Articles | Volume 13, issue 19
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9695–9712, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9695-2013
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9695–9712, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9695-2013
Research article
02 Oct 2013
Research article | 02 Oct 2013

A comparison of atmospheric composition using the Carbon Bond and Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanisms

G. Sarwar et al.

Related authors

The pathway of impacts of aerosol direct effects on secondary inorganic aerosol formation
Jiandong Wang, Jia Xing, Shuxiao Wang, Rohit Mathur, Jiaping Wang, Yuqiang Zhang, Chao Liu, Jonathan Pleim, Dian Ding, Xing Chang, Jingkun Jiang, Peng Zhao, Shovan Kumar Sahu, Yuzhi Jin, David C. Wong, and Jiming Hao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5147–5156, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5147-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5147-2022, 2022
Short summary
Impacts of condensable particulate matter on atmospheric organic aerosols and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China
Mengying Li, Shaocai Yu, Xue Chen, Zhen Li, Yibo Zhang, Zhe Song, Weiping Liu, Pengfei Li, Xiaoye Zhang, Meigen Zhang, Yele Sun, Zirui Liu, Caiping Sun, Jingkun Jiang, Shuxiao Wang, Benjamin Murphy, Kiran Alapaty, Rohit Mathur, Daniel Rosenfeld, and John Seinfeld
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-212,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-212, 2022
Revised manuscript under review for ACP
Short summary
Long-term Regional Trends of Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition in the United States from 2002 to 2017
Sarah E. Benish, Jesse O. Bash, Kristen M. Foley, K. Wyat Appel, Christian Hogrefe, Robert Gilliam, and George Pouliot
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-201,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-201, 2022
Revised manuscript under review for ACP
Short summary
A comparative study of two-way and offline coupled WRF v3.4 and CMAQ v5.0.2 over the contiguous US: performance evaluation and impacts of chemistry–meteorology feedbacks on air quality
Kai Wang, Yang Zhang, Shaocai Yu, David C. Wong, Jonathan Pleim, Rohit Mathur, James T. Kelly, and Michelle Bell
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7189–7221, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7189-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7189-2021, 2021
Short summary
Incorporation of volcanic SO2 emissions in the Hemispheric CMAQ (H-CMAQ) version 5.2 modeling system and assessing their impacts on sulfate aerosol over the Northern Hemisphere
Syuichi Itahashi, Rohit Mathur, Christian Hogrefe, Sergey L. Napelenok, and Yang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5751–5768, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Observation-based analysis of ozone production sensitivity for two persistent ozone episodes in Guangdong, China
Kaixiang Song, Run Liu, Yu Wang, Tao Liu, Liyan Wei, Yanxing Wu, Junyu Zheng, Boguang Wang, and Shaw Chen Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8403–8416, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8403-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8403-2022, 2022
Short summary
A machine learning approach to quantify meteorological drivers of ozone pollution in China from 2015 to 2019
Xiang Weng, Grant L. Forster, and Peer Nowack
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 8385–8402, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8385-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8385-2022, 2022
Short summary
Discrepancy in assimilated atmospheric CO over East Asia in 2015–2020 by assimilating satellite and surface CO measurements
Zhaojun Tang, Jiaqi Chen, and Zhe Jiang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7815–7826, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7815-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7815-2022, 2022
Short summary
Potential environmental impact of bromoform from Asparagopsis farming in Australia
Yue Jia, Birgit Quack, Robert D. Kinley, Ignacio Pisso, and Susann Tegtmeier
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7631–7646, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7631-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7631-2022, 2022
Short summary
Satellite soil moisture data assimilation impacts on modeling weather variables and ozone in the southeastern US – Part 2: Sensitivity to dry-deposition parameterizations
Min Huang, James H. Crawford, Gregory R. Carmichael, Kevin W. Bowman, Sujay V. Kumar, and Colm Sweeney
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7461–7487, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7461-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7461-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Appel, K. W., Gilliland, A. B., Sarwar, G., and Gilliam, R. C.: Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 4.5: Sensitivities impacting model performance, Part I-Ozone, Atmos. Environ., 41, 9603–9615, 2007.
Appel, K. W., Pouliot, G., Simon, H., Sarwar, G., Pye, H. O. T., Napelenok, S., Akhtar, F., Roselle, S.J.: Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 6, 1859-1899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-6-1859-2013, 2013.
Arnold, J. R., Dennis, R. L., and Tonnesen, G. S.: Diagnostic Evaluation of Numerical Air Quality Models with Specialized Ambient Observations: Testing the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System (CMAQ) at Selected SOS 95 Ground Sites, Atmos. Environ., 37, 1185–1198, 2003.
Arnold, J. R. Dennis, R. L.: Testing CMAQ chemistry sensitivities in base case and emissions control runs at SEARCH and SOS99 surface sites in the southeastern US, Atmos. Environ., 40, 5027–5040, 2006.
Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G.,Jenkin, M. E., Kerr, J. A., Rossi, M. J., and Troe, J.: Summary of evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry – IUPAC subcommittee on gas kinetic data evaluation for atmospheric chemistry, available at: http://www.iupac-kinetic.ch.cam.ac.uk/index.html, last access: 8 December 2005.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint