Articles | Volume 21, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6093-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6093-2021
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
26 Apr 2021
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 26 Apr 2021

Observing the timescales of aerosol–cloud interactions in snapshot satellite images

Edward Gryspeerdt, Tom Goren, and Tristan W. P. Smith

Related authors

Observing the role of wind-driven processes in the evolution of warm marine cloud properties
Vishnu Nair, Edward Gryspeerdt, Antti Arola, Antti Lipponen, and Timo Virtanen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4272,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4272, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Evaluating simulations of ship tracks in a high-resolution model
Anna Tippett, Paul R. Field, and Edward Gryspeerdt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3877,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3877, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
The ice supersaturation biases limiting contrail modelling are structured around extratropical depressions
Oliver G. A. Driver, Marc E. J. Stettler, and Edward Gryspeerdt
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2737,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2737, 2025
Short summary
How does the lifetime of detrained cirrus impact the high-cloud radiative effect in the tropics?
George Horner and Edward Gryspeerdt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5617–5631, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5617-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5617-2025, 2025
Short summary
Factors limiting contrail detection in satellite imagery
Oliver G. A. Driver, Marc E. J. Stettler, and Edward Gryspeerdt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1115–1134, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1115-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1115-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ackerman, A. S., Toon, O. B., and Hobbs, P. V.: Dissipation of Marine Stratiform Clouds and Collapse of the Marine Boundary Layer Due to the Depletion of Cloud Condensation Nuclei by Clouds, Science, 262, 226–229, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.262.5131.226, 1993. a
Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., and Toon, O. B.: The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing, Nature, 432, 1014, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03174, 2004. a, b, c
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227, 1989. a
Bennartz, R. and Rausch, J.: Global and regional estimates of warm cloud droplet number concentration based on 13 years of AQUA-MODIS observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9815–9836, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9815-2017, 2017. a
Bohren, C. F.: Multiple scattering of light and some of its observable consequences, Am. J. Phys., 55, 524, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15109, 1987. a
Download
Short summary
Cloud responses to aerosol are time-sensitive, but this development is rarely observed. This study uses isolated aerosol perturbations from ships to measure this development and shows that macrophysical (width, cloud fraction, detectability) and microphysical (droplet number) properties of ship tracks vary strongly with time since emission, background cloud and meteorological state. This temporal development should be considered when constraining aerosol–cloud interactions with observations.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint