. A., Salvador, P., Artíñano, B., García dos Santos, S., Anguas, M., Notario, A., Saiz-Lopez, A., Harrison, R. M., Millán, M., and Ahn, K.-H.: Phenomenology of summer ozone episodes over the Madrid Metropolitan Area, central Spain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6511–6533, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6511-2018, 2018.
Reche, C., Moreno, T., Amato, F., Pandolfi, M., Pérez, J., de La Paz, D., Diaz, E., Gómez-Moreno, F., Pujadas, M., and Artíñano, B.: Spatio-temporal patterns of high summer ozone events in the Madrid Basin, Central Spain, Atmos. Environ., 185, 207–220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.002, 2018.
Saiz-Lopez, A., Borge, R., Notario, A., Adame, J. A., de la Paz, D., Querol, X., Artíñano, B., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., and Cuevas, C. A.: Unexpected increase in the oxidation capacity of the urban atmosphere of Madrid, Spain, Sci. Rep., 7, 45956, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45956, 2017.
San José, R., Stohl, A., Karatzas, K., Bohler, T., James, P., and Pérez, J. L.: A modelling study of an extraordinary night time ozone episode over Madrid domain, Environ. Modell. Softw., 20, 587–593, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.03.009, 2005.
Sartelet, K. N., Couvidat, F., Seigneur, C., and Roustan, Y.: Impact of biogenic emissions on air quality over Europe and North America, Atmos. Environ., 53, 131–141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.046, 2012.
Sarwar, G., Simon, H., Bhave, P., and Yarwood, G.: Examining the impact of heterogeneous nitryl chloride production on air quality across the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6455–6473, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6455-2012, 2012.
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-1-118-94740-1, 2016.
Seltzer, K. M., Shindell, D. T., and Malley, C. S.: Measurement-based assessment of health burdens from long-term ozone exposure in the United States, Europe, and China, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 104018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae29d, 2018.
Shu, Q., Napelenok, S. L., Hutzell, W. T., Baker, K. R., Henderson, B. H., Murphy, B. N., and Hogrefe, C.: Comparison of ozone formation attribution techniques in the northeastern United States, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2303–2322, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023, 2023.
Sicard, P., Agathokleous, E., Anenberg, S. C., De Marco, A., Paoletti, E., and Calatayud, V.: Trends in urban air pollution over the last two decades: A global perspective, Sci. Total Environ., 858, 160064, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160064, 2023.
Sillman, S.: The use of NOy, H2O2, and HNO3 as indicators for ozone-NOX-hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 14175–14188, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02953, 1995.
Simon, H., Valin, L. C., Baker, K. R., Henderson, B. H., Crawford, J. H., Pusede, S. E., Kelly, J. T., Foley, K. M., Chris Owen, R., and Cohen, R. C.: Characterizing CO and NOy sources and relative ambient ratios in the Baltimore area using ambient measurements and source attribution modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 3304–3320, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027688, 2018.
Simpson, D.: Biogenic emissions in Europe: 2. Implications for ozone control strategies, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 22891–22906, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01878, 1995.
Sitch, S., Cox, P., Collins, W., and Huntingford, C.: Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink, Nature, 448, 791, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06059, 2007.
Skamarock, W. C. and Klemp, J. B.: A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3465–3485, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.037, 2008.
Stevenson, D., Dentener, F., Schultz, M., Ellingsen, K., Van Noije, T., Wild, O., Zeng, G., Amann, M., Atherton, C., and Bell, N.: Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D08301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006338, 2006.
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M.: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_all_final.pdf (last access: 1 April 2023), 2013.
Tagaris, E., Sotiropoulou, R. E. P., Gounaris, N., Andronopoulos, S., and Vlachogiannis, D.: Impact of biogenic emissions on ozone and fine particles over Europe: Comparing effects of temperature increase and a potential anthropogenic NOX emissions abatement strategy, Atmos. Environ., 98, 214–223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.056, 2014.
Thunis, P., Clappier, A., Tarrasón, L., Cuvelier, C., Monteiro, A., Pisoni, E., Wesseling, J., Belis, C., Pirovano, G., and Janssen, S.: Source apportionment to support air quality planning: Strengths and weaknesses of existing approaches, Environ. Int., 130, 104825, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.019, 2019.
UNC: SMOKE's V365 User's Manual, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, https://www.cmascenter.org/smoke/documentation/3.6.5/manual_smokev365.pdf (last access: 22 November 2022), 2015.
U.S. EPA: Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v5.4 User Guide, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, https://github.com/USEPA/CMAQ/tree/5.4/DOCS/Users_Guide (last access: 22 January 2021), 2022.
US EPA Office of Research and Development: CMAQ (5.3.2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4081737, 2020.
Valverde, V., Pay, M. T., and Baldasano, J. M.: Ozone attributed to Madrid and Barcelona on-road transport emissions: Characterization of plume dynamics over the Iberian Peninsula, Sci. Total Environ., 543, 670–682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.070, 2016.
Visser, A. J., Boersma, K. F., Ganzeveld, L. N., and Krol, M. C.: European NOx emissions in WRF-Chem derived from OMI: impacts on summertime surface ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11821–11841, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11821-2019, 2019.
Wang, P., Schade, G., Estes, M., and Ying, Q.: Improved MEGAN predictions of biogenic isoprene in the contiguous United States, Atmos. Environ., 148, 337–351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.006, 2017.
Weng, H., Lin, J., Martin, R., Millet, B. M., Jaeglé, L., Ridley, D., Keller, C., Li, C., Du, M., and Meng, J.: Global high-resolution emissions of soil NOX, sea salt aerosols, and biogenic volatile organic compounds, Sci. Data, 7, 148, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0488-5, 2020.
Whitten, G. Z., Heo, G., Kimura, Y., McDonald-Buller, E., Allen, D. T., Carter, W. P., and Yarwood, G.: A new condensed toluene mechanism for Carbon Bond: CB05-TU, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5346–5355, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.029, 2010.
WHO: WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide: executive summary, ISBN 9789240034228, 2021.
Xu, J., Ma, J. Z., Zhang, X. L., Xu, X. B., Xu, X. F., Lin, W. L., Wang, Y., Meng, W., and Ma, Z. Q.: Measurements of ozone and its precursors in Beijing during summertime: impact of urban plumes on ozone pollution in downwind rural areas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12241–12252, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12241-2011, 2011.
Yarwood, G., Jung, J., Whitten, G., Heo, G., Mellberg, J., and Estes, M.: Updates to the Carbon Bond Mechanism for Version 6 (CB6), in: 9th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, 11–13 October 2010, 1–4, https://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2010/abstracts/emery_updates_carbon_2010.pdf (last access: 4 January 2023), 2010.
Yienger. J. J. and Levy II, H.: Empirical model of global soil-biogenic NOχ emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 11447–11464, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00370, 1995.
Young, P. J., Archibald, A. T., Bowman, K. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Naik, V., Stevenson, D. S., Tilmes, S., Voulgarakis, A., Wild, O., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R. M., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R. B., Shindell, D. T., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2063–2090, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013, 2013.
Zaveri, R. A., Berkowitz, C. M., Kleinman, L. I., Springston, S. R., Doskey, P. V., Lonneman, W. A., and Spicer, C. W.: Ozone production efficiency and NOX depletion in an urban plume: Interpretation of field observations and implications for evaluating O3-NOX-VOC sensitivity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4436, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003144, 2003.
Zhang, R., Cohan, A., Biazar, A. P., and Cohan, D. S.: Source apportionment of biogenic contributions to ozone formation over the United States, Atmos. Environ., 164, 8–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.044, 2017.
Zhang, S., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Du, X., Qu, L., Tang, W., Xu, J., and Meng, F.: Formation processes and source contributions of ground-level ozone in urban and suburban Beijing using the WRF-CMAQ modelling system, J. Environ. Sci., 127, 753–766, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.06.016, 2023.
Zhang, T., Xu, X., and Su, Y.: Impacts of Regional Transport and Meteorology on Ground-Level Ozone in Windsor, Canada, Atmosphere, 11, 1111, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11101111, 2020.
Zhang, Y., Yu, S., Chen, X., Li, Z., Li, M., Song, Z., Liu, W., Li, P., Zhang, X., Lichtfouse, E., and Rosenfeld, D.: Local production, downward and regional transport aggravated surface ozone pollution during the historical orange-alert large-scale ozone episode in eastern China, Environ. Chem. Lett., 20, 1577–1588, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01421-0, 2022.
Ziemke, J. R., Oman, L. D., Strode, S. A., Douglass, A. R., Olsen, M. A., McPeters, R. D., Bhartia, P. K., Froidevaux, L., Labow, G. J., Witte, J. C., Thompson, A. M., Haffner, D. P., Kramarova, N. A., Frith, S. M., Huang, L.-K., Jaross, G. R., Seftor, C. J., Deland, M. T., and Taylor, S. L.: Trends in global tropospheric ozone inferred from a composite record of TOMS/OMI/MLS/OMPS satellite measurements and the MERRA-2 GMI simulation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3257–3269, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3257-2019, 2019.
Zohdirad, H., Jiang, J., Aksoyoglu, S., Namin, M. M., Ashrafi, K., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Investigating sources of surface ozone in central Europe during the hot summer in 2018: High temperatures, but not so high ozone, Atmos. Environ., 279, 119099, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119099, 2022.
Short summary
This source apportionment modeling study shows that around 70 % of ground-level O3 in Madrid (Spain) is transported from other regions. Nonetheless, emissions from local sources, mainly road traffic, play a significant role, especially under atmospheric stagnation. Local measures during those conditions may be able to reduce O3 peaks by up to 30 % and, thus, lessen impacts from high-O3 episodes in the Madrid metropolitan area.
This source apportionment modeling study shows that around 70 % of ground-level O3 in Madrid...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint