Articles | Volume 22, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8037-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Warm and moist air intrusions into the winter Arctic: a Lagrangian view on the near-surface energy budgets
Cheng You
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Michael Tjernström
Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Abhay Devasthale
Remote Sensing Unit, Research and Development Department, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden
Related authors
Cheng You
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1392, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1392, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research examines how cyclones form near Greenland, combining mountain effects and fast jet stream above 8 km. Simulations show Greenland’s mountains boost cyclone strength, but the jet stream alone can spark their formation. Even after moving from the mountains, the longer memory of the mountain effect at high level sustain cyclones for four days, enabling them to reach the Arctic. The study reveals how mountain-jet stream interactions drive extreme weather.
Theresa Mathes, Heather Guy, John Prytherch, Julia Kojoj, Ian Brooks, Sonja Murto, Paul Zieger, Birgit Wehner, Michael Tjernström, and Andreas Held
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8455–8474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8455-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8455-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Arctic is warming faster than the global average and an investigation of aerosol–cloud–sea ice interactions is crucial for studying its climate system. During the ARTofMELT Expedition 2023, particle and sensible heat fluxes were measured over different surfaces. Wide lead surfaces acted as particle sources, with the strongest sensible heat fluxes, while closed ice surfaces acted as particle sinks. In this study, methods to measure these interactions are improved, enhancing our understanding of Arctic climate processes.
Abhay Devasthale, Sandra Andersson, Erik Engström, Frank Kaspar, Jörg Trentmann, Anke Duguay-Tetzlaff, Jan Fokke Meirink, Erik Kjellström, Tomas Landelius, Manu Anna Thomas, and Karl-Göran Karlsson
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1169–1182, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1169-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1169-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
By compositing trends in multiple climate variables, this study presents emerging regimes that are relevant for solar energy applications. It is shown that the favourable conditions for exploiting solar energy are emerging during spring and early summer. The study also underscores the increasingly important role of clouds in regulating surface solar radiation as the aerosol concentrations are decreasing over Europe and the societal value of satellite-based climate monitoring.
Cheng You
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1392, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1392, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research examines how cyclones form near Greenland, combining mountain effects and fast jet stream above 8 km. Simulations show Greenland’s mountains boost cyclone strength, but the jet stream alone can spark their formation. Even after moving from the mountains, the longer memory of the mountain effect at high level sustain cyclones for four days, enabling them to reach the Arctic. The study reveals how mountain-jet stream interactions drive extreme weather.
Michail Karalis, Gunilla Svensson, Manfred Wendisch, and Michael Tjernström
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3709, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3709, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
During the spring Arctic warm-air intrusion captured by HALO-(𝒜𝒞)3, the airmass demonstrated a column-like structure. We built a Lagrangian modeling framework using a single-column model (AOSCM) to simulate the airmass transformation. Comparing to observations, reanalysis and forecast data, we found that the AOSCM can successfully reproduce the main features of the transformation. The framework can be used for future model development to improve Arctic weather and climate prediction.
Manu Anna Thomas, Klaus Wyser, Shiyu Wang, Marios Chatziparaschos, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Montserrat Costa-Surós, Maria Gonçalves Ageitos, Maria Kanakidou, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Athanasios Nenes, Twan van Noije, Philippe Le Sager, and Abhay Devasthale
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6903–6927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6903-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol–cloud interactions occur at a range of spatio-temporal scales. While evaluating recent developments in EC-Earth3-AerChem, this study aims to understand the extent to which the Twomey effect manifests itself at larger scales. We find a reduction in the warm bias over the Southern Ocean due to model improvements. While we see footprints of the Twomey effect at larger scales, the negative relationship between cloud droplet number and liquid water drives the shortwave radiative effect.
Alejandro Baró Pérez, Michael S. Diamond, Frida A.-M. Bender, Abhay Devasthale, Matthias Schwarz, Julien Savre, Juha Tonttila, Harri Kokkola, Hyunho Lee, David Painemal, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4591–4610, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4591-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4591-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use a numerical model to study interactions between humid light-absorbing aerosol plumes, clouds, and radiation over the southeast Atlantic. We find that the warming produced by the aerosols reduces cloud cover, especially in highly polluted situations. Aerosol impacts on drizzle play a minor role. However, aerosol effects on cloud reflectivity and moisture-induced changes in cloud cover dominate the climatic response and lead to an overall cooling by the biomass burning plumes.
John Prytherch, Sonja Murto, Ian Brown, Adam Ulfsbo, Brett F. Thornton, Volker Brüchert, Michael Tjernström, Anna Lunde Hermansson, Amanda T. Nylund, and Lina A. Holthusen
Biogeosciences, 21, 671–688, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-671-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-671-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We directly measured methane and carbon dioxide exchange between ocean or sea ice and the atmosphere during an icebreaker-based expedition to the central Arctic Ocean (CAO) in summer 2021. These measurements can help constrain climate models and carbon budgets. The methane measurements, the first such made in the CAO, are lower than previous estimates and imply that the CAO is an insignificant contributor to Arctic methane emission. Gas exchange rates are slower than previous estimates.
Karl-Göran Karlsson, Martin Stengel, Jan Fokke Meirink, Aku Riihelä, Jörg Trentmann, Tom Akkermans, Diana Stein, Abhay Devasthale, Salomon Eliasson, Erik Johansson, Nina Håkansson, Irina Solodovnik, Nikos Benas, Nicolas Clerbaux, Nathalie Selbach, Marc Schröder, and Rainer Hollmann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4901–4926, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4901-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4901-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a global climate data record on cloud parameters, radiation at the surface and at the top of atmosphere, and surface albedo. The temporal coverage is 1979–2020 (42 years) and the data record is also continuously updated until present time. Thus, more than four decades of climate parameters are provided. Based on CLARA-A3, studies on distribution of clouds and radiation parameters can be made and, especially, investigations of climate trends and evaluation of climate models.
Ines Bulatovic, Julien Savre, Michael Tjernström, Caroline Leck, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7033–7055, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7033-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7033-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We use numerical modeling with detailed cloud microphysics to investigate a low-altitude cloud system consisting of two cloud layers – a type of cloud situation which was commonly observed during the summer of 2018 in the central Arctic (north of 80° N). The model generally reproduces the observed cloud layers and the thermodynamic structure of the lower atmosphere well. The cloud system is maintained unless there are low aerosol number concentrations or high large-scale wind speeds.
Gillian Young McCusker, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4819–4847, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we show that recent versions of two atmospheric models – the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System – overestimate Arctic cloud fraction within the lower troposphere by comparison with recent remote-sensing measurements made during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition. The overabundance of cloud is interlinked with the modelled thermodynamic structure, with strong negative temperature biases coincident with these overestimated cloud layers.
Manu Anna Thomas, Abhay Devasthale, and Michael Kahnert
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 119–137, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-119-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-119-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Southern Ocean (SO) covers a large area of our planet and its boundary layer is dominated by sea salt aerosols during winter. These aerosols have large implications for the regional climate through their direct and indirect effects. Using satellite and reanalysis data, we document if and how the aerosol properties over the SO are dependent on different local meteorological parameters. Such an observational assessment is necessary to improve the understanding of atmospheric aerosol processes.
Tiina Nygård, Michael Tjernström, and Tuomas Naakka
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 1263–1282, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1263-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-1263-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Temperature and humidity profiles in the Arctic atmosphere in winter are affected by both the large-scale dynamics and the local processes, such as radiation, cloud formation and turbulence. The results show that the influence of different large-scale flows on temperature and humidity profiles must be viewed as a progressing set of processes. Within the Arctic, there are notable regional differences in how large-scale flows affect the temperature and specific humidity profiles.
Manu Anna Thomas, Abhay Devasthale, and Tiina Nygård
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16593–16608, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16593-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16593-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of transported pollutants and their spatial distribution in the Arctic are governed by the local atmospheric circulation or weather states. Therefore, we investigated eight different atmospheric circulation types observed during the spring season in the Arctic. Using satellite and reanalysis datasets, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of the typical circulation patterns that can lead to enhanced or reduced pollution concentrations in the different sectors of the Arctic.
Erik Johansson, Abhay Devasthale, Michael Tjernström, Annica M. L. Ekman, Klaus Wyser, and Tristan L'Ecuyer
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4087–4101, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4087-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4087-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding the coupling of clouds to large-scale circulation is a grand challenge for the climate community. Cloud radiative heating (CRH) is a key parameter in this coupling and is therefore essential to model realistically. We, therefore, evaluate a climate model against satellite observations. Our findings indicate good agreement in the seasonal pattern of CRH even if the magnitude differs. We also find that increasing the horizontal resolution in the model has little effect on the CRH.
Alejandro Baró Pérez, Abhay Devasthale, Frida A.-M. Bender, and Annica M. L. Ekman
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6053–6077, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6053-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6053-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We study the impacts of above-cloud biomass burning plumes on radiation and clouds over the southeast Atlantic using data derived from satellite observations and data-constrained model simulations. A substantial amount of the aerosol within the plumes is not classified as smoke by the satellite. The atmosphere warms more with increasing smoke aerosol loading. No clear influence of aerosol type, loading, or moisture within the overlying aerosol plumes is detected on the cloud top cooling rates.
Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Ian M. Brooks, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Annika Burzik, and Ryan Neely III
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 289–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-289-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-289-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides interesting new results on the thermodynamic structure of the boundary layer, cloud conditions, and fog characteristics in the Arctic during the Arctic Ocean 2018 campaign. It provides information for interpreting further process studies on aerosol–cloud interactions and shows substantial differences in thermodynamic conditions and cloud characteristics based on comparison with previous campaigns. This certainly raises the question of whether it is just an exceptional year.
Peggy Achtert, Ewan J. O'Connor, Ian M. Brooks, Georgia Sotiropoulou, Matthew D. Shupe, Bernhard Pospichal, Barbara J. Brooks, and Michael Tjernström
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14983–15002, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14983-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14983-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present observations of precipitating and non-precipitating Arctic liquid and mixed-phase clouds during a research cruise along the Russian shelf in summer and autumn of 2014. Active remote-sensing observations, radiosondes, and auxiliary measurements are combined in the synergistic Cloudnet retrieval. Cloud properties are analysed with respect to cloud-top temperature and boundary layer structure. About 8 % of all liquid clouds show a liquid water path below the infrared black body limit.
Cited articles
Ali, S. M. and Pithan, F.: Following moist intrusions into the Arctic using
SHEBA observations in a Lagrangian perspective, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 3522–3533, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3859, 2020.
Andreas, E. L., Guest, P. S., Persson, P. O. G., Fairall, C. W., Horst, T.
W., Moritz, R. E., and Semmer, S. R.: Near-surface water vapor over polar sea
ice is always near ice saturation, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 107, SHE 8-1–SHE 8-15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc000411, 2002.
Brooks, I. M., Tjernström, M., Persson, P. O. G., Shupe, M. D.,
Atkinson, R. A., Canut, G., Birch, C. E., Mauritsen, T., Sedlar, J., and
Brooks, B. J.: The Turbulent Structure of the Arctic Summer Boundary Layer
During The Arctic Summer Cloud-Ocean Study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
122, 9685–9704, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027234, 2017.
Cohen, J., Screen, J. A., Furtado, J. C., Barlow, M., Whittleston, D.,
Coumou, D., Francis, J., Dethloff, K., Entekhabi, D., Overland, J., and
Jones, J.: Recent Arctic amplification and extreme mid-latitude weather,
Nat. Geosci., 7, 627–637, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2234, 2014.
Cox, C. J., Stone, R. S., Douglas, D. C., Stanitski, D. M., and Gallagher, M.
R.: The Aleutian Low-Beaufort Sea Anticyclone: A Climate Index Correlated
With the Timing of Springtime Melt in the Pacific Arctic Cryosphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 7464–7473, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083306, 2019.
Draxler, R. R.: Sensitivity of a Trajectory Model to the Spatial and
Temporal Resolution of the Meteorological Data during CAPTEX, J. Clim. Appl.
Meteorol., 26, 1577–1588, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1987)026<1577:soatmt>2.0.co;2, 1987.
Gong, T. and Luo, D.: Ural blocking as an amplifier of the Arctic sea ice
decline in winter, J. Climate, 30, 2639–2654, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0548.1, 2017.
Gong, T., Feldstein, S., and Lee, S.: The role of downward infrared radiation
in the recent arctic winter warming trend, J. Climate, 30, 4937–4949,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0180.1, 2017.
Graham, R. M., Cohen, L., Ritzhaupt, N., Segger, B., Graversen, R. G.,
Rinke, A., Walden, V. P., Granskog, M. A., and Hudson, S. R.: Evaluation of
six atmospheric reanalyses over Arctic sea ice from winter to early summer,
J. Climate, 32, 4121–4143, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0643.1, 2019.
Graversen, R. G., Mauritsen, T., Tjernström, M., Källén, E., and
Svensson, G.: Vertical structure of recent Arctic warming, Nature, 451, 53–56, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06502, 2008.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay,
P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J. N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020 (data available at: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era5, last access: 14 June 2022).
Johansson, E., Devasthale, A., Tjernström, M., Ekman, A. M. L., and L'Ecuyer, T.: Response of the lower troposphere to moisture intrusions into the Arctic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2527–2536, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072687, 2017.
Kahl, J. D. and Samson, P. J.: Uncertainty in trajectory calculations due to
low resolution meteorological data, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 25, 1816–1831,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<1816:UITCDT>2.0.CO;2, 1986.
Kim, B. M., Son, S. W., Min, S. K., Jeong, J. H., Kim, S. J., Zhang, X.,
Shim, T., and Yoon, J. H.: Weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex by
Arctic sea-ice loss, Nat. Commun., 5, 4646, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5646, 2014.
Kim, K. Y. and Son, S. W.: Physical characteristics of Eurasian winter
temperature variability, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 044009,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/044009, 2016.
Kim, K. Y., Kim, J. Y., Kim, J., Yeo, S., Na, H., Hamlington, B. D., and
Leben, R. R.: Vertical Feedback Mechanism of Winter Arctic Amplification and
Sea Ice Loss, Sci. Rep., 9, 1184, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38109-x, 2019.
Komatsu, K. K., Alexeev, V. A., Repina, I. A., and Tachibana, Y.: Poleward
upgliding Siberian atmospheric rivers over sea ice heat up Arctic upper air,
Sci. Rep., 8, 2872, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21159-6, 2018.
Lee, S., Gong, T., Feldstein, S. B., Screen, J. A., and Simmonds, I.:
Revisiting the Cause of the 1989–2009 Arctic Surface Warming Using the
Surface Energy Budget: Downward Infrared Radiation Dominates the Surface
Fluxes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 10654–10661, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075375, 2017.
Lemone, M. A., Angevine, W. M., Bretherton, C. S., Chen, F., Dudhia, J., Fedorovich, E., Katsaros, K. B., Lenschow, D. H., Mahrt, L., Patton, E. G., Sun, J., Tjernström, M., and Weil, J.: 100 Years of Progress in Boundary Layer Meteorology, Meteor. Mon., 59, 9.1–9.85, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-18-0013.1, 2018.
Li, M., Luo, D., Simmonds, I., Dai, A., Zhong, L., and Yao, Y.: Anchoring of
atmospheric teleconnection patterns by Arctic Sea ice loss and its link to
winter cold anomalies in East Asia, Int. J. Climatol., 41, 547–558, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6637, 2021.
Lindsay, R., Wensnahan, M., Schweiger, A., and Zhang, J.: Evaluation of seven
different atmospheric reanalysis products in the arctic, J. Climate, 27,
2588–2606, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00014.1, 2014.
Liu, Y., Key, J. R., Vavrus, S., and Woods, C.: Time evolution of the cloud
response to moisture intrusions into the Arctic during Winter, J. Climate,
31, 9389–9405, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0896.1, 2018.
Luo, B., Luo, D., Wu, L., Zhong, L., and Simmonds, I.: Atmospheric
circulation patterns which promote winter Arctic sea ice decline, Environ.
Res. Lett., 12, 054017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa69d0, 2017a.
Luo, D., Yao, Y., Dai, A., Simmonds, I., and Zhong, L.: Increased quasi
stationarity and persistence of winter ural blocking and Eurasian extreme
cold events in response to arctic warming. Part II: A theoretical
explanation, J. Climate, 30, 3569–3587, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0262.1, 2017b.
Luo, D., Chen, X., Dai, A., and Simmonds, I.: Changes in atmospheric blocking
circulations linked with winter Arctic warming: A new perspective, J. Climate, 31, 7661–7678, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0040.1, 2018.
Luo, D., Chen, X., Overland, J., Simmonds, I., Wu, Y., and Zhang, P.:
Weakened potential vorticity barrier linked to recent winter Arctic Sea ice
loss and midlatitude cold extremes, J. Climate, 32, 4235–4261,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0449.1, 2019.
Mayer, M., Tietsche, S., Haimberger, L., Tsubouchi, T., Mayer, J., and Zuo,
H. A. O.: An improved estimate of the coupled Arctic energy budget, J. Climate, 32, 7915–7934, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0233.1, 2019.
Messori, G., Woods, C., and Caballero, R.: On the drivers of wintertime
temperature extremes in the high arctic, J. Climate, 31, 1597–1618,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0386.1, 2018.
Mori, M., Watanabe, M., Shiogama, H., Inoue, J., and Kimoto, M.: Robust
Arctic sea-ice influence on the frequent Eurasian cold winters in past
decades, Nat. Geosci., 7, 869–873, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2277, 2014.
Morrison, H., De Boer, G., Feingold, G., Harrington, J., Shupe, M. D., and
Sulia, K.: Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds, Nat. Geosci.,
5, 11–17, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1332, 2012.
Nygård, T., Naakka, T., and Vihma, T.: Horizontal moisture transport
dominates the regional moistening patterns in the arctic, J. Climate, 33,
6793–6807, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0891.1, 2020.
Overland, J. E. and Wang, M.: Recent extreme arctic temperatures are due to
a split polar vortex, J. Climate, 29, 5609–5616, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0320.1, 2016.
Overland, J. E., Wood, K. R., and Wang, M.: Warm Arctic-cold continents:
Climate impacts of the newly open arctic sea, Polar Res., 30, 15787,
https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v30i0.15787, 2011.
Papritz, L.: Arctic lower-tropospheric warm and cold extremes: Horizontal
and vertical transport, diabatic processes, and linkage to synoptic
circulation features, J. Climate, 33, 993–1016, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0638.1, 2020.
Papritz, L., Hauswirth, D., and Hartmuth, K.: Moisture origin, transport pathways, and driving processes of intense wintertime moisture transport into the Arctic, Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1-2022, 2022.
Persson, P. O. G., Fairall, C. W., Andreas, E. L., Guest, P. S., and
Perovich, D. K.: Measurements near the Atmospheric Surface Flux Group tower
at SHEBA: Near-surface conditions and surface energy budget, J. Geophys.
Res.-Ocean., 107, 8045, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc000705, 2002.
Petoukhov, V. and Semenov, V. A.: A link between reduced Barents-Kara sea
ice and cold winter extremes over northern continents, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D21111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013568, 2010.
Pithan, F., Medeiros, B., and Mauritsen, T.: Mixed-phase clouds cause climate
model biases in Arctic wintertime temperature inversions, Clim. Dynam., 43, 289–303, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1964-9, 2014.
Pithan, F., Svensson, G., Caballero, R., Chechin, D., Cronin, T. W., Ekman,
A. M. L., Neggers, R., Shupe, M. D., Solomon, A., Tjernström, M., and
Wendisch, M.: Role of air-mass transformations in exchange between the
Arctic and mid-latitudes, Nat. Geosci., 11, 805–812,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0234-1, 2018.
Rudeva, I. and Simmonds, I.: Midlatitude winter extreme temperature events
and connections with anomalies in the arctic and tropics, J. Climate, 34,
3733–3749, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0371.1, 2021.
Screen, J. A. and Simmonds, I.: The central role of diminishing sea ice in
recent Arctic temperature amplification, Nature, 464, 1334–1337,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09051, 2010.
Screen, J. A., Bracegirdle, T. J., and Simmonds, I.: Polar Climate Change as
Manifest in Atmospheric Circulation, Current Climate Change Reports, 4,
383–395, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0111-4, 2018.
Sedlar, J. and Tjernström, M.: Clouds, warm air, and a climate cooling
signal over the summer Arctic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 1095–1103, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071959, 2017.
Serreze, M. C. and Francis, J. A.: The arctic amplification debate, Climatic
Change, 76, 241–264, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-9017-y, 2006.
Simmonds, I.: Comparing and contrasting the behaviour of Arctic and
Antarctic sea ice over the 35 year period 1979–2013, Ann. Glaciol., 56,
18–28, https://doi.org/10.3189/2015AoG69A909, 2015.
Simmonds, I. and Li, M.: Trends and variability in polar sea ice, global
atmospheric circulations, and baroclinicity, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1504,
167–186, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14673, 2021.
Sotiropoulou, G., Sedlar, J., Tjernström, M., Shupe, M. D., Brooks, I. M., and Persson, P. O. G.: The thermodynamic structure of summer Arctic stratocumulus and the dynamic coupling to the surface, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12573–12592, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12573-2014, 2014.
Stohl, A., Wotawa, G., Seibert, P., and Kromp-Kolb, H.: Interpolation errors
in wind fields as a function of spatial and temporal resolution and their
impact on different types of kinematic trajectories, J. Appl. Meteorol.,
34, 2149–2165, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2149:IEIWFA>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Tang, Q., Zhang, X., Yang, X., and Francis, J. A.: Cold winter extremes in
northern continents linked to Arctic sea ice loss, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 014036, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014036, 2013.
Tjernström, M. and Graversen, R. G.: The vertical structure of the lower
Arctic troposphere analysed from observati0ns and the ERA-40 reanalysis, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 431–443, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.380, 2009.
Tjernström, M., Birch, C. E., Brooks, I. M., Shupe, M. D., Persson, P. O. G., Sedlar, J., Mauritsen, T., Leck, C., Paatero, J., Szczodrak, M., and Wheeler, C. R.: Meteorological conditions in the central Arctic summer during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6863–6889, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6863-2012, 2012.
Tjernström, M., Shupe, M. D., Brooks, I. M., Persson, P. O. G.,
Prytherch, J., Salisbury, D. J., Sedlar, J., Achtert, P., Brooks, B. J.,
Johnston, P. E., Sotiropoulou, G., and Wolfe, D.: Warm-air advection, air
mass transformation and fog causes rapid ice melt, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
42, 5594–5602, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064373, 2015.
Tjernström, M., Shupe, M. D., Brooks, I. M., Achtert, P., Prytherch, J.,
and Sedlar, J.: Arctic summer airmass transformation, surface inversions,
and the surface energy budget, J. Climate, 32, 769–789, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0216.1, 2019.
Wang, C., Graham, R. M., Wang, K., Gerland, S., and Granskog, M. A.: Comparison of ERA5 and ERA-Interim near-surface air temperature, snowfall and precipitation over Arctic sea ice: effects on sea ice thermodynamics and evolution, The Cryosphere, 13, 1661–1679, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1661-2019, 2019.
Woods, C. and Caballero, R.: The role of moist intrusions in winter arctic
warming and sea ice decline, J. Climate, 29, 4473–4485,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0773.1, 2016.
Woods, C., Caballero, R., and Svensson, G.: Large-scale circulation
associated with moisture intrusions into the Arctic during winter, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 40, 4717–4721, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50912, 2013.
You, C., Tjernström, M., and Devasthale, A.: Warm-Air Advection Over
Melting Sea-Ice: A Lagrangian Case Study, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 179, 99–116, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00590-1, 2020.
You, C., Tjernström, M., and Devasthale, A.: Eulerian and Lagrangian
views of warm and moist air intrusions into summer Arctic, Atmos. Res., 256, 105586, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105586, 2021.
You, C., Tjernström, M., Devasthale, A., and Steinfeld, D.: The role of atmospheric blocking in regulating Arctic warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL097899, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL097899, 2022.
Short summary
In winter when solar radiation is absent in the Arctic, the poleward transport of heat and moisture into the high Arctic becomes the main contribution of Arctic warming. Over completely frozen ocean sectors, total surface energy budget is dominated by net long-wave heat, while over the Barents Sea, with an open ocean to the south, total net surface energy budget is dominated by the surface turbulent heat.
In winter when solar radiation is absent in the Arctic, the poleward transport of heat and...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint