Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-685-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-685-2015
Research article
 | 
19 Jan 2015
Research article |  | 19 Jan 2015

Mercury vapor air–surface exchange measured by collocated micrometeorological and enclosure methods – Part I: Data comparability and method characteristics

W. Zhu, J. Sommar, C.-J. Lin, and X. Feng

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Xinbin Feng on behalf of the Authors (15 Dec 2014)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (17 Dec 2014) by Leiming Zhang
Short summary
Mercury vapor fluxes measured by the micrometeorological (MM) and dynamic flux chambers (DFCs) methods were compared. Distinct temporal trends existed between MM and DFCs fluxes; the novel chamber method provided net cumulative flux on a level with those derived by MM methods. Statistical analysis indicated that the medians of turbulent fluxes estimated by three MM techniques were not significantly different. Recommendations are given regarding the deployment of Hg flux quantification methods.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint