Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-685-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-685-2015
Research article
 | 
19 Jan 2015
Research article |  | 19 Jan 2015

Mercury vapor air–surface exchange measured by collocated micrometeorological and enclosure methods – Part I: Data comparability and method characteristics

W. Zhu, J. Sommar, C.-J. Lin, and X. Feng

Related authors

Dissolved organic matter fosters core mercury-methylating microbiomes for methylmercury production in paddy soils
Qiang Pu, Bo Meng, Jen-How Huang, Kun Zhang, Jiang Liu, Yurong Liu, Mahmoud A. Abdelhafiz, and Xinbin Feng
Biogeosciences, 22, 1543–1556, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1543-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1543-2025, 2025
Short summary
Atmospheric Mercury: Recent advances in theoretical, computational, experimental, observational and isotopic understanding to decipher its complex redox transformations in the upper and lower atmosphere and interaction with Earth surface reservoirs
Jonas O. Sommar, Xueling Tang, Xinyu Shi, Guangyi Sun, Che-Jen Lin, and Xinbin Feng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4190,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4190, 2025
Short summary
The Multi-Compartment Hg Modeling and Analysis Project (MCHgMAP): Mercury modeling to support international environmental policy
Ashu Dastoor, Hélène Angot, Johannes Bieser, Flora Brocza, Brock Edwards, Aryeh Feinberg, Xinbin Feng, Benjamin Geyman, Charikleia Gournia, Yipeng He, Ian M. Hedgecock, Ilia Ilyin, Terry Keating, Jane Kirk, Che-Jen Lin, Igor Lehnherr, Robert Mason, David McLagan, Marilena Muntean, Peter Rafaj, Eric M. Roy, Andrei Ryjkov, Noelle E. Selin, Francesco De Simone, Anne L. Soerensen, Frits Steenhuisen, Oleg Travnikov, Shuxiao Wang, Xun Wang, Simon Wilson, Rosa Wu, Qingru Wu, Yanxu Zhang, Jun Zhou, Wei Zhu, and Scott Zolkos
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-65,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-65, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Speciated atmospheric mercury at the Waliguan Global Atmosphere Watch station in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: implication of dust-related sources for particulate bound mercury
Hui Zhang, Xuewu Fu, Ben Yu, Baoxin Li, Peng Liu, Guoqing Zhang, Leiming Zhang, and Xinbin Feng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15847–15859, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15847-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15847-2021, 2021
Short summary
Isotopic compositions of atmospheric total gaseous mercury in 10 Chinese cities and implications for land surface emissions
Xuewu Fu, Chen Liu, Hui Zhang, Yue Xu, Hui Zhang, Jun Li, Xiaopu Lyu, Gan Zhang, Hai Guo, Xun Wang, Leiming Zhang, and Xinbin Feng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6721–6734, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6721-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6721-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Field Measurements | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Accurate elucidation of oxidation under heavy ozone pollution: a full suite of radical measurements in the chemically complex atmosphere
Renzhi Hu, Guoxian Zhang, Haotian Cai, Jingyi Guo, Keding Lu, Xin Li, Shengrong Lou, Zhaofeng Tan, Changjin Hu, Pinhua Xie, and Wenqing Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3011–3028, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3011-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3011-2025, 2025
Short summary
Emissions of intermediate-volatility and semi-volatile organic compounds (I/SVOCs) from different cumulative-mileage diesel vehicles at various ambient temperatures
Shuwen Guo, Xuan Zheng, Xiao He, Lewei Zeng, Liqiang He, Xian Wu, Yifei Dai, Zihao Huang, Ting Chen, Shupei Xiao, Yan You, Sheng Xiang, Shaojun Zhang, Jingkun Jiang, and Ye Wu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2695–2705, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2695-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2695-2025, 2025
Short summary
Characterization of nitrous acid and its potential effects on secondary pollution in the warm season in Beijing urban areas
Junling Li, Chaofan Lian, Mingyuan Liu, Hao Zhang, Yongxin Yan, Yufei Song, Chun Chen, Jiaqi Wang, Haijie Zhang, Yanqin Ren, Yucong Guo, Weigang Wang, Yisheng Xu, Hong Li, Jian Gao, and Maofa Ge
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2551–2568, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2551-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2551-2025, 2025
Short summary
Vertical changes in volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and impacts on photochemical ozone formation
Xiao-Bing Li, Bin Yuan, Yibo Huangfu, Suxia Yang, Xin Song, Jipeng Qi, Xianjun He, Sihang Wang, Yubin Chen, Qing Yang, Yongxin Song, Yuwen Peng, Guiqian Tang, Jian Gao, Dasa Gu, and Min Shao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2459–2472, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2459-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2459-2025, 2025
Short summary
Diurnal, seasonal, and interannual variations in δ(18O) of atmospheric O2 and its application to evaluate natural and anthropogenic changes in oxygen, carbon, and water cycles
Shigeyuki Ishidoya, Satoshi Sugawara, and Atsushi Okazaki
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1965–1987, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1965-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1965-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D.: Eddy Covariance: a Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2012.
Bahlmann, E., Ebinghaus, R., and Ruck, W.: Development and application of a laboratory flux measurement system (LFMS) for the investigation of the kinetics of mercury emissions from soils, J. Environ. Manage., 81, 114–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.022, 2006.
Bash, J. O.: Description and initial simulation of a dynamic bidirectional air-surface exchange model for mercury in Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D06305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012834, 2010.
Bash, J. O. and Miller, D. R.: A relaxed eddy accumulation system for measuring surface fluxes of total gaseous mercury, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 244–257, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA908.1, 2008.
Bash, J. O. and Miller, D. R.: Growing season total gaseous mercury (TGM) flux measurements over an Acer rubrum L. stand, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5953–5961, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.008, 2009.
Short summary
Mercury vapor fluxes measured by the micrometeorological (MM) and dynamic flux chambers (DFCs) methods were compared. Distinct temporal trends existed between MM and DFCs fluxes; the novel chamber method provided net cumulative flux on a level with those derived by MM methods. Statistical analysis indicated that the medians of turbulent fluxes estimated by three MM techniques were not significantly different. Recommendations are given regarding the deployment of Hg flux quantification methods.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint