Articles | Volume 24, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3009-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3009-2024
Research article
 | 
08 Mar 2024
Research article |  | 08 Mar 2024

Individual coal mine methane emissions constrained by eddy covariance measurements: low bias and missing sources

Kai Qin, Wei Hu, Qin He, Fan Lu, and Jason Blake Cohen

Related authors

A gapless 0.05° daytime-hourly tropospheric NO2 dataset (2019–2024) over key Asian hotspots reconstructed using physics-aware deep learning
Hongrui Gao, Qin He, Kai Qin, Jhoon Kim, Diego Loyola, Pravash Tiwari, Lingxiao Lu, and Jason B. Cohen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 7883–7914, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-7883-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-7883-2026, 2026
Short summary
Quantifying and attributing CO emissions over Central Asia using TROPOMI and explicit observational uncertainty
Ye Feng, Jason Blake Cohen, Xiaolu Li, Lingxiao Lu, Shuo Wang, Zhewen Liu, Lei Wang, Jian Liu, and Kai Qin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 15139–15159, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15139-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-15139-2026, 2026
Short summary
Evaluating When and Where TROPOMI XCH4 Uncertainties Yield Consistent Flux Estimation over East, South, and Central Asia
Wei Hu, Jason Blake Cohen, Lingxiao Lu, Bo Zheng, Pravash Tiwari, Simone Lolli, Andrea Garzelli, Jun Li, and Kai Qin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4468,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4468, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Reassessing the Reliability of WRF-CMAQ-Based PM2.5 Prediction from a Generalization Perspective
Xinqi Wei, Qin He, and Kai Qin
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIX-B3-2026, 1477–1485, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIX-B3-2026-1477-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIX-B3-2026-1477-2026, 2026
The added value of new ground-based observations in improving China's methane emission quantification
Huiru Zhong, Lu Shen, Fengwei Wan, Meng Qu, and Kai Qin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 4759–4778, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-4759-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-4759-2026, 2026
Short summary

Cited articles

Alberto, M. C. R., Wassmann, R., Buresh, R. J., Quilty, J. R., Correa, T. Q., Sandro, J. M., and Centeno, C. A. R.: Measuring methane flux from irrigated rice fields by eddy covariance method using open-path gas analyzer, Field Crop. Res., 160, 12–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.02.008, 2014. 
Allen, D.: Attributing Atmospheric Methane to Anthropogenic Emission Sources, Accounts Chem. Res., 49, 1344–1350, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00081, 2016. 
Allen, D. T., Torres, V. M., Thomas, J., Sullivan, D. W., Harrison, M., Hendler, A., Herndon, S. C., Kolb, C. E., Fraser, M. P., Hill, A. D., Lamb, B. K., Miskimins, J., Sawyer, R. F., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 18023–18023, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304880110, 2013. 
Andrews, A. E., Kofler, J. D., Trudeau, M. E., Williams, J. C., Neff, D. H., Masarie, K. A., Chao, D. Y., Kitzis, D. R., Novelli, P. C., Zhao, C. L., Dlugokencky, E. J., Lang, P. M., Crotwell, M. J., Fischer, M. L., Parker, M. J., Lee, J. T., Baumann, D. D., Desai, A. R., Stanier, C. O., De Wekker, S. F. J., Wolfe, D. E., Munger, J. W., and Tans, P. P.: CO2, CO, and CH4 measurements from tall towers in the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory's Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network: instrumentation, uncertainty analysis, and recommendations for future high-accuracy greenhouse gas monitoring efforts, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 647–687, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-647-2014, 2014. 
Arad, V., Arad, S., Cosma, V. A., Suvar, M., and Sgem: Gazodinamic regime on geomechanics point of view for jiu valley coal beds, 14th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference (SGEM), Albena, Bulgaria, 17–26, Jun, 2014, 269–276, https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2014/B13/S3.036, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
We compute CH4 emissions and uncertainty on a mine-by-mine basis, including underground, overground, and abandoned mines. Mine-by-mine gas and flux data and 30 min observations from a flux tower located next to a mine shaft are integrated. The observed variability and bias correction are propagated over the emissions dataset, demonstrating that daily observations may not cover the range of variability. Comparisons show both an emissions magnitude and spatial mismatch with current inventories.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint