Articles | Volume 22, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-119-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-119-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
04 Jan 2022
Research article |
| 04 Jan 2022
| 04 Jan 2022
Marine aerosol properties over the Southern Ocean in relation to the wintertime meteorological conditions
Research and Development Unit, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Folkborgsvägen 17, 60176 Norrköping, Sweden
Abhay Devasthale
Research and Development Unit, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Folkborgsvägen 17, 60176 Norrköping, Sweden
Michael Kahnert
Research and Development Unit, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Folkborgsvägen 17, 60176 Norrköping, Sweden
Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Chalmersplatsen 4, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
Related authors
Montserrat Costa-Surós, María Gonçalves Ageitos, Marios Chatziparaschos, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Manu Anna Thomas, Gilbert Montané Pinto, Stelios Myriokefalitakis, Twan van Noije, Philippe Le Sager, Maria Kanakidou, Athanasios Nenes, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4659, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4659, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Mixed-phase clouds play a key role in Earth’s climate but remain poorly represented in climate models. We improved their representation in the EC-Earth model by introducing an aerosol-sensitive scheme for ice formation and a machine-learning approach for secondary ice production. These advances produce more realistic cloud properties and radiative effects, highlighting that both processes are essential for reliable climate projections.
Abhay Devasthale, Sandra Andersson, Erik Engström, Frank Kaspar, Jörg Trentmann, Anke Duguay-Tetzlaff, Jan Fokke Meirink, Erik Kjellström, Tomas Landelius, Manu Anna Thomas, and Karl-Göran Karlsson
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1169–1182, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1169-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1169-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
By compositing trends in multiple climate variables, this study presents emerging regimes that are relevant for solar energy applications. It is shown that the favourable conditions for exploiting solar energy are emerging during spring and early summer. The study also underscores the increasingly important role of clouds in regulating surface solar radiation as the aerosol concentrations are decreasing over Europe and the societal value of satellite-based climate monitoring.
Manu Anna Thomas, Klaus Wyser, Shiyu Wang, Marios Chatziparaschos, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Montserrat Costa-Surós, Maria Gonçalves Ageitos, Maria Kanakidou, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Athanasios Nenes, Twan van Noije, Philippe Le Sager, and Abhay Devasthale
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6903–6927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6903-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol–cloud interactions occur at a range of spatio-temporal scales. While evaluating recent developments in EC-Earth3-AerChem, this study aims to understand the extent to which the Twomey effect manifests itself at larger scales. We find a reduction in the warm bias over the Southern Ocean due to model improvements. While we see footprints of the Twomey effect at larger scales, the negative relationship between cloud droplet number and liquid water drives the shortwave radiative effect.
Victoria A. Flood, Kimberly Strong, Cynthia H. Whaley, Kaley A. Walker, Thomas Blumenstock, James W. Hannigan, Johan Mellqvist, Justus Notholt, Mathias Palm, Amelie N. Röhling, Stephen Arnold, Stephen Beagley, Rong-You Chien, Jesper Christensen, Makoto Deushi, Srdjan Dobricic, Xinyi Dong, Joshua S. Fu, Michael Gauss, Wanmin Gong, Joakim Langner, Kathy S. Law, Louis Marelle, Tatsuo Onishi, Naga Oshima, David A. Plummer, Luca Pozzoli, Jean-Christophe Raut, Manu A. Thomas, Svetlana Tsyro, and Steven Turnock
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1079–1118, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1079-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1079-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
It is important to understand the composition of the Arctic atmosphere and how it is changing. Atmospheric models provide simulations that can inform policy. This study examines simulations of CH4, CO, and O3 by 11 models. Model performance is assessed by comparing results matched in space and time to measurements from five high-latitude ground-based infrared spectrometers. This work finds that models generally underpredict the concentrations of these gases in the Arctic troposphere.
Cynthia H. Whaley, Kathy S. Law, Jens Liengaard Hjorth, Henrik Skov, Stephen R. Arnold, Joakim Langner, Jakob Boyd Pernov, Garance Bergeron, Ilann Bourgeois, Jesper H. Christensen, Rong-You Chien, Makoto Deushi, Xinyi Dong, Peter Effertz, Gregory Faluvegi, Mark Flanner, Joshua S. Fu, Michael Gauss, Greg Huey, Ulas Im, Rigel Kivi, Louis Marelle, Tatsuo Onishi, Naga Oshima, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Jeff Peischl, David A. Plummer, Luca Pozzoli, Jean-Christophe Raut, Tom Ryerson, Ragnhild Skeie, Sverre Solberg, Manu A. Thomas, Chelsea Thompson, Kostas Tsigaridis, Svetlana Tsyro, Steven T. Turnock, Knut von Salzen, and David W. Tarasick
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 637–661, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study summarizes recent research on ozone in the Arctic, a sensitive and rapidly warming region. We find that the seasonal cycles of near-surface atmospheric ozone are variable depending on whether they are near the coast, inland, or at high altitude. Several global model simulations were evaluated, and we found that because models lack some of the ozone chemistry that is important for the coastal Arctic locations, they do not accurately simulate ozone there.
Cynthia H. Whaley, Rashed Mahmood, Knut von Salzen, Barbara Winter, Sabine Eckhardt, Stephen Arnold, Stephen Beagley, Silvia Becagli, Rong-You Chien, Jesper Christensen, Sujay Manish Damani, Xinyi Dong, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Gregory Faluvegi, Mark Flanner, Joshua S. Fu, Michael Gauss, Fabio Giardi, Wanmin Gong, Jens Liengaard Hjorth, Lin Huang, Ulas Im, Yugo Kanaya, Srinath Krishnan, Zbigniew Klimont, Thomas Kühn, Joakim Langner, Kathy S. Law, Louis Marelle, Andreas Massling, Dirk Olivié, Tatsuo Onishi, Naga Oshima, Yiran Peng, David A. Plummer, Olga Popovicheva, Luca Pozzoli, Jean-Christophe Raut, Maria Sand, Laura N. Saunders, Julia Schmale, Sangeeta Sharma, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Henrik Skov, Fumikazu Taketani, Manu A. Thomas, Rita Traversi, Kostas Tsigaridis, Svetlana Tsyro, Steven Turnock, Vito Vitale, Kaley A. Walker, Minqi Wang, Duncan Watson-Parris, and Tahya Weiss-Gibbons
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5775–5828, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Air pollutants, like ozone and soot, play a role in both global warming and air quality. Atmospheric models are often used to provide information to policy makers about current and future conditions under different emissions scenarios. In order to have confidence in those simulations, in this study we compare simulated air pollution from 18 state-of-the-art atmospheric models to measured air pollution in order to assess how well the models perform.
Manu Anna Thomas, Abhay Devasthale, and Tiina Nygård
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16593–16608, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16593-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16593-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of transported pollutants and their spatial distribution in the Arctic are governed by the local atmospheric circulation or weather states. Therefore, we investigated eight different atmospheric circulation types observed during the spring season in the Arctic. Using satellite and reanalysis datasets, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of the typical circulation patterns that can lead to enhanced or reduced pollution concentrations in the different sectors of the Arctic.
Ulas Im, Kostas Tsigaridis, Gregory Faluvegi, Peter L. Langen, Joshua P. French, Rashed Mahmood, Manu A. Thomas, Knut von Salzen, Daniel C. Thomas, Cynthia H. Whaley, Zbigniew Klimont, Henrik Skov, and Jørgen Brandt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10413–10438, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Future (2015–2050) simulations of the aerosol burdens and their radiative forcing and climate impacts over the Arctic under various emission projections show that although the Arctic aerosol burdens are projected to decrease significantly by 10 to 60 %, regardless of the magnitude of aerosol reductions, surface air temperatures will continue to increase by 1.9–2.6 ℃, while sea-ice extent will continue to decrease, implying reductions of greenhouse gases are necessary to mitigate climate change.
Augustin Colette, Gaëlle Collin, François Besson, Etienne Blot, Vincent Guidard, Frédérik Meleux, Adrien Royer, Valentin Petiot, Claire Miller, Oihana Fermond, Alizé Jeant, Mario Adani, Joaquim Arteta, Anna Benedictow, Robert Bergström, Dene Bowdalo, Jorgen Brandt, Gino Briganti, Ana C. Carvalho, Jesper Heile Christensen, Florian Couvidat, Ilaria D'Elia, Massimo D'Isidoro, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Gaël Descombes, Enza Di Tomaso, John Douros, Jeronimo Escribano, Henk Eskes, Hilde Fagerli, Yalda Fatahi, Johannes Flemming, Elmar Friese, Lise Frohn, Michael Gauss, Camilla Geels, Guido Guarnieri, Marc Guevara, Antoine Guion, Jonathan Guth, Risto Hänninen, Kaj Hansen, Ulas Im, Ruud Janssen, Marine Jeoffrion, Mathieu Joly, Luke Jones, Oriol Jorba, Evgeni Kadantsev, Michael Kahnert, Jacek W. Kaminski, Rostislav Kouznetsov, Richard Kranenburg, Jeroen Kuenen, Anne Caroline Lange, Joachim Langner, Victor Lannuque, Francesca Macchia, Astrid Manders, Mihaela Mircea, Agnes Nyiri, Miriam Olid, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Yuliia Palamarchuk, Antonio Piersanti, Blandine Raux, Miha Razinger, Lennard Robertson, Arjo Segers, Martijn Schaap, Pilvi Siljamo, David Simpson, Mikhail Sofiev, Anders Stangel, Joanna Struzewska, Carles Tena, Renske Timmermans, Thanos Tsikerdekis, Svetlana Tsyro, Svyatoslav Tyuryakov, Anthony Ung, Andreas Uppstu, Alvaro Valdebenito, Peter van Velthoven, Lina Vitali, Zhuyun Ye, Vincent-Henri Peuch, and Laurence Rouïl
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6835–6883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6835-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6835-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service – Regional Production delivers daily forecasts, analyses, and reanalyses of air quality in Europe. The service relies on a distributed modelling production by 11 leading European modelling teams following stringent requirements with an operational design that has no equivalent in the world. All the products are free, open, and quality-assured and disseminated with a high level of reliability.
Montserrat Costa-Surós, María Gonçalves Ageitos, Marios Chatziparaschos, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Manu Anna Thomas, Gilbert Montané Pinto, Stelios Myriokefalitakis, Twan van Noije, Philippe Le Sager, Maria Kanakidou, Athanasios Nenes, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4659, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4659, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Mixed-phase clouds play a key role in Earth’s climate but remain poorly represented in climate models. We improved their representation in the EC-Earth model by introducing an aerosol-sensitive scheme for ice formation and a machine-learning approach for secondary ice production. These advances produce more realistic cloud properties and radiative effects, highlighting that both processes are essential for reliable climate projections.
Abhay Devasthale, Sandra Andersson, Erik Engström, Frank Kaspar, Jörg Trentmann, Anke Duguay-Tetzlaff, Jan Fokke Meirink, Erik Kjellström, Tomas Landelius, Manu Anna Thomas, and Karl-Göran Karlsson
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1169–1182, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1169-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1169-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
By compositing trends in multiple climate variables, this study presents emerging regimes that are relevant for solar energy applications. It is shown that the favourable conditions for exploiting solar energy are emerging during spring and early summer. The study also underscores the increasingly important role of clouds in regulating surface solar radiation as the aerosol concentrations are decreasing over Europe and the societal value of satellite-based climate monitoring.
Manu Anna Thomas, Klaus Wyser, Shiyu Wang, Marios Chatziparaschos, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Montserrat Costa-Surós, Maria Gonçalves Ageitos, Maria Kanakidou, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Athanasios Nenes, Twan van Noije, Philippe Le Sager, and Abhay Devasthale
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6903–6927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6903-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol–cloud interactions occur at a range of spatio-temporal scales. While evaluating recent developments in EC-Earth3-AerChem, this study aims to understand the extent to which the Twomey effect manifests itself at larger scales. We find a reduction in the warm bias over the Southern Ocean due to model improvements. While we see footprints of the Twomey effect at larger scales, the negative relationship between cloud droplet number and liquid water drives the shortwave radiative effect.
Alejandro Baró Pérez, Michael S. Diamond, Frida A.-M. Bender, Abhay Devasthale, Matthias Schwarz, Julien Savre, Juha Tonttila, Harri Kokkola, Hyunho Lee, David Painemal, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4591–4610, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4591-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4591-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use a numerical model to study interactions between humid light-absorbing aerosol plumes, clouds, and radiation over the southeast Atlantic. We find that the warming produced by the aerosols reduces cloud cover, especially in highly polluted situations. Aerosol impacts on drizzle play a minor role. However, aerosol effects on cloud reflectivity and moisture-induced changes in cloud cover dominate the climatic response and lead to an overall cooling by the biomass burning plumes.
Victoria A. Flood, Kimberly Strong, Cynthia H. Whaley, Kaley A. Walker, Thomas Blumenstock, James W. Hannigan, Johan Mellqvist, Justus Notholt, Mathias Palm, Amelie N. Röhling, Stephen Arnold, Stephen Beagley, Rong-You Chien, Jesper Christensen, Makoto Deushi, Srdjan Dobricic, Xinyi Dong, Joshua S. Fu, Michael Gauss, Wanmin Gong, Joakim Langner, Kathy S. Law, Louis Marelle, Tatsuo Onishi, Naga Oshima, David A. Plummer, Luca Pozzoli, Jean-Christophe Raut, Manu A. Thomas, Svetlana Tsyro, and Steven Turnock
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1079–1118, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1079-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1079-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
It is important to understand the composition of the Arctic atmosphere and how it is changing. Atmospheric models provide simulations that can inform policy. This study examines simulations of CH4, CO, and O3 by 11 models. Model performance is assessed by comparing results matched in space and time to measurements from five high-latitude ground-based infrared spectrometers. This work finds that models generally underpredict the concentrations of these gases in the Arctic troposphere.
Karl-Göran Karlsson, Martin Stengel, Jan Fokke Meirink, Aku Riihelä, Jörg Trentmann, Tom Akkermans, Diana Stein, Abhay Devasthale, Salomon Eliasson, Erik Johansson, Nina Håkansson, Irina Solodovnik, Nikos Benas, Nicolas Clerbaux, Nathalie Selbach, Marc Schröder, and Rainer Hollmann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4901–4926, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4901-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4901-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a global climate data record on cloud parameters, radiation at the surface and at the top of atmosphere, and surface albedo. The temporal coverage is 1979–2020 (42 years) and the data record is also continuously updated until present time. Thus, more than four decades of climate parameters are provided. Based on CLARA-A3, studies on distribution of clouds and radiation parameters can be made and, especially, investigations of climate trends and evaluation of climate models.
Cynthia H. Whaley, Kathy S. Law, Jens Liengaard Hjorth, Henrik Skov, Stephen R. Arnold, Joakim Langner, Jakob Boyd Pernov, Garance Bergeron, Ilann Bourgeois, Jesper H. Christensen, Rong-You Chien, Makoto Deushi, Xinyi Dong, Peter Effertz, Gregory Faluvegi, Mark Flanner, Joshua S. Fu, Michael Gauss, Greg Huey, Ulas Im, Rigel Kivi, Louis Marelle, Tatsuo Onishi, Naga Oshima, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Jeff Peischl, David A. Plummer, Luca Pozzoli, Jean-Christophe Raut, Tom Ryerson, Ragnhild Skeie, Sverre Solberg, Manu A. Thomas, Chelsea Thompson, Kostas Tsigaridis, Svetlana Tsyro, Steven T. Turnock, Knut von Salzen, and David W. Tarasick
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 637–661, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study summarizes recent research on ozone in the Arctic, a sensitive and rapidly warming region. We find that the seasonal cycles of near-surface atmospheric ozone are variable depending on whether they are near the coast, inland, or at high altitude. Several global model simulations were evaluated, and we found that because models lack some of the ozone chemistry that is important for the coastal Arctic locations, they do not accurately simulate ozone there.
Cheng You, Michael Tjernström, and Abhay Devasthale
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8037–8057, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In winter when solar radiation is absent in the Arctic, the poleward transport of heat and moisture into the high Arctic becomes the main contribution of Arctic warming. Over completely frozen ocean sectors, total surface energy budget is dominated by net long-wave heat, while over the Barents Sea, with an open ocean to the south, total net surface energy budget is dominated by the surface turbulent heat.
Cynthia H. Whaley, Rashed Mahmood, Knut von Salzen, Barbara Winter, Sabine Eckhardt, Stephen Arnold, Stephen Beagley, Silvia Becagli, Rong-You Chien, Jesper Christensen, Sujay Manish Damani, Xinyi Dong, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Nikolaos Evangeliou, Gregory Faluvegi, Mark Flanner, Joshua S. Fu, Michael Gauss, Fabio Giardi, Wanmin Gong, Jens Liengaard Hjorth, Lin Huang, Ulas Im, Yugo Kanaya, Srinath Krishnan, Zbigniew Klimont, Thomas Kühn, Joakim Langner, Kathy S. Law, Louis Marelle, Andreas Massling, Dirk Olivié, Tatsuo Onishi, Naga Oshima, Yiran Peng, David A. Plummer, Olga Popovicheva, Luca Pozzoli, Jean-Christophe Raut, Maria Sand, Laura N. Saunders, Julia Schmale, Sangeeta Sharma, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Henrik Skov, Fumikazu Taketani, Manu A. Thomas, Rita Traversi, Kostas Tsigaridis, Svetlana Tsyro, Steven Turnock, Vito Vitale, Kaley A. Walker, Minqi Wang, Duncan Watson-Parris, and Tahya Weiss-Gibbons
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5775–5828, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Air pollutants, like ozone and soot, play a role in both global warming and air quality. Atmospheric models are often used to provide information to policy makers about current and future conditions under different emissions scenarios. In order to have confidence in those simulations, in this study we compare simulated air pollution from 18 state-of-the-art atmospheric models to measured air pollution in order to assess how well the models perform.
Manu Anna Thomas, Abhay Devasthale, and Tiina Nygård
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16593–16608, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16593-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16593-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of transported pollutants and their spatial distribution in the Arctic are governed by the local atmospheric circulation or weather states. Therefore, we investigated eight different atmospheric circulation types observed during the spring season in the Arctic. Using satellite and reanalysis datasets, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of the typical circulation patterns that can lead to enhanced or reduced pollution concentrations in the different sectors of the Arctic.
Ulas Im, Kostas Tsigaridis, Gregory Faluvegi, Peter L. Langen, Joshua P. French, Rashed Mahmood, Manu A. Thomas, Knut von Salzen, Daniel C. Thomas, Cynthia H. Whaley, Zbigniew Klimont, Henrik Skov, and Jørgen Brandt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10413–10438, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Future (2015–2050) simulations of the aerosol burdens and their radiative forcing and climate impacts over the Arctic under various emission projections show that although the Arctic aerosol burdens are projected to decrease significantly by 10 to 60 %, regardless of the magnitude of aerosol reductions, surface air temperatures will continue to increase by 1.9–2.6 ℃, while sea-ice extent will continue to decrease, implying reductions of greenhouse gases are necessary to mitigate climate change.
Erik Johansson, Abhay Devasthale, Michael Tjernström, Annica M. L. Ekman, Klaus Wyser, and Tristan L'Ecuyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4087–4101, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4087-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4087-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding the coupling of clouds to large-scale circulation is a grand challenge for the climate community. Cloud radiative heating (CRH) is a key parameter in this coupling and is therefore essential to model realistically. We, therefore, evaluate a climate model against satellite observations. Our findings indicate good agreement in the seasonal pattern of CRH even if the magnitude differs. We also find that increasing the horizontal resolution in the model has little effect on the CRH.
Alejandro Baró Pérez, Abhay Devasthale, Frida A.-M. Bender, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6053–6077, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6053-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6053-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We study the impacts of above-cloud biomass burning plumes on radiation and clouds over the southeast Atlantic using data derived from satellite observations and data-constrained model simulations. A substantial amount of the aerosol within the plumes is not classified as smoke by the satellite. The atmosphere warms more with increasing smoke aerosol loading. No clear influence of aerosol type, loading, or moisture within the overlying aerosol plumes is detected on the cloud top cooling rates.
Cited articles
Andreas, E. L.: A new sea spray generation function for wind speeds up to 32 m/s, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 2175–2184, 1998. a
Bates, T. S., Huebert, B. J., Gras, J. L., Griffiths, F. B., and Durkee, P. A.:
International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) Project's First Aerosol
Characterization Experiment (ACE 1): Overview, J. Geophys. Res., 103,
16297–16318, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03741, 1998a. a
Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson-Parris,
D., Boucher, O., Carslaw, K. S., Christensen, M., Daniau, A.-L., Dufresne,
J.-L., Feingold, G., Fiedler, S., Forster, P., Gettelman, A., Haywood, J. M.,
Lohmann, U., Malavelle, F., Mauritsen, T., McCoy, D. T., Myhre, G.,
Mülmenstädt, J., Neubauer, D., Possner, A., Rugenstein, M., Sato, Y.,
Schulz, M., Schwartz, S. E., Sourdeval, O., Storelvmo, T., Toll, V., Winker,
D., and Stevens, B.: Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate
change, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000660, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000660, 2020. a
Carvalho, L. M. V., Jones, C., and Ambrizzi, T.: Opposite Phases of the
Antarctic Oscillation and Relationships with Intraseasonal to Interannual
Activity in the Tropics during the Austral Summer, J. Clim., 18, 702–718,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3284.1, 2005. a
Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B. N., Duncan, B. N.,
Martin, R. V., Logan, J. A., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.: Tropospheric
aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with
satellite and Sun photometer measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0461:TAOTFT>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Clarke, A. D., Owens, S. R., and Zhou, J.: An ultrafine sea-salt flux from
breaking waves: Implications for cloud condensation nuclei in the remote
marine atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res-Atmos., 111, D06202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006565,
2006. a
Cotterell, M. I., Willoughby, R. E., Bzdek, B. R., Orr-Ewing, A. J., and Reid, J. P.: A complete parameterisation of the relative humidity and wavelength dependence of the refractive index of hygroscopic inorganic aerosol particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9837–9851, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9837-2017, 2017. a
de Leeuw, G., Neele, F. P., Hill, M., Smith, M. H., and Vignati, E.: Production
of sea spray aerosol in the surf zone, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 29397–29409,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900549, 2000. a, b
Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Brock, C. A., Campuzano-Jost, P., Dibb, J. E., Jimenez, J.-L., Kupc, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Schill, G. P., Thornhill, K. L., Williamson, C. J., Wilson, J. C., and Ziemba, L. D.: A new method to quantify mineral dust and other aerosol species from aircraft platforms using single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6209–6239, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6209-2019, 2019. a
Fuelberg, H. E., Newell, R. E., Westberg, D. J., Maloney, J. C., Hannan,
J. R., Martin, B. D., Avery, M. A., and Zhu, Y.: A meteorological overview of
the second Pacific Exploratory Mission in the tropics, J. Geophys. Res., 106, D23,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900173, 2001. a
Ghan, S. J., Laulainen, N., Easter, R. C., Wagener, R., Nemesure, S., Chapman,
E., and Leung, Y. Z. R.: Evaluation of aerosol direct radiative forcing in
MIRAGE, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 5295–5316, 2001. a
Gong, S. L.: A parameterization of sea-salt aerosol source function for sub-
and super-micron particles, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17, 1097,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002079, 2003. a, b
Grythe, H., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Quinn, P., and Stohl, A.: A review of sea-spray aerosol source functions using a large global set of sea salt aerosol concentration measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1277–1297, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1277-2014, 2014. a
Guelle, W., Schulz, M., Balkanski, Y., and Dentener, F.: Influence of the
source formulation on modeling atmospheric global distribution of sea salt
aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 27509–27524, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900249,
2001. a, b
Haarig, M., Ansmann, A., Althausen, D., Klepel, A., Groß, S., Freudenthaler, V., Toledano, C., Mamouri, R.-E., Farrell, D. A., Prescod, D. A., Marinou, E., Burton, S. P., Gasteiger, J., Engelmann, R., and Baars, H.: Triple-wavelength depolarization-ratio profiling of Saharan dust over Barbados during SALTRACE in 2013 and 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10767–10794, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10767-2017, 2017. a
Haywood, J. M., Ramaswamy, V., and Soden, B. J.: Tropospheric Aerosol Climate
Forcing in Clear-Sky Satellite Observations over the Oceans, Science, 283,
1299–1303, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5406.1299, 1999. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons,
A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati,
G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M.,
Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global
reanalysis, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803,
2020. a
Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J.,
Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A.: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific
Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 881 pp., 2001. a
Irshad, R., Grainger, R. G., Peters, D. M., McPheat, R. A., Smith, K. M., and Thomas, G.: Laboratory measurements of the optical properties of sea salt aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 221–230, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-221-2009, 2009. a
Jaeglé, L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Alexander, B., and Lin, J.-T.: Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and remote sensing observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3137–3157, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3137-2011, 2011. a, b
Kanngießer, F. and Kahnert, M.: Modeling optical properties of non-cubical
sea-salt particles, J. Geophys. Res., 126, e2020JD033674,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033674, 2021a. a, b
Kanngießer, F. and Kahnert, M.: Optical properties of water-coated sea salt
model particles, Opt. Express, 29, 34926–34950, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.437680,
2021b. a
Kaufman, Y. J., Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., and Dubovik, O.: Baseline maritime
aerosol: methodology to derive the optical thickness and scattering
properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3251–3254, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013312,
2001. a
Lim, E.-P. and Simmonds, I.: Explosive cyclone development in the Southern
Hemisphere and a comparison with Northern Hemisphere events, Mon. Weather Rev., 130,
2188–2209, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2188:ECDITS>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Lim, E.-P. and Simmonds, I.: Southern Hemisphere Winter Extratropical Cyclone
Characteristics and Vertical Organization Observed with the ERA-40 Data in
1979–2001, J. Clim., 20, 2675–2690, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4135.1, 2007. a
Ma, X., von Salzen, K., and Li, J.: Modelling sea salt aerosol and its direct and indirect effects on climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1311–1327, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1311-2008, 2008. a
Mallet, P.-E., Pujol, O., Brioude, J., Evan, S., and Jensen, A.: Marine aerosol
distribution and variability over the pristine Southern Indian Ocean, Atmos.
Env., 182, 17–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.03.016, 2018. a
Mishchenko, M. I., Travis, L. D., and Lacis, A. A.: Multiple Scattering of
Light by Particles, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 9780521158015, 2006. a
Monahan, E. C., Spiel, D. E., and Davidson, K. L.: A model of marine aerosol
generation via whitecaps and wave disruption, in Oceanic Whitecaps, edited by:
Monahan, E. and Niocaill, G. M., Springer, Dordrecht, 167–174,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4668-2_16, 1986. a, b
Murphy, D. M., Froyd, K. D., Bian, H., Brock, C. A., Dibb, J. E., DiGangi, J. P., Diskin, G., Dollner, M., Kupc, A., Scheuer, E. M., Schill, G. P., Weinzierl, B., Williamson, C. J., and Yu, P.: The distribution of sea-salt aerosol in the global troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4093–4104, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4093-2019, 2019. a
NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: CALIPSO Lidar Level 2 Aerosol Profile, V4-20, NASA Langley Atmospheric Science Data Center DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/CALIOP/CALIPSO/LID_L2_05KMAPRO-STANDARD-V4-20, 2018.
Neumann, D., Matthias, V., Bieser, J., Aulinger, A., and Quante, M.: A comparison of sea salt emission parameterizations in northwestern Europe using a chemistry transport model setup, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9905–9933, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9905-2016, 2016. a
Nilsson, E. D., Mårtensson, E. M., Van Ekeren, J. S., de Leeuw, G., Moerman, M., and O'Dowd, C.: Primary marine aerosol emissions: size resolved eddy covariance measurements with estimates of the sea salt and organic carbon fractions, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, 13345–13400, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-7-13345-2007, 2007. a, b
O'Dowd, C. D., Smith, M. H., Costerdine, I. E., and Lowe, J. A.: Marine
aerosol, sea salt, and the marine sulphur cycle: A short review, Atmos. Environ., 31,
73–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00106-9, 1997. a
OSISAF(2017): Global Sea Ice Concentration Climate Data Record v2.0 –
Multimission, EUMETSAT SAF on Ocean and Sea Ice, Version 2.0, 28 pp.,
https://doi.org/10.15770/EUM_SAF_OSI_0008, 2017. a
Pierce, J. R. and Adams, P. J.: Global evaluation of CCN formation by direct
emission of sea salt and growth of ultrafine sea salt, J. Geophys. Res., 111,
D06203, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006186, 2006. a
Reason, C. J. C. and Rouault, M.: Links between the Antarctic Oscillation and
winter rainfall over western South Africa, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32,
L07705, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022419, 2005. a
Revell, L. E., Kremser, S., Hartery, S., Harvey, M., Mulcahy, J. P., Williams, J., Morgenstern, O., McDonald, A. J., Varma, V., Bird, L., and Schuddeboom, A.: The sensitivity of Southern Ocean aerosols and cloud microphysics to sea spray and sulfate aerosol production in the HadGEM3-GA7.1 chemistry–climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15447–15466, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15447-2019, 2019. a, b
Sakai, T., Nagai, T., Zaizen, Y., and Mano, Y.: Backscattering linear
depolarization ratio measurements of mineral, sea-salt, and ammonium sulfate
particles simulated in a laboratory chamber, Appl. Opt., 49, 4441–4449,
https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.004441, 2010. a
Shindell, D. T., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Flanner, M., Jiao, C., Chin, M., Young, P. J., Lee, Y. H., Rotstayn, L., Mahowald, N., Milly, G., Faluvegi, G., Balkanski, Y., Collins, W. J., Conley, A. J., Dalsoren, S., Easter, R., Ghan, S., Horowitz, L., Liu, X., Myhre, G., Nagashima, T., Naik, V., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., Takemura, T., Voulgarakis, A., Yoon, J.-H., and Lo, F.: Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2939–2974, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2939-2013, 2013. a
Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A. D., Howell, S. G., Kapustin, V. N., and Huebert,
B. J.: Sea-salt vertical profiles over the Southern and tropical Pacific
oceans: Microphysics, optical properties, spatial variability, and variations
with wind speed, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D24201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004975,
2004. a, b
Sievering, H., Boatman, J., Gorman, E., Kim, Y., Anderson, L., Ennis, G.,
Luria, M., and Pandis, S.: Removal of sulfur from the marine boundary layer
by ozone oxidation in sea-salt aerosols, Nature, 360, 571–573,
https://doi.org/10.1038/360571a0, 1992. a
Simmonds, I. and Keay, K.: Variability of Southern Hemisphere extratropical
cyclone behavior, J. Clim., 13, 550–561,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<0550:VOSHEC>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Smith, M. H., Park, P. M., and Consterdine, I. E.: Marine aerosol
concentrations and estimated fluxes over sea, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 119,
809–824, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711951211, 1993. a
Spada, M., Jorba, O., García-Pando, C. P., Janjic, Z., and Baldasano, J. M.:
On the evaluation of global sea-salt aerosol models at coastal/orographic
stations, Atmos. Environ., 101, 41–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.019,
2015. a, b
Stevens, B., Farrell, D., Hirsch, L., Jansen, F., Nuijens, L., Serikov, I.,
Brügmann, B., Forde, M., Linne, H., Lonitz, K., and Prospero, J. M.: The
Barbados Cloud Observatory: Anchoring investigations of clouds and
circulation on the edge of the ITCZ, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 787–801,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00247.1, 2016. a
Sun, B., Bi, L., Yang, P., Kahnert, M., and Kattawar, G.: Invariant Imbedding
T-matrix Method for Light Scattering by Nonspherical and Inhomogeneous
Particles, Elsevier, Amsterdam, ISBN 9780128180907, 2020. a
Tang, I. N.: Chemical and size effects of hygroscopic aerosols on light
scattering coefficients, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 19245–19250,
https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03003, 1996. a
Tang, I. N.: Thermodynamic and optical properties of sea salt aerosol, J.
Geophys. Res., 102, 23269–23275, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01806, 1997. a, b, c
Thomas, G. E. and Stamnes, K.: Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and Ocean,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 9781316148549, 2002. a
Tian, B., Manning, E., Roman, J., Thrastarson, H., Fetzer, E., and Monarrez, R.: AIRS Version 7 Level 3 Product User Guide, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, available at: https://airs.jpl.nasa.gov/data/products/v7-L2-L3/ (last access: 3 June 2021), 2020.
Tonboe, R. T., Eastwood, S., Lavergne, T., Sørensen, A. M., Rathmann, N., Dybkjær, G., Pedersen, L. T., Høyer, J. L., and Kern, S.: The EUMETSAT sea ice concentration climate data record, The Cryosphere, 10, 2275–2290, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2275-2016, 2016.
Tsyro, S., Aas, W., Soares, J., Sofiev, M., Berge, H., and Spindler, G.: Modelling of sea salt concentrations over Europe: key uncertainties and comparison with observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10367–10388, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10367-2011, 2011. a, b
Vignati, E., de Leeuw, G., and Berkowicz, R.: Modeling coastal aerosol
transport and effects of surf-produced aerosols on process in the marine
atmospheric boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 20225–20238,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000025, 2001. a, b
Vignati, E., Wilson, J., and Stier, P.: M7: a size resolved aerosol mixture
module for the use in global aerosol models, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22202,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004485, 2004. a
Vogt, R., Sander, R., von Glasow, R., and Crutzen, P. J.: Iodine Chemistry and
its Role in Halogen Activation and Ozone Loss in the Marine Boundary Layer: A
Model Study, J. Atmos. Chem., 32, 375–395, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006179901037,
1999. a
Weng, H., Lin, J., Martin, R., Millet, D., Jaeglé, L., Ridley, D., Keller, C.,
Li, C., Du, M., and Meng, J.: Global high-resolution emissions of soil NOx,
sea salt aerosols, and biogenic volatile organic compounds, Sci. Data, 7,
148, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0488-5, 2020. a, b
Winker, D. M., Vaughan, M. A., Omar, A., Hu, Y., Powell, K. A., Liu, Z., Hunt,
W. H., and Young, S. A.: Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data
Processing Algorithms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 26,
2310–2323, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1281.1, 2009. a
Winker, D. M., Tackett, J. L., Getzewich, B. J., Liu, Z., Vaughan, M. A., and Rogers, R. R.: The global 3-D distribution of tropospheric aerosols as characterized by CALIOP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3345–3361, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3345-2013, 2013.
a
Wise, M. E., Freney, E. J., Tyree, C. A., Allen, J. O., Martin, S. T., Russell,
L. M., and Buseck, P. R.: Hygroscopic behavior and liquid-layer composition
of aerosol particles generated from natural and artificial seawater, J.
Geophys. Res., 114, D03201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010449, 2009. a
Young, S. A., Vaughan, M. A., Garnier, A., Tackett, J. L., Lambeth, J. D., and Powell, K. A.: Extinction and optical depth retrievals for CALIPSO's Version 4 data release, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5701–5727, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5701-2018, 2018. a
Zeng, J., Zhang, G., Long, S., Liu, K., Cao, L., Bao, L., and Li, Y.: Sea salt
deliquescence and crystallization in atmosphere: An in situ investigation
using X‐ray phase contrast imaging, Surf. Interface Anal., 45,
930–936, https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.5184, 2013. a, b
Zhang, K. M., Knipping, E. M., Wexler, A. S., Bhave, P. V., and Tonnesen,
G. S.: Size distribution of sea‐salt emissions as a function of relative
humidity, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3373–3379, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03003, 2005. a
Zhu, L., Jacob, D. J., Eastham, S. D., Sulprizio, M. P., Wang, X., Sherwen, T., Evans, M. J., Chen, Q., Alexander, B., Koenig, T. K., Volkamer, R., Huey, L. G., Le Breton, M., Bannan, T. J., and Percival, C. J.: Effect of sea salt aerosol on tropospheric bromine chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6497–6507, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6497-2019, 2019. a
Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10609–10631, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013, 2013. a
Zieger, P., Väisänen, O., Corbin, J. C., Partridge, D. G., Bastelberger, S.,
Mousavi‐Fard, M., Rosati, B., Gysel, M., Krieger, U., Leck, C., Nenes, A.,
Riipinen, I., Virtanen, A., and Salter, M. E.: Revising the hygroscopicity of
inorganic sea salt particles, Nat. Commun., 8, 15883, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15883, 2017. a, b
Short summary
The Southern Ocean (SO) covers a large area of our planet and its boundary layer is dominated by sea salt aerosols during winter. These aerosols have large implications for the regional climate through their direct and indirect effects. Using satellite and reanalysis data, we document if and how the aerosol properties over the SO are dependent on different local meteorological parameters. Such an observational assessment is necessary to improve the understanding of atmospheric aerosol processes.
The Southern Ocean (SO) covers a large area of our planet and its boundary layer is dominated by...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint