Thank you for your extremely thorough responses to the referee reports. I only see two points remaining to be clarified before I can recommend the manuscript for publication.

Firstly, in your response to the comment of referee #1 "195: presumably the authors' decisions about land type mapping (& differences for “W89” vs “Z03”) impact the authors' results… one implication of this is that the authors' statement in the abstract or introduction that the only thing different across parameterizations is the model structure is not necessarily true", you provide an adequate response to the comment in the main body of your text, but on line 16 of your revised manuscript, it still reads "the differences in simulated vd are entirely due to differences in deposition model structures." It appears to me that differences in the land type mapping also affect the model intercomparison results, so your statement in the abstract may need to be modified to reflect this.

Secondly, also in the abstract, the text "current approaches of global ozone dry deposition modelling over 1982-2011" suggests that you are using deposition schemes from this period, when I think you actually mean meteorology and LAI from this period. A simple rewording could clarify this.