Articles | Volume 21, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16203-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16203-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Revisiting adiabatic fraction estimations in cumulus clouds: high-resolution simulations with a passive tracer
Eshkol Eytan
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Orit Altaratz
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Mark Pinsky
Institute of Earth Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
Alexander Khain
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Earth Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
Related authors
No articles found.
Huan Liu, Ilan Koren, Orit Altaratz, and Shutian Mu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2574, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2574, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds play a crucial role in Earth's climate by reflecting sunlight and trapping heat. Understanding how clouds respond to global warming (cloud feedback) is essential for climate change. However, the natural climate variability, like ENSO, can distort these estimates. Relying on long-term reanalysis data and simulations, this study finds that ENSO with a typical periodicity of 2–7 years can introduce a significant bias on cloud feedback estimates on even decadal to century time scales.
Manuel Santos Gutiérrez, Mickaël David Chekroun, and Ilan Koren
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.11545, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.11545, 2024
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
This letter explores a novel approach for the formation of cloud droplets in rising adiabatic air parcels. Our approach combines microphysical equations accounting for moisture, updrafts and concentration of aerosols. Our analysis reveals three regimes: A) Low moisture and high concentration can hinder activation; B) Droplets can activate and stabilize above critical sizes, and C) sparse clouds can have droplets exhibiting activation and deactivation cycles.
Huan Liu, Ilan Koren, Orit Altaratz, and Mickaël D. Chekroun
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6559–6569, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6559-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6559-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds' responses to global warming contribute the largest uncertainty in climate prediction. Here, we analyze 42 years of global cloud cover in reanalysis data and show a decreasing trend over most continents and an increasing trend over the tropical and subtropical oceans. A reduction in near-surface relative humidity can explain the decreasing trend in cloud cover over land. Our results suggest potential stress on the terrestrial water cycle, associated with global warming.
Elisa T. Sena, Ilan Koren, Orit Altaratz, and Alexander B. Kostinski
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 16111–16122, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-16111-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-16111-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We used record-breaking statistics together with spatial information to create record-breaking SST maps. The maps reveal warming patterns in the overwhelming majority of the ocean and coherent islands of cooling, where low records occur more frequently than high ones. Some of these cooling spots are well known; however, a surprising elliptical area in the Southern Ocean is observed as well. Similar analyses can be performed on other key climatological variables to explore their trend patterns.
Tom Dror, Mickaël D. Chekroun, Orit Altaratz, and Ilan Koren
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12261–12272, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12261-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12261-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
A part of continental shallow convective cumulus (Cu) was shown to share properties such as organization and formation over vegetated areas, thus named green Cu. Mechanisms behind the formed patterns are not understood. We use different metrics and an empirical orthogonal function (EOF) to decompose the dataset and quantify organization factors (cloud streets and gravity waves). We show that clouds form a highly organized grid structure over hundreds of kilometers at the field lifetime.
Tom Dror, J. Michel Flores, Orit Altaratz, Guy Dagan, Zev Levin, Assaf Vardi, and Ilan Koren
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 15297–15306, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15297-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15297-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We used in situ aerosol measurements over the Atlantic, Caribbean, and Pacific to initialize a cloud model and study the impact of aerosol concentration and sizes on warm clouds. We show that high aerosol concentration increases cloud mass and reduces surface rain when giant particles (diameter > 9 µm) are present. The large aerosols changed the timing and magnitude of internal cloud processes and resulted in an enhanced evaporation below cloud base and dramatically reduced surface rain.
Cited articles
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness,
Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989. a
Altaratz, O., Koren, I., Reisin, T., Kostinski, A., Feingold, G., Levin, Z., and Yin, Y.: Aerosols' influence on the interplay between condensation, evaporation and rain in warm cumulus cloud, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 15–24, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-15-2008, 2008. a
Baker, M., Corbin, R., and Latham, J.: The influence of entrainment on the
evolution of cloud droplet spectra: I. A model of inhomogeneous mixing,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 106, 581–598, 1980. a
Bera, S.: Droplet spectral dispersion by lateral mixing process in continental
deep cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy.,
214, 105550, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105550, 2021. a, b
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and
aerosols, in: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution
of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, 571–657, Cambridge University Press, 2013. a
Brenguier, J.-L., Bachalo, W. D., Chuang, P. Y., Esposito, B. M., Fugal, J.,
Garrett, T., Gayet, J.-F., Gerber, H., Heymsfield, A., Kokhanovsky, A.,
and Korolev, A.: In situ measurements of cloud and precipitation particles, Airborne
Measurements for Environmental Research: Methods and Instruments,
225–301, Wiley-VCH Verlag & Co. KGaA,
Weinheim, Germany, 2013. a
Ceppi, P., Brient, F., Zelinka, M. D., and Hartmann, D. L.: Cloud feedback
mechanisms and their representation in global climate models, WIRES Clim. Change, 8, e465, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.465, 2017. a
Dagan, G., Koren, I., Altaratz, O., and Heiblum, R. H.: Time-dependent, non-monotonic response of warm convective cloud fields to changes in aerosol loading, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7435–7444, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7435-2017, 2017. a
Fan, J., Ovtchinnikov, M., Comstock, J. M., McFarlane, S. A., and Khain, A.:
Ice formation in Arctic mixed-phase clouds: Insights from a 3-D
cloud-resolving model with size-resolved aerosol and cloud microphysics,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D04205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010782, 2009. a
Freud, E., Rosenfeld, D., Andreae, M. O., Costa, A. A., and Artaxo, P.: Robust relations between CCN and the vertical evolution of cloud drop size distribution in deep convective clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1661–1675, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1661-2008, 2008. a
Gerber, H.: Structure of small cumulus clouds, in: Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on
Clouds and Precipitation, 105–108, 14–18 August 2000, Reno, Nevada, 2000. a
Hirsch, E., Koren, I., Altaratz, O., Levin, Z., and Agassi, E.: Enhanced
humidity pockets originating in the mid boundary layer as a mechanism of
cloud formation below the lifting condensation level, Environ. Res.
Lett., 12, 024020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5ba4, 2017. a
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New
York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324, 2013. a
Jaenicke, R. G.: Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and
Technology: Volume 4, Meteorology; Subvolume B, Physical and Chemical
Properties of the Air, Geophysics and Space Research, New Series, Group V,
Springer-Verlag, Germany, 1988. a
Khain, A., Pokrovsky, A., Pinsky, M., Seifert, A., and Phillips, V.: Simulation
of effects of atmospheric aerosols on deep turbulent convective clouds using
a spectral microphysics mixed-phase cumulus cloud model. Part I: Model
description and possible applications, J. Atmos. Sci.,
61, 2963–2982, 2004. a
Khain, P., Heiblum, R., Blahak, U., Levi, Y., Muskatel, H., Vadislavsky, E.,
Altaratz, O., Koren, I., Dagan, G., Shpund, J., and Khain, A.: Parameterization of
vertical profiles of governing microphysical parameters of shallow cumulus
cloud ensembles using LES with bin microphysics, J. Atmos.
Sci., 76, 533–560, 2019. a
Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D. A.: Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM
summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and
sensitivities, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 607–625, 2003. a
Kim, B.-G., Miller, M. A., Schwartz, S. E., Liu, Y., and Min, Q.: The role of
adiabaticity in the aerosol first indirect effect, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D05210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008961, 2008. a
Korolev, A. V. and Mazin, I. P.: Supersaturation of water vapor in clouds,
J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 2957–2974, 2003. a
Merk, D., Deneke, H., Pospichal, B., and Seifert, P.: Investigation of the adiabatic assumption for estimating cloud micro- and macrophysical properties from satellite and ground observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 933–952, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-933-2016, 2016. a
Nuijens, L. and Siebesma, A. P.: Boundary layer clouds and convection over
subtropical oceans in our current and in a warmer climate, Current Climate
Change Reports, 5, 80–94, 2019. a
Ovtchinnikov, M. and Kogan, Y. L.: An investigation of ice production
mechanisms in small cumuliform clouds using a 3D model with explicit
microphysics. Part I: Model description, J. Atmos. Sci.,
57, 2989–3003, 2000. a
Pandithurai, G., Dipu, S., Prabha, T. V., Maheskumar, R., Kulkarni, J., and
Goswami, B.: Aerosol effect on droplet spectral dispersion in warm
continental cumuli, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D16202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016532, 2012. a
Pawlowska, H., Grabowski, W. W., and Brenguier, J.-L.: Observations of the
width of cloud droplet spectra in stratocumulus, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, L19810, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026841, 2006. a
Pinsky, M., Eytan, E., Koren, I., Altaratz, O., and Khain, A.: Convective and
turbulent motions in non-precipitating Cu. Part 1: Method of separation of
convective and turbulent motions, J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 2307–2321, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0127.1, 2021. a
Sherwood, S. C., Bony, S., and Dufresne, J.-L.: Spread in model climate
sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing, Nature, 505, 37–42, 2014. a
Siebesma, A. P., Bretherton, C. S., Brown, A., Chlond, A., Cuxart, J.,
Duynkerke, P. G., Jiang, H., Khairoutdinov, M., Lewellen, D., Moeng, C.-H.,
and Sanchez, E.: A large eddy simulation intercomparison study of shallow cumulus
convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1201–1219, 2003. a
Small, J. D., Chuang, P. Y., Feingold, G., and Jiang, H.: Can aerosol decrease
cloud lifetime?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L16806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038888, 2009. a
Yang, F., Shaw, R., and Xue, H.: Conditions for super-adiabatic droplet growth after entrainment mixing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9421–9433, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9421-2016, 2016. a
Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M.,
Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of higher climate
sensitivity in CMIP6 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47,
e2019GL085782, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782, 2020. a
Zhang, S., Xue, H., and Feingold, G.: Vertical profiles of droplet effective radius in shallow convective clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4633–4644, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4633-2011, 2011.
a
Zhao, M. and Austin, P. H.: Life cycle of numerically simulated shallow cumulus
clouds. Part II: Mixing dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 62,
1291–1310, 2005. a
Short summary
Describing cloud mixing processes is among the most challenging fronts in cloud physics. Therefore, the adiabatic fraction (AF) that serves as a mixing measure is a valuable metric. We use high-resolution (10 m) simulations of single clouds with a passive tracer to test the skill of different methods used to derive AF. We highlight a method that is insensitive to the available cloud samples and allows considering microphysical effects on AF estimations in different environmental conditions.
Describing cloud mixing processes is among the most challenging fronts in cloud physics....
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint