Articles | Volume 22, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
11 Oct 2022
Research article |
| 11 Oct 2022
| 11 Oct 2022
Dynamics of ENSO-driven stratosphere-to-troposphere transport of ozone over North America
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
Amy H. Butler
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
Andrew O. Langford
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
Dillon Elsbury
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
Melissa L. Breeden
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA
Related authors
John R. Albers, Matthew Newman, Magdalena A. Balmaseda, William Sweet, Yan Wang, and Tongtong Xu
Ocean Sci., 21, 1761–1785, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1761-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1761-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Providing early warning of coastal flooding is an emerging priority for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. We assess whether current operational forecast models can provide the basis for predicting the risks of higher-than-normal coastal sea level values up to 6 weeks in advance. For many United States coastal locations, models have sufficient prediction skill to be used as the basis for the development of a high tide flooding prediction system on subseasonal timescales.
Melissa Leah Breeden, Andrew Hoell, Rochelle Pauline Worsnop, John Robert Albers, Michael T. Hobbins, Rachel Maya Robinson, and Daniel James Vimont
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-115, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-115, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We explore the predictability of saturation vapor pressure deficit (VPD), a key indicator of wildfire danger, one to 18 months in advance. Seasonal VPD forecasts are generated using a statistical dynamical model that produces high VPD skill related to a long-term warming trend and sea surface temperatures. Understanding where forecast skill comes from is important to for improving forecast models, and this study shows the role of multiple unique processes in contributing to VPD forecasts.
Melissa Leah Breeden, Andrew Hoell, John Robert Albers, and Kimberly Slinski
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 963–980, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-963-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-963-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We compare the month-to-month evolution of daily precipitation over central southwest Asia (CSWA), a data-sparse, food-insecure area prone to drought and flooding. The seasonality of CSWA precipitation aligns with the seasonality of warm conveyor belts (WCBs), the warm, rapidly ascending airstreams associated with extratropical storms, most common from February–April. El Niño conditions are related to more WCBs and precipitation and La Niña conditions the opposite, except in January.
Dillon Elsbury, Amy H. Butler, John R. Albers, Melissa L. Breeden, and Andrew O'Neil Langford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5101–5117, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5101-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5101-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
One of the global hotspots where stratosphere-to-troposphere transport (STT) of ozone takes place is over Pacific North America (PNA). However, we do not know how or if STT over PNA will change in response to climate change. Using climate model experiments forced with
worst-casescenario Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 climate change, we find that changes in net chemical production and transport of ozone in the lower stratosphere increase STT of ozone over PNA in the future.
Melissa L. Breeden, John R. Albers, and Andrew Hoell
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1183–1197, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1183-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1183-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We use a statistical dynamical model to generate precipitation forecasts for lead times of 2–6 weeks over southwest Asia, which are needed to support humanitarian food distribution. The model signal-to-noise ratio is used to identify a smaller subset of forecasts with particularly high skill, so-called subseasonal forecasts of opportunity (SFOs). Precipitation SFOs are often related to slowly evolving tropical phenomena, namely the El Niño–Southern Oscillation and Madden–Julian Oscillation.
John R. Albers, Amy H. Butler, Melissa L. Breeden, Andrew O. Langford, and George N. Kiladis
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 433–452, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-433-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-433-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Weather variability controls the transport of ozone from the stratosphere to the Earth’s surface and water vapor from oceanic source regions to continental land masses. Forecasting these types of transport has high societal value because of the negative impacts of ozone on human health and the role of water vapor in governing precipitation variability. We use upper-level wind forecasts to assess the potential for predicting ozone and water vapor transport 3–6 weeks ahead of time.
Melissa L. Breeden, Amy H. Butler, John R. Albers, Michael Sprenger, and Andrew O'Neil Langford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2781–2794, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2781-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2781-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Prior research has found a maximum in deep stratosphere-to-troposphere mass/ozone transport over the western United States in boreal spring, which can enhance surface ozone concentrations, reducing air quality. We find that the winter-to-summer evolution of the north Pacific jet increases the frequency of stratospheric intrusions that drive transport, helping explain the observed maximum. The El Niño–Southern Oscillation affects the timing of the spring jet transition and therefore transport.
John R. Albers, Matthew Newman, Magdalena A. Balmaseda, William Sweet, Yan Wang, and Tongtong Xu
Ocean Sci., 21, 1761–1785, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1761-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1761-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Providing early warning of coastal flooding is an emerging priority for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. We assess whether current operational forecast models can provide the basis for predicting the risks of higher-than-normal coastal sea level values up to 6 weeks in advance. For many United States coastal locations, models have sufficient prediction skill to be used as the basis for the development of a high tide flooding prediction system on subseasonal timescales.
Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Peter Hitchcock, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zac D. Lawrence, Wuhan Ning, Philip Rupp, Zheng Wu, Hilla Afargan-Gerstman, Natalia Calvo, Álvaro de la Cámara, Martin Jucker, Gerbrand Koren, Daniel De Maeseneire, Gloria L. Manney, Marisol Osman, Masakazu Taguchi, Cory Barton, Dong-Chang Hong, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Hera Kim, Jeff Knight, Piero Malguzzi, Daniele Mastrangelo, Jiyoung Oh, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Isla R. Simpson, Seok-Woo Son, Damien Specq, and Tim Stockdale
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3611, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3611, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs) are known to follow a sustained wave dissipation in the stratosphere, which depends on both the tropospheric and stratospheric states. However, the relative role of each state is still unclear. Using a new set of subseasonal to seasonal forecasts, we show that the stratospheric state does not drastically affect the precursors of three recent SSWs, but modulates the stratospheric wave activity, with impacts depending on SSW features.
Alexey Yu. Karpechko, Amy H. Butler, and Frederic Vitart
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2556, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2556, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We study how the knowledge of future tropical and stratospheric conditions could improve forecasts in winter remotely, via teleconnections, 3–6 weeks ahead. We find that the tropics improve forecasts of sea level pressure in subtropics, Europe, and North America. The stratosphere improves forecasts in high latitudes and Europe. Improvements are small for temperature and precipitation. Larger forecast ensembles than usually available for research are needed to predict teleconnection signals.
Clara Orbe, Alison Ming, Gabriel Chiodo, Michael Prather, Mohamadou Diallo, Qi Tang, Andreas Chrysanthou, Hiroaki Naoe, Xin Zhou, Irina Thaler, Dillon Elsbury, Ewa Bednarz, Jonathon S. Wright, Aaron Match, Shingo Watanabe, James Anstey, Tobias Kerzenmacher, Stefan Versick, Marion Marchand, Feng Li, and James Keeble
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2761, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2761, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) is the main source of wind fluctuations in the tropical stratosphere, which can couple to surface climate. However, models do a poor job of simulating the QBO in the lower stratosphere, for reasons that remain unclear. One possibility is that models do not completely represent how ozone influences the QBO-associated wind variations. Here we propose a multi-model framework for assessing how ozone influences the QBO in recent past and future climates.
Ewa M. Bednarz, Amy H. Butler, Xinyue Wang, Zhihong Zhuo, Wandi Yu, Georgiy Stenchikov, Matthew Toohey, and Yunqian Zhu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1970, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1970, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Injection of sulfur and water vapour by the Hunga volcanic eruption significantly altered chemical composition and radiative budget of the stratosphere. Yet, whether the eruption could also affect surface climate, especially via indirect pathways, remains poorly understood. Here we investigate these effects using large ensembles of simulations with the CESM2(WACCM6) Earth system model.
Ying Dai, Peter Hitchcock, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, and William J. M. Seviour
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-484, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-484, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Using a new database of S2S forecasts generated by SNAPSI, we find that with a successful forecast of the sudden warming, S2S models can capture the European precipitation signals after the 2018 SSW several weeks in advance. The findings indicate that the stratosphere represents an important source of S2S predictability for precipitation over Europe and call for consideration of stratospheric variability in hydrological prediction at S2S timescales.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zachary D. Lawrence, Amy H. Butler, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Gerbrand Koren, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Judah Cohen, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Javier García-Serrano, Neil P. Hindley, Martin Jucker, Hera Kim, Robert W. Lee, Simon H. Lee, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Inna Polichtchouk, Jian Rao, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 171–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Variability in the extratropical stratosphere and troposphere is coupled, and because of the longer timescales characteristic of the stratosphere, this allows for a window of opportunity for surface prediction. This paper assesses whether models used for operational prediction capture these coupling processes accurately. We find that most processes are too weak; however downward coupling from the lower stratosphere to the near surface is too strong.
Melissa Leah Breeden, Andrew Hoell, Rochelle Pauline Worsnop, John Robert Albers, Michael T. Hobbins, Rachel Maya Robinson, and Daniel James Vimont
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-115, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-115, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We explore the predictability of saturation vapor pressure deficit (VPD), a key indicator of wildfire danger, one to 18 months in advance. Seasonal VPD forecasts are generated using a statistical dynamical model that produces high VPD skill related to a long-term warming trend and sea surface temperatures. Understanding where forecast skill comes from is important to for improving forecast models, and this study shows the role of multiple unique processes in contributing to VPD forecasts.
Dillon Elsbury, Federico Serva, Julie M. Caron, Seung-Yoon Back, Clara Orbe, Jadwiga H. Richter, James A. Anstey, Neal Butchart, Chih-Chieh Chen, Javier García-Serrano, Anne Glanville, Yoshio Kawatani, Tobias Kerzenmacher, Francois Lott, Hiroaki Naoe, Scott Osprey, Froila M. Palmeiro, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Stefan Versick, Shingo Watanabe, and Kohei Yoshida
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3950, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3950, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study examines how the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO), a major tropical weather pattern, is influenced by persistent El Niño or La Niña sea surface temperature conditions during winter. Using a coordinated set of climate model experiments, we find that El Niño strengthens Kelvin waves, speeding up MJO propagation, while La Niña strengthens Rossby waves, slowing it down. Better understanding these interactions between the MJO and ocean helps us better understand natural climate variability.
Thomas J. Ballinger, Kent Moore, Qinghua Ding, Amy H. Butler, James E. Overland, Richard L. Thoman, Ian Baxter, Zhe Li, and Edward Hanna
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1473–1488, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1473-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1473-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study chronicles the meteorological conditions that led to the anomalous, tandem March 2023 ice melt event in the Labrador and Bering seas. A sudden stratospheric warming event initiated the development of an anticyclonic circulation pattern over the Greenland–Labrador region, while the La Niña background state supported ridging conditions over Alaska, both of which aided northward transport of warm, moist air and drove the concurrent sea ice melt extremes.
Yunqian Zhu, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Valentina Aquila, Elisabeth Asher, Ewa M. Bednarz, Slimane Bekki, Christoph Brühl, Amy H. Butler, Parker Case, Simon Chabrillat, Gabriel Chiodo, Margot Clyne, Lola Falletti, Peter R. Colarco, Eric Fleming, Andrin Jörimann, Mahesh Kovilakam, Gerbrand Koren, Ales Kuchar, Nicolas Lebas, Qing Liang, Cheng-Cheng Liu, Graham Mann, Michael Manyin, Marion Marchand, Olaf Morgenstern, Paul Newman, Luke D. Oman, Freja F. Østerstrøm, Yifeng Peng, David Plummer, Ilaria Quaglia, William Randel, Samuel Rémy, Takashi Sekiya, Stephen Steenrod, Timofei Sukhodolov, Simone Tilmes, Kostas Tsigaridis, Rei Ueyama, Daniele Visioni, Xinyue Wang, Shingo Watanabe, Yousuke Yamashita, Pengfei Yu, Wandi Yu, Jun Zhang, and Zhihong Zhuo
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3412, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3412, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To understand the climate impact of the 2022 Hunga volcanic eruption, we developed a climate model-observation comparison project. The paper describes the protocols and models that participate in the experiments. We designed several experiments to achieve our goal of this activity: 1. evaluate the climate model performance; 2. understand the Earth system responses to this eruption.
Yoshio Kawatani, Kevin Hamilton, Shingo Watanabe, James A. Anstey, Jadwiga H. Richter, Neal Butchart, Clara Orbe, Scott M. Osprey, Hiroaki Naoe, Dillon Elsbury, Chih-Chieh Chen, Javier García-Serrano, Anne Glanville, Tobias Kerzenmacher, François Lott, Froila M. Palmerio, Mijeong Park, Federico Serva, Masakazu Taguchi, Stefan Versick, and Kohei Yoshioda
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3270, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3270, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) of the tropical stratospheric mean winds has been relatively steady over the 7 decades it has been observed, but there are always cycle-to-cycle variations. This study used several global atmospheric models to investigate systematic modulation of the QBO by the El Niño/La Niña cycle. All models simulated shorter periods during El Niño, in agreement with observations. By contrast, the models disagreed even on the sign of the El Niño effect on QBO amplitude.
Andrew O. Langford, Raul J. Alvarez II, Kenneth C. Aikin, Sunil Baidar, W. Alan Brewer, Steven S. Brown, Matthew M. Coggan, Patrick D. Cullis, Jessica Gilman, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Detlev Helmig, Bryan J. Johnson, K. Emma Knowland, Rajesh Kumar, Aaron D. Lamplugh, Audra McClure-Begley, Brandi J. McCarty, Ann M. Middlebrook, Gabriele Pfister, Jeff Peischl, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Pamela S. Rickley, Andrew W. Rollins, Scott P. Sandberg, Christoph J. Senff, and Carsten Warneke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1938, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1938, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
High ozone (O3) formed by reactions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can harm human health and welfare. High O3 is usually associated with hot summer days, but under certain conditions, high O3 can also form under winter conditions. In this study, we describe a high O3 event that occurred in Colorado during the COVID-19 quarantine that was caused in part by the decrease in traffic, and in part by a shallow inversion created by descent of stratospheric air.
Matthew S. Johnson, Alexei Rozanov, Mark Weber, Nora Mettig, John Sullivan, Michael J. Newchurch, Shi Kuang, Thierry Leblanc, Fernando Chouza, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff, Kevin B. Strawbridge, Raul J. Alvarez, Andrew O. Langford, Christoph J. Senff, Guillaume Kirgis, Brandi McCarty, and Larry Twigg
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2559–2582, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2559-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2559-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Monitoring tropospheric ozone (O3), a harmful pollutant negatively impacting human health, is primarily done using ground-based measurements and ozonesondes. However, these observation types lack the coverage to fully understand tropospheric O3. Satellites can retrieve tropospheric ozone with near-daily global coverage; however, they are known to have biases and errors. This study uses ground-based lidars to validate multiple satellites' ability to observe tropospheric O3.
Melissa Leah Breeden, Andrew Hoell, John Robert Albers, and Kimberly Slinski
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 963–980, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-963-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-963-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We compare the month-to-month evolution of daily precipitation over central southwest Asia (CSWA), a data-sparse, food-insecure area prone to drought and flooding. The seasonality of CSWA precipitation aligns with the seasonality of warm conveyor belts (WCBs), the warm, rapidly ascending airstreams associated with extratropical storms, most common from February–April. El Niño conditions are related to more WCBs and precipitation and La Niña conditions the opposite, except in January.
Ewa M. Bednarz, Amy H. Butler, Daniele Visioni, Yan Zhang, Ben Kravitz, and Douglas G. MacMartin
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13665–13684, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13665-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We use a state-of-the-art Earth system model and a set of stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) strategies to achieve the same level of global mean surface cooling through different combinations of location and/or timing of the injection. We demonstrate that the choice of SAI strategy can lead to contrasting impacts on stratospheric and tropospheric temperatures, circulation, and chemistry (including stratospheric ozone), thereby leading to different impacts on regional surface climate.
Dillon Elsbury, Amy H. Butler, John R. Albers, Melissa L. Breeden, and Andrew O'Neil Langford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5101–5117, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5101-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5101-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
One of the global hotspots where stratosphere-to-troposphere transport (STT) of ozone takes place is over Pacific North America (PNA). However, we do not know how or if STT over PNA will change in response to climate change. Using climate model experiments forced with
worst-casescenario Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 climate change, we find that changes in net chemical production and transport of ozone in the lower stratosphere increase STT of ozone over PNA in the future.
Melissa L. Breeden, John R. Albers, and Andrew Hoell
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1183–1197, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1183-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1183-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We use a statistical dynamical model to generate precipitation forecasts for lead times of 2–6 weeks over southwest Asia, which are needed to support humanitarian food distribution. The model signal-to-noise ratio is used to identify a smaller subset of forecasts with particularly high skill, so-called subseasonal forecasts of opportunity (SFOs). Precipitation SFOs are often related to slowly evolving tropical phenomena, namely the El Niño–Southern Oscillation and Madden–Julian Oscillation.
Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irene Erner, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 977–1001, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Forecast models that are used to predict weather often struggle to represent the Earth’s stratosphere. This may impact their ability to predict surface weather weeks in advance, on subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescales. We use data from many S2S forecast systems to characterize and compare the stratospheric biases present in such forecast models. These models have many similar stratospheric biases, but they tend to be worse in systems with low model tops located within the stratosphere.
Peter Hitchcock, Amy Butler, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Tim Stockdale, James Anstey, Dann Mitchell, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Tongwen Wu, Yixiong Lu, Daniele Mastrangelo, Piero Malguzzi, Hai Lin, Ryan Muncaster, Bill Merryfield, Michael Sigmond, Baoqiang Xiang, Liwei Jia, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Jiyoung Oh, Damien Specq, Isla R. Simpson, Jadwiga H. Richter, Cory Barton, Jeff Knight, Eun-Pa Lim, and Harry Hendon
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5073–5092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5073-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes an experimental protocol focused on sudden stratospheric warmings to be carried out by subseasonal forecast modeling centers. These will allow for inter-model comparisons of these major disruptions to the stratospheric polar vortex and their impacts on the near-surface flow. The protocol will lead to new insights into the contribution of the stratosphere to subseasonal forecast skill and new approaches to the dynamical attribution of extreme events.
Shima Bahramvash Shams, Von P. Walden, James W. Hannigan, William J. Randel, Irina V. Petropavlovskikh, Amy H. Butler, and Alvaro de la Cámara
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5435–5458, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5435-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5435-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Large-scale atmospheric circulation has a strong influence on ozone in the Arctic, and certain anomalous dynamical events, such as sudden stratospheric warmings, cause dramatic alterations of the large-scale circulation. A reanalysis model is evaluated and then used to investigate the impact of sudden stratospheric warmings on mid-atmospheric ozone. Results show that the position of the cold jet stream over the Arctic before these events influences the variability of ozone.
Adam A. Scaife, Mark P. Baldwin, Amy H. Butler, Andrew J. Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Steven C. Hardiman, Peter Haynes, Alexey Yu Karpechko, Eun-Pa Lim, Shunsuke Noguchi, Judith Perlwitz, Lorenzo Polvani, Jadwiga H. Richter, John Scinocca, Michael Sigmond, Theodore G. Shepherd, Seok-Woo Son, and David W. J. Thompson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2601–2623, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Great progress has been made in computer modelling and simulation of the whole climate system, including the stratosphere. Since the late 20th century we also gained a much clearer understanding of how the stratosphere interacts with the lower atmosphere. The latest generation of numerical prediction systems now explicitly represents the stratosphere and its interaction with surface climate, and here we review its role in long-range predictions and projections from weeks to decades ahead.
Andrew O. Langford, Christoph J. Senff, Raul J. Alvarez II, Ken C. Aikin, Sunil Baidar, Timothy A. Bonin, W. Alan Brewer, Jerome Brioude, Steven S. Brown, Joel D. Burley, Dani J. Caputi, Stephen A. Conley, Patrick D. Cullis, Zachary C. J. Decker, Stéphanie Evan, Guillaume Kirgis, Meiyun Lin, Mariusz Pagowski, Jeff Peischl, Irina Petropavlovskikh, R. Bradley Pierce, Thomas B. Ryerson, Scott P. Sandberg, Chance W. Sterling, Ann M. Weickmann, and Li Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1707–1737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1707-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1707-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Fires, Asian, and Stratospheric Transport–Las Vegas Ozone Study (FAST-LVOS) combined lidar, aircraft, and in situ measurements with global models to investigate the contributions of stratospheric intrusions, regional and Asian pollution, and wildfires to background ozone in the southwestern US during May and June 2017 and demonstrated that these processes contributed to background ozone levels that exceeded 70 % of the US National Ambient Air Quality Standard during the 6-week campaign.
Amy H. Butler and Daniela I. V. Domeisen
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 453–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-453-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-453-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We classify by wave geometry the stratospheric polar vortex during the final warming that occurs every spring in both hemispheres due to a combination of radiative and dynamical processes. We show that the shape of the vortex, as well as the timing of the seasonal transition, is linked to total column ozone prior to and surface weather following the final warming. These results have implications for prediction and our understanding of stratosphere–troposphere coupling processes in springtime.
John R. Albers, Amy H. Butler, Melissa L. Breeden, Andrew O. Langford, and George N. Kiladis
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 433–452, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-433-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-433-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Weather variability controls the transport of ozone from the stratosphere to the Earth’s surface and water vapor from oceanic source regions to continental land masses. Forecasting these types of transport has high societal value because of the negative impacts of ozone on human health and the role of water vapor in governing precipitation variability. We use upper-level wind forecasts to assess the potential for predicting ozone and water vapor transport 3–6 weeks ahead of time.
Antara Banerjee, Amy H. Butler, Lorenzo M. Polvani, Alan Robock, Isla R. Simpson, and Lantao Sun
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6985–6997, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6985-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6985-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We find that simulated stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could lead to warmer Eurasian winters alongside a drier Mediterranean and wetting to the north. These effects occur due to the strengthening of the Northern Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex, which shifts the North Atlantic Oscillation to a more positive phase. We find the effects in our simulations to be much more significant than the wintertime effects of large tropical volcanic eruptions which inject much less sulfate aerosol.
Melissa L. Breeden, Amy H. Butler, John R. Albers, Michael Sprenger, and Andrew O'Neil Langford
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2781–2794, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2781-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2781-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Prior research has found a maximum in deep stratosphere-to-troposphere mass/ozone transport over the western United States in boreal spring, which can enhance surface ozone concentrations, reducing air quality. We find that the winter-to-summer evolution of the north Pacific jet increases the frequency of stratospheric intrusions that drive transport, helping explain the observed maximum. The El Niño–Southern Oscillation affects the timing of the spring jet transition and therefore transport.
Shi Kuang, Bo Wang, Michael J. Newchurch, Kevin Knupp, Paula Tucker, Edwin W. Eloranta, Joseph P. Garcia, Ilya Razenkov, John T. Sullivan, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff, Liqiao Lei, Christoph J. Senff, Andrew O. Langford, Thierry Leblanc, and Vijay Natraj
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 5277–5292, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5277-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5277-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Ozone lidar is a state-of-the-art remote-sensing instrument to measure atmospheric ozone concentrations with high spatiotemporal resolution. In this study, we show that an ozone lidar can also provide reliable aerosol measurements through intercomparison with colocated aerosol lidar observations.
Li Zhang, Meiyun Lin, Andrew O. Langford, Larry W. Horowitz, Christoph J. Senff, Elizabeth Klovenski, Yuxuan Wang, Raul J. Alvarez II, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Patrick Cullis, Chance W. Sterling, Jeff Peischl, Thomas B. Ryerson, Steven S. Brown, Zachary C. J. Decker, Guillaume Kirgis, and Stephen Conley
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10379–10400, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10379-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10379-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Measuring and quantifying the sources of elevated springtime ozone in the southwestern US is challenging but relevant to the implications for control policy. Here we use intensive field measurements and two global models to study ozone sources in the region. We find that ozone from the stratosphere, wildfires, and Asia is an important source of high-ozone events in the region. Our analysis also helps understand the uncertainties in ozone simulations with individual models.
Cited articles
Albers, J. R. and Nathan, T. R.: Pathways for communicating the effects of
stratospheric ozone to the polar vortex: Role of zonally asymmetric ozone,
J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 785–801, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0126.1, 2012.
Albers, J. R. and Newman, M.: A priori identification of skillful
extratropical subseasonal forecasts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 12527–12536, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085270, 2019.
Albers, J. R. and Newman, M.: Subseasonal predictability of the
North Atlantic Oscillation, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 044024,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe781, 2021.
Albers, J. R., Kiladis, G. N., Birner, T., and Dias, J.: Tropical
Upper-Tropospheric Potential Vorticity Intrusions during Sudden
Stratospheric Warmings, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 2361–2384,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0238.1, 2016.
Albers, J. R., Perlwitz, J., Butler, A. H., Birner, T., Kiladis, G. N.,
Lawrence, Z. D., Manney, G. L., Langford, A. O., and Dias, J.: Mechanisms
governing interannual variability of stratosphere-to-troposphere ozone
transport, J. Geophys. Res., 123, 234–260,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026890, 2018.
Albers, J. R., Butler, A. H., Breeden, M. L., Langford, A. O., and Kiladis, G. N.: Subseasonal prediction of springtime Pacific–North American transport using upper-level wind forecasts, Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 433–452, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-433-2021, 2021.
Andrews, D. G., Holton, J. R., and Leovy, C. B.: Middle atmosphere dynamics, Academic Press, ISBN 9780120585762, 1987.
Benito-Barca, S., Calvo, N., and Abalos, M.: Driving mechanisms for the ENSO impact on stratospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-378, in review, 2022.
Bönisch, H., Engel, A., Curtius, J., Birner, Th., and Hoor, P.: Quantifying transport into the lowermost stratosphere using simultaneous in-situ measurements of SF6 and CO2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5905–5919, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5905-2009, 2009.
Brasseur, G., and Solomon, S.: Aeronomy of the middle atmosphere: Chemistry and physics of the stratosphere and mesosphere, Atmospheric and Oceanographic Sciences Library, 3rd edn., Springer, Berlin, Germany, vol. 32, 646 pp., ISBN 9781402038242, 2005.
Breeden, M. L., Butler, A. H., Albers, J. R., Sprenger, M., and Langford, A. O.: The spring transition of the North Pacific jet and its relation to deep stratosphere-to-troposphere mass transport over western North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2781–2794, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2781-2021, 2021.
Butchart, N.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation, Rev. Geophys., 52, 157–184,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000448, 2014.
Butler, A. H. and Domeisen, D. I. V.: The wave geometry of final stratospheric warming events, Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 453–474, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-453-2021, 2021.
Calvo, N., Garcia, R., Randel, W., and Marsh, D.: Dynamical mechanism for
the increase in tropical upwelling in the lowermost tropical stratosphere
during warm ENSO events, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2331–2340,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3433.1, 2010.
Capotondi, A., Wittenberg, A. T., Newman, M., Di Lorenzo, E., Yu, J.-Y.,
Braconnot, P., Cole, J., Dewitte, B., Giese, B., Guilyardi, E., Jin, F. F.,
Karnauskas, K., Kirtman, B., Lee, T., Schneider, N., Xue, Y., and Yeh, S.:
Understanding ENSO diversity, Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., 96, 921–938,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00117.1, 2015.
Charney, J. and Drazin, P.: Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from
the lower into the upper atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 83–109,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i001p00083, 1961.
Cooper, O. R., Langford, A. O., Parrish, D. D., and Fahey, D. W.: Challenges
of a lowered US ozone standard, Science, 348, 1096–1097,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5748, 2015.
Deser, C., Simpson, I. R., McKinnon, K. A., and Phillips, A. S.: The
Northern Hemisphere extratropical atmospheric circulation response to ENSO:
How well do we know it and how do we evaluate models accordingly?, J.
Climate, 30, 5059–5082, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0844.1, 2017.
Deser, C., Simpson, I. R., Phillips, A. S., and McKinnon, K. A.: How well do
we know ENSO's climate impacts over North America, and how do we evaluate
models accordingly?, J. Climate, 31, 4991–5014,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0783.1, 2018.
Diallo, M., Konopka, P., Santee, M. L., Müller, R., Tao, M., Walker, K. A., Legras, B., Riese, M., Ern, M., and Ploeger, F.: Structural changes in the shallow and transition branch of the Brewer–Dobson circulation induced by El Niño, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 425–446, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-425-2019, 2019.
Emmons, L., Hess, P., Klonecki, A., Tie, X., Horowitz, L., Lamarque, J.-F.,
Kinnison, D., Brasseur, G., Atlas, E., Browell, E., Cantrell, C., Eisele,
F., Mauldin, R. L., Merrill, J., Ridley, B., Shetter, R.: Budget of
tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 8372, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002665, 2003.
Fiore, A., Jacob, D. J., Liu, H., Yantosca, R. M., Fairlie, T. D., and Li,
Q.: Variability in surface ozone background over the United States:
Implications for air quality policy, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4787, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003855, 2003.
Fiore, A., Oberman, J., Lin, M., Zhang, L., Clifton, O., Jacob, D. J., Naik,
V., Horowitz, L., Pinto, J., and Milly, G.: Estimating North American
background ozone in US surface air with two independent global models:
Variability, uncertainties, and recommendations, Atmos. Environ., 96,
284–300, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.045, 2014.
Fusco, A. C. and Salby, M. L.: Interannual variations of total ozone and
their relationship to variations of planetary wave activity, J. Climate, 12,
1619–1629, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1619:IVOTOA>2.0.CO;2,
1999.
Garcia, R. and Hartmann, D.: The Role of Planetary Waves in the Maintenance
of the Zonally Averaged Ozone Distribution of the Upper Stratosphere., J.
Atmos. Sci., 37, 2248–2264, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2248:TROPWI>2.0.CO;2,
1980.
García-Herrera, R., Calvo, N., Garcia, R., and Giorgetta, M.:
Propagation of ENSO temperature signals into the middle atmosphere: A
comparison of two general circulation models and ERA-40 reanalysis data, J.
Geophys. Res., 111, D0610, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006061, 2006.
Garfinkel, C., Hurwitz, M., Waugh, D., and Butler, A.: Are the
teleconnections of Central Pacific and Eastern Pacific El Niño distinct
in boreal wintertime?, Clim. Dynam., 41, 1835–1852,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1570-2, 2013.
Gettelman, A., Hoor, P., Pan, L. L., Randel, W., Hegglin, M. I., and Birner,
T.: The extratropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Rev. Geophys., 49, RG3003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000355, 2011.
Gille, J. C., Bailey, P. L., Russell, J., and Russell, J.: Temperature and
composition measurements from the LRIR and LIMS experiments on Nimbus 6 and
7, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 296, 205–218,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1980.0165, 1980.
Hartmann, D. L.: Some aspects of the coupling between radiation, chemistry,
and dynamics in the stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 9631–9640,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JC086iC10p09631, 1981.
Hartmann, D. L. and Garcia, R. R.: A mechanistic model of ozone transport by
planetary waves in the stratosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 350–364,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<0350:AMMOOT>2.0.CO;2,
1979.
Hegglin, M. I. and Shepherd, T. G.: O3-N2O correlations from the
Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment: Revisiting a diagnostic of transport and
chemistry in the stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D19301,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008281, 2007.
Hess, P., Kinnison, D., and Tang, Q.: Ensemble simulations of the role of the stratosphere in the attribution of northern extratropical tropospheric ozone variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2341–2365, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2341-2015, 2015.
Hoerling, M. P., Schaack, T. K., and Lenzen, A. J.: A global analysis of stratospheric-tropospheric exchange during northern winter, Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 162–172, 1993.
Hsu, J. and Prather, M. J.: Stratospheric variability and tropospheric
ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D06102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010942, 2009.
James, P., Stohl, A., Forster, C., Eckhardt, S., Seibert, P., and Frank, A.:
A 15-year climatology of stratosphere–troposphere exchange with a
Lagrangian particle dispersion model 2, Mean climate and seasonal
variability, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8522, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002639, 2003.
Koch, P., Wernli, H., and Davies, H. C.: An event-based jet-stream
climatology and typology, Int. J. Climatol., 26, 283–301,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1255, 2006.
Konopka, P., Ploeger, F., Tao, M., Birner, T., and Riese, M.: Hemispheric
asymmetries and seasonality of mean age of air in the lower stratosphere:
Deep versus shallow branch of the Brewer-Dobson circulation, J. Geophys.
Res., 120, 2053–2066, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022429, 2015.
Langford, A. and Reid, S.: Dissipation and mixing of a small-scale stratospheric intrusion in the upper troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31265–31276, 1998.
Langford, A., O'Leary, T., Masters, C., Aikin, K., and Proffitt, M.: Modulation of middle and upper tropospheric ozone at northern midlatitudes by the El Niño/Southern Oscillation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2667–2670, 1998.
Langford, A. O.: Stratosphere-troposphere exchange at the subtropical jet:
Contribution to the tropospheric ozone budget at midlatitudes, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 26, 2449–2452, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900556, 1999.
Langford, A. O., Senff, C. J., Alvarez II, R. J., Aikin, K. C., Baidar, S., Bonin, T. A., Brewer, W. A., Brioude, J., Brown, S. S., Burley, J. D., Caputi, D. J., Conley, S. A., Cullis, P. D., Decker, Z. C. J., Evan, S., Kirgis, G., Lin, M., Pagowski, M., Peischl, J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Pierce, R. B., Ryerson, T. B., Sandberg, S. P., Sterling, C. W., Weickmann, A. M., and Zhang, L.: The Fires, Asian, and Stratospheric Transport–Las Vegas Ozone Study (FAST-LVOS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 1707–1737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1707-2022, 2022.
Lefohn, A. S., Oltmans, S. J., Dann, T., and Singh, H. B.: Present-day
variability of background ozone in the lower troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.,
106, 9945–9958, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900793, 2001.
Li, Y. and Lau, N.-C.: Influences of ENSO on stratospheric variability, and
the descent of stratospheric perturbations into the lower troposphere, J.
Climate, 26, 4725–4748, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00581.1, 2013.
Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Oltmans, S. J.,
Tarasick, D., and Rieder, H. E.: Climate variability modulates western US
ozone air quality in spring via deep stratospheric intrusions, Nat. Commun.,
6, 7105, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105, 2015.
Manney, G., Zurek, R., O'Neill, A., and Swinbank, R.: On the motion of air
through the stratospheric polar vortex, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2973–2994,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2973:OTMOAT>2.0.CO;2,
1994.
McIntyre, M. and Palmer, T.: Breaking planetary waves in the stratosphere,
Nature, 305, 593–600, https://doi.org/10.1038/305593a0, 1983.
Mills, M. J., Richter, J. H., Tilmes, S., Kravitz, B., MacMartin, D. G.,
Glanville, A. A., Tribbia, J. J., Lamarque, J.-F., Vitt, F., Schmidt, A.,
Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Bacmeister, J. T., Kinnison, D. E.: Radiative and
chemical response to interactive stratospheric sulfate aerosols in fully
coupled CESM1 (WACCM), J. Geophys. Res., 122, 13–061,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027006, 2017.
Neu, J. L., Flury, T., Manney, G. L., Santee, M. L., Livesey, N. J., and
Worden, J.: Tropospheric ozone variations governed by changes in
stratospheric circulation, Nat. Geosci., 7, 340–344,
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2138, 2014.
NOAA: Index of /groups/csl8/modeldata/data/Albers_etal_2022, NOAA [data set], https://csl.noaa.gov/groups/csl8/modeldata/data/Albers_etal_2022/, last access: 6 October 2022.
Olsen, M. A., Wargan, K., and Pawson, S.: Tropospheric column ozone response to ENSO in GEOS-5 assimilation of OMI and MLS ozone data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7091–7103, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7091-2016, 2016.
Oman, L. D., Douglass, A. R., Ziemke, J. R., Rodriguez, J. M., Waugh, D. W.,
and Nielsen, J. E.: The ozone response to ENSO in Aura satellite
measurements and a chemistry-climate simulation, J. Geophys. Res., 118,
965–976, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018546, 2013.
Ploeger, F. and Birner, T.: Seasonal and inter-annual variability of lower stratospheric age of air spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10195–10213, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10195-2016, 2016.
Plumb, R. A.: Stratospheric transport, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 80, 793–809, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.80.793, 2002.
Randel, W., Chanin, M.-L., and Michaut, C.: SPARC Intercomparison of
Middle Atmosphere Climatologies, SPARC Report no. 3, https://www.sparc-climate.org/publications/sparc-reports/sparc-report-no-3/ (last access: 6 October 2022), 2002.
Rao, J., Yu, Y., Guo, D., Shi, C., Chen, D., and Hu, D.: Evaluating the
Brewer–Dobson circulation and its responses to ENSO, QBO, and the solar
cycle in different reanalyses, Earth and Planetary Physics, 3, 166–181,
https://doi.org/10.26464/epp2019012, 2019.
Ray, E. A., Moore, F. L., Elkins, J. W., Dutton, G. S., Fahey, D. W.,
Vömel, H., Oltmans, S. J., and Rosenlof, K. H.: Transport into the
Northern Hemisphere lowermost stratosphere revealed by in situ tracer
measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 26,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900323, 1999.
Reed, R. J.: The role of vertical motions in ozone-weather relationships, J.
Atmos. Sci., 7, 263–267,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1950)007<0263:TROVMI>2.0.CO;2,
1950.
Reed, R. J. and Danielsen, E. F.: Fronts in the vicinity of the tropopause, Archiv für Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Ser. A, Meteorologie und Geophysik, 11, 1–17, 1958.
Salby, M. L.: A ubiquitous wavenumber-5 anomaly in the Southern Hemisphere
during FGGE, Mon. Wea. Rev., 110, 1712–1721,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1982)110<1712:AUWAIT>2.0.CO;2,
1982.
Salby, M. L., and Callaghan, P. F.: Fluctuations of total ozone and
their relationship to stratospheric air motions, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 98(D2), 2715-2727, 1993.
Salby, M. L. and Callaghan, P. F.: Interannual changes of the stratospheric
circulation: Relationship to ozone and tropospheric structure, J. Climate,
15, 3673–3685, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)015<3673:ICOTSC>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Salby, M. L. and Callaghan, P. F.: On the wintertime increase of Arctic ozone: Relationship to changes of the polar-night vortex, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D06116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007948, 2007a.
Salby, M. L. and Callaghan, P. F.: Influence of planetary wave activity on
the stratospheric final warming and spring ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D20111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007536, 2007b.
Schoeberl, M. R. and Krueger, A. J.: Medium scale disturbances in total
ozone during southern hemisphere summer, Bull. Amer. Met. Soc., 64,
1358–1365, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1983)064<1358:MSDITO>2.0.CO;2,
1983.
Shapiro, M.: Turbulent mixing within tropopause folds as a mechanism for the
exchange of chemical constituents between the stratosphere and troposphere,
J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 994–1004,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<0994:TMWTFA>2.0.CO;2,
1980.
Shapiro, M., Wernli, H., Bond, N., and Langland, R.: The influence of the
1997–99 El Niño Southern Oscillation on extratropical baroclinic life
cycles over the eastern North Pacific, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc., 127,
331–342, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757205, 2001.
Simpson, I. R., Shepherd, T. G., and Sigmond, M.: Dynamics of the lower
stratospheric circulation response to ENSO, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 2537–2556,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-05.1, 2011.
Škerlak, B., Sprenger, M., and Wernli, H.: A global climatology of stratosphere–troposphere exchange using the ERA-Interim data set from 1979 to 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 913–937, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-913-2014, 2014.
Sprenger, M., Wernli, H., and Bourqui, M.: Stratosphere–Troposphere Exchange and Its Relation to Potential Vorticity Streamers and Cutoffs near the Extratropical Tropopause, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 1587–1602, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3911.1, 2007.
Terao, Y., Logan, J. A., Douglass, A. R., and Stolarski, R. S.: Contribution
of stratospheric ozone to the interannual variability of tropospheric ozone
in the northern extratropics, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D18309,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009854, 2008.
Tilmes, S., Lamarque, J.-F., Emmons, L. K., Kinnison, D. E., Marsh, D., Garcia, R. R., Smith, A. K., Neely, R. R., Conley, A., Vitt, F., Val Martin, M., Tanimoto, H., Simpson, I., Blake, D. R., and Blake, N.: Representation of the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) CAM4-chem within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1853–1890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1853-2016, 2016.
Trenberth, K. and National Center for Atmospheric Research Staff:
The Climate Data Guide: Nino SST Indices (Nino 1+2, 3, 3.4, 4; ONI and
TNI),
https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/nino-sst-indices-nino-12-3-34-4-oni-and-tni, last access: 6 October 2022.
Wang, J., Pawson, S., Tian, B., Liang, M.-C., Shia, R.-L., Yung, Y. L., and
Jiang, X.: El Niño–Southern Oscillation in tropical and midlatitude
column ozone, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 1911–1921,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-045.1, 2011.
Waugh, D. W., and Polvani, L. M.: Climatology of intrusions into the
tropical upper troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3857–3860,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012250, 2000.
Weber, M., Dikty, S., Burrows, J. P., Garny, H., Dameris, M., Kubin, A., Abalichin, J., and Langematz, U.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation and total ozone from seasonal to decadal time scales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11221–11235, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11221-2011, 2011.
Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M., Neu, J.,
Parrish, D., Reider, H., Schnell, J., Tilmes, S., Wild, O., Zhang, L.,
Ziemke, J., Brandt, J., Delcloo, A., Doherty, R. M., Geels, C.,
Hegglin, M. I., Hu, L., Im, U., Kumar, R., Luhar, A., Murray, L., Plummer,
D., Rodriguez, J., Saiz-Lopez, A., Schultz, M. G., Woodhouse, M. T., and Zeng, G.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6, 1–49, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265, 2018.
Zeng, G. and Pyle, J. A.: Influence of El Niño Southern Oscillation on
stratosphere/troposphere exchange and the global tropospheric ozone budget,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L01814, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021353, 2005.
Zhang, J., Tian, W., Wang, Z., Xie, F., and Wang, F.: The influence of ENSO
on northern midlatitude ozone during the winter to spring transition, J.
Climate, 28, 4774–4793, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00615.1, 2015.
Zhang, L., Lin, M., Langford, A. O., Horowitz, L. W., Senff, C. J., Klovenski, E., Wang, Y., Alvarez II, R. J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Cullis, P., Sterling, C. W., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Brown, S. S., Decker, Z. C. J., Kirgis, G., and Conley, S.: Characterizing sources of high surface ozone events in the southwestern US with intensive field measurements and two global models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10379–10400, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10379-2020, 2020.
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(11947 KB) - Full-text XML
- Corrigendum
-
Supplement
(992 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Short summary
Ozone transported from the stratosphere contributes to background ozone concentrations in the free troposphere and to surface ozone exceedance events that affect human health. The physical processes whereby the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) modulates North American stratosphere-to-troposphere ozone transport during spring are documented, and the usefulness of ENSO for predicting ozone events that may cause exceedances in surface air quality standards are assessed.
Ozone transported from the stratosphere contributes to background ozone concentrations in the...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint